Seven experiments explore whether organizational diversity initiatives heighten White Americans’ concerns about the respect and value afforded toward their racial group and increase their perceptions of anti-White bias. The presence (vs. absence) of organizational diversity initiatives (i.e., diversity awards, diversity training, diversity mission statements) caused White Americans to perceive Whites as less respected and valued than Blacks and to blame a White man’s rejection for a promotion on anti-White bias. Several moderators were tested, including evidence that Whites were clearly advantaged within the organization, that the rejected White candidate was less meritorious than the Black candidate, that promotion opportunities were abundant (vs. scarce), and individual differences related to support for the status hierarchy and identification with Whites. There was little evidence that these moderators reduced Whites’ perceptions of diversity initiatives as harmful to their racial group.
BobocelD. R.Son HingL. S.DaveyL. M.StanleyD. J.ZannaM. P. (1998). Justice-based opposition to social policies: Is it genuine?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(3), 653–669.
2.
BossonJ. K.VandelloJ. A.MichniewiczK. S.LenesJ. G. (2012). American men’s and women’s beliefs about gender discrimination: For men, it’s not quite a zero-sum game. Masculinities & Social Change, 1(3), 210–239.
3.
BrocknerJ.WiesenfeldB. M. (1996). An integrative framework for explaining reactions to decisions: Interactive effects of outcomes and procedures. Psychological Bulletin, 120(2), 189–208.
4.
ColquittJ. A.ConlonD. E.WessonM. J.PorterC. O.NgK. Y. (2001). Justice at the millennium: a meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 425–445.
5.
CraigM. A.RichesonJ. A. (2017). Information about the US racial demographic shift triggers concerns about anti-White discrimination among the prospective White “minority.”PLOS ONE, 12(9), 1–20.
6.
CraigM. A.RichesonJ. A. (2018). Majority no more? The influence of neighborhood racial diversity and salient national population changes on Whites’ perceptions of racial discrimination. RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences, 4(5), 141–157.
7.
CrawfordJ. T.VodapalliS.StingelR. E.RuscioJ. (2019). Do status-legitimizing beliefs moderate effects of racial progress on perceptions of anti-white bias? A replication of wilkins and kaiser (2014). Social Psychological and Personality Science, 10, 768–774.
8.
DaveyL. M.BobocelD. R.Son HingL. S.ZannaM. P. (1999). Preference for the merit principle scale: An individual difference measure of distributive justice preferences. Social Justice Research, 12, 223–240.
9.
DobbinF. (2009). Inventing equal opportunity. Princeton University Press.
10.
DoverT. L.MajorB.KaiserC. R. (2014). Diversity initiatives, status, and system-justifying beliefs: When and how diversity efforts de-legitimize discrimination claims. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 17(4), 485–493.
11.
DoverT. L.MajorB.KaiserC. R. (2016). Members of high-status groups are threatened by pro-diversity organizational messages. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 62, 58–67.
12.
DoverT. L.MajorB.KaiserC. R. (in press). Cardiovascular, behavioral, and psychological responses to organizational pro-diversity messages among racial minorities. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations.
13.
EarleM.HodsonG. (2020). Questioning white losses and anti-white discrimination in the United States. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(2), 160–168.
14.
EdelmanL. B.KriegerL. H.EliasonS. R.AlbistonC. R.MellemaV. (2011). When organizations rule: Judicial deference to institutionalized employment structures. American Journal of Sociology, 117(3), 888–954.
15.
EibachR. P.KeeganT. (2006). Free at last? Social dominance, loss aversion, and white and black Americans’ differing assessments of racial progress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(3), 453.
16.
EssesV. M.JacksonL. M.ArmstrongT. L. (1998). Intergroup competition and attitudes toward immigrants and immigration: An instrumental model of group conflict. Journal of Social Issues, 54(4), 699–724.
17.
GohJ. X.HallJ. A.RosenthalR. (2016). Mini meta-analysis of your own studies: Some arguments on why and a primer on how. Social & Personality Psychology Compass, 10, 535–549.
18.
GündemirS.GalinskyA. D. (2018). Multicolored blindfolds: How organizational multiculturalism can conceal racial discrimination and delegitimize racial discrimination claims. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 9, 825–834. https://doi.org/1948550617726830
19.
GündemirS.HomanA. C.UsovaA.GalinskyA. D. (2017). Multicultural meritocracy: The synergistic benefits of valuing diversity and merit. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 73, 34–41.
HayesA. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (2nd ed.). The Guilford Press.
22.
HeilmanM. E.WelleB. (2006). Disadvantaged by diversity? The effects of diversity goals on competence perceptions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36(5), 1291–1319.
23.
KaiserC. R.MajorB.JurcevicI.DoverT. L.BradyL. M.ShapiroJ. R. (2013). Presumed fair: ironic effects of organizational diversity structures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(3), 504–519.
24.
KalevA.DobbinF.KellyE. (2006). Best practices or best guesses? Assessing the efficacy of corporate affirmative action and diversity policies. American Sociological Review, 71(4), 589–617.
25.
KehnA.RuthigJ. C. (2013). Perceptions of gender discrimination across six decades: The moderating roles of gender and age. Sex Roles, 69(5–6), 289–296.
KnowlesE. D.LoweryB. S.ShulmanE. P.SchaumbergR. L. (2013). Race, ideology, and the Tea Party: A longitudinal study. PLOS ONE, 8(6), Article e67110.
28.
KroschA. R.TylerT. R.AmodioD. M. (2017). Race and recession: The effect of economic scarcity and egalitarian motivation on racial discrimination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 13(6), 892–909.
29.
LindE. A.TylerT. R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. Plenum Press.
30.
MutzD. C. (2018). Status threat, not economic hardship, explains the 2016 presidential vote. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115, E4330–E4339. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1718155115
NortonM. I.SommersS. R. (2011). Whites see racism as a zero-sum game that they are now losing. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(3), 215–218.
33.
PerryS. P.WagesJ. E. (2020). Zero-sum beliefs of racial progress. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(2), 130–131.
34.
PlautV. C.GarnettF. G.BuffardiL. E.Sanchez-BurksJ. (2011). “What about me?” Perceptions of exclusion and Whites’ reactions to multiculturalism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(2), 337–353.
35.
PlautV. C.ThomasK. M.GorenM. J. (2009). Is multiculturalism or color blindness better for minorities?Psychological Science, 20(4), 444–446.
36.
Purdie-VaughnsV.SteeleC. M.DaviesP. G.DitlmannR.CrosbyJ. R. (2008). Social identity contingencies: How diversity cues signal threat or safety for African Americans in mainstream institutions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(4), 615–630.
37.
RothsteinR. (2017). The color of law: A forgotten history of how our government segregated America. Liveright Publishing Corporation.
38.
SherifM. (1966). Common predicament: Social psychology of intergroup conflict and cooperation. Houghton & Mifflin.
39.
SmallP.MajorB.KaiserC. R. (2021). Making diversity work for everybody? The double-edged sword of all-inclusive diversity [Unpublished manuscript].
StevensF. G.PlautV. C.Sanchez-BurksJ. (2008). Unlocking the benefits of diversity: All-inclusive multiculturalism and positive organizational change. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 44(1), 116–133.
42.
WaltonG. M.SpencerS. J.ErmanS. (2013). Affirmative meritocracy. Social Issues and Policy Review, 7(1), 1–35.
43.
WilkinsC. L.HirschA. A.KaiserC. R.InklesM. P. (2017). The threat of racial progress and the self-protective nature of perceiving anti-White bias. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 20(6), 801–812.
44.
WilkinsC. L.KaiserC. R. (2014). Racial progress as threat to the status hierarchy: Implications for perceptions of anti-White bias. Psychological Science, 25(2), 439–446.
45.
WilkinsC. L.WellmanJ. D.BabbittL. G.ToosiN. R.SchadK. D. (2015). You can win but I can’t lose: Bias against high-status groups increases their zero-sum beliefs about discrimination. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 57, 1–14.
46.
WilkinsC. L.WellmanJ. D.KaiserC. R. (2013). Status legitimizing beliefs predict positivity toward Whites who claim anti-White bias. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(6), 1114–1119.
47.
WilkinsC. L.WellmanJ. D.ToosiN. R.MillerC. A.LisnekJ.MartinL. A. (in press). Is LGBT progress seen as an attack on Christians? Examining Christian/sexual orientation zero-sum beliefs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.
48.
WiltonL. S.BellA.VahradyanM.KaiserC. R. (2020). Show don’t tell: Diversity dishonesty harms racial/ethnic minorities at work. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 46, 1171–1185.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
