The authoritarianism literature is divided over whether perceived threats to normative social order (sociotropic threats) or threats to the individual’s well-being (personal threats) activate authoritarian predispositions. In addition, while some approaches claim that perceived threats primarily trigger those high in authoritarianism, others claim that those who are low in authoritarianism are more sensitive to threats. Given the centrality of authoritarianism and threat on support for extraordinary policies in the context of COVID-19, this article sought to test to what extent different types of threats moderated the effect of authoritarianism on support for tough law and order policies and harsh punishments to contain the spread of coronavirus. Data from two preregistered survey experiments indicates that those high in authoritarianism were more willing to support tough law and order policies when primed with sociotropic threats while those low in authoritarianism became more willing to support such policies when primed with personal threats.
AltemeyerB. (1981). Right-wing authoritarianism. University of Manitoba Press.
2.
AltemeyerB. (1996). The authoritarian specter. Harvard University Press.
3.
AsbrockF.FritscheI. (2013). Authoritarian reactions to terrorist threat: Who is being threatened, the me or the we?International Journal of Psychology, 48, 35–49.
4.
BrandtM. J.HenryP. J. (2012). Gender inequality and gender differences in authoritarianism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 1301–1315.
5.
CohrsJ. C.KielmannS.MaesJ.MoschnerB. (2005b). Effects of right-wing authoritarianism and threat from terrorism on restriction of civil liberties. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 5, 263–276.
6.
CohrsJ. C.MoschnerB.MaesJ.KielmannS. (2005a). The motivational bases of right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation: Relations to values and attitudes in the aftermath of September 11, 2001. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1425–1434.
7.
DotyR. M.PetersonB. E.WinterD. G. (1991). Threat and authoritarianism in the United States, 1978-1987. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 629–640.
8.
DuckittJ. (1989). Authoritarianism and group identification: A new view of an old construct. Political Psychology, 10, 63–84.
9.
DuckittJ. (2001). A dual-process cognitive-motivational theory of ideology and prejudice. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 41–133.
10.
DuckittJ. (2013). Introduction to the special section on authoritarianism in societal context: The role of threat. International Journal of Psychology, 1, 1–5.
11.
DuckittJ. (2006). Differential effects of right wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation on outgroup attitudes and their mediation by threat from and competitiveness to outgroups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 684–696.
12.
DunnK. P. (2020). The authoritarian predisposition, perceived threat, and trust in political institutions. PsyArXiv Preprint. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/ewtdr
13.
DunnK. P.GriffithsE.LambS.ShorttR.TheochariE. (2017). The human empowerment sequence and the development of libertarian values: A Theoretical and empirical adjustment to the human empowerment sequence. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 48, 771–789.
FeldmanS. (2003). Enforcing social conformity: A theory of authoritarianism. Political Psychology, 24, 41–74.
16.
FeldmanS. (2013). Authoritarianism in social context: The role of threat. International Journal of Psychology, 48, 55–59.
17.
FeldmanS. (2020). Authoritarianism, threat, and intolerance. In BorgidaE.FedericoC.MillerJ. (Eds.), At the forefront of political psychology: Essays in Honor of John L. Sullivan (pp. 35–54). Routledge.
18.
FeldmanS.StennerK. (1997). Perceived threat and authoritarianism. Political Psychology, 18, 741–770.
19.
FestingerL. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Standford University Press.
20.
GadarianS. K.GoodmanS. W.PepinskyT. (2021). Partisanship, health behavior, and policy attitudes in the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic. PLOS ONE, 16(4), Article e0249596.
21.
Golec de ZavalaA.BierwiaczonekK.BaranT.KeenanO.HaseA. (2021). The COVID-19 pandemic, authoritarianism and rejection of sexual dissenters in Poland. Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Diversity, 8, 250–260.
22.
HartmanT. K.StocksT. V. A.McKayR.Gibson-MillerJ.LevitaL.MartinezA. P.MasonL.McBrideO.MurphyJ.ShevlinM.BennettK. M.HylandP.KaratziasT.VallièresF.BentallR. P. (2021). The authoritarian dynamic during the COVID-19 pandemic: Effects on nationalism and anti-immigrant sentiment. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 12, 1274–1285.
23.
HetheringtonM.SuhayE. (2011). Authoritarianism, threat, and Americans’ support for the war on terror. American Journal of Political Science, 55, 546–560.
24.
HetheringtonM.WeilerJ. D. (2009). Authoritarianism and polarization in American politics. Cambridge University Press.
25.
HuddyL.FeldmanS.TaberC.LahavG. (2005). Threat, anxiety, and support for antiterrorism policies. American Journal of Political Science, 49, 593–608.
JostJ. T.GlaserJ.KruglanskiA. W.SullowayF. J. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 339–375.
28.
KossowskaM.TrejtowiczM.LemusS.BukowskiM.Van HielA.GoodwinR. (2011). Relationships between right-wing authoritarianism, terrorism threat, and attitudes towards restrictions of civil rights: A comparison among four European countries. British Journal of Psychology, 102, 245–259.
29.
KundaZ. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 480–498.
30.
MacWilliamsM. (2016). The rise of Trump: America’s authoritarian spring. The Amherst College Press.
31.
MansonJ. H. (2020). Right-wing authoritarianism, left-wing authoritarianism, and pandemic-mitigation authoritarianism. Personality and Individual Differences, 167, 110251.
32.
McFarlandS. G. (1981). Effects of question order on survey responses. Political Research Quarterly, 45, 208–215.
33.
MehlhaffI. D.RyanT. J.HetheringtonM.MacKuenM. (2021). Where motivated reasoning withers and looms large: Fear and partisan reactions to the COVID-19 pandemic (Working Paper). https://imehlhaff.net/files/Fear.pdf
34.
NailP. R.McGregorI.DrinkwaterA. I.SteeleG. M.ThompsonA. W. (2009). Threat causes liberals to think like conservatives. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 901–907.
35.
NapierJ.JostJ. (2008). The “antidemocratic personality” revisited: A cross-national investigation of working-class authoritarianism. Journal of Social Issues, 64, 595–617.
36.
OnraetE.Van HielA. (2013). When threat to society becomes a threat to oneself: Implications for right-wing attitudes and ethnic prejudice. International Journal of Psychology, 48, 25–34.
RickertE. J. (1998). Authoritarianism and economic threat: Implications for political behavior. Political Psychology, 19, 707–720.
39.
RoccatoM.VienoA.RussoS. (2014). The country’s crime rate moderates the relation between authoritarian predispositions and the manifestations of authoritarianism: A multilevel, multinational study. European Journal of Personality, 28, 14–24.
40.
SalesS. M. (1973). Threat as a factor in authoritarianism: An analysis of archival data. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28, 44–57.
41.
SilvaB. C. (2018). The (non)impact of the 2015 Paris terrorist attacks on political attitudes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 44, 838–850.
42.
StennerK. (2005). The authoritarian dynamic. Cambridge University Press.
43.
StevensD.Vaughan-WilliamsN. (2016). Citizens and security threats: Issues, perceptions and consequences beyond the national frame. British Journal of Political Science, 46, 149–175.
44.
TourangeauR.RasinskiK.BradburnN.D’AndradeR. (1989). Carryover effects in attitude surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, 53, 495–524.
45.
Van AsschehJ.DierckK. (2019). Attitudes towards outgroups before and after terror attacks. Terrorism & Political Violence, 33(7), 1530–1545.
46.
VasilopoulosP.MarcusG. E.FoucaultM. (2018). Emotional responses to the Charlie Hebdo attacks: Addressing the authoritarianism puzzle. Political Psychology, 39, 557–575.
47.
ZallerJ. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
