Group-based emotions can shape group members’ behaviors and intergroup relations. Therefore, we propose that people may try to regulate emotions of outgroup members to attain ingroup goals. We call this phenomenon “motivated intergroup emotion regulation.” In four studies, conducted in both hypothetical and real-world contexts, we show that deterrence and reconciliation goals influence how fearful or calm people want outgroup members to feel, respectively. We further show that such motivated intergroup emotion regulation can guide behavior toward the outgroup, influencing how outgroup members feel (Studies 1, 2, and 4) and behave (Study 4). We demonstrate how affiliation with the ingroup, which renders ingroup goals more salient, shapes what ingroup members want outgroup members to feel (Studies 3 and 4) and subsequently how outgroup members feel and behave (Study 4). Finally, we discuss how motivated intergroup emotion regulation might contribute to understanding motivation in emotion regulation, group-based emotions, and intergroup relations.
AronA.AronE. N.SmollanD. (1992). Inclusion of Other in the Self Scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 596–612.
2.
Bar-TalD. (2000). From intractable conflict through conflict resolution to reconciliation: Psychological analysis. Political Psychology, 21, 351–365.
3.
Bar-TalD.HalperinE.de RiveraJ. (2007). Collective emotions in conflict situations: Societal implications. Journal of Social Issues, 63, 441–460.
4.
BrewerM. B. (2007). The social psychology of intergroup relations: Social categorization, ingroup bias, and outgroup prejudice. In KruglanskiA. W.HigginsE. T. (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (2nd ed., pp. 695–715). Guilford Press.
5.
CikaraM.BruneauE.Van BavelJ. J.SaxeR. (2014). Their pain gives us pleasure: How intergroup dynamics shape empathic failures and counter-empathic responses. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 55, 110–125.
6.
EllemersN. (2012). The group self. Science, 336, 848–852.
7.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.BuchnerA.LangA. G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 1149–1160.
8.
FishbachA.DharR. (2005). Goals as excuses or guides: The liberating effect of perceived goal progress on choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 32, 370–377.
9.
FordB. Q.FeinbergM.LamP.MaussI. B.JohnO. (2019). Using reappraisal to regulate negative emotion after the 2016 U.S. presidential election: Does emotion regulation trump political action?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 117, 998–1015.
10.
FraleyR. C.VazireS. (2014). The N-pact factor: Evaluating the quality of empirical journals with respect to sample size and statistical power. PLoS ONE, 9, Article e109019.
11.
GneezyU.ImasA. (2014). Materazzi effect and the strategic use of anger in competitive interactions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111, 1334–1337.
12.
GoldenbergA.HalperinE.van ZomerenM.GrossJ. J. (2016). The process model of group-based emotion: Integrating inter-group emotion and emotion regulation perspectives. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 20, 118–141.
13.
GoldenbergA.SaguyT.HalperinE. (2014). How group-based emotions are shaped by collective emotions: Evidence for emotional transfer and emotional burden. Journal of Per-sonality and Social Psychology, 107, 581–596.
14.
GrossJ. J.ThompsonR. A. (2007). Emotion regulation: Conceptual foundations. In GrossJ. J. (Ed.), Handbook of emotion regulation (pp. 3–24). Guilford Press.
Hasan-AslihS.NetzerL.TamirM.SaguyT.Van ZomerenM.HalperinE. (2019). When we want them to fear us: The motivation to influence outgroup emotions in collective action. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 22, 724–745.
17.
HayesA. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford Press.
18.
HenryK. B.ArrowH.CariniB. (1999). A tripartite model of group identification: Theory and measurement. Small Group Research, 30, 558–581.
19.
HoggM. A. (2001). A social identity theory of leadership. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 184–200.
20.
IyerA.LeachC. W. (2008). Emotion in inter-group relations. European Review of Social Psychology, 19, 86–125.
21.
KaiserR. B.HoganR.CraigS. B. (2008). Leadership and the fate of organizations. American Psychologist, 63, 96–110.
22.
KuppensT.YzerbytV. Y.DandacheS.FischerA. H.van der SchalkJ. (2013). Social identity salience shapes group-based emotions through group-based appraisals. Cognition and Emotion, 27(8), 1359–1377.
23.
LernerJ. S.GonzalezR. M.SmallD. A.FischhoffB. (2003). Effects of fear and anger on perceived risks of terrorism a national field experiment. Psychological Science, 14, 144–150.
24.
LevyJ.GoldsteinA.InflusM.MasalhaS.Zagoory-SharonO.FeldmanR. (2016). Adolescents growing up amidst intractable conflict attenuate brain response to pain of outgroup. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113, 13696–13701.
25.
MackieD. M.DevosT.SmithE. R. (2000). Intergroup emotions: Explaining offensive action tendencies in an intergroup context. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 602–616.
26.
MackieD. M.SmithE. R. (2018). Intergroup emotions theory: Production, regulation, and modification of group-based emotions. In OlsonJ. M. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 58, pp. 1–69). Academic Press.
27.
MaitnerA. T.MackieD. M.SmithE. R. (2006). Evidence for the regulatory function of intergroup emotion: Emotional consequences of implemented or impeded intergroup action tendencies. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 720–728.
28.
MaorM.GrossJ. (2015, April16–19). Emotion regulation by emotional entrepreneurs: Implications for political science and international relations [Paper presentation]. 73rd Annual Conference of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL, United States.
29.
MarchE. (2019). Psychopathy, sadism, empathy, and the motivation to cause harm: New evidence confirms malevolent nature of the Internet troll. Personality and Individual Differences, 141, 133–137.
30.
MatsumotoD.FrankM. G.HwangH. C. (2015). The role of intergroup emotions in political violence. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24, 369–373.
31.
NetzerL.Van KleefG. A.TamirM. (2015). Interpersonal instrumental emotion regulation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 58, 124–135.
32.
NivenK.HolmanD.TotterdellP. (2012). How to win friendship and trust by influencing people’s feelings: An investigation of interpersonal affect regulation and the quality of relationships. Human Relations, 65, 777–805.
33.
OppenheimerD. M.MeyvisT.DavidenkoN. (2009). Instructional manipulation checks: Detecting satisficing to increase statistical power. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 867–872.
34.
Page-GouldE.Mendoza-DentonR.TroppL. R. (2008). With a little help from my cross-group friend: Reducing anxiety in intergroup contexts through cross-group friendship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1080–1094.
PetrocelliJ. V.SmithE. R. (2005). Who I am, who we are, and why: Links between emotions and causal attributions for self-and group discrepancies. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1628–1642.
37.
PoratR.HalperinE.MannheimI.TamirM. (2016). Together we cry: Social motives and preferences for group-based sadness. Cognition and Emotion, 30, 66–79.
38.
PoratR.HalperinE.TamirM. (2016). What we want is what we get: Group-based emotional preferences and conflict resolution. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110, 167–190.
39.
RoccasS.KlarY.LiviatanI. (2006). The paradox of group-based guilt: Modes of national identification, conflict vehemence, and reactions to the in-group’s moral violations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 698–711.
40.
SharvitK.BrambillaM.BabushM.ColucciF. P. (2015). To feel or not to feel when my group harms others? The regulation of collective guilt as motivated reasoning. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41, 1223–1235.
41.
SharvitK.ValetzkyS. (2019). Who wants to be collectively guilty? A causal role for motivation in the regulation of collective guilt. Motivation and Emotion, 43, 103–111.
42.
SmithE. R.MackieD. M. (2016). Group-level emotions. Current Opinion in Psychology, 11, 15–19.
43.
StaubE.PearlmanL. A.GubinA.HagengimanaA. (2005). Healing, reconciliation, forgiving and the prevention of violence after genocide or mass killing: An intervention and its experimental evaluation in Rwanda. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 24, 297–334.
44.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In AustinW. G.WorchelS. (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–48). Nelson-Hall.
45.
TamT.HewstoneM.CairnsE.TauschN.MaioG.KenworthyJ. (2007). The impact of intergroup emotions on forgiveness in Northern Ireland. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 10, 119–136.
46.
TamirM. (2016). Why do people regulate their emotions? A taxonomy of motives in emotion regulation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 20, 199–222.
47.
TamirM.FordB. Q. (2009). Choosing to be afraid: Preferences for fear as a function of goal pursuit. Emotion, 9, 488–497.
48.
ThomasK. A.CliffordS. (2017). Validity and Mechanical Turk: An assessment of exclusion methods and interactive experiments. Computers in Human Behavior, 77, 184–197.
49.
TsaiJ. L.MiaoF. F.SeppalaE.FungH. H.YeungD. Y. (2007). Influence and adjustment goals: Sources of cultural differences in ideal affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 1102–1117.
50.
Van KnippenbergD.Van KleefG. A. (2016). Leadership and affect: Moving the hearts and minds of followers. The Academy of Management Annals, 10, 799–840.
51.
WhitakerJ. L.BushmanB. J. (2012). “Remain calm. Be kind.” Effects of relaxing video games on aggressive and prosocial behavior. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3, 88–92.
52.
YzerbytV.DumontM.WigboldusD.GordijnE. (2003). I feel for us: The impact of categorization and identification on emotions and action tendencies. British Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 533–549.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
