Sociotropic and Personal Threats and Authoritarian Reactions During COVID-19

Abstract

The authoritarianism literature is divided over whether perceived threats to normative social order (sociotropic threats) or threats to the individual’s well-being (personal threats) activate authoritarian predispositions. In addition, while some approaches claim that perceived threats primarily trigger those high in authoritarianism, others claim that those who are low in authoritarianism are more sensitive to threats. Given the centrality of authoritarianism and threat on support for extraordinary policies in the context of COVID-19, this article sought to test to what extent different types of threats moderated the effect of authoritarianism on support for tough law and order policies and harsh punishments to contain the spread of coronavirus. Data from two preregistered survey experiments indicates that those high in authoritarianism were more willing to support tough law and order policies when primed with sociotropic threats while those low in authoritarianism became more willing to support such policies when primed with personal threats.

Keywords

authoritarianism threat COVID-19 political attitudes political psychology attitudes

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Altemeyer

(1981). Right-wing authoritarianism. University of Manitoba Press.

Altemeyer

(1996). The authoritarian specter. Harvard University Press.

Asbrock

Fritsche

(2013). Authoritarian reactions to terrorist threat: Who is being threatened, the me or the we? International Journal of Psychology, 48, 35–49.

Brandt

M. J.

Henry

P. J.

(2012). Gender inequality and gender differences in authoritarianism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 1301–1315.

Cohrs

J. C.

Kielmann

Maes

Moschner

(2005b). Effects of right-wing authoritarianism and threat from terrorism on restriction of civil liberties. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 5, 263–276.

Cohrs

J. C.

Moschner

Maes

Kielmann

(2005a). The motivational bases of right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation: Relations to values and attitudes in the aftermath of September 11, 2001. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1425–1434.

Doty

R. M.

Peterson

B. E.

Winter

D. G.

(1991). Threat and authoritarianism in the United States, 1978-1987. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 629–640.

Duckitt

(1989). Authoritarianism and group identification: A new view of an old construct. Political Psychology, 10, 63–84.

Duckitt

(2001). A dual-process cognitive-motivational theory of ideology and prejudice. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 41–133.

10.

Duckitt

(2013). Introduction to the special section on authoritarianism in societal context: The role of threat. International Journal of Psychology, 1, 1–5.

11.

Duckitt

(2006). Differential effects of right wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation on outgroup attitudes and their mediation by threat from and competitiveness to outgroups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 684–696.

12.

Dunn

K. P.

(2020). The authoritarian predisposition, perceived threat, and trust in political institutions. PsyArXiv Preprint. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/ewtdr

13.

Dunn

K. P.

Griffiths

Lamb

Shortt

Theochari

(2017). The human empowerment sequence and the development of libertarian values: A Theoretical and empirical adjustment to the human empowerment sequence. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 48, 771–789.

14.

Engelhardt

A. M.

Feldman

Hetherington

M. J.

(2021). Advancing the measurement of authoritarianism. Political Behavior, 1–24. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11109-021-09718-6

15.

Feldman

(2003). Enforcing social conformity: A theory of authoritarianism. Political Psychology, 24, 41–74.

16.

Feldman

(2013). Authoritarianism in social context: The role of threat. International Journal of Psychology, 48, 55–59.

17.

Feldman

(2020). Authoritarianism, threat, and intolerance. In Borgida

Federico

Miller

(Eds.), At the forefront of political psychology: Essays in Honor of John L. Sullivan (pp. 35–54). Routledge.

18.

Feldman

Stenner

(1997). Perceived threat and authoritarianism. Political Psychology, 18, 741–770.

19.

Festinger

(1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Standford University Press.

20.

Gadarian

S. K.

Goodman

S. W.

Pepinsky

(2021). Partisanship, health behavior, and policy attitudes in the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic. PLOS ONE, 16(4), Article e0249596.

21.

Golec de Zavala

Bierwiaczonek

Baran

Keenan

Hase

(2021). The COVID-19 pandemic, authoritarianism and rejection of sexual dissenters in Poland. Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Diversity, 8, 250–260.

22.

Hartman

T. K.

Stocks

T. V. A.

McKay

Gibson-Miller

Levita

Martinez

A. P.

Mason

McBride

Murphy

Shevlin

Bennett

K. M.

Hyland

Karatzias

Vallières

Bentall

R. P.

(2021). The authoritarian dynamic during the COVID-19 pandemic: Effects on nationalism and anti-immigrant sentiment. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 12, 1274–1285.

23.

Hetherington

Suhay

(2011). Authoritarianism, threat, and Americans’ support for the war on terror. American Journal of Political Science, 55, 546–560.

24.

Hetherington

Weiler

J. D.

(2009). Authoritarianism and polarization in American politics. Cambridge University Press.

25.

Huddy

Feldman

Taber

Lahav

(2005). Threat, anxiety, and support for antiterrorism policies. American Journal of Political Science, 49, 593–608.

26.

Ipsos. (2020). Tracking the coronavirus: Results from a multicountry poll. Wave 4. https://www.ipsos.com/sites/default/files/ct/news/documents/2020-03/tracking-the-coronavirus-wave-4-ipsos.pdf

27.

Jost

J. T.

Glaser

Kruglanski

A. W.

Sulloway

F. J.

(2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 339–375.

28.

Kossowska

Trejtowicz

Lemus

Bukowski

Van Hiel

Goodwin

(2011). Relationships between right-wing authoritarianism, terrorism threat, and attitudes towards restrictions of civil rights: A comparison among four European countries. British Journal of Psychology, 102, 245–259.

29.

Kunda

(1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 480–498.

30.

MacWilliams

(2016). The rise of Trump: America’s authoritarian spring. The Amherst College Press.

31.

Manson

J. H.

(2020). Right-wing authoritarianism, left-wing authoritarianism, and pandemic-mitigation authoritarianism. Personality and Individual Differences, 167, 110251.

32.

McFarland

S. G.

(1981). Effects of question order on survey responses. Political Research Quarterly, 45, 208–215.

33.

Mehlhaff

I. D.

Ryan

T. J.

Hetherington

MacKuen

(2021). Where motivated reasoning withers and looms large: Fear and partisan reactions to the COVID-19 pandemic (Working Paper). https://imehlhaff.net/files/Fear.pdf

34.

Nail

P. R.

McGregor

Drinkwater

A. I.

Steele

G. M.

Thompson

A. W.

(2009). Threat causes liberals to think like conservatives. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 901–907.

35.

Napier

Jost

(2008). The “antidemocratic personality” revisited: A cross-national investigation of working-class authoritarianism. Journal of Social Issues, 64, 595–617.

36.

Onraet

Van Hiel

(2013). When threat to society becomes a threat to oneself: Implications for right-wing attitudes and ethnic prejudice. International Journal of Psychology, 48, 25–34.

37.

Pew Research. (2020). Worries about coronavirus surge, as most Americans expect a recession or worse. https://www.people-press.org/2020/03/26/worries-about-coronavirus-surge-as-most-americans-expect-a-recession-or-worse/

38.

Rickert

E. J.

(1998). Authoritarianism and economic threat: Implications for political behavior. Political Psychology, 19, 707–720.

39.

Roccato

Vieno

Russo

(2014). The country’s crime rate moderates the relation between authoritarian predispositions and the manifestations of authoritarianism: A multilevel, multinational study. European Journal of Personality, 28, 14–24.

40.

Sales

S. M.

(1973). Threat as a factor in authoritarianism: An analysis of archival data. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28, 44–57.

41.

Silva

B. C.

(2018). The (non)impact of the 2015 Paris terrorist attacks on political attitudes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 44, 838–850.

42.

Stenner

(2005). The authoritarian dynamic. Cambridge University Press.

43.

Stevens

Vaughan-Williams

(2016). Citizens and security threats: Issues, perceptions and consequences beyond the national frame. British Journal of Political Science, 46, 149–175.

44.

Tourangeau

Rasinski

Bradburn

D’Andrade

(1989). Carryover effects in attitude surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, 53, 495–524.

45.

Van Asscheh

Dierck

. (2019). Attitudes towards outgroups before and after terror attacks. Terrorism & Political Violence, 33(7), 1530–1545.

46.

Vasilopoulos

Marcus

G. E.

Foucault

(2018). Emotional responses to the Charlie Hebdo attacks: Addressing the authoritarianism puzzle. Political Psychology, 39, 557–575.

47.

Zaller

(1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.14 MB