Functional limitations—difficulty in carrying out activities of daily living—have been linked to poorer well-being in Western cultures. This might be partly due to the lower personal control associated with functional limitations. However, compared with the West, in Asian cultural contexts (e.g., Japan) where agency and control are based less predominantly on individual attributes, the link between functional limitations and well-being may be weaker. Using cross-sectional probability samples from the United States and Japan (Study 1), functional limitations were associated with lower well-being in both cultures, though the association was weaker in Japan than in the United States and personal control played a mediating role. Furthermore, analyses of longitudinal data (Study 2) showed the cross-cultural patterns generally consistent with the cross-sectional analyses of Study 1, though the cultural moderation was found for fewer well-being measures. Such findings enrich our understanding of how health status and well-being are related across cultures.
BanduraA. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman.
2.
ChaoS. F. (2014). Functional disability and depressive symptoms: Longitudinal effects of activity restriction, perceived stress, and social support. Aging & Mental Health, 18(6), 767–776. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2013.878308
3.
Chentsova-DuttonY. E.TsaiJ. L. (2010). Self-focused attention and emotional reactivity: The role of culture. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(3), 507–519. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018534
4.
ClarkeP.MarshallV. W.RyffC. D.RosenthalC. J. (2000). Well-being in Canadian seniors: Findings from the Canadian study of health and aging. Canadian Journal of Aging, 19(2), 139–159.
5.
DienerE.OishiS.LucasR. E. (2003). Personality, culture, and subjective well-being: Emotional and cognitive evaluations of life. Annual Review of Psychology, 54(1), 403–425. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145056
6.
DreweliesJ.WagnerJ.Tesch-RömerC.HeckhausenJ. (2017). Perceived control across the second half of life: The role of physical health and social integration. Psychology and Aging, 32(1), 76–92. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000143
7.
EomK.KimH. S.ShermanD. K.IshiiK. (2016). Cultural variability in the link between environmental concern and support for environmental action. Psychological Science, 27(10), 1331–1339.
8.
FiskeA. P.KitayamaS.MarkusH. R.NisbettR. E. (1998). The cultural matrix of social psychology. In GilbertD. T.FiskeS. T.LindzeyG. (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (pp. 915–981). McGraw-Hill.
9.
HamamuraT.HeineS. J.PaulhusD. L. (2008). Cultural differences in response styles: The role of dialectical thinking. Personality and Individual Differences, 44(4), 932–942. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2007.10.034
Hoshino-BrowneE.ZannaA. S.SpencerS. J.ZannaM. P.KitayamaS.LackenbauerS. (2005). On the cultural guises of cognitive dissonance: The case of Easterners and Westerners. Journal of personality and social psychology, 89(3), 294.
12.
InfurnaF. J.InfurnaC. J. (2017). The development of perceived control. In SpechtJ. (Ed.) Personality development across the lifespan (pp. 243–256). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-804674-6.00015-6
13.
InfurnaF. J.KappesC.FraireN. (2018). Long-term antecedents of constraints and mastery: Findings from the health and retirement study. Psychology and Aging, 33(6), 965–974.
14.
InfurnaF. J.MayerA. (2015). The effects of constraints and mastery on mental and physical health: Conceptual and methodological considerations. Psychology and Aging, 30(2), 432–448. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039050
15.
InfurnaF. J.OkunM. A. (2015). Antecedents and outcomes of level and rates of change in perceived control: The moderating role of age. Developmental Psychology, 51(10), 1420–1437. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039530
16.
IyengarS. S.LepperM. R. (2000). When choice is demotivating: Can one desire too much of a good thing?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(6), 995–1006. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.6.995
17.
KitayamaS.KarasawaM.CurhanK. B.RyffC. D.MarkusH. R. (2010). Independence and interdependence predict health and wellbeing: Divergent patterns in the United States and Japan. Frontiers in Psychology, 1, Article 163. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00163
18.
KitayamaS.SnibbeA. C.MarkusH. R.SuzukiT. (2004). Is there any “free” choice? Self and dissonance in two cultures. Psychological Science, 15(8), 527–533.
19.
KunzmannU.LittleT. D.SmithJ. (2000). Is age-related stability of subjective well-being a paradox? Cross-sectional and longitudinal evidence from the Berlin Aging Study. Psychology and Aging, 15(3), 511–526. https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/pdfs/US4819339.pdf
20.
LachmanM. E. (2006). Perceived control over aging-related declines adaptive beliefs and behaviors. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15(6), 282–286.
21.
LachmanM. E.AgrigoroaeiS. (2010). Promoting functional health in midlife and old age: Long-term protective effects of control beliefs, social support, and physical exercise. PLOS ONE, 5(10), Article e13297. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0013297
22.
LachmanM. E.NeupertS. D.AgrigoroaeiS. (2011). The relevance of control beliefs for health and aging. In Warner SchaieK.WillisS. L. (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of aging (7th ed., pp. 175–190). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-380882-0.00011-5
23.
LachmanM. E.WeaverS. L. (1998). The sense of control as a moderator of social class differences in health and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(3), 763–773.
24.
LinI. F.WuH. S. (2014). Activity limitations, use of assistive devices or personal help, and well-being: Variation by education. The Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 69(Suppl. 1), S16–S25. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbu115
25.
MarkusH. R.KitayamaS. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224–253.
26.
MarkusH. R.UchidaY.OmoregieH.TownsendS. S. M.KitayamaS. (2006). Going for the gold models of agency in Japanese and American contexts. Psychological Science, 17(2), 103–112. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01672.x
27.
MillerJ. G. (1984). Culture and the development of everyday social explanation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(5), 961–978. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.46.5.961
28.
MillerJ. G. (2003). Culture and agency: Implications for psychological theories of motivation and social development. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 45(1), 59–99.
29.
MroczekD. K.KolarzC. M. (1998). The effect of age on positive and negative affect: A developmental perspective on happiness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(5), 1333–1349. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.5.1333
30.
OkunM. A.StockW. A.HaringM. J.WitterR. A. (1984). Health and subjective well-being: A meta-analysis. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 19(2), 111–132. https://doi.org/10.2190/QGJN-0N81-5957-HAQD
31.
ParkJ.KitayamaS.MarkusH. R.CoeC. L.MiyamotoY.KarasawaM.BoylanJ. M. (2013). Social status and anger expression: The cultural moderation hypothesis. Emotion, 13(6), 1122–1131.
32.
PavotW.DienerE. (2008). The satisfaction with life scale and the emerging construct of life satisfaction. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 3(2), 137–152.
33.
PrendaK. M.LachmanM. E. (2001). Planning for the future: A life management strategy for increasing control and life satisfaction in adulthood. Psychology and Aging, 16(2), 206–216.
34.
RadlerB. T.RyffC. D. (2010). Who participates? Accounting for longitudinal retention in the MIDUS National Study of Health and Well-Being. Journal of Aging and Health, 22(3), 307–331. https://doi.org/10.1177/0898264309358617
35.
RizzaF.GisonA.BonassiS.Dall’ArmiV.TontoF.GiaquintoS. (2017). ‘Locus of control’, health-related quality of life, emotional distress and disability in Parkinson’s disease. Journal of Health Psychology, 22(7), 844–852.
36.
RyanR. M.DeciE. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 141–166.
37.
RyffC. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(6), 1069–1081.
38.
RyffC. D.MageeW. J.KlingK. C.WingE. H. (1999). Forging macro-micro linkages in the study of psychological well-being. In RyffC. D.MarshallV. W. (Eds.), The self and society in aging processes (pp. 247–278). Springer.
39.
RyffC. D.Morozink BoylanJ.CoeC. L.KarasawaM.KawakamiN.KitayamaS.. . .ParkJ. (2014). Adult development in Japan and the United States: Comparing theories and findings about growth, maturity, and well-being. In JensenL. A. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of human development and culture (pp. 666–679). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199948550.013.41
40.
SastryJ.RossC. E. (1998). Asian ethnicity and the sense of personal control. Social Psychology Quarterly, 61(2), 101–120.
41.
SatoA.YasudaA. (2001). Development of the Japanese version of Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) scales. Japanese Journal of Personality, 9(2), 138–139.
42.
ShwederR. A. (2003). Toward a deep cultural psychology of shame. Social Research: An International Quarterly, 70(4), 1100–1129.
43.
SimmonsJ. P.NelsonL. D.SimonsohnU. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1359–1366.
TaylorM. G.LynchS. M. (2004). Trajectories of impairment, social support, and depressive symptoms in later life. The Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 59(4), 238–246. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/59.4.S238
VerbruggeL. M. (1986). Role burdens and physical health of women and men. Women & Health, 11(1), 47–77.
49.
WatsonD.ClarkL. A.TellegenA. (1988). Development and Validation of Brief Measures of Positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063–1070. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063
50.
WeiszJ. R.RothbaumF. M.BlackburnT. C. (1984). Standing out and standing in: The psychology of control in America and Japan. American Psychologist, 39(9), 955–969. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.39.9.955
WurmS.Tesch-RömerC.TomasikM. J. (2007). Longitudinal findings on aging-related cognitions, control beliefs, and health in later life. The Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 62(3), P156–P164. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/62.3.P156
53.
YangF.GuD.MitnitskiA. (2016). Frailty and life satisfaction in Shanghai older adults: The roles of age and social vulnerability. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 67, 68–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2016.07.001
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
