Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The current research investigates the role of racialized work ethic stereotypes on attitudes toward welfare. We hypothesized that work ethic stereotypes shape both people’s attitudes toward welfare and their perceptions of who benefits from these policies. Consistent with hypotheses, when the demographic composition of welfare recipients was majority Black (vs. White), participants thought recipients were lazier and were less positive to welfare programs and policies (Study 1). Describing welfare recipients as hardworking (vs. no information control) mitigated this effect, even when the demographic composition of welfare recipients was majority Black (Study 2). Finally, we investigated whether work ethic stereotypes shape both attitudes toward welfare and spontaneous mental images of recipients. Images generated when participants were asked to envision hardworking (vs. lazy) recipients were rated by a separate sample as more representative of White Americans and garnered more support for providing welfare benefits (Study 3).

Keywords

prejudice/stereotyping intergroup relations social cognition political psychology

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Brinkman

Todorov

Dotsch

(2017). Visualising mental representations: A primer on noise-based reverse correlation in social psychology. European Review of Social Psychology, 28(1), 333–361.

Brown-Iannuzzi

J. L.

Dotsch

Cooley

Payne

B. K.

(2017). The relationship between mental representations of welfare recipients and attitudes toward welfare. Psychological Science, 28, 92–103. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797616674999

Cone

Brown-Iannuzzi

J. L.

Lei

Dotsch

(2020). Type I error is inflated in the two-phase reverse correlation procedure. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 1948550620938616.

Cooley

E. C.

Brown-Iannuzzi

J. L.

Boudreau

(2019). Shifting stereotypes of welfare recipients can reverse racial biases in support for wealth redistribution. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 10, 1065–1074. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550619829062

Devine

P. G.

Elliot

A. J.

(1995). Are racial stereotypes really fading? The Princeton trilogy revisited. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21(11), 1139–1150.

Dotsch

(2015). Rcicr: Reverse correlation image classification toolbox. R package version 0.3.0.

Dupree

C. H.

Torrez

Obianuju

Fiske

S. T.

(2020). Race-status associations: Distinct effects of three novel measures among White and Black perceivers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Advance online publication.

Edsall

T. B.

Edsall

M. D.

(1992). Chain reaction: The impact of race, rights, and taxes on American politics. WW Norton & Company.

Faul

Erdfelder

Buchner

Lang

A. G.

(2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149

10.

Furnham

(1982). The protestant work ethic and attitudes toward unemployment. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 55, 277–285. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1982.tb00101.x

11.

Gilens

(1995). Racial attitudes and opposition to welfare. The Journal of Politics, 57(4), 994–1014.

12.

Gilens

(1996). “Race coding” and White opposition to welfare. The American Political Science Review, 90, 593–604. https://doi.org/10.2307/2082611

13.

Gilens

(1999). Why Americans Hate Welfare: Race. Media, and the Politics of Antipoverty Policy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

14.

Hayes

A. F.

(2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis (2nd ed.). Guildford Press.

15.

Henry

P. J.

Reyna

Weiner

(2004). Hate welfare but help the poor: How the attributional content of stereotypes explains the paradox of reactions to the destitute in America. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34, 34–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb02536.x

16.

Henry

P. J.

Sears

D. O.

(2002). The Symbolic Racism 2000 Scale. Political Psychology, 23, 253–283. https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895X.00281

17.

Katz

Braly

(1933). Racial stereotypes of one hundred college students. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 28, 280–290. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0074049

18.

Kay

A. C.

Jost

J. T.

(2003). Complementary justice: Effects of “poor but happy” and “poor but honest” stereotype exemplars on system justification and implicit activation of the justice motive. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 823–837. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.5.823

19.

Kitayama

Imada

. (2010). Implicit independence and interdependence: A cultural task analysis. In Mesquita

Barrett

L. F.

Smith

E. R.

(Eds.), The mind in context (pp. 174–200). Guilford Press.

20.

Leiby

(1978). A history of social welfare and social work in the United States. Columbia University Press.

21.

MacLeod

Montero

Speer

(1999). America’s changing attitudes toward welfare and welfare recipients, 1938–1995. The Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 2, 175–186. https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/jrlsasw26&i=385

22.

Mangini

M. C.

Biederman

(2004). Making the ineffable explicit: Estimating the information employed for face classifications. Cognitive Science, 28(2), 209–226.

23.

Moffitt

R. A.

Garlow

(2018). Did welfare reform increase employment and reduce poverty? https://inequality.stanford.edu/sites/default/files/Pathways_Winter2018_Employment-Poverty.pdf

24.

Oppenheimer

D. M.

Meyvis

Davidenko

(2009). Instructional manipulation checks: Detecting satisficing to increase statistical power. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(4), 867–872.

25.

Peffley

Hurwitz

Sniderman

P. M.

(1997). Racial stereotypes and whites’ political views of blacks in the context of welfare and crime. American Journal of Political Science, 30–60.

26.

Richeson

J. A.

Sommers

S. R.

(2016). Toward a social psychology of race and race relations for the twenty-first century. Annual Review of Psychology, 67, 439–463. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115115

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.80 MB

Investigating the Interplay Between Race,Work Ethic Stereotypes,and Attitudes Toward Welfare Recipients and Policies

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material