Meritocracy is a prominent narrative embedded in America’s educational system: work hard and anyone can achieve success. Yet, racial disparities in education suggest this narrative does not tell the full story. Four studies (N = 1,439) examined how applicants for a teaching position are evaluated when they invoke different narratives regarding who or what is to blame for racial disparities (i.e., individuals vs. systems). We hypothesized these evaluations would differ depending on teacher race (Black/White) and evaluator political orientation. Results revealed conservatives evaluated Black and White applicants advocating for personal responsibility more favorably than applicants advocating for social responsibility. Liberals preferred social responsibility applicants, but only when they were White. They were more ambivalent in their evaluations and hiring decisions if the applicants were Black. Our findings suggest that Black applicants advocating for social change are penalized by both liberal and conservative evaluators.
AugoustinosM.EveryD. (2007). The language of “race” and prejudice: A discourse of denial, reason, and liberal-practical politics. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 26(2), 123–141.
2.
AxtJ. R.NguyenH.NosekB. A. (2018). The Judgment Bias Task: A flexible method for assessing individual differences in social judgment biases. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 76, 337–355.
3.
BainbridgeW. A.IsolaP.OlivaA. (2013). The intrinsic memorability of face photographs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142(4), 1323–1334.
4.
Bonilla-SilvaE. (2006). Racism without racists: Color-blind racism and the persistence of racial inequality in the United States. Rowman & Littlefield.
5.
BuhrmesterM.KwangT.GoslingS. D. (2011). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data?Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 3–5.
6.
CihangirS.BarretoM.EllemersN. (2014). Men as allies against sexism: The positive effects of a suggestion of sexism by male (vs. female) sources. Sage Open, 4(2), 2158244014539168.
7.
CozzarelliC.WilkinsonA. V.TaglerM. J. (2001). Attitudes toward the poor and attributions for poverty. Journal of Social Issues, 57(2), 207–227.
8.
CrenshawK. (1995). Introduction. In CrenshawK.GotandaN.PellerG.ThomasK. (Eds.), Critical race theory: The key writings that formed the movement (pp. 276–290). The New Press.
9.
CuddyA. J.GlickP.BeningerA. (2011). The dynamics of warmth and competence judgments, and their outcomes in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 31, 73–98.
10.
CzoppA. M.MonteithM. J. (2003). Confronting prejudice (literally): Reactions to confrontations of racial and gender bias. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(4), 532–544.
11.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.BuchnerA.LangA. G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G* Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160.
12.
FeaginJ. R. (1972). Poverty: We still believe that God helps those who help themselves. Psychology Today, 6(6), 101–110.
13.
FeaginJ. R. (2010). The white racial frame: Centuries of racial framing and counter framing. Routledge.
14.
FeaginJ. R.SikesM. P. (1994). Living with racism: The black middle-class experience. Beacon Press.
15.
FloresA. (2007). Examining disparities in mathematics education: Achievement gap or opportunity gap?The High School Journal, 91(1), 29–42.
16.
GershensonS.HartC.HymanJ.LindsayC.PapageorgeN. W. (2018). The long-run impacts of same-race teachers (No. w25254). National Bureau of Economic Research.
17.
GollustS. E.LantzP. M.UbelP. A. (2009). The polarizing effect of news media messages about the social determinants of health. American Journal of Public Health, 99(12), 2160–2167.
18.
JonesJ. M. (1991). Racism: A cultural analysis of the problem. In JonesR. L. (Ed.), Black psychology (p. 609–635). Cobb & Henry Publishers.
19.
JonesJ. M. (1998). Psychological knowledge and the new American dilemma of race. Journal of Social Issues, 54(4), 641–662.
20.
JostJ. T.BanajiM. R.NosekB. A. (2004). A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Political Psychology, 25, 881–919.
21.
KaiserC. R.DyrenforthP. S.HagiwaraN. (2006). Why are attributions to discrimination interpersonally costly? A test of system-and group-justifying motivations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1523–1536.
22.
KaiserC. R.MillerC. T. (2001). Stop complaining! The social costs to making attributions to discrimination. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 254–263.
23.
KinderD. R.SandersL. M. (1996). Divided by color: Racial politics and democratic ideals. University of Chicago Press
24.
KrohM. (2007). Measuring left–right political orientation: The choice of response format. Public Opinion Quarterly, 71(2), 204–220.
25.
Ladson-BillingsG.TateW. F. (1995). Toward a critical race theory of education. Teachers College Record, 97(1), Article 47.
26.
LipsitzG. (1995). The possessive investment in whiteness: Racialized social democracy and the “White” problem in American studies. American Quarterly, 47(3), 369–387.
27.
McCoyS. K.MajorB. (2007). Priming meritocracy and the psychological justification of inequality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 341–351.
28.
McDonaldS. J. (2001). How Whites explain Black and Hispanic inequality. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 65(4), 562–573.
29.
MeroeA. S. (2014). Democracy, meritocracy and the uses of education. The Journal of Negro Education, 83(4),485–498.
30.
MijsJ. J. (2016). The unfulfillable promise of meritocracy: Three lessons and their implications for justice in education. Social Justice Research, 29(1), 14–34.
31.
MilkmanK. L.AkinolaM.ChughD. (2012). Temporal distance and discrimination an audit study in academia. Psychological Science, 23(7), 710–717.
32.
MorganP. L.FarkasG.HillemeierM. M.MaczugaS. (2016). Science achievement gaps begin very early, persist, and are largely explained by modifiable factors. Educational Researcher, 45(1), 18–35.
33.
PerezM. J.SalterP. S. (2019). Trust, innocence, and individual responsibility: Neoliberal dreams of a colorblind peace. Journal of Social Issues, 75(1), 267–285.
34.
PrattoF.KorchmarosJ. D.HegartyP. (2007). When race and gender go without saying. Social Cognition, 25(2), 221–247.
35.
RasinskiH. M.CzoppA. M. (2010). The effect of target status on witnesses’ reactions to confrontations of bias. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 32(1), 8–16.
36.
SalterP.AdamsG. (2013). Toward a critical race psychology. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7(11), 781–793.
37.
SalterP. S.HirschK. A.SchlegelR. J.ThaiL. T. (2016). Who needs individual responsibility? Audience race and message content influence third-party evaluations of political messages. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7(1), 29–36.
38.
SearsD. O.HenryP. J. (2003). The origins of symbolic racism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(2), 259.
39.
SidaniusJ.PrattoF.SinclairS.Van LaarC. (1996). Mother Teresa meets Genghis Khan: The dialectics of hierarchy-enhancing and hierarchy-attenuating career choices. Social Justice Research, 9(2), 145–170.
40.
SkitkaL. J.MullenE.GriffinT.HutchinsonS.ChamberlinB. (2002). Dispositions, scripts, or motivated correction? Understanding ideological differences in explanations for social problems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(2), 470–487.
41.
VillegasA. M.DavisD. E. (2008). Preparing teachers of color to confront racial/ethnic disparities in educational outcomes. In Cochran-SmithM.Feiman-NemserS.McIntyreD. J.DemersK. (Eds.) Handbook of research on teacher education: Enduring questions in changing contexts (pp. 583–605). Routledge.
42.
VillegasA. M.IrvineJ. J. (2010). Diversifying the teaching force: An examination of major arguments. The Urban Review, 42(3), 175–192.
43.
ZhouH.FishbachA. (2016). The pitfall of experimenting on the web: How unattended selective attrition leads to surprising (yet false) research conclusions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111(4), 493–504.
44.
ZuckerG. S.WeinerB. (1993). Conservatism and perceptions of poverty: An attributional analysis. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23(12), 925–943.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
