Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Spatial layouts can significantly influence the formation and outcomes of social relationships. Physical proximity is thus essential to understanding the elemental building blocks of social networks, dyads. Situating relationships in space is instrumental to formulating better models of collaboration and information sharing in organizations and more robust theories of networks and their effects. We propose, develop, and test a concept, the functional zone, which effectively captures Festinger et al.’s classic description of “functional distance” as it pertains to social interactions. We operationalize functional zone with measures of path and areal zone overlap. At two biomedical research buildings with different layouts (compact versus linear), regression analyses of collaboration rates show that increasing path overlap increases collaboration. More traditional distance measures influence collaboration only in the more linear building. The functional zone concept improves our ability to understand relationships and their attendant organizational outcomes.

Keywords

physical proximity social networks scientific collaboration functional distance relationship formation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Agneessens

Wittek

(2012). Where do intra-organizational advice relations come from? The role of informal status and social capital in social exchange. Social Networks, 34, 333-345. doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2011.04.002

Allen

T. J.

(1977). Managing the flow of technology: Technology transfer and the dissemination of technological information within the R&D organization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Allen

T. J.

Fustfeld

A. R.

(1975). Research laboratory architecture and the structuring of communications. R&D Management, 5, 153-164. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9310.1975.tb01230.x

Burt

R. S.

(2004). Structural holes and good ideas. American Journal of Sociology, 110, 349-399.

Cowgill

Wolfers

Zitzewitz

(2009). Using prediction markets to track information flows: Evidence from Google (Working paper). Dartmouth College. Retrieved from http://bocowgill.com/GooglePredictionMarketPaper.pdf

Dijkstra

E. W.

(1959). A note on two problems in connexion with graphs. Numerische Mathematik, 1, 269-271.

Ehrenberg

R. G.

Zhang

(2005). Do tenured and tenure-track faculty matter? The Journal of Human Resources, 40, 647-659.

Festinger

Schachter

Back

K. W.

(1950). Social pressures in informal groups: A study of human factors in housing (1st ed.). New York, NY: Harper.

Grannis

(2011). From the ground up: Translating geography into community through neighbor networks. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

10.

Hansen

M. T.

(1999). The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 82-111. doi:10.2307/2667032

11.

Heerwagen

J. H.

Kampschroer

Powell

K. M.

Loftness

(2004). Collaborative knowledge work environments. Building Research & Information, 32, 510-528. doi:10.1080/09613210412331313025

12.

Hillier

(1996). Space is the machine: A configurational theory of architecture. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

13.

Hillier

Hanson

(1984). The social logic of space. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

14.

Hua

Loftness

Heerwagen

J. H.

Powell

K. M.

(2011). Relationship between workplace spatial settings and occupant-perceived support for collaboration. Environment and Behavior, 43, 807-826.

15.

Karazsia

B. T.

van Dulmen

M. H. M.

(2008). Regression models for count data: Illustrations using longitudinal predictors of childhood injury. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 33, 1076-1084.

16.

Kono

Palmer

Friedland

Zafonte

(1998). Lost in space: The geography of corporate interlocking directorates. American Journal of Sociology, 103, 863-911.

17.

Kossinets

Watts

D. J.

(2006). Empirical analysis of an evolving social network. Science, 311, 88-90. doi:10.1126/science.1116869

18.

Liu

C. C.

(2010). A spatial ecology of structural holes: Scientists and communication at a biotechnology firm. Academy of Management Annual Meeting Proceedings, 1-6. doi:10.5465/ambpp.2010.54497844

19.

Long

J. S.

Freese

(2006). Regression models for categorical dependent variables using Stata (2nd ed.). College Station, TX: StataCorp LP.

20.

Merriam-Webster

(2003). Merriam-Webster’s collegiate dictionary. Springfield, MA: Merriam-Webster.

21.

Mizruchi

M. S.

Marquis

(2006). Egocentric, sociocentric, or dyadic?: Identifying the appropriate level of analysis in the study of organizational networks. Social Networks, 28, 187-208. doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2005.06.002

22.

Monge

P. R.

Kirste

K. K.

(1980). Measuring proximity in human organization. Social Psychology Quarterly, 43, 110-115.

23.

Moodysson

Jonsson

(2007). Knowledge collaboration and proximity. European Urban and Regional Studies, 14, 115-131.

24.

Peponis

Bafna

Bajaj

Bromberg

Congdon

Rashid

Zimring

(2007). Designing space to support knowledge work. Environment and Behavior, 39, 815-840.

25.

Pfeffer

(1992). Managing with power: Politics and influence in organizations. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

26.

Pierce

C. A.

Byrne

Aguinis

(1996). Attraction in organizations: A model of workplace romance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 17, 5-32.

27.

Powell

G. N.

Foley

(1998). Something to talk about: Romantic relationships M organizational settings. Journal of Management, 24, 421-448.

28.

Powell

W. W.

Koput

K. W.

Smith-Doerr

(1996). Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 116-145. doi:10.2307/2393988

29.

Sack

(1986). Human territoriality: Its theory and history. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

30.

Sack

(1993). The power of place and space. Geographical Review, 83, 326-329.

31.

Sailer

McCulloh

(2012). Social networks and spatial configuration—How office layouts drive social interaction. Social Networks, 34, 47-58. doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2011.05.005

32.

Sailer

Penn

(June, 2009). Spatiality and transpatiality in workplace environments. Paper presented at the 7th International Space Syntax Symposium, Stockholm, Sweden.

33.

Snyder

T. D.

Dillow

S. A.

(2012). Digest of education statistics, 2011 (I. o. E. Sciences, Trans.). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.

34.

Sykes

R. E.

(1977). A theory of proximity and attraction. Springfield, VA: Reproduced by National Technical Information Service.

35.

Toker

Gray

D. O.

(2008). Innovation spaces: Workspace planning and innovation in U.S. university research centers. Research Policy, 37, 309-329. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.09.006.

36.

Wineman

J. D.

Kabo

F. W.

Davis

G. F.

(2009). Spatial and social networks in organizational innovation. Environment and Behavior, 41, 427-442.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.16 MB

Shared Paths to the Lab

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material