The Empowering Function of the Belief in a Just World for the Self: Trait-Level and Experimental Tests of Its Association With Positive and Negative Affect

Abstract

Belief in a just world for the self (BJW-self) is a resource that promotes adaptive functioning. We theorize that BJW-self has such an effect because it is empowering. This article reports on four studies (N = 967) testing whether BJW-self encourages more positive and less negative affect indirectly through empowerment. There was support for this hypothesis at a trait level across all studies, and specifically in Study 1. Experimental evidence, however, was more complex. Study 2 demonstrated the causal effect of the mediator, empowerment, on affect. Study 3 demonstrated that affirming BJW-self enhanced empowerment with an associated increase in positive affect and reduced negative affect. Study 4 showed that enhancing empowerment did not significantly influence the effect of affirmed BJW-self on affect, but blocking empowerment did, although this finding is qualified by no significant effect on empowerment. We discuss the theoretical implications of these findings, and the challenges of experimentally manipulating BJW-self.

Keywords

belief in a just world BJW-self BJW empowerment positive affect negative affect

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anderson

Berdahl

J. L.

(2002). The experience of power: Examining the effects of power on approach and inhibition tendencies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(6), 1362–1377. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.83.6.1362

Anderson

Galinsky

A. D.

(2006). Power, optimism, and risk-taking. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36(4), 511–536. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.324

Bartholomaeus

Strelan

(2016). Just world beliefs and forgiveness: The mediating role of implicit theories of relationships. Personality and Individual Differences, 96, 106–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.02.081

Bartholomaeus

Strelan

(2019). The adaptive, approach-oriented correlates of belief in a just world for the self: A review of the research. Personality and Individual Differences, 151, Article 109485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.06.028

Baumeister

R. F.

Bratslavsky

Finkenauer

Vohs

K. D.

(2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5(4), 323–370. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.5.4.323

Bombari

Schmid Mast

Bachmann

(2017). Felt power explains the link between position power and experienced emotions. Emotion, 17(1), 55–66. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000207

Carver

C. S.

White

T. L.

(1994). Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: The BIS/BAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(2), 319–333. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.2.319

Cattaneo

L. B.

Chapman

A. R.

(2010). The process of empowerment: A model for use in research and practice. American Psychologist, 65(7), 646–659. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018854

Christandl

(2013). The belief in a just world as a personal resource in the context of inflation and financial crises. Applied Psychology, 62(3), 486–518. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2012.00489.x

10.

Clifton

J. D.

Baker

J. D.

Park

C. L.

Yaden

D. B.

Clifton

A. B.

Terni

Miller

J. L.

Zeng

Giorgi

Schwartz

H. A.

(2019). Primal world beliefs. Psychological Assessment, 31(1), 82–99. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000639

11.

Correia

Batista

M. T.

Lima

M. L.

(2009). Does the belief in a just world bring happiness? Causal relationships among belief in a just world, life satisfaction and mood. Australian Journal of Psychology, 61(4), 220–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049530802579515

12.

Dalbert

(2001). The justice motive as a personal resource: Dealing with challenges and critical life events. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.

13.

Dalbert

Dzuka

(2004). Belief in a just world, personality and well-being of adolescents. In Dalbert

Sallay

(Eds.), The justice motive in adolescence and young adulthood: Origins and consequences (pp. 101–116). Routledge.

14.

Dalbert

Stoeber

(2006). The personal belief in a just world and domain-specific beliefs about justice at school and in the family: A longitudinal study with adolescents. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 30(3), 200–207. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025406063638

15.

Diener

Wirtz

Tov

Kim-Prieto

Choi

Oishi

Biswas-Diener

(2010). New well-being measures: Short scales to assess flourishing and positive and negative feelings. Social Indicators Research, 97(2), 143–156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-009-9493-y

16.

Fast

N. J.

Gruenfeld

D. H.

Sivanathan

Galinsky

A. D.

(2009). Illusory control: A generative force behind power’s far-reaching effects. Psychological Science, 20(4), 502–508. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02311.x

17.

Fischer

A. R.

Holz

K. B.

(2010). Testing a model of women’s personal sense of justice, control, well-being, and distress in the context of sexist discrimination. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 34(3), 297–310. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2010.01576.x

18.

Fleeson

(2001). Toward a structure-and process-integrated view of personality: Traits as density distributions of states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(6), 1011–1027. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.80.6.1011

19.

Fredrickson

B. L.

(2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist, 56(3), 218–226. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.56.3.218

20.

Galinsky

A. D.

Gruenfeld

D. H.

Magee

J. C.

(2003). From power to action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(3), 453–466. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.3.453

21.

Galinsky

A. D.

Magee

J. C.

Gruenfeld

D. H.

Whitson

J. A.

Liljenquist

K. A.

(2008). Power reduces the press of the situation: Implications for creativity, conformity, and dissonance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(6), 1450–1466. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012633

22.

Hafer

C. L.

(2000). Investment in long-term goals and commitment to just means drive the need to believe in a just world. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(9), 1059–1073. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672002611004

23.

Hafer

C. L.

Bègue

(2005). Experimental research on just-world theory: Problems, developments, and future challenges. Psychological Bulletin, 131(1), 128–167. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.131.1.128

24.

Hafer

C. L.

Busseri

M. A.

Rubel

A. N.

Drolet

C. E.

Cherrington

J. N.

(2019). A latent factor approach to belief in a just world and its association with well-being. Social Justice Research, 33, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-019-00342-8

25.

Hafer

C. L.

Sutton

(2016). Belief in a just world. In Sabbagh

Schmitt

(Eds.), Handbook of social justice theory and research (pp. 145–160). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3216-0_8

26.

Hayes

A. F.

(2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guildford Press.

27.

Keltner

Gruenfeld

D. H.

Anderson

(2003). Power, approach, and inhibition. Psychological Review, 110(2), 265–284. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.110.2.265

28.

Lachman

M. E.

Weaver

S. L.

(1998). The sense of control as a moderator of social class differences in health and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(3), 763–773. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.3.763

29.

Lammers

Burgmer

(2019). Power increases the self-serving bias in the attribution of collective successes and failures. European Journal of Social Psychology, 49(5), 1087–1095. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2556

30.

Lammers

Stoker

J. I.

Rink

Galinsky

A. D.

(2016). To have control over or to be free from others? The desire for power reflects a need for autonomy. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42(4), 498–512. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167216634064

31.

Leach

Weick

(2018). From grumpy to cheerful (and back): How power impacts mood in and across different contexts. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 79, 107–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2018.05.004

32.

Leach

Weick

Lammers

(2017). Does influence beget autonomy? Clarifying the relationship between social and personal power. Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology, 1(1), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/jts5.5

33.

Lerner

M. J.

(1980). The belief in a just world: A fundamental delusion. Springer.

34.

Lerner

M. J.

Miller

D. T.

(1978). Just world research and the attribution process: Looking back and ahead. Psychological Bulletin, 85(5), 1030–1051. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.85.5.1030

35.

Lerner

M. J.

Miller

D. T.

Holmes

J. G.

(1976). Deserving and the emergence of forms of justice. In Berkowitz

Walster

(Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 9, pp. 133–162). Elsevier.

36.

Lipkus

I. M.

Dalbert

Siegler

I. C.

(1996). The importance of distinguishing the belief in a just world for self versus for others: Implications for psychological well-being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22(7), 666–677. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167296227002

37.

Marsh

H. W.

Hau

K.-T.

Wen

(2004). In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler’s (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling, 11(3), 320–341. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1103_2

38.

Mõttus

(2016). Towards more rigorous personality trait–outcome research. European Journal of Personality, 30(4), 292–303. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2041

39.

Muthén

L. K.

Muthén

B. O.

(1998-2017). Mplus User’s Guide (8th ed.). Muthén & Muthén.

40.

Pirlott

A. G.

MacKinnon

D. P.

(2016). Design approaches to experimental mediation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 66, 29–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.09.012

41.

Schindler

Wenzel

Dobiosch

Reinhard

M. A.

(2019). The role of belief in a just world for (dis)honest behavior. Personality and Individual Differences, 142, 72–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.01.037

42.

Scholz

Strelan

(2021). In control, optimistic, and resilient: Age-related effects of living in a just world among adolescents. Personality and Individual Differences, 171, Article 110474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110474

43.

Simmons

J. P.

Nelson

L. D.

Simonsohn

(2013, January). Life after P-Hacking. Presentation at the 2013 Society for Personality and Social Psychology Meeting, New Orleans, LA, United States. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2205186

44.

Spencer

S. J.

Zanna

M. P.

Fong

G. T.

(2005). Establishing a causal chain: Why experiments are often more effective than mediational analyses in examining psychological processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(6), 845–851. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.845

45.

Strelan

Callisto

(2020). Good outcomes are more likely for me than you—Especially in a just world. Personality and Individual Differences, 163, Article 110033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110033

46.

Strelan

Van Prooijen

Gollwitzer

(2020). When transgressors intend to cause harm: The empowering effects of revenge and forgiveness on victim well-being. British Journal of Social Psychology, 59(2), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12357

47.

Strelan

Zdaniuk

(2015). Threatened state self-esteem reduces forgiveness. Self and Identity, 14, 16–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2014.889034

48.

Sutton

R. M.

Stoeber

Kamble

S. V.

(2017). Belief in a just world for oneself versus others, social goals, and subjective well-being. Personality and Individual Differences, 113, 115–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.03.026

49.

Sutton

R. M.

Winnard

E. J.

(2007). Looking ahead through lenses of justice: The relevance of just-world beliefs to intentions and confidence in the future. British Journal of Social Psychology, 46(3), 649–666. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466606X166220

50.

Ucar

G. K.

Hasta

Malatyali

M. K.

(2019). The mediating role of perceived control and hopelessness in the relation between personal belief in a just world and life satisfaction. Personality and Individual Differences, 143, 68–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.02.021

51.

Weick

Guinote

(2010). How long will it take? Power biases time predictions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(4), 595–604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2010.03.005

52.

Wojciszke

Struzynska–Kujalowicz

(2007). Power influences self–esteem. Social Cognition, 25(4), 472–494. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2007.25.4.472

53.

Ren

Huang

Wang

(2018). Undergraduates’ belief in a just world and subjective well-being: The mediating role of sense of control. Social Behavior and Personality, 46(5), 831–840. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.6912

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

12.75 MB