People’s emotions toward their ingroups and salient outgroups often change over time as a result of changing circumstances or intentional self-regulation. To investigate such dynamics, two studies assessed participants’ perceived past, present, and ideal levels of group-based emotions toward ingroups and outgroups, for several different types of groups. Consistent with predictions, participants ideally wanted to feel more positive and less negative emotions toward the ingroup compared to their present levels. However, contrary to predictions, ideal emotions toward competitive outgroups were more positive than negative. Several effects over time suggested the successful regulation of emotion: Ideal levels of positive ingroup emotion predicted group-related behavioral intentions as well as emotions reported at a later time, over and above present levels. This work puts group-based emotions in a subjective temporal context and opens new directions for theory-driven investigation and new possibilities for interventions.
BarrettL. F.QuigleyK. S.Bliss-MoreauE.AronsonK. R. (2004). Interoceptive sensitivity and self-reports of emotional experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(5), 684–697. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.87.5.684
BatesD.MächlerM.BolkerB.WalkerS. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
BrauerM.CurtinJ. J. (2017). Linear mixed-effects models and the analysis of nonindependent data: A unified framework to analyze categorical and continuous independent variables that vary within-subjects and/or within-items. Psychological Methods, 23(3), 389–411. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000159
6.
BundaK.BusseriM. A. (2019). Subjective trajectories for self-rated health as a predictor of change in physical health over time: Results from an 18-year longitudinal study. Social Cognition, 37(3), 206–228.
7.
ColeS. N.BerntsenD. (2016). Do future thoughts reflect personal goals? Current concerns and mental time travel into the past and future. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69(2), 273–284. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2015.1044542
8.
CottrellC. A.NeubergS. L. (2005). Different emotional reactions to different groups: A sociofunctional threat-based approach to “prejudice.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(5), 770–789. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.88.5.770
9.
CuddyA. J. C.FiskeS. T.GlickP. (2008). Warmth and competence as universal dimensions of social perception: The stereotype content model and the BIAS map. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol 40, pp. 61–149). Elsevier Academic Press. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(07)00002-0
10.
DoosjeB.BranscombeN. R.SpearsR.MansteadA. S. R. (1998). Guilty by association: When one’s group has a negative history. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(4), 872–886. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.4.872
11.
EllsworthP. C.SmithC. A. (1988). Shades of joy: Patterns of appraisal differentiating pleasant emotions. Cognition and Emotion, 2, 301–331.
12.
GoldenbergA.HalperinE.van ZomerenM.GrossJ. J. (2016). The process model of group-based emotion: Integrating intergroup emotion and emotion regulation perspectives. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 20(2), 118–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868315581263
13.
GrossJ. J. (1998). The emerging field of emotion regulation: An integrative review. Review of General Psychology, 2(3), 271–299.
14.
HalperinE.PoratR.TamirM.GrossJ. J. (2013). Can emotion regulation change political attitudes in intractable conflicts? From the laboratory to the field. Psychological Science, 24(1), 106–111. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612452572
HoggM.HohmanZ.RiveraJ. (2008). Why do people join groups? Three motivational accounts from social psychology. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 1269–1280. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00099.x
17.
KalmoeN. P.MasonL. (2019, January). Lethal mass partisanship: Prevalence, correlates, and electoral contingencies. NCAPSA American Politics Meeting, Washington, DC.
18.
KennyD. A.JuddC. (2019). The unappreciated heterogeneity of effect sizes: Implications for power, precision, planning of research, and replication. Psychological Methods, 24, 578–589. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000209
19.
KesslerT.HollbachS. (2005). Group-based emotions are determinants of ingroup identification. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41(6), 677–695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2005.01.001
20.
KleinF.SepekoffB.WolfT. J. (1985). Sexual orientation: A multi-variable dynamic process. Journal of Homosexuality, 11(1-2), 35–49. https://doi.org/10.1300/J082v11n01_04
21.
KnightA. P.EisenkraftN. (2015). Positive is usually good, negative is not always bad: The effects of group affect on social integration and task performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100, 1214–1227. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000006
22.
LeachC. W.Van ZomerenM.ZebelS.VliekM. L. W.PennekampS. F.DoosjeB.. . . SpearsR. (2008). Group-level self-definition and self-investment: A hierarchical (multicomponent) model of in-group identification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(1), 144–165. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.95.1.144
23.
LehrS. A.FerreiraM. L.BanajiM. (2017). When outgroup negativity trumps ingroup positivity: Fans of the Boston Red Sox and New York Yankees place greater value on rival losses than own-team gains. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 22, 26–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430217712834
24.
LevineL. J.LenchH. C.KarnazeM. M.CarlsonS. J. (2018). Bias in predicted and remembered emotion. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 19, 73–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2017.10.008
25.
MackieD. M.MunasingheA.SmithE. R.PauketatJ. V. T.ReedM. E.WeismanA. (in preparation). Emotional connection to identification with the ingroup. University of California, Santa Barbara.
26.
MackieD. M.SmithE. R. (2015). Intergroup emotions. In DovidioJ.SimpsonJ. (Eds.), APA handbook of personality and social psychology: Vol. II. Interpersonal relationships and group processes (pp. 263–293). American Psychological Association.
27.
MackieD. M.SmithE. R. (2018). Intergroup emotions theory: Production, regulation, and modification of group-based emotions. In OlsonJ. M. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 58, pp. 1–69). Elsevier.
28.
MaitnerA. T.MackieD. M.SmithE. (2007). Antecedents and consequences of satisfaction and guilt following ingroup aggression. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 10(2), 223–237. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430207075154
29.
MoonsW. G.LeonardD.MackieD. M.SmithE. (2009). I feel our pain: Antecedents and consequences of emotional self-stereotyping. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(4), 760–769. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.04.016
30.
MuthC.OraveczZ.GabryJ. (2018). User-friendly Bayesian regression modeling: A tutorial with rstanarm and shinystan. The Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 14(2), 99–119. https://doi.org/10.20982/tqmp.14.2.p099
PoratR.HalperinE.TamirM. (2016). What we want is what we get: Group-based emotional preferences and conflict resolution. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110(2), 167–190. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000043
33.
RossM. (1989). Relation of implicit theories to the construction of personal histories. Psychological Review, 96(2), 341–357. http://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.96.2.341
34.
RydellR. J.MackieD. M.MaitnerA. T.ClaypoolH. M.RyanM. J.SmithE. (2008). Arousal, processing, and risk taking: Consequences of intergroup anger. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 34(8), 1141–1152. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167208319694
35.
SmeekesA. (2015). National nostalgia: A group-based emotion that benefits the in-group but hampers intergroup relations. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 49, 54–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2015.07.001
36.
SmithE. R. (1993). Social identity and social emotions: Toward new conceptualizations of prejudice. In MackieD. M.HamiltonD. L. (Eds.), Affect, cognition, and stereotyping: Interactive processes in group perception; affect, cognition, and stereotyping: Interactive processes in group perception (pp. 297–315). Academic Press.
37.
SmithE. R.MackieD. M. (2006). It’s about time: Intergroup emotions as time-dependent phenomena. In BrownR.CapozzaD. (Eds.), Social identities: Motivational, emotional and cultural influences; social identities: Motivational, emotional and cultural influences (pp. 173–187). Psychology Press/Taylor & Francis (UK)
38.
SmithE. R.MackieD. M. (2015). Dynamics of group-based emotions: Insights from intergroup emotions theory. Emotion Review, 7(4), 349–354. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073915590614
39.
SmithE. R.SegerC. R.MackieD. M. (2007). Can emotions be truly group level? Evidence regarding four conceptual criteria. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(3), 431–446. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.93.3.431
40.
StrackF.SchwarzN.GschneidingerE. (1985). Happiness and reminiscing: The role of time perspective, affect, and mode of thinking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(6), 1460–1469. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.49.6.1460
41.
TamirM. (2016). Why do people regulate their emotions? A taxonomy of motives in emotion regulation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 20(3), 199–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868315586325
42.
TamirM.SchwartzS. H.CieciuchJ.RiedigerM.TorresC.ScollonC.DzokotoV.ZhouX.VishkinA. (2015). Desired emotions across cultures: A value-based account. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111(1), 67–82. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000072
TurnerJ. C.HoggM. A.OakesP. J.ReicherS. D.WetherellM. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Basil Blackwell.
45.
Van BovenL.CarusoE. M. (2015). The tripartite foundations of temporal psychological distance: Metaphors, ecology, and teleology. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 9(11), 593–605.
46.
van LeeuwenE.van DijkW.KaynakÜ. (2013). Of saints and sinners: How appeals to collective pride and guilt affect outgroup helping. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 16(6), 781–796. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430213485995
47.
van ZomerenM.LeachC. W.SpearsR. (2012). Protesters as “passionate economists”: A dynamic dual pathway model of approach coping with collective disadvantage. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16(2), 180–199. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868311430835
48.
van ZomerenM.PostmesT.SpearsR. (2008). Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: A quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 134(4), 504–535. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.504
49.
WatsonD.ClarkL. A. (1991). Self-versus peer ratings of specific emotional traits: Evidence of convergent and discriminant validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(6), 927–940. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.60.6.927
50.
WildschutT.BruderM.RobertsonS.TilburgW. A. P.van SedikidesC. (2014). Collective nostalgia: A group-level emotion that confers unique benefits on the group. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107(5), 844–863. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037760
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
