Planning promotes progress toward goal achievement in a wide range of domains. To date, planning has mostly been studied as an individual process. In couples, however, the partner is likely to play an important role in planning. This study tested the effects of individual and dyadic planning on goal progress and goal-related actions. Two samples of couples (N = 76 and N = 87) completed daily diaries over a period of 28 and 21 days. The results indicate that individual and dyadic planning fluctuate on a daily basis and support the idea that dyadic planning is predominantly used as a complementary strategy to individual planning. As expected, individual and dyadic planning were positively associated with higher levels of action control and goal progress. In Sample 2, dyadic planning was only associated with goal progress on days in which individuals felt that they were dependent upon their partners’ behaviors to achieve their goals.
AdriaanseM. A.OettingenG.GollwitzerP. M.HennesE. P.De RidderD. T.De WitJ. B. (2010). When planning is not enough: Fighting unhealthy snacking habits by mental contrasting with implementation intentions (MCII). European Journal of Social Psychology, 40(7), 1277–1293. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.730
2.
BaldwinS. A.ImelZ. E.BraithwaiteS. R.AtkinsD. C. (2014). Analyzing multiple outcomes in clinical research using multivariate multilevel models. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 82, 920–930. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035628
3.
BerliC.BolgerN.ShroutP. E.StadlerG.ScholzU. (2018). Interpersonal processes of couples’ daily support for goal pursuit: The example of physical activity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 44(3), 332–344. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167217739264
4.
BerscheidE.SnyderM.OmotoA. M. (1989). The relationship closeness inventory: Assessing the closeness of interpersonal relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(5), 792–807. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.5.792
5.
BodenmannG. (2005). Dyadic coping and its significance for marital functioning. In RevensonT. A.KayserK.BodenmannG. (Eds.), Decade of behavior. Couples coping with stress: Emerging perspectives on dyadic coping (p. 33–49). American Psychological Association.
BolgerN.LaurenceauJ. P. (2013). Intensive longitudinal methods: An introduction to diary and experience sampling research. Guilford Press.
8.
BuitenhuisA. H.TuinmanM. A.HagedoornM. (2019). A planning intervention to quit smoking in single-smoking couples: does partner involvement improve effectiveness?Psychology & Health, 1, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2019.1703983
9.
BurkertS.ScholzU.GrallaO.RoigasJ.KnollN. (2011). Dyadic planning of health-behavior change after prostatectomy: A randomized-controlled planning intervention. Social Science & Medicine, 73(5), 783–792. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.06.016
10.
CarverC. S.ScheierM. F. (2002). Control processes and self-organization as complementary principles underlying behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 64(4), 304–315. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0604_05
11.
DeNeveK. M.CooperH. (1998). The happy personality: A meta-analysis of 137 personality traits and subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 197–229. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.124.2.197
12.
EdwardsL. J.MullerK. E.WolfingerR. D.QaqishB. F.SchabenbergerO. (2008). An R2 statistic for fixed effects in the linear mixed model. Statistics in Medicine, 27(29), 6137–6157. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.3429
13.
FinkelE. J.HuiC. M.CarswellK. L.LarsonG. M. (2014). The suffocation of marriage: Climbing Mount Maslow without enough oxygen. Psychological Inquiry, 25(1), 1–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2014.863723
14.
FitzsimonsG. M.FinkelE. J. (2010). Interpersonal influences on self-regulation. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19, 101–105. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0963721410364499
GereJ.ImpettE. A. (2018). Shifting priorities: Effects of partners’ goal conflict on goal adjustment processes and relationship quality in developing romantic relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 35(6), 793–810. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407517698851
19.
GirmeY. U.OverallN. C.SimpsonJ. A. (2013). When visibility matters: Short-term versus long-term costs and benefits of visible and invisible support. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39(11), 1441–1454. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167213497802
20.
GodinhoC. A.AlvarezM. J.LimaM. L.SchwarzerR. (2014). Will is not enough: Coping planning and action control as mediators in the prediction of fruit and vegetable intake. British Journal of Health Psychology, 19(4), 856–870. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjhp.12084
21.
GolanR.SchwarzfuchsD.StampferM. J.ShaiI. (2010). Halo effect of a weight-loss trial on spouses: The DIRECT Spouse study. Public Health Nutrition, 13(4), 544–549. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980009991273
GollwitzerP. M.SheeranP. (2006). Implementation intentions and goal achievement: A meta-analysis of effects and processes. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 69–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(06)38002-1
24.
GomillionS.MurrayS. L.LamarcheV. M. (2015). Losing the wind beneath your wings: The prospective influence of romantic breakup on goal progress. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6(5), 513–520. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550614568160
25.
GorinA. A.WingR. R.FavaJ. L.JakicicJ. M.JefferyR.WestD. S.BreljeK.DiLilloV. G. (2008). Weight loss treatment influences untreated spouses and the home environment: Evidence of a ripple effect. International Journal of Obesity, 32(11), 1678–1684. https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2008.150
26.
GosnellC. L.GableS. L. (2017). You deplete me: Impacts of providing positive and negative event support on self-control. Personal Relationships, 24(3), 598–622. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.1220
27.
HofmannW.FinkelE. J.FitzsimonsG. M. (2015). Close relationships and self-regulation: How relationship satisfaction facilitates momentary goal pursuit. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109(3), 434–452. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000020
28.
HowellR. T.HowellC. J. (2008). The relation of economic status to subjective well-being in developing countries: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 536–560. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.536
29.
KellerJ.BurkertS.WiedemannA. U.LuszczynskaA.SchraderM.KnollN. (2015). Individual and dyadic planning predicting pelvic floor exercise among prostate cancer survivors. Rehabilitation Psychology, 60, 222–231. https://doi.org/10.1037/rep0000047
30.
KellerJ.HohlD. H.HosoyaG.HeuseS.ScholzU.LuszczynskaA.KnollN. (2020). Long-term effects of a dyadic planning intervention with couples motivated to increase physical activity. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 49, 101710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2020.101710
31.
KellerJ.WiedemannA. U.HohlD. H.ScholzU.BurkertS.SchraderM.KnollN. (2017). Predictors of dyadic planning: Perspectives of prostate cancer survivors and their partners. British Journal of Health Psychology, 22(1), 42–59. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjhp.12216
32.
KlugH. J.MaierG. W. (2015). Linking goal progress and subjective well-being: A meta-analysis. Journal of Happiness Studies, 16(1), 37–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-013-9493-0
33.
KnollN.HohlD. H.KellerJ.SchuezN.LuszczynskaA.BurkertS. (2017). Effects of dyadic planning on physical activity in couples: A randomized controlled trial. Health Psychology, 36(1), 8–20. https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0000423
34.
LaurenceauJ. P.BarrettL. F.RovineM. J. (2005). The interpersonal process model of intimacy in marriage: A daily-diary and multilevel modeling approach. Journal of Family Psychology, 19(2), 314–323. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.19.2.314
35.
MartireL. M.SchulzR.HelgesonV. S.SmallB. J.SaghafiE. M. (2010). Review and meta-analysis of couple-oriented interventions for chronic illness. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 40(3), 325–342. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-010-9216-2
36.
McLeanN.GriffinS.ToneyK.HardemanW. (2003). Family involvement in weight control, weight maintenance and weight-loss interventions: a systematic review of randomised trials. International Journal of Obesity, 27(9), 987–1005. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijo.0802383
37.
MeeusW. H.BranjeS. J.van der ValkI.de WiedM. (2007). Relationships with intimate partner, best friend, and parents in adolescence and early adulthood: A study of the saliency of the intimate partnership. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 31(6), 569–580. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025407080584
OkunM. A.StockW. A.HaringM. J.WitterR. A. (1984). Health and subjective well-being: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 19, 111–132. https://doi.org/10.2190/QGJN-0N81-5957-HAQD
40.
RiccioM. T.ShroutP. E.BalcetisE. (2019). Interpersonal pursuit of intrapersonal health goals: Social cognitive–motivational mechanisms by which social support promotes self-regulatory success. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 13(10), Article e12495. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12495
41.
RosenthalR.RosnowR. L. (2008). Essentials of behavioral research: Methods and data analysis (3rd ed.). McGraw Hill.
42.
Rossignac-MilonM.HigginsE. T. (2018). Epistemic companions: Shared reality development in close relationships. Current Opinion in Psychology, 23, 66–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.01.001
43.
RusbultC. E.BuunkB. P. (1993). Commitment processes in close relationships: An interdependence analysis. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10(2), 175–204. https://doi.org/10.1177/026540759301000202
44.
SelcukE.GunaydinG.OngA. D.AlmeidaD. M. (2016). Does partner responsiveness predict hedonic and eudaimonic well-being? A 10-year longitudinal study. Journal of Marriage and Family, 78(2), 311–325. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12272
45.
ShroutP. E.LaneS. P.MehlM. R.ConnerT. S. (2012). Handbook of research methods for studying daily life. Gilford Press.
46.
SniehottaF. F.ScholzU.SchwarzerR. (2005). Bridging the intention–behaviour gap: Planning, self-efficacy, and action control in the adoption and maintenance of physical exercise. Psychology & Health, 20(2), 143–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870440512331317670
47.
WiebeD. J.BakerA. C.SuchyY.StumpT. K.BergC. A. (2018). Individual differences and day-to-day fluctuations in goal planning and type 1 diabetes management. Health Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0000624
48.
ZeeK. S.BolgerN. (2019). Visible and invisible social support: How, why, and when. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28(3), 314–320. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721419835214
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
