Numerous studies have demonstrated an out-group processing deficit for faces of other ethnic groups (“cross-race effect” or “own-race bias”). Most studies have employed Blacks, Asians, and Whites. This study employed a perceptual matching task to investigate the out-group processing deficit with 128 Turkish and 128 Austrian children between the ages of 10 and 15 years studying Turkish and German faces. Participants were required to match a face (in three-quarter view) to the corresponding face in a 2 × 5 matrix of faces (in frontal view). As predicted from Sporer's in-group/out-group model of face processing, there was an asymmetric interaction between ethnicity of participants and ethnicity of faces. Turkish children were faster in matching Turkish faces than were Austrian children, whereas there was no difference for German faces. Older children matched faces faster than younger children. Practical implications for matching of faces to photographs on identification cards or when searching for targets of other ethnic groups are discussed.
Argstatter, H., Gehrke, J., Hueweler, A., Kampschulte, A., Schraub, E.M., & Sporer, S.L. (2002, March). Wiedererkennen von Eigen- und Fremdgruppen-Gesichtern [Recognition of in-group and out-group faces]. Paper presented at the 44th Tagung experimentell arbeitender Psychologen, Chemnitz, Germany.
2.
Bothwell, R.K., Brigham, J.C., & Malpass, R.S. (1989). Cross-racial identification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15, 19-25.
3.
Bower, G.H., & Karlin, M.B. (1974). Depth of processing pictures of faces and recognition memory. Journal of ExperimentalPsychology, 103, 751-757.
4.
Brigham, J.C. (1993). College students' racial attitudes. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23, 1933-1967.
5.
Carroo, A.W. (1986). Other race recognition: A comparison of Black Americans and African subjects. Perceptual and Motor Skills , 62, 135-138.
6.
Chiroro, P., & Valentine, T. (1995). An investigation of the contact hypothesis of the own-race bias in face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48A, 879-894.
7.
Chung, M., & Thomson, D.M. (1995). Development of face recognition. British Journal of Psychology, 86, 55-87.
8.
Cross, J.F., Cross, J., & Daly, J. (1971). Sex, race, age, and beauty as factors in recognition of faces. Perception and Psychophysics, 10, 393-396.
9.
Darwin, C. (1872). The expression of the emotions in man and animals . London: John Murray.
10.
Elfenbein, H.A., & Ambady, N. (2002a). Is there an in-group advantage in emotion recognition ? Psychological Bulletin, 128, 243-249.
11.
Elfenbein, H.A., & Ambady, N. (2002b). On the universality and cultural specificity of emotion recognition: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin , 128, 203-235.
12.
Elfenbein, H.A., & Ambady, N. (2003). When familiarity breeds accuracy: Cultural exposure and facial emotion recognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 276-290.
13.
Gehrke, J., & Sporer, S.L. (2006). Patrolling the borders: Will police officers perform better than students with foreign faces. Unpublished manuscript, University of Giessen, Germany.
14.
Goldstein, A.G. (1979a). Facial features variation: Anthropometric data II. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 13, 191-193.
15.
Goldstein, A.G. (1979b). Race-related variation of facial features: Anthropometric data I. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 13, 187-190.
16.
Goldstein, A.G., & Chance, J.E. (1978). Judging face similarity in own and other races . Journal of Psychology, 98, 185-193.
17.
Levin, D.T. (1996). Classifying faces by race: The structure of face categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 1364-1382.
18.
Lindsay, D.S., Jack, P.C., & Christian, M.A. (1991). Other-race face perception . Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 587-589.
19.
Malpass, R.S. (1979). A cross-cultural face recognition field manual: Description and a validation study. In L. H. Eckensberger, W. J. Lonner, & Y. H. Poortinga (Eds.), Cross-cultural contributions to psychology (pp. 27-39). Lisse, the Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.
20.
Malpass, R.S. (1990). An excursion into utilitarian analysis. Behavior Science Research, 24, 1-15.
21.
Malpass, R.S., Erskine, D.W., & Vaughn, L.L. (1988, April). Matching own- and other-race faces. Paper presented at the meetings of the Eastern Psychological Association , Buffalo, NY.
22.
Matsumoto, D. (2002). Methological requirements to test a possible in-group advantage in judging emotions across cultures: Comment on Elfenbein and Ambady (2002) and evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 236-242.
23.
Meissner, C.A., & Brigham, J.C. (2001). Thirty years of investigating the own-race bias in face memory: A meta-analytic review. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 7, 3-35.
24.
Meissner, C.A., Brigham, J.C., & Bennett, B. (2003, July). Perceptual memory skill and the cross-race effect: Evidence from eye-tracking and verbal reports. Paper presented at the fifth meeting of the Society for Applied Memory and Cognition, Aberdeen, Scotland.
25.
Ng, W.-J., & Lindsay, R.C.L. (1994). Cross-race facial recognition: Failure of the contact hypothesis. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 25, 217-232.
26.
Pezdek, K., Blandon-Gitlin, I., & Moore, C. (2003). Children's face recognition memory: More evidence for the cross-race effect. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 760-763.
27.
Quattrone, G.A., & Jones, E.E. (1980). The perception of variability within ingroups and outgroups: Implications for the law of small numbers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 141-152.
28.
Rodin, M.J. (1987). Who is memorable to whom: A study of cognitive disregard. Social Cognition, 5, 144-165.
29.
Rosenthal, R. (1991). Meta-analytic procedures for social research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
30.
Shapiro, P.N., & Penrod, S. (1986). A meta-analysis of facial identification studies . Psychological Bulletin, 100, 139-156.
31.
Sporer, S.L. (1991). Deep—deeper—deepest? Encoding strategies and the recognition of human faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology, Learning , Memory and Cognition, 17, 323-333.
32.
Sporer, S.L. (1993). Clothing as a contextual cue in facial recognition . German Journal of Psychology, 17, 183-199.
33.
Sporer, S.L. (1999, July). The own-race bias in Germany: Testing the contact hypothesis with Turks and Germans. Paper presented at the fourth European Conference on Psychology and Law of the American Psychology—Law Association and the European Psychology—Law Association , Dublin, Ireland.
34.
Sporer, S.L. (2001a). The cross-race bias: Beyond recognition of faces in the laboratory. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 7, 170-200.
35.
Sporer, S.L. (2001b). Recognizing faces of other ethnic groups: An integration of theories. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law , 7, 36-97.
36.
Sporer, S.L. (2003, July). Classification of out-group faces: Testing rival theoretical models. Paper presented at the fifth meeting of the Society for Applied Memory and Cognition, Aberdeen, Scotland.
37.
Wright, D.B., Boyd, C.E., & Tredoux, C.G. (2001). A field study of own-race bias in Africa and England . Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 7, 119-133.
38.
Wright, D.B., Boyd, C.E., & Tredoux, C.G. (2003). Own race bias and face recognition in South Africa and England. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17, 365-373.
39.
Wright, D.B., & Stroud, J.N. (2002). Age differences in lineup identification accuracy: People are better with their own age. Law and Human Behavior , 26, 641-654.
