People often fail to keep their mind from wandering. Here, we examine how the tendency to mind wander is affected by people’s beliefs, or lay theories. Building on research on lay theories and self-regulation, we test whether differences in people’s beliefs about the extent to which mind wandering is controllable affect thought control strategies and mind-wandering rates in daily life and the laboratory. We develop a new scale to assess control-related beliefs about mind wandering. Scores on the scale predict mind wandering (Study 1) and intrusive thoughts (Study 2) in everyday life, thought control strategies and dysfunctional responses to unwanted thoughts (Study 2), and mind wandering during reading in the laboratory (Studies 3–6). Moreover, experimentally induced lay theories affect mind-wandering rates during reading (Studies 4 and 5). Finally, the effectiveness of strategies people can use to reduce their mind wandering depends on their lay theories (Studies 2 and 6).
AbramowitzJ. S.TolinD. F.StreetG. P. (2001). Paradoxical effects of thought suppression: A meta-analysis of controlled studies. Clinical Psychology Review, 21(5), 683–703.
2.
BerleD.StarcevicV. (2005). Thought–action fusion: Review of the literature and future directions. Clinical Psychology Review, 25(3), 263–284.
3.
BrownK. W.RyanR. M. (2003). The benefits of being present: Mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(4), 822–848.
CiceroD. C.KernsJ. G.McCarthyD. M. (2010). The Aberrant Salience Inventory: A new measure of psychosis proneness. Psychological Assessment, 22(3), 688–701.
6.
ClarkD. A.de SilvaP. (1985). The nature of depressive and anxious, intrusive thoughts: Distinct or uniform phenomena?Behaviour Research and Therapy, 23(4), 383–393.
7.
ColesM. E.HeimbergR. G. (2005). Thought control strategies in generalized anxiety disorder. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 29(1), 47–56.
8.
ComreyA. L.LeeH. B. (2013). A first course in factor analysis. Psychology Press.
9.
DweckC. S. (2000). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. Psychology Press.
10.
DweckC. S.ChiuC.HongY. (1995). Implicit theories: Elaboration and extension of the model. Psychological Inquiry: An International Journal for the Advancement of Psychological Theory, 6(4), 322–333.
11.
FulmerS. M.D’MelloS. K.StrainA.GraesserA. C. (2015). Interest-based text preference moderates the effect of text difficulty on engagement and learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 41, 98–110.
12.
GreenM. C.BrockT. C. (2000). The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(5), 701–721.
13.
HalvorsenM.HagenR.HjemdalO.EriksenM. S.SørliÅ. J.WaterlooK.EisemannM.WangC. E. (2015). Metacognitions and thought control strategies in unipolar major depression: A comparison of currently depressed, previously depressed, and never-depressed individuals. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 39(1), 31–40.
14.
HayesA. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (2nd ed.). Guilford Publications.
15.
HongS. M.FaeddaS. (1996). Refinement of the Hong Psychological Reactance Scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 56(1), 173–182.
16.
HornJ. L. (1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 30, 179–185. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02289447
17.
JobV.DweckC. S.WaltonG. M. (2010). Ego depletion—Is it all in your head? Implicit theories about willpower affect self-regulation. Psychological Science, 21(11), 1686–1693.
18.
KarnazeM. M.LevineL. J. (2018). Data versus Spock: Lay theories about whether emotion helps or hinders. Cognition and Emotion, 32(3), 549–565.
19.
KillingsworthM. A.GilbertD. T. (2010). A wandering mind is an unhappy mind. Science, 330(6006), 932.
20.
KlingerE.CoxW. M. (1987). Dimensions of thought flow in everyday life. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 7(2), 105–128.
21.
LindquistS.McLeanJ. (2011). Daydreaming and its correlates in an educational environment. Learning and Individual Differences, 21(2), 158–167.
22.
MageeJ. C.HardenK. P.TeachmanB. A. (2012). Psychopathology and thought suppression: A quantitative review. Clinical Psychology Review, 32(3), 189–201.
23.
MoldenD. C.DweckC. S. (2006). Finding “meaning” in psychology: A lay theories approach to self-regulation, social perception, and social development. American Psychologist, 6(3), 192–203.
24.
MrazekA. J.IhmE. D.MoldenD. C.MrazekM. D.ZedeliusC. M.SchoolerJ. W. (2018). Expanding minds: Growth mindsets of self-regulation and the influences on effort and perseverance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 79, 164–180.
25.
MrazekM. D.FranklinM. S.PhillipsD. T.BairdB.SchoolerJ. W. (2013). Mindfulness training improves working memory capacity and GRE performance while reducing mind wandering. Psychological Science, 24(5), 776–781.
26.
MrazekM. D.MooneyhamB. W.MrazekK. L.SchoolerJ. W. (2016). Pushing the limits: Cognitive, affective, and neural plasticity revealed by an intensive multifaceted intervention. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 10, Article 117. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00117
27.
MrazekM. D.SmallwoodJ.SchoolerJ. W. (2012). Mindfulness and mind-wandering: Finding convergence through opposing constructs. Emotion, 12(3), 442–448.
28.
PhillipsN. E.MillsC.D’MelloS.RiskoE. F. (2016). On the influence of re-reading on mind wandering. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69(12), 2338–2357.
29.
RachmanS. (1981). Part I. Unwanted intrusive cognitions. Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy, 3(3), 89–99.
30.
RaykovT.MarcoulidesG. A. (2016). Scale reliability evaluation under multiple assumption violations. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 23(2), 302–313.
31.
RobisonM. K.UnsworthN. (2018). Cognitive and contextual correlates of spontaneous and deliberate mind-wandering. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 44(1), 85–98.
32.
ScheibeS.SheppesG.StaudingerU. M. (2015). Distract or reappraise? Age-related differences in emotion-regulation choice. Emotion, 15(6), 677–681.
33.
SchönbrodtF. D.PeruginiM. (2013). At what sample size do correlations stabilize?Journal of Research in Personality, 47(5), 609–612.
34.
SchoolerJ. W.ReichleE.HalpernD. (2004). Zoning out while reading: Evidence for dissociations between experience and metaconsciousness. In LevinD. T. (Ed.), Thinking and seeing: Visual metacognition in adults and children (pp. 203–226). MIT Press.
35.
SchoolerJ. W.SmallwoodJ.ChristoffK.HandyT. C.ReichleE. D.SayetteM. A. (2011). Meta-awareness, perceptual decoupling and the wandering mind. Trends in Cognitive Neurosciences, 15(7), 319–326.
36.
SeliP.CarriereJ. S.SmilekD. (2015). Not all mind wandering is created equal: Dissociating deliberate from spontaneous mind wandering. Psychological Research, 79(5), 750–758.
37.
SeliP.JonkerT. R.CheyneJ. A.CortesK.SmilekD. (2015). Can research participants comment authoritatively on the validity of their self-reports of mind wandering and task engagement?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 41(3), 701–709.
38.
SeliP.RiskoE. F.SmilekD. (2016). On the necessity of distinguishing between unintentional and intentional mind wandering. Psychological Science, 27(5), 685–691.
39.
SeliP.RiskoE. F.SmilekD.SchacterD. L. (2016). Mind-wandering with and without intention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(8), 605–617.
40.
SeliP.SchacterD. L.RiskoE. F.SmilekD. (2019). Increasing participant motivation reduces rates of intentional and unintentional mind wandering. Psychological Research, 83(5), 1057–1069.
41.
SeliP.WammesJ. D.RiskoE. F.SmilekD. (2016). On the relation between motivation and retention in educational contexts: The role of intentional and unintentional mind wandering. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(4), 1280–1287.
42.
ShafranR.ThordarsonD. S.RachmanS. (1996). Thought-action fusion in obsessive compulsive disorder. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 10(5), 379–391.
43.
SmallwoodJ.McSpaddenM.SchoolerJ. W. (2008). When attention matters: The curious incident of the wandering mind. Memory & Cognition, 36(6), 1144–1150.
44.
SmallwoodJ.NindL.O’ConnorR. C. (2009). When is your head at? An exploration of the factors associated with the temporal focus of the wandering mind. Consciousness and Cognition, 18(1), 118–125.
45.
TroyA. S.ShallcrossA. J.DavisT. S.MaussI. B. (2013). History of mindfulness-based cognitive therapy is associated with increased cognitive reappraisal ability. Mindfulness, 4(3), 213–222.
46.
WellsA. (2005). Detached mindfulness in cognitive therapy: A metacognitive analysis and ten techniques. Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy, 23(4), 337–355.
47.
WellsA.DaviesM. I. (1994). The Thought Control Question-naire: A measure of individual differences in the control of unwanted thoughts. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 32(8), 871–878.
48.
ZedeliusC. M.BroadwayJ. M.SchoolerJ. W. (2015). Motivating meta-awareness of mind wandering: A way to catch the mind in flight?Consciousness and Cognition, 36, 44–53.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
