Growing evidence indicates that whether critical and hostile behavior harms relationships depends on how partners respond. The current studies test a key behavioral indicator of partners’ responsiveness by examining whether partners’ withdrawal when actors exhibit negative-direct behavior predicts within-person and longitudinal declines in perceived partner responsiveness and relationship satisfaction. Test of Actors’ negative-direct × Partners’ withdrawal interactions indicated that partners’ withdrawal in the context of actors’ negative-direct behavior when targeted for change during conflict discussions (Study 1, N = 162 dyads) and during daily interactions (Study 2, N = 151 dyads) predicted lower perceived partner responsiveness and relationship satisfaction. This Actor × Partner effect did not emerge when actors were pushing for change during conflict (Study 1) and was more consistent predicting perceived partner responsiveness. These results illustrate the importance of Actor × Partner effects and indicate that actors’ own destructive behavior provides an important context to diagnose partners’ responsiveness.
BakerL. R.McNultyJ. K. (2015). Adding insult to injury: Partner depression moderates the association between partner-regulation attempts and partners’ motivation to resolve interpersonal problems. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41, 839–852. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167215580777
2.
BaucomB. R.AtkinsD. C.EldridgeK.McFarlandP.SevierM.ChristensenA. (2011). The language of demand/withdraw: Verbal and vocal expression in dyadic interactions. Journal of Family Psychology, 25, 570–580. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024064
3.
BaucomB. R.DickensonJ. A.AtkinsD. C.BaucomD. H.FischerM. S.WeusthoffS.HahlwegK.ZimmermannT. (2015). The interpersonal process model of demand/withdraw behavior. Journal of Family Psychology, 29(1), 80–90. https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000044
4.
BaucomB. R.McFarlandP. T.ChristensenA. (2010). Gender, topic, and time in observed demand–withdraw interaction in cross- and same-sex couples. Journal of Family Psychology, 24(3), 233–242. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019717
5.
BerryD. S.WillinghamJ. K. (1997). Affective traits, responses to conflict, and satisfaction in romantic relationships. Journal of Research in Personality, 31(4), 564–576. https://doi.org/10.1006/jrpe.1997.2198
6.
BolgerN.LaurenceauJ.-P. (2013). Intensive longitudinal methods: An introduction to diary and experience sampling research. Guilford Press.
7.
BurrellN.KartchF.AllenM.HillC. (2014). A meta-analysis of demand/withdraw interaction patterns. In BurrellN.AllenM.GayleB.PreissR. (Eds.), Managing inter-personal conflict: Advances through meta-analysis (pp. 297–315). Routledge.
8.
CanevelloA.CrockerJ. (2010). Creating good relationships: Responsiveness, relationship quality, and interpersonal goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(1), 78–106. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018186
9.
CaughlinJ. P. (2002). The demand/withdraw pattern of communication as a predictor of marital satisfaction over time: Unresolved issues and future directions. Human Communication Research, 28(1), 49–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2002.tb00798.x
10.
CaughlinJ. P.HustonT. L. (2002). A contextual analysis of the association between demand/withdraw and marital satisfaction. Personal Relationships, 9(1), 95–119. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6811.00007
11.
ChristensenA.HeaveyC. L. (1990). Gender and social structure in the demand/withdraw pattern of marital conflict. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 73–81.
12.
ChristensenA.ShenkJ. L. (1991). Communication, conflict, and psychological distance in nondistressed, clinic, and divorcing couples. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59(3), 458–463. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.59.3.458
13.
ChristensenA.SullawayM. (1984). Communication Patterns Questionnaire [Unpublished manuscript]. University of California, Los Angeles.
14.
CohenC. L.BradburyT. N. (1997). Negative life events, marital interaction, and the longitudinal course of newlywed marriage. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 114–128. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.73.1.114
15.
CurranP. J.HussongA. M. (2009). Integrative data analysis: The simultaneous analysis of multiple data sets. Psychological Methods, 14(2), 81–100. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015914
16.
DonatoS.PariseM.PaganiA. F.BertoniA.IafrateR. (2014). Demand-withdraw, couple satisfaction and relationship duration. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 140, 200–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.04.410
17.
DrigotasS. M.WhitneyG. A.RusbultC. E. (1995). On the peculiarities of loyalty: A diary study of responses to dissatisfaction in everyday life. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 596–609. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167295216006
18.
FletcherG. J. O.OverallN. C.CampbellL. (2020). Reconsidering the “best practices” for testing the predictive validity of ideal standards: A response to Eastwick, Finkel, and Simpson (2018). Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167220910323
19.
FletcherG. J. O.SimpsonJ. A.ThomasG. (2000). The measurement of perceived relationship quality components: A confirmatory factor analytic approach. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(3), 340–354. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167200265007
20.
FletcherG. J. O.SimpsonJ. A.ThomasG.GilesL. (1999). Ideals in intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(1), 72–89. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.76.1.72
21.
GableS. L.GonzagaG. C.StrachmanA. (2006). Will you be there for me when things go right? Supportive responses to positive event disclosures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(5), 904–917. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.91.5.904
22.
GirmeY. U.OverallN. C.SimpsonJ. A. (2013). When visibility matters: Short-term versus long-term costs and benefits of visible and invisible support. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39(1), 1441–1454. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167213497802
GottmanJ. M.KrokoffL. J. (1989). Marital interaction and satisfaction: A longitudinal view. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 57, 47–52.
25.
GottmanJ. M.LevensonR. W. (1992). Marital processes predictive of later dissolution: Behavior, physiology, and health. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 221–233.
26.
GottmanJ. M.LevensonR. W. (2000). The timing of divorce: Predicting when a couple will divorce over a 14-year period. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62(3), 737–745. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.00737.x
27.
HeaveyC. L.ChristensenA.MalamuthN. M. (1995). The longitudinal impact of demand and withdrawal during marital conflict. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63(5), 797–801. http://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.63.5.797
28.
HeaveyC. L.LayneC.ChristensenA. (1993). Gender and conflict structure in marital interaction: A replication and extension. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61(1), 16–27. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.61.1.16
KarneyB. R.BradburyT. N. (1995). The longitudinal course of marital quality and stability: A review of theory, method and research. Psychological Bulletin, 118(1), 3–34.
31.
KarneyB. R.BradburyT. N. (1997). Neuroticism, marital interaction, and the trajectory of marital satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1075–1092. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.72.5.1075
32.
KelleyH. H.ThibautJ. W. (1978). Interpersonal relations: A theory of interdependence. John Wiley.
33.
KennyD. A.KashyD. A.CookW. L. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. Guilford Press.
34.
KurdekL. A. (1995). Predicting change in marital satisfaction from husbands’ and wives’ conflict resolution styles. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57(1), 153–164. https://doi.org/10.2307/353824
35.
LaurenceauJ. P.BarrettL. F.PietromonacoP. R. (1998). Intimacy as an interpersonal process: The importance of self-disclosure, partner disclosure, and perceived partner responsiveness in interpersonal exchanges. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(5), 1238–1251. http://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.5.1238
36.
LavnerJ. A.KarneyB. R.BradburyT. N. (2016). Does couples’ communication predict marital satisfaction, or does marital satisfaction predict communication?Journal of Marriage and Family, 78, 680–694. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12301
37.
LemayE. P.JrClarkM. S. (2008). How the head liberates the heart: Projection of communal responsiveness guides relationship promotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(4), 647–671. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.94.4.647
McGinnM. M.McFarlandP. T.ChristensenA. (2009). Antecedents and consequences of demand/withdraw. Journal of Family Psychology, 23, 749–757. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016185
40.
McNultyJ. K. (2016). Highlighting the contextual nature of interpersonal relationships. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 54, 247–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aesp.2016.02.003
41.
McNultyJ. K.RussellV. M. (2010). When “negative” behaviors are positive: A contextual analysis of the long-term effects of problem-solving behaviors on changes in relationship satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(4), 587–604. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017479
42.
MurrayS. L.BellaviaG. M.RoseP.GriffinD. W. (2003). Once hurt, twice hurtful: How perceived regard regulates daily marital interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 126–147. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.1.126
43.
OverallN. C. (2018). Does partners’ negative-direct communication during conflict help sustain perceived commitment and relationship quality across time?Social Psychological and Personality Science, 9(4), 481–492. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617712030
44.
OverallN. C. (2020). Behavioral variability reduces the harmful longitudinal effects of partners’ negative-direct behavior on relationship problems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000231
45.
OverallN. C.FletcherG. J. O.SimpsonJ. A. (2006). Regulation processes in intimate relationships: The role of ideal standards. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(4), 662–685. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.91.4.662
46.
OverallN. C.FletcherG. J. O.SimpsonJ. A.SibleyC. G. (2009). Regulating partners in intimate relationships: The costs and benefits of different communication strategies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(3), 620–639. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012961
47.
OverallN. C.GirmeY. U.LemayE. P.JrHammondM. D. (2014). Attachment anxiety and reactions to relationship threat: The benefits and costs of inducing guilt in romantic partners. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106, 235–256. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034371
48.
OverallN. C.HammondM. D.McNultyJ. K.FinkelE. J. (2016). When power shapes interpersonal behavior: Low relationship power predicts men’s aggressive responses to low situational power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111, 195–217. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000059
49.
OverallN. C.McNultyJ. K. (2017). What type of communication during conflict is beneficial for intimate relationships?Current Opinion in Psychology, 13, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.03.002
50.
OverallN. C.SibleyC. G. (2010). Convergent and discriminant validity of the Accommodation Scale: Evidence from three diary studies. Personality and Individual Differences, 48, 299–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2009.10.020
51.
OverallN. C.SibleyC. G.TravagliaL. K. (2010). Loyal but ignored: The benefits and costs of constructive communication behavior. Personal Relationships, 17(1), 127–148. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2010.01257.x
ReisH. T.ClarkM. S. (2013). Responsiveness. In SimpsonJ. A.CampbellL. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of close relationships (pp. 400–423). Oxford University Press.
54.
ReisH. T.ClarkM. S.HolmesJ. G. (2004). Perceived partner responsiveness as an organizing construct in the study of intimacy and closeness. In MashekD.AronA. (Eds.), The handbook of closeness and intimacy (pp. 201–225). Lawrence Erlbaum.
55.
RosenthalR.RosnowR. L. (2007). Essentials of behavioral research: Methods and data analysis (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
56.
RossJ. M.KarneyB. R.NguyenT. P.BradburyT. N. (2019). Communication that is maladaptive for middle-class couples is adaptive for socioeconomically disadvantaged couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 116(4), 582–597. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000158
57.
RusbultC. E.MartzJ. M.AgnewC. R. (1998). The investment model scale: Measuring commitment level, satisfaction level, quality of alternatives, and investment size. Personal Relationships, 5(4), 357–391. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.1998.tb00177.x
RusbultC. E.VeretteJ.WhitneyG. A.SlovikL. F.LipkusI. (1991). Accommodation processes in close relationships: Theory and preliminary empirical evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(1), 53–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.60.1.53
60.
SchrodtP.WittP. L.ShimkowskiJ. R. (2014). A meta-analytical review of the demand/withdraw pattern of interaction and its associations with individual, relational, and communicative outcomes. Communication Monographs, 81, 28–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2013.813632
61.
TimmonsA. C.ArbelR.MargolinG. (2017). Daily patterns of stress and conflict in couples: Associations with marital aggression and family-of-origin aggression. Journal of Family Psychology, 31(1), 93–104. https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000227
62.
TofighiD.MacKinnonD. P. (2011). RMediation: An R package for mediation analysis confidence intervals. Behavior Research Methods, 43(3), 692–700. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-011-0076-x
63.
VissermanM. L.RighettiF.ImpettE. A.KeltnerD.Van LangeP. A. M. (2018). It’s the motive that counts: Perceived sacrifice motives and gratitude in romantic relationships. Emotion, 18(5), 625–637. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000344
64.
WegerH. (2005). Disconfirming communication and self-verification in marriage: Associations among the demand/withdraw interaction pattern, feeling understood, and marital satisfaction. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 22(1), 19–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407505047835
65.
WieselquistJ.RusbultC. E.FosterC. A.AgnewC. R. (1999). Commitment, pro-relationship behavior, and trust in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 25(5), 942–966. https://doi.org/10.1037%2F0022-3514.77.5.942
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
