In most long-term romantic relationships, partners experience sexual conflicts of interest in which one partner declines the other partner’s sexual advances. We investigated the distinct ways people reject a partner’s advances (i.e., with reassuring, hostile, assertive, and deflecting behaviors) in Studies 1 and 2. Using cross-sectional (Study 3) and daily experience methods (Study 4), we investigated how perceptions of a partner’s rejection behaviors are linked with the rejected partner’s relationship and sexual satisfaction. We found robust evidence that perceived partner reassuring behaviors were associated with greater satisfaction, whereas perceived partner hostile behaviors were associated with lower levels of satisfaction. Perceived partner responsiveness was a key mechanism underlying the effects. Findings for assertive and deflecting behaviors were limited, but the effect of deflecting behaviors was qualified by levels of hostile behaviors for sexual satisfaction. Findings provide the first empirical investigation of the specific ways partners can decline one another’s advances to preserve satisfaction.
BirnbaumG. E.ReisH. T.MizrahiM.Kanat-MaymonY.SassO.Granovski-MilnerC. (2016). Intimately connected: The importance of partner responsiveness for experiencing sexual desire. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111(4), 530.
5.
BraunV.ClarkeV. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
6.
BrownT. A. (2014). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. Guilford Publications.
7.
ByersE. S. (2011). Beyond the birds and the bees and was it good for you? Thirty years of research on sexual communication. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 52(1), 20.
8.
ByersE. S.DemmonsS. (1999). Sexual satisfaction and sexual self-disclosure within dating relationships. Journal of Sex Research, 36(2), 180–189.
9.
ByersE. S.HeinleinL. (1989). Predicting initiations and refusals of sexual activities in married and cohabiting heterosexual couples. Journal of Sex Research, 26(2), 210–231.
10.
ByersE. S.LewisK. (1988). Dating couples’ disagreements over the desired level of sexual intimacy. Journal of Sex Research, 24(1), 15–29.
11.
CarsonR. C. (1969). Interaction concepts of personality. Aldine.
12.
CheungG. W.RensvoldR. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 233–255.
13.
CollinsN. L.FeeneyB. C. (2000). A safe haven: An attachment theory perspective on support seeking and caregiving in intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(6), 1053–1073.
14.
CupachW. R.ComstockJ. (1990). Satisfaction with sexual communication in marriage: Links to sexual satisfaction and dyadic adjustment. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 7(2), 179–186.
15.
DaviesS.KatzJ.JacksonJ. L. (1999). Sexual desire discrepancies: Effects on sexual and relationship satisfaction in heterosexual dating couples. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 28(6), 553–567.
16.
DavisD.ShaverP. R.WidamanK. F.VernonM. L.FolletteW. C.BeitzK. (2006). “I can’t get no satisfaction”: Insecure attachment, inhibited sexual communication, and sexual dissatisfaction. Personal Relationships, 13(4), 465–483.
17.
DayL. C.MuiseA.JoelS.ImpettE. A. (2015). To do it or not to do it? How communally motivated people navigate sexual interdependence dilemmas. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41(6), 791–804.
18.
DienerE.SeligmanM. E. (2002). Very happy people. Psychological Science, 13(1), 81–84.
19.
DobsonK.ZhuJ.BalzariniR. N.CampbellL. (2019). Responses to sexual advances and satisfaction in romantic relationships: Is yes good and no bad?Social Psychological and Personality Science.
20.
FallisE. E.RehmanU. S.WoodyE. Z.PurdonC. (2016). The longitudinal association of relationship satisfaction and sexual satisfaction in long-term relationships. Journal of Family Psychology, 30(7), 822–831.
21.
FraleyR. C.HeffernanM. E.VicaryA. M.BrumbaughC. C. (2011). The experiences in close relationships—Relationship Structures Questionnaire: A method for assessing attachment orientations across relationships. Psychological Assessment, 23(3), 615–625.
22.
GoodboyA. K.BrannM. (2010). Flirtation rejection strategies: Toward an understanding of communicative disinterest in flirting. The Qualitative Report, 15(2), 268–278.
23.
GottmanJ. M. (2014). What predicts divorce? The relationship between marital processes and marital outcomes. Psychology Press.
24.
GreeneK.FaulknerS. L. (2005). Gender, belief in the sexual double standard, and sexual talk in heterosexual dating relationships. Sex Roles, 53(3–4), 239–251.
25.
GuerreroL. K.FarinelliL.McEwanB. (2009). Attachment and relational satisfaction: The mediating effect of emotional communication. Communication Monographs, 76(4), 487–514.
26.
HaaseC. M. (2014). Emotion regulation in intimate relationships. Society for the Study of Behavioral Development, 1(65), 17–21.
27.
HaupertM. L.GesselmanA. N.MoorsA. C.FisherH. E.GarciaJ. R. (2017). Prevalence of experiences with consensual nonmonogamous relationships: Findings from two national samples of single Americans. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 43(5), 424–440.
28.
HinkinT. R. (1998). A brief tutorial on the development of measures for use in survey questionnaires. Organizational Research Methods, 2(1), 104–121.
29.
HuL. T.BentlerP. M. (1999). Structural equation modeling: A multidisciplinary journal. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55.
30.
HurlbertD. F. (1991). The role of assertiveness in female sexuality: A comparative study between sexually assertive and sexually nonassertive women. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 17(3), 183–190.
31.
ImpettE. A.PeplauL. A.GableS. L. (2005). Approach and avoidance sexual motives: Implications for personal and interpersonal well-being. Personal Relationships, 12(4), 465–482.
32.
JourilesE. N.Simpson RoweL.McDonaldR.KleinsasserA. L. (2014). Women’s expression of anger in response to unwanted sexual advances: Associations with sexual victimization. Psychology of Violence, 4(2), 170–183.
33.
KarneyB. R.BradburyT. N. (1995). The longitudinal course of marital quality and stability: A review of theory, method, and research. Psychological Bulletin, 118(1), 3–34.
34.
KimJ. J.MuiseA.SakalukJ. K.ImpettE.A. (2019). Sexual Rejection Scale. In MilhausenR.SakalukJ. K.FisherT.DavisC. M.YarberW. (Eds). The handbook of sexuality-related measures (4th ed.).
35.
LaneS. P.ShroutP. E. (2010). Assessing the reliability of within-person change over time: A dynamic factor analysis approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 45(6), 1027.
36.
LaurenceauJ. P.BolgerN. (2005). Using diary methods to study marital and family processes. Journal of Family Psychology, 19(1), 86.
37.
LawranceK.ByersE. S. (1998). Interpersonal Exchange Model of Sexual Satisfaction Questionnaire. In DavisC. M.YarberW. L.BauremanR.SchreerG.DavisS. L. (Eds.), Sexuality related measures: A compendium (2nd ed., pp. 514–519). SAGE.
38.
LearyM. R.SpringerC.NegelL.AnsellE.EvansK. (1998). The causes, phenomenology, and consequences of hurt feelings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(5), 1225–1237.
39.
LearyT. (1957). Interpersonal diagnosis of personality: A functional theory and methodology for personality evaluation. Ronald Press.
40.
LemayE. P.Jr.ClarkM. S.FeeneyB. C. (2007). Projection of responsiveness to needs and the construction of satisfying communal relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(5), 834–853.
41.
MaasC. J. M.HoxJ. J. (2005). Sufficient sample sizes for multilevel modeling. Methodology, 1, 86–92.
42.
MaiselN. C.GableS. L.StrachmanA. (2008). Responsive behaviors in good times and in bad. Personal Relationships, 15(3), 317–338.
43.
MarkK. P. (2015). Sexual desire discrepancy. Current Sexual Health Reports, 7(3), 198–202.
44.
MarkmanH. J.RhoadesG. K.StanleyS. M.RaganE. P.WhittonS. W. (2010). The premarital communication roots of marital distress and divorce: The first five years of marriage. Journal of Family Psychology, 24(3), 289–298.
45.
McNultyJ. K.RussellV. M. (2010). Changes in relationship satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(4), 587–604.
46.
MettsS.CupachW. R.ImahoriT. T. (1992). Perceptions of sexual compliance-resisting messages in three types of cross-sex relationships. Western Journal of Communication, 56(1), 1–17.
47.
MorokoffP. J.QuinaK.HarlowL. L.WhitmireL.GrimleyD. M.GibsonP. R.BurkholderG. J. (1997). Sexual Assertiveness Scale (SAS) for women: Development and validation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(4), 790–804.
48.
MuiseA.ImpettE. A.KoganA.DesmaraisS. (2013). Keeping the spark alive being motivated to meet a partner’s sexual needs sustains sexual desire in long-term romantic relationships. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4(3), 267–273.
49.
MurrayS. L.HolmesJ. G.CollinsN. L. (2006). Optimizing assurance: The risk regulation system in relationships. Psychological Bulletin, 132(5), 641–666.
50.
OverallN. C.FletcherG. J. O.SimpsonJ. A.SibleyC. G. (2009). Regulating partners in intimate relationships: The costs and benefits of different communication strategies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(3), 620–639.
51.
OverallN. C.McNultyJ. K. (2017). What type of communication during conflict is beneficial for intimate relationships?Current Opinion in Psychology, 13, 1–5.
52.
OverallN. C.SimpsonJ. A.StruthersH. (2013). Buffering attachment-related avoidance: Softening emotional and behavioral defenses during conflict discussions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(5), 854–871.
53.
PeplauL. A. (2003). Human sexuality: How do men and women differ?Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12(2), 37–40.
54.
PornprasertmanitS.MillerP.SchoemannA.RosseelY. (2013). semTools: Useful tools for structural equation modeling [R Package Available on CRAN]. https://rdrr.io/cran/semTools/man/semTools.html
55.
RancourtK. M.FlynnM.BergeronS.RosenN. O. (2017). It takes two: Sexual communication patterns and the sexual and relational adjustment of couples coping with provoked vestibulodynia. The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 14(3), 434–443.
56.
RaudenbushS.BrykA. S.CheongY. F.CongdonR.du ToitM. (2004). HLM-6: Hierarchical linear and nonlinear modeling. Scientific Software International.
57.
R Core Team. (2018). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.R-project.org/
58.
RehmanU. S.LizdekI.FallisE. E.SutherlandS.GoodnightJ. A. (2017). How is sexual communication different from nonsexual communication? A moment-by-moment analysis of discussions between romantic partners. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 46(8), 2339–2352.
59.
ReisH. T.ClarkM. S.HolmesJ. G. (2004). Perceived partner responsiveness as an organizing construct in the study of intimacy and closeness. In Handbook of closeness and intimacy (pp. 211–236). Psychology Press.
60.
RichardsJ. M.ButlerE. A.GrossJ. J. (2003). Emotion regulation in romantic relationships: The cognitive consequences of concealing feelings. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 20(5), 599–620.
61.
RichardsonD. S.GreenL. R. (2006). Direct and indirect aggression: Relationships as social context. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36(10), 2492–2508.
62.
RischG. S.RileyL. A.LawlerM. G. (2003). Problematic issues in the early years of marriage: Content for premarital education. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 31(3), 253–269.
63.
RosseelY. (2012). Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling and more. Version 0.5–12 (BETA). Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36.
64.
RusbultC. E.BissonnetteV. L.ArriagaX. B.CoxC. L.BradburyT. N. (1998). Accommodation processes during the early years of marriage. The developmental course of marital dysfunction, 74–113.
65.
RusbultC. E.ZembrodtI. M. (1983). Responses to dissatisfaction in romantic involvements: A multidimensional scaling analysis. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19(3), 274–293.
66.
SanfordK. (2003). Problem–solving conversations in marriage: Does it matter what topics couples discuss?Personal Relationships, 10(1), 97–112.
67.
SeligJ. P.PreacherK. J. (2008). Monte Carlo method for assessing mediation: An interactive tool for creating confidence intervals for indirect effects [Computer software].
68.
SimmsL. J.WatsonD. (2007). The construct validation approach to personality scale construction. In RobinsR. W.FraleyR. C.KruegerR. F. (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in personality psychology (pp. 240–258). Guilford Press.
69.
SimpsonJ. A.OverallN. C. (2014). Partner buffering of attachment insecurity. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23(1), 54–59.
70.
TangN.BensmanL.HatfieldE. (2013). Culture and sexual self-disclosure in intimate relationships. Interpersona: An International Journal of Personal Relationships, 7, 227–245.
71.
TheissJ. A.EstleinR. (2014). Antecedents and consequences of the perceived threat of sexual communication: A test of the relational turbulence model. Western Journal of Communication, 78(4), 404–425.
72.
WebsterG. D.DeWallC. N.PondR. S.DeckmanT.JonasonP. K.LeB. M.NicholsA. L.SchemberT. O.CryselL. C.CrosierB. S.SmithC. V.Layne PaddockE.NezlekJ. B.KirkpatrickL. A.BryanA. D.BatorR. J. (2014). The Brief Aggression Questionnaire: Psychometric and behavioral evidence for an efficient measure of trait aggression. Aggressive Behavior, 40(2), 120–139.
73.
WigginsJ. S. (1991). Agency and communion as conceptual coordinates for the understanding and measurement of interpersonal behavior. In CicchettiD.GroveW. M. (Eds.), Thinking clearly about psychology: Essays in honor of Paul E. Meehl. Vol. 1; Matters of public interest, Vol. 2; Personality and psychopathology (pp. 89–113). University of Minnesota Press.
74.
ZhangZ.ZyphurM. J.PreacherK. J. (2009). Testing multilevel mediation using hierarchical linear models: Problems and solutions. Organizational Research Methods, 12(4), 695–719.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
