We examined how the attribution of criminal behavior to an individual’s “true” self influences justice preferences. In Study 1 (N = 521), the extent to which undergraduates attributed a crime to a target’s true self positively predicted their endorsement of a retributive form of punishment and negatively predicted their endorsement of a restorative form of punishment. Study 2 (N = 404) was preregistered and replicated these associations, even when controlling for other perceived causes (e.g., personality, environment). In Study 3 (N = 282), undergraduates rated retributive punishment more favorably and restorative punishment less favorably when induced to think that the crime was (vs. was not) reflective of the target’s true self. Study 4 (N = 935) was preregistered and replicated these experimental effects across different types of crime vignettes in an online sample. These results highlight the ways that intuitions about “true” selves shape punishment preferences.
AlickeM. D. (2000). Culpable control and the psychology of blame. Psychological Bulletin, 126(4), 556–574.
2.
BastianB.DensonT. F.HaslamN. (2013). The roles of dehumanization and moral outrage in retributive justice. PLOS ONE, 8(4), Article e61842.
3.
BenchS. W.SchlegelR. J.DavisW. E.VessM. (2015). Thinking about change in the self and others: The role of self-discovery metaphors and the true self. Social Cognition, 33(3), 169–185.
4.
CarlsmithK. M. (2008). On justifying punishment: The discrepancy between words and actions. Social Justice Research, 21(2), 119–137.
5.
CarlsmithK. M.DarleyJ. M. (2008). Psychological aspects of retributive justice. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 40(1), 193–236.
6.
CarlsmithK. M.DarleyJ. M.RobinsonP. H. (2002). Why do we punish? Deterrence and just deserts as motives for punishment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(2), 284.
7.
CarrollJ. S. (1978). Causal attributions in expert parole decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36(12), 1501–1511.
8.
CarrollJ. S.PayneJ. W. (1977). Crime seriousness, recidivism risk, and causal attributions in judgments of prison term by students and experts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62(5), 595–602.
9.
CarrollJ. S.PerkowitzW. T.LurigioA. J.WeaverF. M. (1987). Sentencing goals, causal attributions, ideology, and personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(1), 107–118.
10.
CarusoG. D. (2020). Justice without retribution: An epistemic argument against retributive criminal punishment. Neuroethics, 13(1), 13–28.
11.
ChristyA. G.SandersC. S.VessM.RoutledgeC.SchlegelR. J. (2017). The true self and existential structure? Unexpected effects of mortality salience and personal need for structure on belief in a true self. Self and Identity, 16(3), 335–352.
12.
ChristyA. G.SchlegelR. J.CimpianA. (2019). Why do people believe in a “true self”? The role of essentialist reasoning about personal identity and the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 117(2), 386–416.
13.
ClarkC. J.LuguriJ. B.DittoP. H.KnobeJ.ShariffA. F.BaumeisterR. F. (2014). Free to punish: a motivated account of free will belief. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106(4), 501.
14.
DarleyJ. M.PittmanT. S. (2003). The psychology of compensatory and retributive justice. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7(4), 324–336.
15.
De FreitasJ.CikaraM.GrossmannI.SchlegelR. (2017). Origins of the belief in good true selves. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21(9), 634–636.
16.
De FreitasJ.SarkissianH.NewmanG. E.GrossmannI.De BrigardF.LucoA.KnobeJ. (2018). Consistent belief in a good true self in misanthropes and three interdependent cultures. Cognitive Science, 42, 134–160.
17.
DunleaJ. P.HeiphetzL. (2020). Children’s and adults’ understanding of punishment and the criminal justice system. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 87, Article 103913.
18.
EnsmingerJ.HenrichJ. (2014). Experimenting with social norms: Fairness and punishment in cross-cultural perspective. Russell Sage Foundation.
19.
GelmanS. A. (2003). The essential child: Origins of essentialism in everyday thought. Oxford University Press, USA.
20.
GelmanS. A.HeymanG. D.LegareC. H. (2007). Developmental changes in the coherence of essentialist beliefs about psychological characteristics. Child Development, 78(3), 757–774.
21.
GrometD. M.DarleyJ. M. (2009). Retributive and restorative justice: Importance of crime severity and shared identity in people’s justice responses. Australian Journal of Psychology, 61(1), 50–57.
22.
HaidtJ. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108(4), 814–834.
23.
HaslamN.RothschildL.ErnstD. (2000). Essentialist beliefs about social categories. British Journal of Social Psychology, 39(1), 113–127.
24.
HeiderF. (1958). Psychological theory of Attribution: Thee psychology of Interpersonal relation.
25.
HeiphetzL. A. (2020). Dehumanization and perceptions of immoral intergroup behavior.
26.
HeiphetzL.GelmanS. A.YoungL. L. (2017). The perceived stability and biological basis of religious beliefs, factual beliefs, and opinions. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 156, 82–98.
27.
HesterN.GrayK. (2020). The moral psychology of raceless, genderless strangers. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(2), 216–230.
28.
JeongS. H. (2009). Public’s Responses to an oil spill accident: A test of the attribution theory and situational crisis communication theory. Public Relations Review, 35(3), 307–309.
29.
KashimaY.TriandisH. C. (1986). The self-serving bias in attributions as a coping strategy: A cross-cultural study. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 17(1), 83–97.
30.
KashimaY.KashimaE.ChiuC. Y.FarsidesT.GelfandM.HongY. Y.. . .YzerbytV. (2005). Culture, essentialism, and agency: Are individuals universally believed to be more real entities than groups?European Journal of Social Psychology, 35(2), 147–169.
31.
KrausM. W.KeltnerD. (2013). Social class rank, essentialism, and punitive judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105(2), 247–261.
32.
LandauM. J.VessM.ArndtJ.RothschildZ. K.SullivanD.AtchleyR. A. (2011). Embodied metaphor and the “true” self: Priming entity expansion and protection influences intrinsic self-expressions in self-perceptions and interpersonal behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47(1), 79–87.
33.
LebowitzM. S.TabbK.AppelbaumP. S. (2019). Asymmetrical genetic attributions for prosocial versus antisocial behaviour. Nature human behaviour, 3(9), 940–949.
34.
MossS. A.LeeE.BermanA.RungD. (2019). When do people value rehabilitation and restorative justice over the punishment of offenders?Victims & Offenders, 14(1), 32–51.
35.
NewmanG. E.BloomP.KnobeJ. (2014). Value judgments and the true self. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40(2), 203–216.
36.
NewmanG. E.De FreitasJ.KnobeJ. (2015). Beliefs about the true self explain asymmetries based on moral judgment. Cognitive Science, 39(1), 96–125.
37.
NewmanG. E.KnobeJ. (2019). The essence of essentialism. Mind & Language, 34(5), 585–605.
38.
SetoE.HicksJ. A. (2016). Disassociating the agent from the self: Undermining belief in free will diminishes true self-knowledge. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7(7), 726–734.
39.
SchlegelR. J.VessM.ArndtJ. (2012). To discover or to create: Metaphors and the true self. Journal of Personality, 80(4), 969–993.
40.
SmithA. M.O’LearyS. G. (1995). Attributions and arousal as predictors of maternal discipline. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 19(4), 459–471.
41.
StrohmingerN.KnobeJ.NewmanG. (2017). The true self: A psychological concept distinct from the self. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(4), 551–560.
42.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. C.AustinW. G.WorchelS. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. Organizational identity: A reader, 56(65), 9780203505984–16.
43.
TempletonL. J.HartnagelT. F. (2012). Causal attributions of crime and the public’s sentencing goals. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 54(1), 45–65.
44.
TylerT. R.JostJ. T. (2007). Psychology and the law: reconciling normative and descriptive accounts of social justice and system legitimacy.
45.
WaxmanS.MedinD.RossN. (2007). Folkbiological reasoning from a cross-cultural developmental perspective: Early essentialist notions are shaped by cultural beliefs. Developmental Psychology, 43(2), 294–308.
46.
WeinerB. (1980). Attribution theory and human motivation. New York: Holt, Reinhart & Winston.
47.
WeinerB.GrahamS.ReynaC. (1997). An attributional examination of retributive versus utilitarian philosophies of punishment. Social Justice Research, 10(4), 431–452.
48.
WoodW. R.SuzukiM. (2016). Four challenges in the future of restorative justice. Victims & Offenders, 11(1), 149–172.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
