Contact with racial outgroups is thought to reduce the cross-race recognition deficit (CRD), the tendency for people to recognize same-race (i.e., ingroup) faces more accurately than cross-race (i.e., outgroup) faces. In 2001, Meissner and Brigham conducted a meta-analysis in which they examined this question and found a meta-analytic effect of r = −.13. We conduct a new meta-analysis based on 20 years of additional data to update the estimate of this relationship and examine theoretical and methodological moderators of the effect. We find a meta-analytic effect of r = −.15. In line with theoretical predictions, we find some evidence that the magnitude of this relationship is stronger when contact occurs during childhood rather than adulthood. We find no evidence that the relationship differs for measures of holistic/configural processing compared with normal processing. Finally, we find that the magnitude of the relationship depends on the operationalization of contact and that it is strongest when contact is manipulated. We consider recommendations for further research on this topic.
AllportG. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Addison-Wesley.
2.
*AnzuresG.WheelerA.QuinnP. C.PascalisO.SlaterA. M.Heron-DelaneyM.TanakaJ. W.LeeK. (2012). Brief daily exposures to Asian females reverses perceptual narrowing for Asian faces in Caucasian infants. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 112(4), 484–495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2012.04.005
3.
AssinkM.WibbelinkC. J. M. (2016). Fitting three-level meta-analytic models in R: A step-by-step tutorial. The Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 12(3), 154–174. https://doi.org/10.20982/tqmp.12.3.p154
4.
*BennettL. B. (2004). The development of the “Other-Race Effect” in children’s face recognition memory (Publication No. 3282569) [Doctoral dissertation, The Florida State University]. ProQuest Information & Learning.
5.
*BergerD. G. (1969). They all look alike [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Vanderbilt University.
6.
BernsteinM. J.YoungS. G.HugenbergK. (2007). The cross-category effect: Mere social categorization is sufficient to elicit an own-group bias in face recognition. Psychological Science, 18(8), 706–712. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01964.x
7.
BobakA. K.HancockP. J. B.BateS. (2016). Super-recognisers in action: Evidence from face-matching and face memory tasks. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 30(1), 81–91. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3170
8.
*BrighamJ. C.MaassA.SnyderL. D.SpauldingK. (1982). Accuracy of eyewitness identification in a field setting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42(4), 673–681. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.42.4.673
9.
BorensteinM.HedgesL. V.HigginsJ. P. T.RothsteinH. R. (2009). Introduction to Meta-Analysis. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470743386
10.
*BukachC. M.CottleJ.UbiwaJ.MillerJ. (2012). Individuation experience predicts other-race effects in holistic processing for both Caucasian and Black participants. Cognition, 123(2), 319–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2012.02.007
11.
*BurgessM. C. R. (1997). The cross-race effect in facial recognition: A function of expertise? (Publication No. 9817306) [Doctoral dissertation, The Florida State University]. ProQuest Information & Learning.
12.
*ByattG.RhodesG. (1998). Recognition of own-race and other-race caricatures: Implications for models of face recognition. Vision Research, 38, 2455–2468.
13.
*CarrooA. W. (1986). Other race recognition: A comparison of Black American and African subjects. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 62(1), 135–138. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1986.62.1.135
14.
*CarrooA. W. (1987). Recognition of faces as a function of race, attitudes, and reported cross-racial friendships. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 64(1), 319–325. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1987.64.1.319
15.
*ChanceJ.GoldsteinA. G.McBrideL. (1975). Differential experience and recognition memory for faces. The Journal of Social Psychology, 97(2), 243–253. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1975.9923344
16.
*ChildsM. J.JonesA.ThwaitesP.ZdravkovicS.ThorleyC.SuzukiA.ShenR.DingQ.. . . TreeJ. J. (in press). Do individual differences in face recognition ability moderate the other ethnicity effect?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance.
17.
*ChiroroP.ValentineT. (1995). An investigation of the contact hypothesis of the own-race bias in face recognition. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 48(4), 879–894. https://doi.org/10.1080/14640749508401421
18.
*CorenblumB.MeissnerC. A. (2006). Recognition of faces of ingroup and outgroup children and adults. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 93(3), 187–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2005.09.001
19.
CorrellJ.HudsonS. M.GuillermoS.EarlsH. A. (2017). Of kith and kin: Perceptual enrichment, expectancy, and reciprocity in face perception. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 21(4), 336–360. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868316657250
20.
*CorrellJ.MaD. S.DavisJ. P. (2021). Perceptual tuning through contact? Contact interacts with perceptual (not memory-based) face-processing ability to predict cross-race recognition. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 92, Article 104058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104058
21.
*CorrellJ.SinghB.MellingerC. (2021). High power test of contact on CRD using Qualtrics Panels 1. Unpublished manuscript.
22.
CowanN. (2008). Chapter 20: What are the differences between long-term, short-term, and working memory? In SossinW. S.LacailleJ.CastellucciV. F.BellevilleS. (Eds.), Essence of memory (Vol. 169, pp. 323–338). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6123(07)00020-9
23.
CrookesK.FavelleS.HaywardW. G. (2013). Holistic processing for other-race faces in Chinese participants occurs for upright but not inverted faces. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, Article 29. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00029
24.
*DavisE. E.MatthewsC. M.MondlochC. J. (2020). Ensemble coding of facial identity is not refined by experience: Evidence from other-race and inverted faces. British Journal of Psychology, 112, 265–281. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12457
*De HeeringA.De LiedekerkeC.DeboniM.RossionB. (2010). The role of experience during childhood in shaping the other-race effect: Experience and the other-race effect. Developmental Science, 13(1), 181–187. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00876.x
27.
DickterC. L.BartholowB. D. (2007). Racial ingroup and outgroup attention biases revealed by event-related brain potentials. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 2(3), 189–198. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsm012
28.
DickterC. L.GagnonK. T.GyurovskiI. I.BrewingtonB. S. (2015). Close contact with racial outgroup members moderates attentional allocation towards outgroup versus ingroup faces. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 18(1), 76–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430214527854
29.
*DigiovanniL. (2010). Accuracy of eyewitness identification of Black Americans as a function of social dominance orientation and cross race contact (Publication No. 3405267) [Doctoral dissertation, Hofstra University]. ProQuest Information & Learning.
30.
DondersN. C.CorrellJ.WittenbrinkB. (2008). Danger stereotypes predict racially biased attentional allocation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(5), 1328–1333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2008.04.002
31.
*DoreH. S. (2002). The own-race bias in children’s eyewitness memory (Publication No. 3047111) [Doctoral dissertation, The Florida State University]. ProQuest Information & Learning.
32.
DuchaineB.NakayamaK. (2006). The Cambridge Face Memory Test: Results for neurologically intact individuals and an investigation of its validity using inverted face stimuli and prosopagnosic participants. Neuropsychologia, 44(4), 576–585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.07.001
33.
DuvalS.TweedieR. (2000). Trim and fill: A simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics, 56(2), 455–463. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0006-341x.2000.00455.x
34.
*ElliottE. S.WillsE. J.GoldsteinA. G. (1973). The effects of discrimination training on the recognition of white and oriental faces. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 2(2), 71–73. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03327717
35.
*FeinmanS.EntwisleD. R. (1976). Children’s ability to recognize other children’s faces. Child Development, 47(2), 506. https://doi.org/10.2307/1128809
36.
*FinkleaK. M. (2008). Investigating inappropriate cue utilization in the own-race bias (Publication No. 3307561) [Doctoral dissertation, University of California San Diego]. ProQuest Information & Learning.
37.
FlevarisT. V.ChapmanE. F. (2015). Cross-racial misidentification: A call to action in Washington State and beyond. Seattle University Law Review, 38(3), Article 861.
GauthierI.TarrM. J.AndersonA. W.SkudlarskiP.GoreJ. C. (1999). Activation of the middle fusiform “face area” increases with expertise in recognizing novel objects. Nature Neuroscience, 2(6), 568–573. https://doi.org/10.1038/9224
40.
GauthierI.WilliamsP.TarrM. J.TanakaJ. (1998). Training “greeble” experts: A framework for studying expert object recognition processes. Vision Research, 38(15–16), 2401–2428. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0042-6989(97)00442-2
41.
GeL.ZhangH.WangZ.QuinnP. C.PascalisO.KellyD.SlaterA.TianJ.LeeK. (2009). Two faces of the other-race effect: Recognition and categorisation of Caucasian and Chinese faces. Perception, 38(8), 1199–1210. https://doi.org/10.1068/p6136
42.
*GoldsteinA. G.ChanceJ. E. (1985). Effects of training on Japanese face recognition: Reduction of the other-race effect. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 23(3), 211–214. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03329829
*HancockK. J.RhodesG. (2008). Contact, configural coding and the other-race effect in face recognition. British Journal of Psychology, 99(1), 45–56. https://doi.org/10.1348/000712607X199981
HaywardW. G.CrookesK.RhodesG. (2013). The other-race effect: Holistic coding differences and beyond. Visual Cognition, 21(9–10), 1224–1247. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506285.2013.824530
48.
*Heron-DelaneyM.AnzuresG.HerbertJ. S.QuinnP. C.SlaterA. M.TanakaJ. W.LeeK.PascalisO. (2011). Perceptual training prevents the emergence of the other race effect during infancy. PLOS ONE, 6(5), Article e19858. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0019858
49.
*HilliarK. F.KempR. I.DensonT. F. (2010). Now everyone looks the same: Alcohol intoxication reduces the own-race bias in face recognition. Law and Human Behavior, 34(5), 367–378. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-009-9204-x
50.
HiroseY.HancockP. J. B. (2007). Equally attending but still not seeing: An eye-tracking study of change detection in own- and other-race faces. Visual Cognition, 15(6), 647–660. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506280601069578
51.
*HjartarsonK. H. (2017). High-level vision in dyslexia: The possibility of inefficient visual expertise as a contributing factor to reading problems [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Heilbrigðisvísindasvið, Háskóla Íslands.
52.
HugenbergK.MillerJ.ClaypoolH. M. (2007). Categorization and individuation in the cross-race recognition deficit: Toward a solution to an insidious problem. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43(2), 334–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2006.02.010
53.
HugenbergK.YoungS. G.BernsteinM. J.SaccoD. F. (2010). The categorization-individuation model: An integrative account of the other-race recognition deficit. Psychological Review, 117(4), 1168–1187. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020463
54.
HughesB. L.CampN. P.GomezJ.NatuV. S.Grill-SpectorK.EberhardtJ. L. (2019). Neural adaptation to faces reveals racial outgroup homogeneity effects in early perception. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(29), 14532–14537. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1822084116
ItoT. A.UrlandG. R. (2003). Race and gender on the brain: Electrocortical measures of attention to the race and gender of multiply categorizable individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(4), 616–626. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.4.616
57.
ItoT. A.UrlandG. R. (2005). The influence of processing objectives on the perception of faces: An ERP study of race and gender perception. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 5(1), 21–36. https://doi.org/10.3758/CABN.5.1.21
58.
*JackiwL. B.ArbuthnottK. D.PfeiferJ. E.MarconJ. L.MeissnerC. A. (2008). Examining the cross-race effect in lineup identification using Caucasian and First Nations samples. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue Canadienne Des Sciences Du Comportement, 40(1), 52–57. https://doi.org/10.1037/0008-400x.40.1.52
59.
JuddC. M.McClellandG. H. (1998). Measurement. In GilbertD. T.FiskeS. T.LindzeyG. (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., pp. 637–679). McGraw-Hill; Distributed exclusively by Oxford University Press.
60.
*LampinenJ. M.RoushA.EricksonW. B.MooreK. N.RaceB. (2015). The effects of simulated distance on recognition of same race and other race faces. Visual Cognition, 23(6), 678–698. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506285.2015.1084071
61.
*LavrakasP. J.BuriJ. R.MayznerM. S. (1976). A perspective on the recognition of other-race faces. Perception & Psychophysics, 20(6), 475–481. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03208285
62.
*LebrechtS.PierceL. J.TarrM. J.TanakaJ. W. (2009). Perceptual other-race training reduces implicit racial bias. PLOS ONE, 4(1), Article e4215. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004215
63.
LennebergE. H. (1967). Biological foundations of language. Wiley.
64.
LevinD. T. (1996). Classifying faces by race: The structure of face categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22(6), 1364–1382. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.22.6.1364
65.
LevinD. T. (2000). Race as a visual feature: Using visual search and perceptual discrimination tasks to understand face categories and the cross-race recognition deficit. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129(4), 559–574. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.129.4.559
LindsayR. C.WellsG. L. (1985). Improving eyewitness identifications from lineups: Simultaneous versus sequential lineup presentation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70(3), 556–564. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.70.3.556
68.
LovénJ.RehnmanJ.WiensS.LindholmT.PeiraN.HerlitzA. (2012). Who are you looking at? The influence of face gender on visual attention and memory for own- and other-race faces. Memory, 20(4), 321–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2012.658064
69.
*MaclinO. H.Van SicklerB. R.MaclinM. K.LiA. (2004). A re-examination of the cross-race effect: The role of race, inversion, and basketball trivia. North American Journal of Psychology, 6(2), 189–203.
70.
MakovskiT.WatsonL. M.KoutstaalW.JiangY. V. (2010). Method matters: Systematic effects of testing procedure on visual working memory sensitivity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36(6), 1466–1479. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020851
71.
*MalpassR. S.KravitzJ. (1969). Recognition for faces of own and other race. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 13(4), 330–334. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0028434
*McKoneE.WanL.PidcockM.CrookesK.ReynoldsK.DawelA.KiddE.FiorentiniC. (2019). A critical period for faces: Other-race face recognition is improved by childhood but not adult social contact. Scientific Reports, 9(1), Article 12820. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-49202-0
75.
*MeissnerC. A. (2001). The influence of perceptual learning in memory for faces: A process-tracing approach to investigating the own-race bias (Publication No. 3021544) [Doctoral dissertation, The Florida State University]. ProQuest Information & Learning.
76.
MeissnerC. A.BrighamJ. C. (2001). Thirty years of investigating the own-race bias in memory for faces: A meta-analytic review. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 7(1), 3–35. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.7.1.3
77.
*MellingerC.SinghB.CorrellJ. (2021). The integrated cross-race contact scale. Manuscript submitted for publication.
78.
*MichelC.CaldaraR.RossionB. (2006). Same-race faces are perceived more holistically than other-race faces. Visual Cognition, 14(1), 55–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506280500158761
79.
MichelC.RossionB.BülthoffI.HaywardW. G.VuongQ. C. (2013). The contribution of shape and surface information in the other-race face effect. Visual Cognition, 21(9–10), 1202–1223. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506285.2013.823141
80.
*NgW.LindsayR. C. L. (1994). Cross-race facial recognition: Failure of the contact hypothesis. Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology, 25(2), 217–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022194252004
Page-GouldE.Mendoza-DentonR.AlegreJ. M.SiyJ. O. (2010). Understanding the impact of cross-group friendship on interactions with novel outgroup members. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(5), 775–793. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017880
83.
Page-GouldE.Mendoza-DentonR.TroppL. R. (2008). With a little help from my cross-group friend: Reducing anxiety in intergroup contexts through cross-group friendship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(5), 1080–1094. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.95.5.1080
84.
PascalisO.FortM.QuinnP. C. (2020). Development of face processing: Are there critical or sensitive periods?Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 36, 7–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2020.05.005
85.
PastorD. A.LazowskiR. A. (2018). On the multilevel nature of meta-analysis: A tutorial, comparison of software programs, and discussion of analytic choices. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 53(1), 74–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2017.1365684
*RhodesG.EwingL.HaywardW. G.MaurerD.MondlochC. J.TanakaJ. W. (2009). Contact and other-race effects in configural and component processing of faces. British Journal of Psychology, 100(4), 717–728. https://doi.org/10.1348/000712608X396503
90.
RhodesG.HaywardW. G.WinklerC. (2006). Expert face coding: Configural and component coding of own-race and other-race faces. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13(3), 499–505. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193876
91.
RichlerJ. J.WongY. K.GauthierI. (2011). Perceptual expertise as a shift from strategic interference to automatic holistic processing. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(2), 129–134. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721411402472
RossionB.CurranT.GauthierI. (2002). A defense of the subordinate-level expertise account for the N170 component. Cognition, 85(2), 189–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(02)00101-4
94.
*SadozaiA. K.KempenK.TredouxC.RobbinsR. A. (2019). Can we look past people’s race? The effect of combining race and a non-racial group affiliation on holistic processing. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72(3), 557–569. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021818760482
95.
*SangrigoliS.PallierC.ArgentiA.-M.VentureyraV., A., G.de SchonenS. (2005). Reversibility of the other-race effect in face recognition during childhood. Psychological Science, 16(6), 440–444. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.01554.x
96.
SchwarzerG.CarpenterJ. R.RückerG. (2015). Meta-analysis with R. Springer.
97.
*SeutloaliG. M. (2015). Own-race bias in facial recognition amongst black, coloured and white participants [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Cape Town.
98.
ShadishW. R.CookT. D.CampbellD. T. (2001). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Houghton Mifflin.
99.
ShriverE. R.HugenbergK. (2010). Power, individuation, and the cross-race recognition deficit. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(5), 767–774. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2010.03.014
100.
*SigurdardottirH. M.HjartarsonK. H.GudmundssonG. L.KristjánssonÁ. (2019). Own-race and other-race face recognition problems without visual expertise problems in dyslexic readers. Vision Research, 158, 146–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2019.02.010
101.
*SloneA. E.BrighamJ. C.MeissnerC. A. (2000). Social and cognitive factors affecting the own-race bias in whites. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 22(2), 71–84. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15324834BASP2202_1
102.
*SporerS. L. (2010). The own-ethnicity effect in facial recognition: Do Turks also look alike to Germans? Unpublished manuscript.
103.
*SporerS. L.GehrkeJ.McClureK. A. (2020). Patrolling the borders: Experience with multiple out-group members is associated with the own-ethnicity effect. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-020-09387-x
104.
*SporerS. L.TrinklB.GuberovaE. (2007). Matching faces: Differences in processing speed of out-group faces by different ethnic groups. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 38(4), 398–412. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022107302310
105.
*StahlJ.WieseH.SchweinbergerS. R. (2008). Expertise and own-race bias in face processing: An event-related potential study. NeuroReport, 19(5), 583–587. https://doi.org/10.1097/WNR.0b013e3282f97b4d
106.
StelterM.DegnerJ. (2018). Investigating the other-race effect in working memory. British Journal of Psychology, 109(4), 777–798. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12304
107.
*SusaK. J.MeissnerC. A.de HeerH. (2010). Modeling the role of social-cognitive processes in the recognition of own- and other-race faces. Social Cognition, 28(4), 523–537. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2010.28.4.523
TanakaJ. W.KieferM.BukachC. M. (2004). A holistic account of the own-race effect in face recognition: Evidence from a cross-cultural study. Cognition, 93(1), B1–B9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2003.09.011
110.
*TanakaJ. W.PierceL. J. (2009). The neural plasticity of other-race face recognition. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 9(1), 122–131. https://doi.org/10.3758/CABN.9.1.122
111.
TarrM. J.GauthierI. (2000). FFA: A flexible fusiform area for subordinate-level visual processing automatized by expertise. Nature Neuroscience, 3(8), 764–769. https://doi.org/10.1038/77666
112.
*The Harvard Law Review Association. (1988). Developments in the law: Race and the criminal process. Harvard Law Review, 101(7), 1472–1641. https://doi.org/10.2307/1341402
113.
TrawalterS.ToddA. R.BairdA. A.RichesonJ. A. (2008). Attending to threat: Race-based patterns of selective attention. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(5), 1322–1327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2008.03.006
114.
*TullisJ. G.BenjaminA. S.LiuX. (2014). Self-pacing study of faces of different races: Metacognitive control over study does not eliminate the cross-race recognition effect. Memory & Cognition, 42(6), 863–875. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-014-0409-y
115.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2018). 2013-2017 American community survey five-year estimates. American Community Survey.
116.
ViechtbauerW. (2010). Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. Journal of Statistical Software, 36(3), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v036.i03
117.
*WalkerP. M.HewstoneM. (2006). A perceptual discrimination investigation of the own-race effect and intergroup experience. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20(4), 461–475. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1191
118.
*WalkerP. M.TanakaJ. W. (2003). An encoding advantage for own-race versus other-race faces. Perception, 32(9), 1117–1125. https://doi.org/10.1068/p5098
119.
*WanL.CrookesK.ReynoldsK. J.IronsJ. L.McKoneE. (2015). A cultural setting where the other-race effect on face recognition has no social–motivational component and derives entirely from lifetime perceptual experience. Cognition, 144, 91–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2015.07.011
120.
*WheatE. (2010). The other race effect: The role of experience and social attitudes on face recognition (Publication No. 695) [Master’s Thesis]. University of Richmond.
*WieseH.KaufmannJ. M.SchweinbergerS. R. (2014). The neural signature of the own-race bias: Evidence from event-related potentials. Cerebral Cortex, 24(3), 826–835. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhs369
123.
WilsonJ. P.HugenbergK.BernsteinM. J. (2013). The cross-race effect and eyewitness identification: How to improve recognition and reduce decision errors in eyewitness situations: CRE and eyewitness identification. Social Issues and Policy Review, 7(1), 83–113. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-2409.2012.01044.x
124.
*WongH. K.StephenI. D.KeebleD. R. T. (2020). The own-race bias for face recognition in a multiracial society. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, Article 208. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00208
125.
WrightD. B.BoydC. E.TredouxC. G. (2001). A field study of own-race bias in South Africa and England. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 7(1), 119–133. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.7.1.119
126.
*WylieL. E.BergtS.HabyJ.BrankE. M.BornsteinB. H. (2015). Age and lineup type differences in the own-race bias. Psychology, Crime & Law, 21(5), 490–506. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2014.989173
127.
*YoungS. G.HugenbergK. (2012). Individuation motivation and face experience can operate jointly to produce the own-race bias. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3(1), 80–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550611409759
128.
YoungS. G.HugenbergK.BernsteinM. J.SaccoD. F. (2012). Perception and motivation in face recognition: A critical review of theories of the cross-race effect. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16(2), 116–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868311418987
129.
ZalmanM. (2012). Qualitatively estimating the incidence of wrongful convictions. Criminal Law Bulletin, 48(2), 221–279.
130.
*ZhaoM.HaywardW. G.BulthoffI. (2014). Face format at encoding affects the other-race effect in face memory. Journal of Vision, 14(9), 6–6. https://doi.org/10.1167/14.9.6
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
