Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Precarious manhood (PM) theory posits that males are expected to actively maintain their reputations as “real men.” We propose that men’s concern about failing to meet masculine standards leads them to embrace policies and politicians that signal strength and toughness—or what we term political aggression. Three correlational studies support this claim. In Study 1, men’s fear of failing to meet masculine expectations predicted their support for aggressive policies (e.g., the death penalty), but not policies lacking aggressive features (e.g., affirmative action). Studies 2 and 3 utilized Google searches to assess the relationship between regional levels of PM and real-world electoral behavior. The use of search terms related to masculine anxieties correlated with Donald Trump’s vote share in the 2016 general election (Study 2) and, confirming preregistered predictions, with Republican candidates’ vote shares in 2018 congressional elections (Study 3). We close by discussing potential sources of variation in PM.

Keywords

precarious manhood masculinity aggression political attitudes voting

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Altemeyer

(1996). The authoritarian specter. Harvard University Press.

American Psychological Association. (2018). APA guidelines for psychological practice with boys and men.

Berke

D. S.

Reidy

D. E.

Miller

J. D.

Zeichner

(2017). Take it like a man: Gender-threatened men’s experience of gender role discrepancy, emotion activation, and pain tolerance. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 18, 62–69. https://doi.org/10.1037/men0000036

Bosson

J. K.

Vandello

J. A.

(2011). Precarious manhood and its links to action and aggression. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 82–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721411402669

Bosson

J. K.

Vandello

J. A.

Burnaford

R. M.

Weaver

J. R.

Arzu Wasti

(2009). Precarious manhood and displays of physical aggression. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 623–634. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167208331161

Bosson

J. K.

Weaver

J. R.

Caswell

A. T.

Burnaford

R. M.

(2012). Gender threats and men’s antigay behaviors: The harmful effects of asserting heterosexuality. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 15, 471–486. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430211432893

Bowles

(2020, February). The pied pipers of the dirtbag left want to lead everyone to Bernie Sanders. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/02/29/us/politics/bernie-sanders-chapo-trap-house.html

Brannon

(1976). Looking at the male role. Psyccritiques, 2, 795–796. https://doi.org/10.1037/014712

Burns

Martin

(2019, April). Trump’s takeover of the Republican Party is almost complete. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/03/us/politics/trump-republican-party.html

10.

Buss

A. H.

Perry

(1992). The Aggression Questionnaire. Personality and Individual Differences, 63, 452–459.

11.

Carian

E. K.

Sobotka

T. C.

(2018). Playing the Trump card: Masculinity threat and the U.S. 2016 presidential election. Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World, 4, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1177/2378023117740699

12.

Carneiro

H. A.

Mylonakis

(2009). Google Trends: A web-based tool for real-time surveillance of disease outbreaks. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 49, 1557–1564. https://doi.org/10.1086/630200

13.

Caswell

A. T.

Bosson

J. K.

Vandello

J. A.

Sellers

J. G.

(2014). Testosterone and men’s stress responses to gender threats. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 15, 4–11. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031394

14.

Center for the American Women and Politics. (2017). The gender gap: Voting choices in presidential elections. https://www.cawp.rutgers.edu/sites/default/files/resources/ggpresvote.pdf

15.

Chapple

Ziebland

(2002). Prostate cancer: Embodied experience and perceptions of masculinity. Sociology of Health and Illness, 24, 820–841. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.00320

16.

Cicchetti

D. V.

(1994). Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychological Assessment, 6, 284–290. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.6.4.284

17.

Cohn

A. M.

Seibert

A. L.

Zeichner

(2009). The role of restrictive emotionality, trait anger, and masculinity threat in men’s perpetration of physical aggression. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 10, 218–224. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015151

18.

Coltman

Devinney

T. M.

Midgley

D. F.

Venaik

(2008). Formative versus reflective measurement models: Two applications of formative measurement. Journal of Buisness Research, 61, 1250–1262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2008.01.013

19.

Connell

R. W.

(1995). Masculinities. University of California Press.

20.

Courtenay

W. H

. (2000). Constructions of masculinity and their influence on men’s well-being: A theory of gender and health. Social Science & Medicine, 50, 1385–1401. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(99)00390-1

21.

DiMuccio

S. H.

Knowles

E. D.

(2020). The political significance of fragile masculinity. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 34, 25–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2019.11.010

22.

DiMuccio

S. H.

Yost

M. R.

Helweg-Larsen

(2017). A qualitative analysis of perceptions of precarious manhood in U.S. and Danish men. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 18, 331–340. https://doi.org/10.1037/men0000062

23.

Donaldson

(1993). What is hegemonic masculinity? Theory and Society, 22, 643–657. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00993540

24.

Ducat

S. J.

(2004). The wimp factor: Gender gaps, holy wars, and the politics of anxious masculinity. Beacon Press.

25.

Duckitt

Sibley

C. G.

(2007). Right wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation and the dimensions of generalized prejudice. European Journal of Personality, 21, 113–130. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.614

26.

Dueck

(2010). Hard line: The republican party and U.S. foreign policy since World War II. Princeton University Press.

27.

Eisler

R. M.

Skidmore

J. R.

Ward

C. H.

(1988). Masculine gender-role stress: Predictor of anger, anxiety, and health-risk behaviors. Journal of Personality Assessment, 52, 133–141.

28.

Environmental Systems Research Institute (ESRI). (2017). ArcGIS. https://www.arcgis.com/

29.

Fasteau

M. F.

(1974). The male machine. McGraw-Hill.

30.

Fergus

K. D.

Gray

R. E.

Fitch

M. I.

(2002). Sexual dysfunction and the preservation of manhood: Experiences of men with prostate cancer. Journal of Health Psychology, 7, 303–316. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105302007003223

31.

Fortin

(2019, January 10). Traditional Masculinity Can Hurt Boys, Say New A.P.A. Guidelines. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/10/science/apa-traditional-masculinity-harmful.html

32.

Frederick

D. A.

Shapiro

L. M.

Williams

T. R.

Seoane

C. M.

McIntosh

R. T.

Fischer

E. W.

(2017). Precarious manhood and muscularity: Effects of threatening men’s masculinity on reported strength and muscle dissatisfaction. Body Image, 22, 156–165.

33.

French

. (2019, January 9). The APA can’t spin its way out of its attack on “traditional masculinity.” The National Review. https://www.nationalreview.com/2019/01/traditional-masculinity-backlash-against-new-apa-guidelines/

34.

Hsu

(2019, January). Gillette ad with a #MeToo edge attracts support and outrage. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/15/business/gillette-ad-men.html

35.

Grossmann

Hopkins

D. A.

(2016). Asymmetric politics: Ideological republicans and group interest Democrats. Oxford University Press.

36.

Hinck

S. S.

Hinck

E. A.

Dailey

W. O.

Hinck

R. S.

Hansen

Madsen

(2018). A tale of two parties: Comparing the intensity of face threats in the Democratic and Republican primary debates of 2012 and 2016. Argumentation and Advocacy, 54, 104–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/00028533.2018.1446865

37.

A. K.

Sidanius

Kteily

Sheehy-Skeffington

Pratto

Henkel

K. E.

Stewart

A. L.

(2015). The nature of social dominance orientation: Theorizing and measuring preferences for intergroup inequality using the new SDO scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109, 1003–1028. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000033

38.

Huang

Jacoby

Strickland

Lai

R. K.

(2016, November 8). Election 2016: Exit polls. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/11/08/us/politics/election-exit-polls.html

39.

Hunt

C. J.

Gonsalkorale

Murray

S. B.

(2013). Threatened masculinity and muscularity: An experimental examination of multiple aspects of muscularity in men. Body Image, 10, 290–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2013.02.007

40.

Johnston

McLellan

McKinlay

(2014). (Perceived) size really does matter: Male dissatisfaction with penis size. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 15, 225–228. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033264

41.

Jost

J. T.

(2006). The end of the end of ideology. American Psychologist, 61, 651–670.

42.

Katz

(2016). Man enough? Donald Trump, Hillary Clinton, and the politics of presidential masculinity. Interlink Books.

43.

Kay

A. C.

Jost

J. T.

(2003). Complementary justice: Effects of “poor but happy” and “poor but honest” stereotype exemplars on system justification and implicit activation of the justice motive. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 823–837. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.5.823

44.

Kimmel

(2006). Manhood in America: A cultural history (2nd ed.). Free Press.

45.

King

(1997). A solution to the ecological inference problem: Reconstructing individual behavior from aggregate data. Princeton University Press.

46.

Kolko

Miller

C. C.

(2018, December 14). As labor market tightens, women are moving into male-dominated jobs. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/12/14/upshot/as-labor-market-tightens-women-are-moving-into-male-dominated-jobs.html

47.

Krieg

(2016, March 4). Donald Trump defends size of his penis. CNN Politics. https://www.cnn.com/2016/03/03/politics/donald-trump-small-hands-marco-rubio/index.html

48.

Kroh

(2007). Measuring left-right political orientation: The choice of response format. Public Opinion Quarterly, 71, 204–220. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfm009

49.

Kurtzleben

(2016, October 1). Trump and the testosterone takeover of 2016. NPR. https://www.npr.org/2016/10/01/494249104/trump-and-the-testosterone-takeover-of-2016

50.

Lakoff

(1996). Moral politics: What conservatives know that liberals don’t (2nd ed.). University Chicago Press.

51.

Lance

C. E.

Butts

M. M.

Michels

L. C.

(2006). The sources of commonly reported cutoff criteria: What did they really say? Organizational Research Methods, 9, 202–220. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428105284919

52.

List of most-disliked YouTube videos. (2020). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_most-disliked_YouTube_videos

53.

Litman

Robinson

Abberbock

(2017). TurkPrime.com: A versatile crowdsourcing data acquisition platform for the behavioral sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 49, 433–442. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-016-0727-z

54.

Loe

(2001). Fixing broken masculinity: Viagra as a technology for the production of gender and sexuality. Sexuality and Culture, 5, 97–125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-001-1032-1

55.

Maass

Cadinu

Guarnieri

Grasselli

(2003). Sexual harassment under social identity threat: The computer harassment paradigm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 853–870. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.5.853

56.

Manganelli Rattazzi

A. M.

Bobbio

Canova

. (2007). A short version of the Right-Wing Authoritarianism (RWA) Scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 1223–1234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2007.03.013

57.

Matson

Russell

T. D.

King

A. R.

(2019). Gun enthusiasm, hypermasculinity, manhood honor, and lifetime aggression. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment and Trauma, 28, 369–383. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926771.2017.1420722

58.

McCarty

N. M.

Poole

K. T.

Rosenthal

(2006). Polarized America: The dance of ideology and unequal riches. MIT Press.

59.

Michniewicz

K. S.

Vandello

J. A.

Bosson

J. K.

(2014). Men’s (mis)perceptions of the gender threatening consequences of unemployment. Sex Roles, 70, 88–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-013-0339-3

60.

Nelson

J. A.

(1994). More thinking about gender: Reply. Hypatia, 9, 199–205. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.1994.tb00120.x

61.

O’Brien

Hart

G. J.

Hunt

(2007). “Standing out from the herd”: Men renegotiating masculinity in relation to their experience of illness. International Journal of Men’s Health, 6, 178–200. https://doi.org/10.3149/jmh.0603.178

62.

Oliphant

B. J.

(2018, June 11). Public support for the death penalty ticks up. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2018/06/11/us-support-for-death-penalty-ticks-up-2018/

63.

Ornstein

N. J.

Mann

T. E.

(2006). The broken branch: How Congress is failing America and how to get it back on track. Oxford University Press.

64.

Parrott

D. J.

(2009). Aggression toward gay men as gender role enforcement: Effects of male role norms, sexual prejudice, and masculine gender role stress. Journal of Personality, 77, 1137–1166. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2009.00577.x

65.

Peer

Brandimarte

Samat

Acquisti

(2017). Beyond the Turk: Alternative platforms for crowdsourcing behavioral research. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 70, 153–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JESP.2017.01.006

66.

Redden

(2018, December). Gender studies scholars say the field is coming under attack in many countries around the globe. Inside Higher Ed. https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2018/12/05/gender-studies-scholars-say-field-coming-under-attack-many-countries-around-globe

67.

Reidy

D. E.

Berke

D. S.

Gentile

Zeichner

(2014). Man enough? Masculine discrepancy stress and intimate partner violence. Personality and Individual Differences, 68, 160–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.04.021

68.

Reidy

D. E.

Brookmeyer

K. A.

Gentile

Berke

D. S.

Zeichner

(2016). Gender role discrepancy stress, high-risk sexual behavior, and sexually transmitted disease. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 45, 459–465. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-014-0413-0

69.

Reidy

D. E.

Smith-Darden

J. P.

Cortina

K. S.

Kernsmith

R. M.

Kernsmith

P. D.

(2015). Masculine discrepancy stress, teen dating violence, and sexual violence perpetration among adolescent boys. The Journal of Adolescent Health, 56, 619–624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2015.02.009

70.

Ricciardelli

L. A.

Williams

R. J.

(1995). Desirable and undesirable gender traits in three behavioral domains. Sex Roles, 33, 637–655. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01547722

71.

Ricciardelli

(2011). Masculinity, consumerism, and appearance: A look at men’s hair. Canadian Review of Sociology, 48, 181–201.

72.

Richardson

H. C.

(2014). To make men free: A history of the Republican Party. Basic Books.

73.

Sanger

D. E.

Kirkpatrick

D. D.

Kershner

(2019, June 25). Trump threatens “obliteration” of Iran, as sanctions dispute escalates. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/06/25/world/middleeast/iran-rouhani-us-sanctions.html

74.

Shrout

P. E.

Fleiss

J. L.

(1979). Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 420–428. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420

75.

Smith

(2018, August 5). Midterm “mini-me”: Is copying Trump a winning strategy for rightwingers? The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/aug/05/donald-trump-imitators-us-midterm-elections-2018

76.

Stephens

B. L.

(2020, January 31). Bernie’s angry bros. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/31/opinion/sanders-bernie-bros.html

77.

Stephens-Davidowitz

(2014). The cost of racial animus on a Black candidate: Evidence using Google search data. Journal of Public Economics, 118, 26–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JPUBECO.2014.04.010

78.

Stephens-Davidowitz

(2017). Everybody lies: Big data, new data, and what the Internet can tell us about who we really are. HarperCollins.

79.

Thompson

E. H.

Barnes

(2013). Meaning of sexual performance among men with and without erectile dysfunction. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 14, 271–280. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029104

80.

Tsang

V. W. L.

Skead

Wassersug

R. J.

Palmer-Hague

J. L.

(2019). Impact of prostate cancer treatments on men’s understanding of their masculinity. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 20, 214–225. https://doi.org/10.1037/men0000184

81.

Ursachi

Horodnic

Zait

(2015). How reliabile are measurement scales? External factors with indirect influence on reliability estimators. Procedia Economics and Finance, 20, 679–686. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00123-9

82.

Vaillancourt

Leaper

. (1997). Pacific Attitudes Toward Gender Scale.

83.

Vandello

J. A.

Bosson

J. K.

(2013). Hard won and easily lost: A review and synthesis of theory and research on precarious manhood. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 14, 101–113. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029826

84.

Vandello

J. A.

Bosson

J. K.

Cohen

Burnaford

R. M.

Weaver

J. R.

(2008). Precarious manhood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1325–1339. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012453

85.

Willer

Rogalin

C. L.

Conlon

Wojnowicz

M. T.

(2013). Overdoing gender: A test of the masculine overcompensation thesis. American Journal of Sociology, 118, 980–1022. https://doi.org/10.1086/668417

86.

Winegard

B. M.

Winegard

Geary

D. C.

(2014). Eastwood’s brawn and Einstein’s brain: An evolutionary account of dominance, prestige, and precarious manhood. Review of General Psychology, 18, 34–48. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036594

87.

Winter

N. J. G.

(2010). Masculine republicans and feminine democrats: Gender and Americans’ explicit and implicit images of the political parties. Political Behavior, 32, 587–618. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-010-9131-z

88.

Woodhill

B. M.

Samuels

C. A.

(2003). Positive and negative androgyny and their relationship with psychological health and well-being. Sex Roles, 48, 555–565. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023531530272

89.

Zeleney

(2018, October 22). The 2018 Trump factor: It’s all about him. News Break. https://www.newsbreak.com/news/1059333241505/the-2018-trump-factor-its-all-about-him

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.08 MB

0.47 MB

Precarious Manhood Predicts Support for Aggressive Policies and Politicians

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material