This article aims to examine the role of Belief in a Just World (BJW) in the legitimation of economic inequality. Using data from 27 European countries (N=47,086), we conducted multilevel analyses and found that BJW positively predicted the legitimation of economic inequality, measured by three indicators: the perceived fairness of the overall wealth inequality, and the fairness of the earnings made by the Top 10% and the Bottom 10% of society. These results persisted after controlling for individual- and country-level variables. Moreover, the BJW effect was stronger on the legitimation of the Bottom 10% incomes, compared to the legitimation of the Top 10%. We also found that economic inequality at the country-level reduced the BJW effect on legitimation of inequality. Finally, BJW displayed a negative indirect effect on support for redistribution, via the legitimation of economic inequalities.
AzevedoF.JostJ. T.RothmundT.SterlingJ. (2019). Neoliberal ideology and the justification of inequality in Capitalist Societies: Why social and economic dimensions of ideology are intertwined. Journal of Social Issues, 75(1), 49–88.
3.
BatesD. M.MächlerM.BolkerB. M.WalkerS. C.MaechlerM.BolkerB. M.WalkerS. C. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
4.
BaumeisterR. F.BratslavskyE.FinkenauerC.VohsK. D. (2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5, 323–370. https://doi.org/10.1037//1089-2680.5.4.323
5.
BruckmüllerS.ReeseG.MartinyS. E. (2017). Is higher inequality less legitimate? Depends on how you frame it!British Journal of Social Psychology, 56(4), 766–781. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12202
6.
ButtrickN. R.OishiS. (2017). The psychological consequences of income inequality. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 11(3), Article e12304. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12304
7.
CallanM. J.EllardJ. H.NicolJ. E. (2006). The belief in a just world and immanent justice reasoning in adults. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1646–1658. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167206292236
8.
CallanM. J.KayA. C.DavidenkoN.EllardJ. H. (2009). The effects of justice motivation on memory for self- and other-relevant events. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 614–623. https://doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2009.02.013
9.
ChowR. M.GalakJ. (2012). The effect of inequality frames on support for redistributive tax policies. Psychological Science, 23(12), 1467–1469. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612450035
CorreiaI.PereiraC. R.ValaJ. (2018). Under victimization by an outgroup: Belief in a just world, national identification, and ingroup blame. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1160. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01160
12.
CortinaJ. M.LandisR. S. (2009). When small effect sizes tell a big story, and when large effect sizes don’t. In LanceC. E.VandenbergR. J. (Eds.), Statistical and methodological myths and urban legends: Doctrine, verity and fable in the organizational and social sciences (pp. 287–308). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
13.
Costa-LopesR.DovidioJ. F.PereiraC. R.JostJ. T. (2013). Social psychological perspectives on the legitimation of social inequality: Past, present and future. European Journal of Social Psychology, 237, 229–237. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.1966
14.
CozzarelliC.WilkinsonA. V.TaglerM. J. (2001). Attitudes toward the poor and attributions for poverty. Journal of Social Issues, 57(2), 207–227. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00209
15.
DalbertC.MontadaL.SchmittM. (1987). Glaube an die gerechte welt als motiv: Validierung zweier skalen [Belief in a just world as a motive: Validation of two scales]. Psychologische Beitrage, 29, 596–615.
16.
DiedenhofenB.MuschJ. (2015). cocor: A comprehensive solution for the statistical comparison of correlations. PLOS ONE, 10(4), Article e0121945. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0121945
DuranteF.FiskeS. T.KervynN.CuddyA. J.AkandeA. D.AdetounB. E.. . . BarlowF. K. (2013). Nations’ income inequality predicts ambivalence in stereotype content: How societies mind the gap. British Journal of Social Psychology, 52(4), 726–746. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12005
20.
European Social Survey. (2020). ESS round 9: ESS-9 2018 documentation report (Edition 2.0). European Social Survey Data Archive, NSD—Norwegian Centre for Research Data for ESS ERIC. https://doi.org/10.21338/NSD-ESS9-2018
FriesenJ. P.LaurinK.ShepherdS.GaucherD.KayA. C. (2018). System justification: Experimental evidence, its contextual nature, and implications for social change. British Journal of Social Psychology, 9, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12278
23.
FurnhamA. (2003). Belief in a just world: Research progress over the past decade. Personality and Individual Differences, 34(5), 795–817. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00072-7
García-CastroJ. D.Rodríguez-BailónR.WillisG. B. (2020). Perceiving economic inequality in everyday life decreases tolerance to inequality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 90, 104019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104019
26.
García-SánchezE.Van der ToornJ.Rodríguez-BailónR.WillisG. B. (2019). The vicious cycle of economic inequality. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 10, 991–1001. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550618811500
27.
GoudarziS.PliskinR.JostJ. T.KnowlesE. D. (2020). Economic system justification predicts muted emotional responses to inequality. Nature Communications, 11, 383. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-14193-z
28.
HaferC. L.BègueL. (2005). Experimental research on just-world theory: Problems, developments, and future challenges. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 128–167. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.131.1.128
29.
HarperD. J.ManasseP. R. (1992). The just world and the third world: British explanations for poverty abroad. The Journal of Social Psychology, 132, 783–785. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1992.9712107
30.
HarperD. J.WagstaffG. F.NewtonJ. T.HarrisonK. R. (1990). Lay causal perceptions of third world poverty and the just world theory. Social Behavior and Personality, 18, 235–238. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.1990.18.2.235
31.
HorwitzS. R.DovidioJ. F. (2017). The rich—love them or hate them? Divergent implicit and explicit attitudes toward the wealthy. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 20(1), 3–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430215596075
32.
JostJ. T.BlountS.PfefferJ.HunyadyG. (2003). Fair market ideology: Its cognitive-motivational underpinnings. Research in Organizational Behavior, 25(03), 53–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-3085(03)25002-4
33.
JostJ. T.GaucherD.SternC. (2015). “The world isn’t fair”: A system justification perspective on social stratification and inequality. In MikulincerM.ShaverP. R. (Eds.), APA handbook of personality and social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 317–340). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/14342-012
34.
JostJ. T.KivetzY.RubiniM.GuermandiG.MossoC. (2005). System-justifying functions of complementary regional and ethnic stereotypes: Cross-national evidence. Social Justice Research, 18(3), 305–333. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-005-6827-z
35.
JostJ. T.WakslakC.TylerT. R. (2008). System justification theory and the alleviation of emotional distress: Palliative effects of ideology in an arbitrary social hierarchy and in society. In HegtvedtK.Clay-WarnerJ. (Eds.), Justice: Advances in group processes (Vol. 25, pp. 181–211). JAI/Emerald.
36.
KaliuzhnaM. (2020). Symmetries and asymmetries in the belief in a just world. Personality and Individual Differences, 161, 109940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.109940
37.
KaragiannakiE. (2017). The empirical relationship between income poverty and income inequality in rich and middle income countries (CASE paper 206/LIP paper 3). Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, and Joseph Rowntree Foundation, London School of Economics. http://sticerd.lse.ac.uk/dps/case/cp/casepaper206.pdf
KrausM. W.ParkJ. W.TanJ. J. X. (2017). Signs of social class: The experience of economic inequality in everyday life. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(3), 422–435. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616673192
LernerM. J. (1965). Evaluation of performance as a function of performer’s reward and attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1, 355–360. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0021806
42.
LernerM. J. (1980). Belief in a just world: A fundamental delusion. Plenum Publishing Corporation.
43.
LernerM. J. (1987). Integrating societal and psychological rules of entitlement: The basic task of each social actor and fundamental problem for the social sciences. Social Justice Research, 1, 107–125. https://doi.org/:10.1007/BF01049386
44.
LernerM. J. (1998). The two forms of belief in a just world: Some thoughts on why and how people care about justice. In MontadaL.LernerM. J. (Eds.), Responses to victimizations and belief in a just world (pp. 247–270). Plenum Press.
45.
LernerM. J.SimmonsC. H. (1966). The observer’s reaction to the “innocent victim”: Compassion or rejection?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 203–210. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0023562
46.
LindemannK.SaarE. (2014). Contextual effects on subjective social position: Evidence from European countries. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 55(1), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020715214527101
47.
LoweryB. S.ChowR. M.KnowlesE. D.UnzuetaM. M. (2012). Paying for positive group esteem: How inequity frames affect whites’ responses to redistributive policies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(2), 323–336. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024598
MillerD. T.RossM. (1975). Self-serving biases in the attribution of causality: Fact or fiction?Psychological Bulletin, 82(2), 213–225. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076486
50.
MontadaL. (1998). Belief in a just world: A hybrid of justice motive and self-interest? In MontadaL.LernerM. J. (Eds.), Responses to victimizations and belief in a just world (pp. 217–246). Plenum Press.
51.
NakagawaS.SchielzethH. (2013). A general and simple method for obtaining R2 from generalized linear mixed-effects models. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 4(2), 133–142. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-210x.2012.00261.x
52.
NortonM. I.ArielyD. (2011). Building a better America—One wealth quintile at a time. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 9–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610393524
PaternosterR.BrameR.MazerolleP.PiqueroA. (1998). Using the correct statistical test for the equality of regression coefficients. Criminology, 36(4), 859–866. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1998.tb01268.x
55.
PereiraC. R.ValaJ.LeyensJ.-P. (2009). From infra-humanization to discrimination: The mediation of symbolic threat needs egalitarian norms. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 336–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2008.10.010
PrattoF.CidamA.StewartA. L.ZeineddineF. B.ArandaM.AielloA.. . . . HenkelK. E. (2013). Social dominance in context and in individuals: Contextual moderation of robust effects of social dominance orientation in 15 languages and 20 countries. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4(5), 587–599. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550612473663
58.
RamosA.PereiraC. R.ValaJ. (2019). The impact of biological and cultural racisms on attitudes towards immigrants and immigration public policies. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 46, 574–592. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2018.1550153
59.
R Core Team. (2019). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
60.
ReichleB.SchneiderA.MontadaL. (1998). How do observers of victimization preserve their belief in a just world cognitively or actionally? Findings from a longitudinal study. In MontadaL.LernerM. J. (Eds.), Responses to victimizations and belief in a just world (pp. 55–64). Plenum Press.
61.
RosseelY. (2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modelling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02
62.
Sánchez-RodríguezÁ.JettenJ.WillisG.Rodríguez-BailónR. (2019). High economic inequality makes us feel less wealthy. International Review of Social Psychology, 32(1), 171–111. https://doi.org/10.5334/irsp.333
63.
SmithK. B. (1985). Seeing justice in poverty: The belief in a just world and ideas about inequalities. Sociological Spectrum, 5, 17–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/02732173.1985.9981739
64.
SoltF.HuY.HudsonK.SongJ.YuD. “Erico.” (2017). Economic inequality and class consciousness. The Journal of Politics, 79(3), 1079–1083. https://doi.org/10.1086/690971
United Nations Development Programme. (2019). Human Development Report 2019- Beyond income, beyond averages, beyond today: Inequalities in human development in the 21st century. http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/hdr2019.pdf
67.
ZhangZ.ZyphurM. J.PreacherK. J. (2009). Testing multilevel mediation using hierarchical linear models. Organizational Research Methods, 12(4), 695–719. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428108327450
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
