Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Although research suggests distressed individuals benefit from others’ empathy, it is unclear how an individual’s level of empathy influences dyadic responses during emotional situations. In the current study, female participants (N = 140; 70 dyads) were paired with a stranger. One member of each dyad (the experiencer) was randomly assigned to undergo a stressful task and disclose negative personal experiences to their partner (the listener). Experiencers paired with listeners higher in dispositional emotional empathy had less negative affect during emotional disclosure and lower sympathetic nervous system reactivity during the stressful task and disclosure. Listeners higher in emotional empathy reported more negative affect in response to their partner’s distress. Furthermore, for listeners higher in emotional empathy, those who more accurately rated their partner’s emotions were more physiologically influenced by their partners. Findings shed light on interpersonal functions of empathy and suggest a stranger’s level of emotional empathy regulates distressed partner’s emotions and physiology.

Keywords

affect contagion interpersonal emotion regulation empathic accuracy physiological linkage social support

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aiken

West

Reno

(1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. SAGE.

Allen

Blascovich

Mendes

W. B.

(2002). Cardiovascular reactivity and the presence of pets, friends, and spouses: The truth about cats and dogs. Psychosomatic Medicine, 64(5), 727–739.

Baez

Flichtentrei

Prats

Mastandueno

García

A. M.

Cetkovich

Ibáñez

(2017). Men, women . . . who cares? A population-based study on sex differences and gender roles in empathy and moral cognition. PLoS ONE, 12(6), Article e0179336. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0179336

Barrett

L. F.

Robin

Pietromonaco

P. R.

Eyssell

K. M.

(1998). Are women the “more emotional” sex? Evidence from emotional experiences in social context. Cognition & Emotion, 12(4), 555–578. https://doi.org/10.1080/026999398379565

Bernston

G. G.

Cacioppo

J. T.

Binkley

P. F.

Uchino

B. N.

Quigley

K. S.

Fieldstone

(1994). Autonomic cardiac control. III. Psychological stress and cardiac response in autonomic space as revealed by pharmacological blockades. Psychophysiology, 31(6), 599–608. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.1994.tb02352.x

Bodie

G. D.

Vickery

A. J.

Gearhart

C. C.

(2013). The nature of supportive listening, I: Exploring the relation between supportive listeners and supportive people. International Journal of Listening, 27(1), 39–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/10904018.2013.732408

Bolger

Zuckerman

Kessler

R. C.

(2000). Invisible support and adjustment to stress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(6), 953–961. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.6.953

Brown

C. L.

Beckes

Allen

J. P.

Coan

J. A.

(2017). Subjective general health and the social regulation of hypothalamic activity. Psychosomatic Medicine, 79(6), 670–673. https://doi.org/10.1097/PSY.0000000000000468

Brown

C. L.

Coan

J. A.

(2016). The social regulation of neural threat responding. In Freund

L. S.

McCune

Esposito

Gee

N. R.

McCardle

(Eds.), The social neuroscience of human-animal interaction (pp. 127–146). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/14856-008.

10.

Brown

C. L.

Hua

A. Y.

De Coster

Sturm

V. E.

Kramer

J. H.

Rosen

H. J.

Miller

B. L.

Levenson

R. W.

(2020). Comparing two facets of emotion perception across multiple neurodegenerative diseases. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 15(5), 511–522. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsaa060

11.

Brown

C. L.

Lwi

S. J.

Goodkind

M. S.

Rankin

K. P.

Merrilees

Miller

B. L.

Levenson

R. W.

(2018). Empathic accuracy deficits in patients with neurodegenerative disease: Association with caregiver depression. American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 26(4), 484–493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jagp.2017.10.012

12.

Brown

C. L.

Van Doren

Ford

B. Q.

Mauss

I. B.

Sze

J. W.

Levenson

R. W.

(2019). Coherence between subjective experience and physiology in emotion: Individual differences and implications for well-being. Emotion, 20(5), 818–829. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000579

13.

Brown

C. L.

Wells

J. L.

Hua

A. Y.

Chen

K.-H.

Merrilees

Miller

B. L.

Levenson

R. W.

(2020). Emotion recognition and reactivity in persons with neurodegenerative disease are differentially associated with caregiver health. The Gerontologist, gnaa030. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnaa030

14.

Brownley

K. A.

Hurwitz

B. E.

Schneiderman

(2000). Cardiovascular psychophysiology. In Cacioppo

Tassinary

Berntson

(Eds.), Handbook of psychophysiology (pp. 224–264). Cambridge University Press.

15.

Chen

K.-H.

Brown

C. L.

Wells

J. L.

Rothwell

E. S.

Otero

M. C.

Levenson

R. W.

Fredrickson

B. L.

(in press). Physiological linkage during shared positive and shared negative emotion. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology.

16.

Chiao

J. Y.

Mathur

V. A.

(2010). Intergroup empathy: How does race affect empathic neural responses? Current Biology, 20(11), R478–R480. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CUB.2010.04.001

17.

Chikovani

Babuadze

Iashvili

Gvalia

Surguladze

(2015). Empathy costs: Negative emotional bias in high empathisers. Psychiatry Research, 229(1–2), 340–346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2015.07.001

18.

Clarke

M. J.

Marks

A. D. G.

Lykins

A. D.

(2016). Bridging the gap: The effect of gender normativity on differences in empathy and emotional intelligence. Journal of Gender Studies, 25(5), 522–539. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2015.1049246

19.

Coan

J. A.

Beckes

Gonzalez

M. Z.

Maresh

E. L.

Brown

C. L.

Hasselmo

(2017). Relationship status and perceived support in the social regulation of neural responses to threat. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 12(10), 1574–1583. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsx091

20.

Coan

J. A.

Brown

C. L.

Beckes

(2014). Our social baseline: The role of social proximity in economy of action. In Mikulincer

Shaver

P. R.

(Eds.), Mechanisms of social connection: From brain to group (pp. 89–104). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/14250-006

21.

Coan

J. A.

Maresh

(2014). Social baseline theory and the social regulation of emotion. In Gross

J. J.

(Ed.), Handbook of emotion regulation (2nd ed., pp. 221–236). Guilford Press.

22.

Cohen

Wills

T. A.

(1985). Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 98(2), 310–357. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.98.2.310

23.

Côté

Kraus

M. W.

Cheng

B. H.

Oveis

van der Löwe

Lian

Keltner

(2011). Social power facilitates the effect of prosocial orientation on empathic accuracy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(2), 217–232. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023171

24.

Davis

M. H.

(1983a). The effects of dispositional empathy on emotional reactions and helping: A multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality, 51(2), 167–184. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1983.tb00860.x

25.

Davis

M. H.

(1983b). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(1), 113–126. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.113

26.

Davis

M. H.

Hull

J. G.

Young

R. D.

Warren

G. G.

(1987). Emotional reactions to dramatic film stimuli: The influence of cognitive and emotional empathy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(1), 126–133. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.1.126

27.

Decety

Fotopoulou

(2015). Why empathy has a beneficial impact on others in medicine: Unifying theories. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 8, Article 457. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00457

28.

Decety

Jackson

P. L.

(2004). The functional architecture of human empathy. Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Reviews, 3(2), 71–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534582304267187

29.

Decety

Smith

K. E.

Norman

G. J.

Halpern

(2014). A social neuroscience perspective on clinical empathy. World Psychiatry, 13(3), 233–237. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/wps.20146

30.

de Waal

F. B. M

. (2008). Putting the altruism back into altruism: The evolution of empathy. Annual Review of Psychology, 59(1), 279–300. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093625

31.

Dezecache

Jacob

Grèzes

(2015). Emotional contagion: Its scope and limits. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19(6), 297–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TICS.2015.03.011

32.

Dimitroff

S. J.

Kardan

Necka

E. A.

Decety

Berman

M. G.

Norman

G. J.

(2017). Physiological dynamics of stress contagion. Scientific Reports, 7(1), Article 6168. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-05811-1

33.

Dindia

Allen

(1992). Sex differences in self-disclosure: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 106–124. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.106

34.

Edwards

L. J.

Muller

K. E.

Wolfinger

R. D.

Qaqish

B. F.

Schabenberger

(2008). An R2 statistic for fixed effects in the linear mixed model. Statistics in Medicine, 27(29), 6137–6157. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.3429

35.

Eisenberger

N. I.

Taylor

S. E.

Gable

S. L.

Hilmert

C. J.

Lieberman

M. D.

(2007). Neural pathways link social support to attenuated neuroendocrine stress responses. NeuroImage, 35(4), 1601–1612. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.NEUROIMAGE.2007.01.038

36.

Elliott

Bohart

A. C.

Watson

J. C.

Murphy

(2018). Therapist empathy and client outcome: An updated meta-analysis. Psychotherapy, 55(4), 399–410. https://doi.org/10.1037/pst0000175

37.

Engert

Plessow

Miller

Kirschbaum

Singer

(2014). Cortisol increase in empathic stress is modulated by emotional closeness and observation modality. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 45, 192–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PSYNEUEN.2014.04.005

38.

Flynn

J. J.

Hollenstein

Mackey

(2010). The effect of suppressing and not accepting emotions on depressive symptoms: Is suppression different for men and women? Personality and Individual Differences, 49(6), 582–586. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PAID.2010.05.022

39.

Fosha

(2001). The dyadic regulation of affect. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 57(2), 227–242. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4679(200102)57:2<227::AID-JCLP8>3.0.CO;2-1

40.

Fukushima

Terasawa

Umeda

(2011). Association between interoception and empathy: Evidence from heartbeat-evoked brain potential. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 79, 259–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2010.10.015

41.

Funder

D. C.

(1995). On the accuracy of personality judgment: A realistic approach. Psychological Review, 102(4), 652–670. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.102.4.652

42.

Goldstein

D. S.

(1987). Stress-induced activation of the sympathetic nervous system. Baillière’s Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 1(2), 253–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0950-351X(87)80063-0

43.

Grynberg

Pollatos

(2015). Perceiving one’s body shapes empathy. Physiology and Behavior, 140, 54–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2014.12.026

44.

Halpern

(2003). What is clinical empathy? Journal of General Internal Medicine, 18(8), 670–674. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.21017.x

45.

Hatfield

(1995). Self-esteem and passionate love relationships. In Brannigan

G. G.

Merrens

M. R.

(Eds.), The social psychologists: Research and adventures (pp. 129–144). McGraw Hill.

46.

Hatfield

Cacioppo

J. T.

Rapson

R. L.

(1993). Emotional contagion. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2(3), 96–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.ep10770953

47.

Henze

G.-I.

Zänkert

Urschler

D. F.

Hiltl

T. J.

Kudielka

B. M.

Pruessner

J. C.

Wüst

(2017). Testing the ecological validity of the Trier Social Stress Test: Association with real-life exam stress. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 75, 52–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PSYNEUEN.2016.10.002

48.

Juster

R.-P.

McEwen

B. S.

Lupien

S. J.

(2010). Allostatic load biomarkers of chronic stress and impact on health and cognition. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 35(1), 2–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.NEUBIOREV.2009.10.002

49.

Kamarck

T. W.

Manuck

S. B.

Jennings

J. R.

(1990). Social support reduces cardiovascular reactivity to psychological challenge: A laboratory model. Psychosomatic Medicine, 52(1), 42–58. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006842-199001000-00004

50.

Karnilowicz

H. R.

Waters

S. F.

Mendes

W. B.

(2019). Not in front of the kids: Effects of parental suppression on socialization behaviors during cooperative parent–child interactions. Emotion, 19(7), 1183–1191. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000527

51.

Kenny

D. A.

Kashy

D. A.

Cook

W. L.

(2006). Dyadic data analysis. Guilford Press.

52.

Kirschbaum

Pirke

K.-M.

Hellhammer

D. H.

(1993). The “trier social stress test”—A tool for investigating psychobiological stress responses in a laboratory setting. Neuropsychobiology, 28(1–2), 76–81. https://doi.org/10.1159/000119004

53.

Klimecki

Altruism

T. S.

(2012). Empathic distress fatigue rather than compassion fatigue? Integrating findings from empathy research in psychology and social neuroscience. In Oakley

Knafo

Madhavan

Wilson

D. S.

(Eds.), Pathological Altruism (pp. 368–383). Oxford University Press.

54.

Kral

T. R. A.

Solis

Mumford

J. A.

Schuyler

B. S.

Flook

Rifken

Patsenko

E. G.

Davidson

R. J.

(2017). Neural correlates of empathic accuracy in adolescence. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 12(11), 1701–1710. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsx099

55.

Kraus

M. W.

Mendes

W. B.

(2014). Sartorial symbols of social class elicit class-consistent behavioral and physiological responses: A dyadic approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(6), 2230–2340. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000023.supp

56.

Levenson

R. W.

Lwi

S. J.

Brown

C. L.

Ford

B. Q.

Otero

M. C.

Verstaen

(2017). Emotion. In Cacioppo

J. T.

Tassinary

L. G.

Berntson

G. G.

(Ed.), Handbook of psychophysiology (pp. 444–464). Cambridge University Press.

57.

Levenson

R. W.

Ruef

A. M.

(1992). Empathy: A physiological substrate. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(2), 234–246. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.63.2.234

58.

Mehrabian

Epstein

(1972). A measure of emotional empathy. Journal of Personality, 40(4), 525–543. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1972.tb00078.x

59.

Mendes

W. B.

(2016). Emotion and the autonomic nervous system. In Barrett

Lewis

Haviland-Jones

(Eds.), Handbook of emotions (4th ed., pp. 166–181). Guilford Press.

60.

Mendes

W. B.

Reis

H. T.

Seery

M. D.

Blascovich

(2003). Cardiovascular correlates of emotional expression and suppression: Do content and gender context matter? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(4), 771–792. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.4.771

61.

Morelli

S. A.

Ong

D. C.

Makati

Jackson

M. O.

Zaki

(2017). Empathy and well-being correlate with centrality in different social networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 114(37), 9843–9847. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1702155114

62.

Oveis

Ocampo

J. M.

Hangen

E. J.

Jamieson

(2020). Emotion regulation contagion: Stress reappraisal promotes challenge responses in teammates. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.31234/OSF.IO/BVFK6

63.

Paivio

S. C.

Laurent

(2001). Empathy and emotion regulation: Reprocessing memories of childhood abuse. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 57(2), 213–226. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4679(200102)57:2<213::AID-JCLP7>3.0.CO;2-B

64.

Pennebaker

J. W.

(1997). Writing about emotional experiences as a therapeutic process. Psychological Science, 8(3), 162–166. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1997.tb00403.x

65.

Posner

Russell

J. A.

Peterson

B. S.

(2005). The circumplex model of affect: An integrative approach to affective neuroscience, cognitive development, and psychopathology. Development and Psychopathology, 17(3), 715–734. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579405050340

66.

Preston

S. D.

de Waal

F. B. M.

(2002). Empathy: Its ultimate and proximate bases. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 25(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X02000018

67.

Reis

H. T.

(1998). Gender differences in intimacy and related behaviors: Context and process. In Canary

D. J.

Dindia

(Eds.), Sex differences and similarities in communication: Critical essays and empirical investigations of sex and gender in interaction (pp. 203–231). Lawrence Erlbaum.

68.

Rimé

(2009). Emotion elicits the social sharing of emotion: Theory and empirical review. Emotion Review, 1(1), 60–85.

69.

Rimé

Mesquita

Boca

Philippot

(1991). Beyond the emotional event: Six studies on the social sharing of emotion. Cognition & Emotion, 5(5–6), 435–465. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699939108411052

70.

Suchman

A. L.

Markakis

Beckman

H. B.

Frankel

(1997). A model of empathic communication in the medical interview. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 277(8), 678–682. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1997.03540320082047

71.

Sze

J. A.

Goodkind

M. S.

Gyurak

Levenson

R. W.

(2012). Aging and emotion recognition: Not just a losing matter. Psychology and Aging, 27(4), 940–950. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029367

72.

Thorson

K. R.

(2018). Understanding the relationship between empathic accuracy and physiological synchrony: A theoretical and analytic guide with evidence from three contexts (New York University). Available from ProQuest Dissertations Publishing (UMI No. 10637769)

73.

Thorson

K. R.

Forbes

C. E.

Magerman

A. B.

West

T. V.

(2019). Under threat but engaged: Stereotype threat leads women to engage with female but not male partners in math. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 58, 243–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CEDPSYCH.2019.03.012

74.

Thorson

K. R.

West

T. V.

(2018). Physiological linkage to an interaction partner is negatively associated with stability in sympathetic nervous system responding. Biological Psychology, 138, 91–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIOPSYCHO.2018.08.004

75.

Thorson

K. R.

West

T. V.

Mendes

W. B.

(2018). Measuring physiological influence in dyads: A guide to designing, implementing, and analyzing dyadic physiological studies. Psychological Methods. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000166

76.

Thorsteinsson

E. B.

James

J. E.

(1999). A Meta-analysis of the effects of experimental manipulations of social support during laboratory stress. Psychology & Health, 14(5), 869–886. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870449908407353

77.

Torre

J. B.

Lieberman

M. D.

(2018). Putting feelings into words: Affect labeling as implicit emotion regulation. Emotion Review, 10(2), 116–124. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073917742706

78.

Waters

S. F.

West

T. V.

Karnilowicz

H. R.

Mendes

W. B.

(2017). Affect contagion between mothers and infants: Examining valence and touch. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 146(7), 1043–1051. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000322

79.

Waters

S. F.

West

T. V.

Mendes

W. B.

(2014). Stress contagion: Physiological covariation between mothers and infants. Psychological Science, 25(4), 934–942. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613518352.Stress

80.

Weisz

Zaki

(2018). Motivated empathy: A social neuroscience perspective. Current Opinion in Psychology, 24, 67–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COPSYC.2018.05.005

81.

West

T. V.

Dovidio

J. F.

Pearson

A. R.

(2014). Accuracy and bias in perceptions of relationship interest for intergroup and intragroup roommates. Social Psychological & Personality Science, 5(2), 235–242.

82.

West

T. V.

Kenny

D. A.

(2011). The truth and bias model of judgment. Psychological Review, 118(2), 357–378. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022936

83.

West

T. V.

Koslov

Page-Gould

Major

Mendes

W. B.

(2017). Contagious anxiety: Anxious European Americans can transmit their physiological reactivity to African Americans. Psychological Science, 28(12), 1796–1806. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617722551

84.

Zaki

(2014). Empathy: A motivated account. Psychological Bulletin, 140(6), 1608–1647. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19586159

85.

Zaki

Bolger

Ochsner

(2009). Unpacking the informational bases of empathic accuracy. Emotion, 9(4), 478–487. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016551

86.

Zaki

Weber

Bolger

Ochsner

(2009). The neural bases of empathic accuracy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106(27), 11382–11387. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0902666106

87.

Zee

K. S.

Bolger

(2019). Visible and invisible social support: How, why, and when. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28(3), 314–320. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721419835214

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.01 MB

0.74 MB

Emotional Empathy in the Social Regulation of Distress: A Dyadic Approach

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material