Does merely referencing that an object or entity has changed affect people’s attitudes and intentions toward it? This research investigates the possibility that change references spark curiosity and information seeking, which can have a positive or negative effect on people’s evaluations of a target stimulus, depending on the information environment. Seven experiments reveal that referencing that an object or entity has changed decreases perceptions of its longevity, but also sparks curiosity about it—a desire to learn more. This curiosity motivates people to seek information about the object or entity, which can enhance or depress their evaluations depending on whether that information search leads to favorable or unfavorable information. When further information is unavailable, change references appear to have a negative impact on people’s evaluations, consistent with well-established longevity biases. This research suggests that change references have an important and generalizable impact on persuasive outcomes and pinpoints the conditions surrounding and processes driving this effect.
AdamL.MancaD.BellR. (2016). Can Facebook be used for research? Experiences using Facebook to recruit pregnant women for a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 18(9), 14388–18871.
AlvesL.AntunesN.AgriciO.SousaC.RamosC. (2016). Click bait: You won’t believe what happens next!. Fronteiras: Journal of Social Technological and Environmental Science, 5(2), 196–213.
5.
BriñolP.PettyR.TormalaZ. (2004). Self-validation of cognitive responses to advertisements. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(4), 559–573.
6.
CacioppoJ.PettyR. (1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42(1), 116–131.
CrandallC.EidelmanS.SkitkaL.MorganS. (2009). Status quo framing increases support for torture. Social Influence, 4(1), 1–10.
9.
EidelmanS.CrandallC. (2009). On the automaticity of the status quo. In JostJ.KayA.ThorisdottirH. (Eds.), Social and psychological bases of ideology and system justification (pp. 85–105). Oxford University Press.
10.
EidelmanS.CrandallC. (2014). The intuitive traditionalist: How biases for existence and longevity promote the status quo. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 50, 53–104.
11.
EidelmanS.PattershallJ.CrandallC. (2010). Longer is better. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(6), 993–998.
12.
FabrigarL.PettyR. (1999). The role of the affective and cognitive bases of attitudes in susceptibility to affectively and cognitively based persuasion. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(3), 363–381.
GolmanR.LoewensteinG. (2018). Information gaps: A theory of preferences regarding the presence and absence of information. Decision, 5(3), 143–164.
16.
JangS.NamkungY. (2009). Perceived quality, emotions, and behavioral intentions: Application of an extended Mehrabian–Russell model to restaurants. Journal of Business Research, 62(4), 451–460.
17.
KhanU.KuporD. (2016). Risk (mis) perception: When greater risk reduces risk perception. Journal of Consumer Research, 43(5), 769–786.
KrugerJ.WirtzD.Van BovenL.AltermattT. (2004). The effort heuristic. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40(1), 91–98.
20.
KuikenJ.SchuthA.SpittersM.MarxM. (2017). Effective headlines of newspaper articles in a digital environment. Digital Journalism, 5(10), 1300–1314.
21.
KuporD. M.LaurinK.LevavJ. (2015). qAnticipating divine protection? Reminders of god can increase nonmoral risk taking. Psychological Science, 26(4), 374–384.
22.
KuporD.LaurinK. (2020). Probable cause: The influence of prior probabilities on forecasts and perceptions of magnitude. Journal of Consumer Research, 46(5), 833–852.
23.
KuporD.ReichT.LaurinK. (2018). The (bounded) benefits of correction: The unanticipated interpersonal advantages of making and correcting mistakes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 149, 165–178.
24.
KuporD.TormalaZ. (2015). Persuasion, interrupted: The effect of momentary interruptions on message processing and persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research, 42(2), 300–315.
25.
KuporD.TormalaZ. (2018). When moderation fosters persuasion: The persuasive power of deviatory reviews. Journal of Consumer Research, 45(3), 490–510.
26.
LancasterA. (2004). What does curiosity really do to the cat? A look at how message exposure can lead to illicit drug trial among college students. Mass Communication and Society, 7(1), 77–95.
27.
LoewensteinG. (1994). The psychology of curiosity: A review and reinterpretation. Psychological Bulletin, 116(1), 75–98.
28.
LynchJ.ChakravartiD.MitraA. (1991). Contrast effects in consumer judgments: Changes in mental representations or in the anchoring of rating scales. Journal of Consumer Research, 18(3), 284–297.
29.
MayP.TiitinenH.IlmoniemiR.NymanG.TaylorJ.NäätänenR. (1999). Frequency change detection in human auditory cortex. Journal of Computational Neuroscience, 6, 99–120.
30.
MoralesA. (2005). Giving firms an “E” for effort: Consumer responses to high-effort firms. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(4), 806–812.
31.
PedersenE.HelmuthE.MarshallG.SchellT.PunKayM.KurzJ. (2015). Using Facebook to recruit young adult veterans: Online mental health research. JMIR Research Protocols, 4(2), Article e63.
32.
PettyR.CacioppoJ. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In PettyR.CacioppoJ. (Eds.), Communication and persuasion (pp. 1–24). Springer.
33.
RosenkransG. (2010). Maximizing user interactivity through banner ad design. Journal of Promotion Management, 16(3), 265–287.
34.
RuckerD. D.TormalaZ. L.PettyR. E.BriñolP. (2014). Consumer conviction and commitment: An appraisal-based framework for attitude certainty. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 24(1), 119–136.
SantosM.LeveC.PratkanisA. (1994). Hey buddy, can you spare seventeen cents? Mindful persuasion and the pique technique. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24(9), 755–764.
37.
SawickiV.WegenerD.ClarkJ.FabrigarL.SmithS.DursoG. (2013). Feeling conflicted and seeking information: When ambivalence enhances and diminishes selective exposure to attitude-consistent information. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39(6), 735–747.
38.
SimonsonI. (2015). Mission (largely) accomplished: What’s next for consumer BDT-JDM researchers?Journal of Marketing Behavior, 1(1), 9–35.
SussmanE.ChenS.Sussman-FortJ.DincesE. (2014). The five myths of MMN: Redefining how to use MMN in basic and clinical research. Brain Topography, 27(4), 553–564.
TormalaZ.JiaJ.NortonM. (2012). The preference for potential. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(4), 567–583.
43.
TormalaZ.PettyR. (2002). What doesn’t kill me makes me stronger: The effects of resisting persuasion on attitude certainty. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(6), 1298–1313.
44.
TormalaZ.PettyR. (2004). Resistance to persuasion and attitude certainty: The moderating role of elaboration. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(11), 1446–1457.
45.
TormalaZ.RuckerD. (2018). Attitude certainty: Antecedents, consequences, and new directions. Consumer Psychology Review, 1(1), 72–89.
46.
Van de GrindW.KoenderinkJ.Van DoornA. (1986). The distribution of human motion detector properties in the monocular visual field. Vision Research, 26(5), 797–810.
47.
WangC.HuangY. (2018). I want to know the answer! Give me fish ‘n’ chips!: The impact of curiosity on indulgent choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 44(5), 1052–1067.
48.
WarnerR.KiddooK. (2014). Are the latter-day saints too latter day? Perceived age of the Mormon Church and attitudes toward Mormons. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 17(1), 67–78.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
