When opinions in a society change toward more or less tolerance of a group, people do not necessarily see it. Drawing on a quasi-representative survey (Study 1, N = 830) and a natural experiment (Study 2, N = 437), we investigated people’s perceptions of the societal norms toward sexual minorities and the influence of laws on these (mis-)perceptions. Study 1 indicated pluralistic ignorance as participants overestimated the societal disapproval toward same-sex issues. Complementing this finding, Study 2 found that informing participants about a new law legalizing stepchild adoption decreased perceived societal disapproval of same-sex parenting compared with participants not informed about the law. Pluralistic ignorance, however, was not affected by the new law. While results indicate that pluralistic ignorance may be more resilient to change, they also highlight that laws can have a dual impact on societies, changing not only the legal situation but also shifting perceptions of societal norms.
BadgettM. L. (2011). Social inclusion and the value of marriage equality in Massachusetts and the Netherlands. Journal of Social Issues, 67(2), 316–334. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2011.01700.x
2.
BartelsB. L.MutzD. C. (2009). Explaining processes of institutional opinion leadership. The Journal of Politics, 71(1), 249–261. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381608090166
BeamanL.DufloE.PandeR.TopalovaP. (2012). Female leadership raises aspirations and educational attainment for girls: A policy experiment in India. Science, 335(6068), 582–586. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1212382
5.
BishinB. G.HayesT. J.IncantalupoM. B.SmithC. A. (2016). Opinion backlash and public attitudes: Are political advances in gay rights counterproductive?American Journal of Political Science, 60(3), 625–648. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12181
6.
BraceI.AdamsK. (2006). An introduction to market & social research: Planning & using research tools & techniques. Kogan Page.
7.
CastroP. (2012). Legal innovation for social change: Exploring change and resistance to different types of sustainability laws. Political Psychology, 33(1), 105–121. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2011.00863.x
CialdiniR. B.KallgrenC. A.RenoR. R. (1991). A focus theory of normative conduct: A theoretical refinement and reevaluation of the role of norms in human behavior. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 24, pp. 201–234). Academic Press.
10.
CoxD.Navarro-RiveraJ.JonesR. P. (2014). A shifting landscape: A decade of change in American attitudes about same-sex marriage and LGBT issues. Public Religion Research Institute. https://www.prri.org/research/2014-lgbt-survey/
11.
CrandallC. S.FergusonM. A.BahnsA. J. (2013). When we see prejudice: The normative window and social change. In StangorC.CrandallC. S. (Eds.), Stereotyping and prejudice: Frontiers of social psychology (pp. 53–69). Psychology Press.
12.
CrandallC. S.MillerJ. M.WhiteM. H. (2018). Changing norms following the 2016 U.S. presidential election: The Trump effect on prejudice. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 9(2), 186–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617750735
13.
CrandallC. S.WarnerR. H. (2005). How a prejudice is recognized. Psychological Inquiry, 16(2/3), 137–141. https://doi.org/2005-09295-012
14.
EicherV.SetterstenR. A.PenicS.GlaeserS.MartenotA.SpiniD. (2015). Normative climates of parenthood across Europe: Judging voluntary childlessness and working parents. European Sociological Review, 32(1), 135–150. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcv083
15.
EisnerL.SpiniD.SommetN. (2020). A contingent perspective on pluralistic ignorance: When the attitudinal object matters. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 32, 25–45. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edz004
16.
European Social Survey Round 3 Data. (2006). Data file edition 3.7. Norwegian Social Science Data Services, Norway—Data Archive and distributor of ESS data. https://doi.org/10.21338/NSD-ESS9-2018
17.
EvelandW. P.GlynnC. J. (2008). Theories on the perception of social reality. In DonsbachW.TraugottM. W. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of public opinion research (pp. 155–163). SAGE.
18.
GetzelsJ. W.GubaE. G. (1957). Social behavior and the administrative process. The School Review, 65(4), 423–441. https://doi.org/10.1086/442411
19.
GoldsteinN. J.CialdiniR. B.GriskeviciusV. (2008). A room with a viewpoint: Using social norms to motivate environmental conservation in hotels. Journal of Consumer Research, 35, 472–482. https://doi.org/10.1086/586910
20.
GuimondS.CrispR. J.De OliveiraP.KamiejskiR.KteilyN.KuepperB.… SidaniusJ. (2013). Diversity policy, social dominance, and intergroup relations: Predicting prejudice in changing social and political contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(6), 941–958. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032069
21.
HatzenbuehlerM. L. (2009). How does sexual minority stigma “get under the skin”? A psychological mediation framework. Psychological Bulletin, 135(5), 707–730. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016441
22.
HatzenbuehlerM. L.McLaughlinK. A.KeyesK. M.HasinD. S. (2010). The impact of institutional discrimination on psychiatric disorders in lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations: A prospective study. American Journal of Public Health, 100, 452–459. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2009.168815
23.
HobbesT. (1969). Leviathan, 1651. Scolar P.
24.
HoggM. A. (2010). Influence and leadership. In FiskeS. T.GilbertD. T.LindzeyG. (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 1166–1207). John Wiley.
25.
International Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Trans and Intersex Association, & MendosL. R. (2019, March), State-Sponsored Homophobia. International Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Trans and Intersex Association.
26.
KatzD.AllportF. H. (1931). Students’ attitudes. Craftsman.
27.
KriesiH.TrechselA. H. (2008). The politics of Switzerland: Continuity and change in a consensus democracy. Cambridge University Press.
28.
LakensD. (2013). Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: A practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, Article 863. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00863
29.
LivingstoneA. G. (2014). Why the psychology of collective action requires qualitative transformation as well as quantitative change. Contemporary Social Science, 9(1), 121–134.
MertonR. K. (1968). Social theory and social structure. Free Press.
33.
MeyerI. H. (2013). Prejudice, social stress, and mental health in lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations: Conceptual issues and research evidence. Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity, 1, 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1037/2329-0382.1.S.3
34.
MoscoviciS. (1988). Notes toward a description of Social Representations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18(3), 211–250. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420180303
35.
MoscoviciS. (2000). The phenomenon of social representations. In MoscoviciS.DuveenG. (Eds.), Social representations: Explorations in social psychology (pp. 18–77). Polity Press. (Original work published 1984)
36.
MurphyW. F.TanenhausJ. (1968). Public opinion and Supreme Court: The Goldwater campaign. Public Opinion Quarterly, 32(1), 31–50. https://doi.org/10.1086/267577
OgolskyB. G.MonkJ. K.RiceT. M.OswaldR. F. (2019). Personal well-being across the transition to marriage equality: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Family Psychology, 33(4), 422–432. https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000504
40.
O’GormanH. J.GarryS. L. (1976). Pluralistic ignorance—A replication and extension. Public Opinion Quarterly, 40(4), 449–458. https://doi.org/10.1086/268331
41.
OswaldR. F.RoutonJ. M.McGuireJ. K.HolmanE. G. (2018). Tolerance versus support: Perceptions of residential community climate among LGB parents. Family Relations, 67(1), 41–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/fare.12292
42.
PaluckE. L. (2009). Reducing intergroup prejudice and conflict using the media: A field experiment in Rwanda. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(3), 574–587. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0011989
43.
PaluckE. L.BallL. (2010). Social norms marketing to reduce gender-based violence [IRC Policy Briefcase]. International Rescue Committee.
44.
PaluckE. L.ShepherdH. S. (2012). The salience of social referents: A field experiment on collective norms and harassment behavior in a school social network. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(6), 899–915. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030015
45.
PettigrewT. F. (2018). The emergence of contextual social psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 44(7), 963–971. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167218756033
46.
PrenticeD. A.MillerD. T. (1993). Pluralistic ignorance and alcohol use on campus: Some consequences of misperceiving the social norm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(2), 243–256. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.64.2.243
47.
PrenticeD. A.MillerD. T. (1996). Pluralistic ignorance and the perpetuation of social norms by unwitting actors. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 28, 161–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60238-5
48.
ReynoldsK. J.SubašićE.TindallK. (2015). The problem of behaviour change: From social norms to an ingroup focus. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 9(1), 45–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12155
49.
SchmittM. T.BranscombeN. R.PostmesT.GarciaA. (2014). The consequences of perceived discrimination for psychological well-being: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 140(4), 921–948. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035754
50.
ShamirJ.ShamirM. (1997). Pluralistic ignorance across issues and over time: Information cues and biases. Public Opinion Quarterly, 61(2), 227–260.
51.
SheltonJ. N.RichesonJ. A. (2005). Intergroup contact and pluralistic ignorance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(1), 91–107. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.88.1.91
52.
SmithT. W.SonJ.KimJ. (2014). Public attitudes toward homosexuality and gay rights across time and countries. UCLA: The Williams Institute. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4p93w90c
53.
SparkmanG.WaltonG. M. (2017). Dynamic norms promote sustainable behavior, even if it is counternormative. Psychological Science, 28(11), 1663–1674. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617719950
54.
Statistique Vaud. (2016). Permanent resident population by exact age, sex, and origin, Vaud 1980-2016 [Data file]. http://www.pisepub.vd.ch/
TankardM. E.PaluckE. L. (2016). Norm perception as a vehicle for social change. Social Issues and Policy Review, 10(1), 181–211. https://doi.org/10.1111/sipr.12022
57.
TankardM. E.PaluckE. L. (2017). The effect of a Supreme Court decision regarding gay marriage on social norms and personal attitudes. Psychological Science, 28(9), 1334–1344. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617709594
World Value Survey. (2009). World Value Survey 1981–2008 official aggregate v.20090902, 2009. http://www.worldvaluessurvey.org. Aggregate File Producer: ASEP/JDS Data Archive, World Values Survey Association.
60.
ZouX.TamK.-P.MorrisM. W.LeeS.LauY.-M.ChiuC. (2009). Culture as common sense: Perceived consensus versus personal beliefs as mechanisms of cultural influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 579–597. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016399
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
