Lockdown Lives: A Longitudinal Study of Inter-Relationships Among Feelings of Loneliness,Social Contacts,and Solidarity During the COVID-19 Lockdown in Early 2020

Abstract

We examine how social contacts and feelings of solidarity shape experiences of loneliness during the COVID-19 lockdown in early 2020. From the PsyCorona database, we obtained longitudinal data from 23 countries, collected between March and May 2020. The results demonstrated that although online contacts help to reduce feelings of loneliness, people who feel more lonely are less likely to use that strategy. Solidarity played only a small role in shaping feelings of loneliness during lockdown. Thus, it seems we must look beyond the current focus on online contact and solidarity to help people address feelings of loneliness during lockdown. Finally, online contacts did not function as a substitute for face-to-face contacts outside the home—in fact, more frequent online contact in earlier weeks predicted more frequent face-to-face contacts in later weeks. As such, this work provides relevant insights into how individuals manage the impact of restrictions on their social lives.

Keywords

COVID-19 loneliness longitudinal methodology solidarity online communication

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Arthur

(2021). Studying the UK job market during the COVID-19 crisis with online job ads. PLOS ONE, 16(5), Article e0251431.

Baumeister

R. F.

Leary

M. R.

(1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497–529.

Berry

Willoughby

M. T.

(2017). On the practical interpretability of cross-lagged panel models: Rethinking a developmental workhorse. Child Development, 88(4), 1186–1206.

Brooks

S. K.

Webster

R. K.

Smith

L. E.

Woodland

Wessely

Greenberg

Rubin

G. J.

(2020). The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: Rapid review of the evidence. The Lancet, 395, 912–920.

Cacioppo

J. T.

Patrick

(2008). Loneliness: Human nature and the need for social connection. W.W. Norton.

Caplan

S. E.

(2003). Preference for online social interaction: A theory of problematic Internet use and psychosocial well-being. Communication Research, 30(6), 625–648.

Coronavirus: How Germany is showing solidarity amid the outbreak. (2020, March). Die Welt. https://www.dw.com/en/coronavirus-how-germany-is-showing-solidarity-amid-the-outbreak/a-52763215

Cutrona

C. E.

(1982). Transition to college: Loneliness and the process of social adjustment. Loneliness: A Sourcebook of Current Theory, Research, and Therapy, 36, 291–309.

de Klerk

Plaisier

Wagemans

. (2020, September). Welbevinden ten tijde van corona. Eerste bevindingen op basis van een bevolkingsenquête uit juli 2020 [Well-being in times of corona. First findings based on a population survey in July 2020]. Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau. https://www.scp.nl/actueel/nieuws/2020/09/10/welbevinden-ten-tijde-van-corona.-eerste-bevindingen-op-basis-van-een-bevolkingsenquete-uit-juli-2020

10.

Dienlin

Masur

P. K.

Trepte

(2017). Reinforcement or displacement? The reciprocity of FtF, IM, and SNS communication and their effects on loneliness and life satisfaction. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 22(2), 71–87.

11.

Dormann

Griffin

M. A.

(2015). Optimal time lags in panel studies. Psychological Methods, 20(4), 489–505. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000041

12.

Drury

Brown

González

Miranda

(2016). Emergent social identity and observing social support predict social support provided by survivors in a disaster: Solidarity in the 2010 Chile earthquake. European Journal of Social Psychology, 46(2), 209–223.

13.

Faul

Erdfelder

Buchner

Lang

A. G.

(2009). Statistical power analyses using G* Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160.

14.

Gee

McGarty

(2013). Aspirations for a cooperative community and support for mental health advocacy: A shared orientation through opinion-based group membership. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43, E426–E441.

15.

Goll

J. C.

Charlesworth

Scior

Stott

(2015). Barriers to social participation among lonely older adults: The influence of social fears and identity. PLOS ONE, 10(2), Article e0116664.

16.

Hale

Angrist

Cameron-Blake

Hallas

Kira

Majumdar

Petherick

Phillips

Tatlow

Webster

(2020). Oxford COVID-19 government response tracker.

17.

Hall

J. A.

Kearney

M. W.

Xing

(2019). Two tests of social displacement through social media use. Information, Communication & Society, 22(10), 1396–1413.

18.

Hamaker

E. L.

Kuiper

R. M.

Grasman

R. P.

(2015). A critique of the cross-lagged panel model. Psychological Methods, 20(1), 102–116.

19.

Haslam

S. A.

Reicher

(2006). Stressing the group: Social identity and the unfolding dynamics of responses to stress. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(5), 1037–1052.

20.

Heinrich

L. M.

Gullone

(2006). The clinical significance of loneliness: A literature review. Clinical Psychology Review, 26(6), 695–718.

21.

Hoehn-Velasco

Silverio-Murillo

de la Miyar

J. R. B.

(2021). The long downturn: The impact of the great lockdown on formal employment. Journal of Economics and Business, 115, Article 105983.

22.

Holt-Lunstad

Smith

T. B.

Baker

Harris

Stephenson

(2015). Loneliness and social isolation as risk factors for mortality: A meta-analytic review. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10(2), 227–237.

23.

Bentler

P. M.

(1999). Cut-off criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55.

24.

Hunt

S. A.

Benford

R. D.

(2004). Collective identity, solidarity, and commitment. In Snow

D. A.

Soule

S. A.

Kriesi

(Eds.), The Blackwell companion to social movements (pp. 433–457). Blackwell.

25.

Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS. (2020). #TogetherWeWin: Inspiring examples of solidarity during the COVID-19 outbreak in eastern Europe and central Asia. https://www.unaids.org/en/resources/presscentre/featurestories/2020/july/20200728_insta_show

26.

Kaniasty

Norris

F. H.

(2004). Social support in the aftermath of disasters, catastrophes, and acts of terrorism: Altruistic, overwhelmed, uncertain, antagonistic, and patriotic communities. In Ursano

R. J.

Norwood

A. E.

Fullerton

C. S.

(Eds.), Bioterrorism: Psychological and public health interventions (pp. 200–229). Cambridge University Press.

27.

Killgore

W. D.

Cloonan

S. A.

Taylor

E. C.

Miller

M. A.

Dailey

N. S.

(2020). Three months of loneliness during the COVID-19 lockdown. Psychiatry Research, 293, 113392.

28.

Lee

S. J.

(2009). Online communication and adolescent social ties: Who benefits more from Internet use? Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14(3), 509–531.

29.

Louis

W. R.

Thomas

Chapman

C. M.

Achia

Wibisono

Mirnajafi

Droogendyk

(2019). Emerging research on intergroup prosociality: Group members’ charitable giving, positive contact, allyship, and solidarity with others. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 13(3), Article e12436.

30.

Luchetti

Lee

J. H.

Aschwanden

Sesker

Strickhouser

J. E.

Terracciano

Sutin

A. R.

(2020). The trajectory of loneliness in response to COVID-19. American Psychologist, 75, 897–908.

31.

Mental Health Foundation. (2020). Loneliness during coronavirus. https://www.mentalhealth.org.uk/coronavirus/loneliness-during-coronavirus

32.

Metropolitan Police. (2020). Coronavirus (Covid-19) police powers. https://www.met.police.uk/advice/advice-and-information/c19/coronavirus-covid-19/coronavirus-covid-19-police-powers/

33.

Muthén

Asparouhov

(2002). Latent variable analysis with categorical outcomes: Multiple-group and growth modeling in Mplus. Mplus Web Notes, 4(5), 1–22.

34.

Muthén

L. K.

Muthén

B. O.

(1998–2017). Mplus user’s guide.

35.

National Health Service. (2020). What you can do if you feel lonely during the coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak. https://www.nhs.uk/oneyou/every-mind-matters/coping-loneliness-during-coronavirus-outbreak/

36.

Nontis

Rocha

(2020). Together apart: The psychology of COVID-19. SAGE.

37.

Nowland

Necka

E. A.

Cacioppo

J. T.

(2018). Loneliness and social internet use: Pathways to reconnection in a digital world? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(1), 70–87.

38.

Office of National Statistics. (2020). Coronavirus and loneliness, Great Britain: 3 April to 3 May 2020. https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/wellbeing/bulletins/coronavirusandlonelinessgreatbritain/3aprilto3may2020

39.

Official data suggests Britons are learning to help each other. (2020, April). The Economist. https://www.economist.com/britain/2020/04/25/official-data-suggest-britons-are-learning-to-help-each-other

40.

Osborne

Sibley

C. G.

(2020). Does Openness to Experience predict changes in conservatism? A nine-wave longitudinal investigation into the personality roots to ideology. Journal of Research in Personality, 87, Article 103979.

41.

Purtill

(2020, July). Facing lockdown 2.0, what did we learn the first time? Leadership and solidarity. ABC. https://www.abc.net.au/triplej/programs/hack/covid-19-coronavirus-solidarity-leadership-lockdown-lessons/12440372

42.

Putnam

R. D.

(2000). Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. In Crothers

Lockhart

(Eds.), Culture and politics (pp. 223–234). Springer.

43.

Rijksinstituut voor Volksgezondheid en Milieu (2020). Naleven gedragsregels [Adherence to behavioural rules]. https://www.rivm.nl/gedragsonderzoek/maatregelen-welbevinden/naleven-gedragsregels

44.

Rodriguez

Trainor

Quarantelli

E. L.

(2006). Rising to the challenges of a catastrophe: The emergent and prosocial behavior following Hurricane Katrina. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 604(1), 82–101.

45.

Russell

Peplau

L. A.

Cutrona

C. E.

(1980). The revised UCLA Loneliness Scale: Concurrent and discriminant validity evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(3), 472–480.

46.

Saeri

A. K.

Cruwys

Barlow

F. K.

Stronge

Sibley

C. G.

(2018). Social connectedness improves public mental health: Investigating bidirectional relationships in the New Zealand attitudes and values survey. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 52(4), 365–374.

47.

Slavich

G. M.

(2020). Psychoneuroimmunology of stress and mental health. In Harkness

K. L.

Hayden

E. P.

(Eds.), The Oxford handbook of stress and mental health (pp. 519–546). Oxford University Press.

48.

Stepanikova

Nie

N. H.

(2010). Time on the Internet at home, loneliness, and life satisfaction: Evidence from panel time-diary data. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(3), 329–338.

49.

Subašić

Reynolds

K. J.

Turner

J. C.

(2008). The political solidarity model of social change: Dynamics of self-categorization in intergroup power relations. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12(4), 330–352.

50.

Taylor

S. E.

(2006). Health psychology. McGraw Hill.

51.

Thorpe

(2020, March). Balcony singing in solidarity spreads across Italy during lockdown. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/mar/14/solidarity-balcony-singing-spreads-across-italy-during-lockdown

52.

Torales

O’Higgins

Castaldelli-Maia

J. M.

Ventriglio

(2020). The outbreak of COVID-10 coronavirus and its impact on global mental health. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 66(4), 317–320. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020764020915212

53.

Valkenburg

P. M.

Peter

(2007). Online communication and adolescent well-being: Testing the stimulation versus the displacement hypothesis. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4), 1169–1182.

54.

VanderWeele

T. J.

Hawkley

L. C.

Cacioppo

J. T.

(2012). On the reciprocal association between loneliness and subjective well-being. American Journal of Epidemiology, 176(9), 777–784. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kws173

55.

World Health Organization. (2020, April). COVID-19 virtual press conference. https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/transcripts/who-audio-emergencies-coronavirus-press-conference-full-06apr2020-final.pdf?sfvrsn=7753b813_2

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.07 MB