A simple compliment can make someone’s day, start a new friendship, or just make the world a better, kinder place. So, why don’t people give more compliments? Perhaps people misforecast the effect their compliment will have. Five studies explored this possibility. In Studies 1a and 1b, compliment givers underestimated how positively the person receiving their compliment would feel, with consequences for their likelihood of giving a compliment. Compliment givers also overestimated how bothered and uncomfortable the recipient would feel (Study 2)—and did so even in hindsight (Study 3). Compliment givers’ own anxiety and concern about their competence led to their misprediction, whereas third-party forecasters were accurate (Study 4). Finally, despite compliment givers’ anxiety at the prospect of giving compliments across our studies, they felt better after having done so (Study 4). Our studies suggest that people misestimate their compliments’ value to others, and so they refrain from engaging in this prosocial behavior.
AbbeyA. (1982). Sex differences in attributions for friendly behavior: Do males misperceive females’ friendliness?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 830–838.
2.
ArkinR. M.AppelmanA. J.BurgerJ. M. (1980). Social anxiety, self-presentation, and the self-serving bias in causal attribution. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 23–35.
3.
AspinwallL. G.TaylorS. E. (1993). Effects of social comparison direction, threat, and self-esteem on affect, self-evaluation, and expected success. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 708–722.
4.
BatesD.MaechlerM.BolkerB.WalkerS. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67, 1–48.
5.
BaumeisterR. F.LearyM. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497–529.
6.
BohnsV. K.DeVincentL. A. (2019). Rejecting unwanted romantic advances is more difficult than suitors realize. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 10, 1102–1110.
7.
BoothbyE. J.CooneyG.SandstromG. M.ClarkM. S. (2018). The liking gap in conversations: Do people like us more than we think?Psychological Science, 29, 1742–1756.
8.
BrownP.LevinsonS. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage (Vol. 4). Cambridge University Press.
9.
CloreG. L.GasperK.GarvinE. (2001). Affect as information. In ForgasJ. P. (Ed.), Handbook of affect and social cognition (pp. 121–144). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
10.
DePauloB. M.TangJ. (1994). Social anxiety and social judgment: The example of detecting deception. Journal of Research in Personality, 28, 142–153.
11.
DeriS.DavidaiS.GilovichT. (2017). Home alone: Why people believe others’ social lives are richer than their own. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113, 858–877.
12.
DunnE. W.AkninL. B.NortonM. I. (2008). Spending money on others promotes happiness. Science, 319, 1687–1688.
13.
DurontoP. M.NishidaT.NakayamaS. I. (2005). Uncertainty, anxiety, and avoidance in communication with strangers. Inter-national Journal of Intercultural Relations, 29, 549–560.
FarrisC.TreatT. A.VikenR. J.McFallR. M. (2008). Sexual coercion and the misperception of sexual intent. Clinical Psychology Review, 28, 48–66.
16.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.LangA. G.BuchnerA. (2007). G* Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191.
17.
FiskeS. T.CuddyA. J.GlickP. (2007). Universal dimensions of social cognition: Warmth and competence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 77–83.
18.
FlynnF. J.LakeV. K. B. (2008). If you need help, just ask: Underestimating compliance with direct requests for help. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 128–143.
19.
FreemanR. B. (1997). Working for nothing: The supply of volunteer labor. Journal of Labor Economics, 15, 140–166.
20.
FreyB. S.MeierS. (2004). Social comparisons and pro-social behavior: Testing “conditional cooperation” in a field experiment. American Economic Review, 94, 1717–1722.
21.
GilovichT.MedvecV. H.SavitskyK. (2000). The spotlight effect in social judgment: An egocentric bias in estimates of the salience of one’s own actions and appearance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 211–222.
22.
GilovichT.SavitskyK.MedvecV. H. (1998). The illusion of transparency: Biased assessments of others’ ability to read one’s emotional states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 332–346.
23.
GoffmanE. (1963). Behavior in public places. Free Press.
24.
HelliwellJ. F.AkninL. B. (2018). Expanding the social science of happiness. Nature Human Behavior, 2, 248–252.
25.
HouseJ. S.LandisK. R.UmbersonD. (1988). Social relationships and health. Science, 241, 540–545.
26.
IsenA. M.LevinP. F. (1972). Effect of feeling good on helping: Cookies and kindness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 21(3), 384–388.
27.
Jacques-TiuraA. J.AbbeyA.ParkhillM. R.ZawackiT. (2007). Why do some men misperceive women’s sexual intentions more frequently than others do? An application of the confluence model. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 1467–1480.
28.
JonesE. E. (1964). Integration: A social-psychological analysis. Appleton-Century-Crofts.
29.
JonesE. E.WortmanC. (1973). Integration: An attributional approach. General Learning Corp.
30.
KirschtJ. P.HaefnerD. P.KegelesS. S.RosenstockI. M. (1966). A national study of health beliefs. Journal of Health and Human Behavior, 7, 248–254.
31.
KumarA.EpleyN. (2018). Undervaluing gratitude: Expressers misunderstand the consequences of showing appreciation. Psychological Science, 29, 1423–1435.
32.
KuporD.FlynnF.NortonM. I. (2017). Half a gift is not half-hearted: A giver–receiver asymmetry in the thoughtfulness of partial gifts. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43, 1686–1695.
33.
KuznetsovaA.BrockhoffP. B.ChristensenR. H. B. (2014). lmerTest: Tests for random and fixed effects for linear mixed effect models (lmer objects of lme4 package). R package version 2.0-6. R-project.org/package=lmerTest.
34.
LearyM. R.DownsD. L. (1995). Interpersonal functions of the self-esteem motive. In KernisM. H. (Eds.), Efficacy, agency, and self-esteem (pp. 123–144). Springer.
35.
LearyM. R.TamborE. S.TerdalS. K.DownsD. L. (1995). Self-esteem as an interpersonal monitor: The sociometer hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 518–530.
36.
McCroskeyJ. C. (1992). Reliability and validity of the willingness to communicate scale. Communication Quarterly, 40, 16–25.
37.
McCroskeyJ. C.RichmondV. P. (1990). Willingness to communicate: A cognitive view. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 5, 19–37.
38.
McIntyreC. W.WatsonD.ClarkL. A.CrossS. A. (1991). The effect of induced social interaction on positive and negative affect. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 29, 67–70.
39.
MendesW. B.BlascovichJ.MajorB.SeeryM. (2001). Challenge and threat responses during downward and upward social comparisons. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31(5), 477–497.
40.
MezulisA. H.AbramsonL. Y.HydeJ. S.HankinB. L. (2004). Is there a universal positivity bias in attributions? A meta-analytic review of individual, developmental, and cultural differences in the self-serving attributional bias. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 711–747.
41.
MooreD. A.HealyP. J. (2008). The trouble with overconfidence. Psychological Review, 115(2), 502–517.
42.
PerloffL. S. (1983). Perceptions of vulnerability to victimization. Journal of Social Issues, 39, 41–61.
43.
PerloffL. S.FetzerB. K. (1986). Self–other judgments and perceived vulnerability to victimization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 502–510.
44.
RoghanizadM. M.BohnsV. K. (2017). Ask in person: You’re less persuasive than you think over email. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 69, 223–226.
45.
RossL.GreeneD.HouseP. (1977). The “false consensus effect”: An egocentric bias in social perception and attribution processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 279–301.
46.
SandstromG. M.BoothbyE. J. (manuscript accepted). Why do people avoid talking to strangers? A mini meta-analysis of predictions and experiences. Self and Identity.
47.
SandstromG. M.BoothbyE. J.CooneyG. Talking to strangers: A week-long intervention reduces barriers to social connection. [Unpublished manuscript]
48.
SandstromG. M.DunnE. W. (2014a). Social interactions and well-being: The surprising power of weak ties. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40, 910–922.
49.
SandstromG. M.DunnE. W. (2014b). Is efficiency overrated? Minimal social interactions lead to belonging and positive affect. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 5, 437–442.
50.
SavitskyK.EpleyN.GilovichT. (2001). Do others judge us as harshly as we think? Overestimating the impact of our failures, shortcomings, and mishaps. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 44–56.
51.
SavitskyK.GilovichT. (2003). The illusion of transparency and the alleviation of speech anxiety. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 618–625.
52.
SchegloffE. A.JeffersonG.SacksH. (1977). The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language, 53, 361–382.
53.
SharotT. (2011). The optimism bias. Current Biology, 21(23), R941–R945.
54.
SheltonJ. N.RichesonJ. A. (2005). Intergroup contact and pluralistic ignorance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 91–107.
55.
SweenyK.CarrollP. J.ShepperdJ. A. (2006). Is optimism always best? Future outlooks and preparedness. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15, 302–306.
56.
TesserA.RosenS. (1975). The reluctance to transmit bad news. In BerkowitzL. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 8, pp. 193–232). Academic Press
57.
ThoitsP. A.HewittL. N. (2001). Volunteer work and well-being. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 42, 115–131.
58.
Van BovenL.LoewensteinG. (2003). Social projection of transient drive states. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 1159–1168.
59.
Van BovenL.LoewensteinG.DunningD. (2005). The illusion of courage in social predictions: Underestimating the impact of fear of embarrassment on other people. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 96(2), 130–141.
60.
VittenglJ. R.HoltC. S. (2000). Getting acquainted: The relationship of self-disclosure and social attraction to positive affect. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 17, 53–66.
61.
WeinsteinN.RyanR. M. (2010). When helping helps: Autonomous motivation for prosocial behavior and its influence on well-being for the helper and recipient. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 222–224.
62.
WeinsteinN. D. (1980). Unrealistic optimism about future life events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 806–820.
63.
WeinsteinN. D. (1987). Unrealistic optimism about susceptibility to health problems: Conclusions from a community-wide sample. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 10, 481–500.
64.
WhillansA. V.ChristieC. D.CheungS.JordanA. H.ChenF. S. (2017). From misperception to social connection: Correlates and consequences of overestimating others’ social connectedness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43(12), 1696–1711.
65.
WillsT. A. (1981). Downward comparison principles in social psychology. Psychological Bulletin, 90, 245–271.
66.
WojciszkeB. (1994). Multiple meanings of behavior: Construing actions in terms of competence or morality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 222–232.
67.
ZakiJ.MitchellJ. P. (2011). Equitable decision making is associated with neural markers of intrinsic value. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108, 19761–19766.
68.
ZhaoX.EpleyN. (2020a). Kind words do not become tired words: Undervaluing the positive impact of frequent compliments. Self and Identity, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2020.1761438
69.
ZhaoX.EpleyN. (2020b). Insufficiently complimentary? Underestimating the positive impact of compliments creates a barrier to expressing them [Unpublished manuscript]. University of Chicago.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
