Can perceived responsiveness, the belief that meaningful others attend to and react supportively to core defining feature of the self, shape the structure of attitudes? We predicted that perceived responsiveness fosters open-mindedness, which, in turn, allows people to be simultaneously aware of opposing evaluations of an attitude object. We also hypothesized that this process will result in behavior intentions to consider multiple perspectives about the topic. Furthermore, we predicted that perceived responsiveness will enable people to tolerate accessible opposing evaluations without feeling discomfort. We found consistent support for our hypotheses in four laboratory experiments (Studies 1–3, 5) and a diary study (Study 4). Moreover, we found that perceived responsiveness reduces the perception that one’s initial attitude is correct and valid. These findings indicate that attitude structure and behavior intentions can be changed by an interpersonal variable, unrelated to the attitude itself.
AmesD.MaissenL. B.BrocknerJ. (2012). The role of listening in interpersonal influence. Journal of Research in Personality, 46(3), 345–349.
2.
ArmitageC. J.ConnerM. (2000). Attitudinal ambivalence: A test of three key hypotheses. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1421–1432.
3.
BirnbaumG. E.ReisH. T. (2012). When does responsiveness pique sexual interest? Attachment and sexual desire in initial acquaintanceships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 946–958.
4.
BolgerN.LaurenceauJ.-P. (2013). Intensive longitudinal methods: An introduction to diary and experience sampling research. Guilford Press.
5.
CacioppoJ. T.PettyR. E. (1981). Social psychological procedures for cognitive response assessment: The thought-listing technique. In MerluzziT.GlassC.GenestM. (Eds.), Cognitive assessment (pp. 309–342). Guilford.
6.
CacioppoJ. T.PettyR. E. (1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 116.
7.
CaprarielloP. A.ReisH. T. (2011). Perceived partner responsiveness minimizes defensive reactions to failure. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2, 365–372.
8.
CastroD. R.KlugerA. N.ItzchakovG. (2016). Does avoidance-attachment style attenuate the benefits of being listened to?European Journal of Social Psychology, 46, 762–775.
9.
ClarkJ. K.WegenerD. T. (2013). Message position, information processing, and persuasion: The discrepancy motives model. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 47, pp. 189–232). Elsevier.
10.
DeMarreeK. G.MorrisonK. R.WheelerS. C.PettyR. E. (2011). Self-ambivalence and resistance to subtle self-change attempts. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 674–686.
11.
EstradaC. A.IsenA. M.YoungM. J. (1997). Positive affect facilitates integration of information and decreases anchoring in reasoning among physicians. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 72, 117–135.
12.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.LangA.-G.BuchnerA. (2007). G* Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191.
13.
FazioR. H.PowellM. C. (1997). On the value of knowing one’s likes and dislikes: Attitude accessibility, stress, and health in college. Psychological Science, 8(6), 430–436.
14.
FredricksonB. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist, 56, 218–226.
15.
FreyD. (1986). Recent research on selective exposure to information. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 19, pp. 41–80). Elsevier.
16.
GilbertD. T.PinelE. C.WilsonT. D.BlumbergS. J.WheatleyT. P. (1998). Immune neglect: A source of durability bias in affective forecasting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 617–638.
17.
GohJ. X.HallJ. A.RosenthalR. (2016). Mini meta-analysis of your own studies: Some arguments on why and a primer on how. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 10, 535–549.
18.
HayesA. F. (2015). An index and test of linear moderated mediation. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 50(1), 1–22.
19.
HayesA. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford.
20.
HellerJ. F.PallakM. S.PicekJ. M. (1973). The interactive effects of intent and threat on boomerang attitude change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 26, 273–279.
21.
ItzchakovG.AmarM.Van HarreveldF. (2020). Don’t let the facts ruin a good story: The effect of vivid reviews on attitude ambivalence and its coping mechanisms. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 88, 103938.
22.
ItzchakovG.DeMarreeK. G.KlugerA. N.Turjeman-LeviY. (2018). The listener sets the tone: High-quality listening increases attitude clarity and behavior-intention consequences. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 44, 762–778.
23.
ItzchakovG.KlugerA. N. (2017a). Can holding a stick improve listening at work? The effect of Listening Circles on employees’ emotions and cognitions. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 26, 663–676.
24.
ItzchakovG.KlugerA. N. (2017b). The listening circle: A simple tool to enhance listening and reduce extremism among employees. Organizational Dynamics, 46, 220–226.
25.
ItzchakovG.KlugerA. N.CastroD. R. (2017). I am aware of my inconsistencies but can tolerate them: The effect of high quality listening on speakers’ attitude ambivalence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43, 105–120.
26.
JostJ. T.FedericoC. M.NapierJ. L. (2009). Political ideology: Its structure, functions, and elective affinities. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 307–337.
27.
KaplanK. J. (1972). On the ambivalence-indifference problem in attitude theory and measurement: A suggested modification of the semantic differential technique. Psychological Bulletin, 77, 361–372.
KruglanskiA. W.WebsterD. M.KlemA. (1993). Motivated resistance and openness to persuasion in the presence or absence of prior information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 861–876.
30.
KumashiroM.SedikidesC. (2005). Taking on board liability-focused information: Close positive relationships as a self-bolstering resource. Psychological Science, 16, 732–739.
31.
KundaZ. (1987). Motivated inference: Self-serving generation and evaluation of causal theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 636–647.
32.
KundaZ. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 480–498.
33.
LearyM. R.BaumeisterR. F. (2000). The nature and function of self-esteem: Sociometer theory. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 32, 1–32.
34.
LordC. G.RossL.LepperM. R. (1979). Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 2098–2109.
35.
LuttrellA.PettyR. E.BriñolP. (2016). Ambivalence and certainty can interact to predict attitude stability over time. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 63, 56–68.
36.
MikulincerM. (1997). Adult attachment style and information processing: Individual differences in curiosity and cognitive closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1217–1230.
37.
MurrayS.LamarcheV. M.SeeryM.JungH. Y.GriffinD.BrinkmanC. (2020). The social-safety system: Fortifying relationships in the face of the unforeseeable. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Advance online publication. doi:10.1037/pspi0000245.
38.
Newby-ClarkI. R.McGregorI.ZannaM. P. (2002). Thinking and caring about cognitive inconsistency: When and for whom does attitudinal ambivalence feel uncomfortable?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 157–166.
39.
PalmerD. L.KalinR. (1991). Predictive validity of the dogmatic rejection scale. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 212–212.
40.
PetrocelliJ. V.TormalaZ. L.RuckerD. D. (2007). Unpacking attitude certainty: Attitude clarity and attitude correctness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 30–41.
41.
PettyR. E.DeMarreeK. G.BriñolP.HorcajoJ.StrathmanA. J. (2008). Need for cognition can magnify or attenuate priming effects in social judgment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 900–912.
42.
PillaudV.CavazzaN.ButeraF. (2013). The social value of being ambivalent: Self-presentational concerns in the expression of attitudinal ambivalence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 1139–1151.
43.
PorterT.SchumannK. (2018). Intellectual humility and openness to the opposing view. Self and Identity, 17, 139–162.
44.
PriesterJ. R.PettyR. E. (1996). The gradual threshold model of ambivalence: Relating the positive and negative bases of attitudes to subjective ambivalence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 431–449.
45.
ReisH. T.ClarkM. S. (2013). Responsiveness. In SimpsonJ. A.CampbellL. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of close relationships (pp. 400–423). Oxford University Press.
46.
ReisH. T.ClarkM. S.HolmesJ. G. (2004). Perceived partner responsiveness as an organizing construct in the study of intimacy and closeness. In MashekD. J.AronA. (Eds.), Handbook of closeness and intimacy (pp. 211–236). Psychology Press.
47.
ReisH. T.GableS. L.ManiaciM. R. (2014). Methods for studying everyday experience in its natural context. Handbook of Research Methods in Social and Personality Psychology, 2, 373–403.
48.
ReisH. T.LeeK. Y.O’KeefeS. D.ClarkM. S. (2018). Perceived partner responsiveness promotes intellectual humility. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 79, 21–33.
49.
RogersC. R. (1980). A way of being. Houghton Mifflin.
50.
SawickiV.WegenerD. T.ClarkJ. K.FabrigarL. R.SmithS. M.DursoG. R. (2013). Feeling conflicted and seeking information: When ambivalence enhances and diminishes selective exposure to attitude-consistent information. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39(6), 735–747.
51.
SchwarzN. (1998). Accessible content and accessibility experiences: The interplay of declarative and experiential information in judgment. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 87–99.
52.
SedikidesC.GreggA. P. (2008). Self-enhancement: Food for thought. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 102–116.
53.
ShermanD. K.CohenG. L. (2006). The psychology of self-defense: Self-affirmation theory. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 183–242.
54.
SmithM. B.BrunerJ. S.WhiteR. W. (1956). Opinions and personality. John Wiley.
55.
SteeleC. M. (1988). The psychology of self-affirmation: Sustaining the integrity of the self. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 21, pp. 261–302). Elsevier.
56.
SteeleC. M.LiuT. J. (1983). Dissonance processes as self-affirmation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 5–19.
57.
ThompsonM. M.ZannaM. P.GriffinD. W. (1995). Let’s not be indifferent about (attitudinal) ambivalence. Attitude Strength: Antecedents and Consequences, 4, 361–386.
58.
TjosvoldD.JohnsonD. W.FabreyL. J. (1980). Effects of controversy and defensiveness on cognitive perspective-taking. Psychological Reports, 47, 1043–1053.
59.
Van HarreveldF.NohlenH. U.SchneiderI. K. (2015). The ABC of ambivalence: Affective, behavioral, and cognitive consequences of attitudinal conflict. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 52, pp. 285–324). Elsevier.
60.
Van HarreveldF.Van der PligtJ.de LiverY. N. (2009). The agony of ambivalence and ways to resolve it: Introducing the MAID model. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13, 45–61.
61.
WatsonD.ClarkL. A.TellegenA. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070.
62.
WeaverJ. R.BossonJ. K. (2011). I feel like I know you: Sharing negative attitudes of others promotes feelings of familiarity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 481–491.
63.
WebsterD. M.KruglanskiA. W. (1994). Individual differences in need for cognitive closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 1049–1062.
64.
WeiM.RussellD. W.MallinckrodtB.VogelD. L. (2007). The Experiences in Close Relationship Scale (ECR)-short form: Reliability, validity, and factor structure. Journal of Personality Assessment, 88, 187–204.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
