Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2020-9
The Big Six Personality Traits and Mental Distress: Dynamic Modeling in a Population Panel Study Reveals Bidirectional Relationships Involving Neuroticism,Extraversion,and Conscientiousness
In a single comprehensive model, using a large nationally representative sample, we investigate longitudinal relationships between mental distress and “Big Six” personality using an analysis approach sensitive to dynamic effects (i.e., to effects of deviations from individual trajectories). We find that, consistent with a mechanism involving scarring by distress, upward deviations (flare-ups) in distress predict flare-ups in Neuroticism 12 months later. Among younger adults (n = 4,775), distress flare-ups predict dips in Conscientiousness. Consistent with a dynamic precursor model, (a) flare-ups in Neuroticism and Extraversion predict subsequent flare-ups in distress among older adults (n = 11,167), and (b) slopes of distress correlate with slopes of a number of traits (e.g., positively for Neuroticism, and, among older adults, negatively for Extraversion). While demonstrating these scarring and dynamic precursor effects, we draw attention to a nuanced direction of dynamic effect for Extraversion, a newly discovered dynamic effect of Conscientiousness, and previously undocumented dynamic effects of traits on each other.
AshtonM. C.LeeK. (2005). Honesty-humility, the Big Five, and the five-factor model. Journal of Personality, 73, 1321–1354.
2.
AshtonM. C.LeeK. (2007). Empirical, theoretical, and practical advantages of the HEXACO model of personality structure. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11, 150–166.
3.
AshtonM. C.LeeK. (2009). The HEXACO-60: A short measure of the major dimensions of personality. Journal of Personality Assessment, 91, 340–345.
4.
BarnettA. G.van der PolsJ. C.DobsonA. J. (2005). Regression to the mean: What it is and how to deal with it. International Journal of Epidemiology, 34, 215–220.
5.
BerryD.WilloughbyM. T. (2017). On the practical interpretability of cross-lagged panel models: Rethinking a developmental workhorse. Child Development, 88, 1186–1206.
6.
BlandJ. M.AltmanD. G. (1994). Regression towards the mean. British Medical Journal, 308, Article 1499.
7.
CarverC. S.Connor-SmithJ. (2010). Personality and coping. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 679–704.
8.
CheungG. W.RensvoldR. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modelling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9, 233–255.
9.
ClarkL. A. (2005). Temperament as a unifying basis for personality and psychopathology. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 114, 505–521.
10.
CokerL. A.SamuelD. B.WidigerT. A. (2002). Maladaptive personality functioning within the Big Five and the five-factor model. Journal of Personality Disorders, 16, 385–401.
11.
CôtèS.MoskowitzD. S. (1998). On the dynamic covariation between interpersonal behavior and affect: Prediction from Neuroticism, Extraversion, and Agreeableness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1032–1046.
12.
CurranP. J.HowardA. L.BainterS. A.LaneS. T.McGinleyJ. S. (2014). The separation of between-person and within-person components of individual change over time: A latent curve model with structured residuals. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 82, 879–894.
13.
CurranP. J.ObeldatK.LosardoD. (2010). Twelve frequently asked questions about growth curve modeling. Journal of Cognitive Development, 11, 121–136.
14.
DeVellisR. F. (2012). Scale development: Theory and applications. SAGE.
15.
DonnellanM. B.OswaldF. L.BairdB. M.LucasR. E. (2006). The mini-IPIP scales: Tiny-yet-effective measures of the Big Five factors of personality. Psychological Assessment, 18, 192–203.
16.
DuckittJ.SibleyC. (2016). The dual process motivational model of ideology and prejudice. In SibleyC.BarlowF. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of the psychology of prejudice. Cambridge University Press.
17.
ElovainioM.JokelaM.RosenströmT.Pulkki-RåbäkL.HakulinenC.JosefssonK.HintsanenM.Keltikangas-JärvinenL. (2015). Temperament and depressive symptoms: What is the direction of the association?Journal of Affective Disorders, 170, 203–212.
18.
EnglishT.CarstensenL. L. (2014). Will interventions targeting Conscientiousness improve aging outcomes?Developmental Psychology, 50, 1478–1481.
19.
FisherL.HesslerD.MasharaniU.StryckerL. (2014). Impact of baseline patient characteristics on interventions to reduce diabetes distress: The role of personal Conscientiousness and diabetes self-efficacy. Diabetic Medicine, 31, 739–746.
20.
FraleyR. C.RobertsB. W. (2005). Patterns of continuity: A dynamic model for conceptualizing the stability of individual differences in psychological constructs across the life course. Psychological Review, 112, 60–74.
21.
HakulinenC.ElovainioM.Pulkki-RåbackL.VirtanenM.Kivimåki JokelaM. (2015). Personality and depressive symptoms: Individual participant meta-analysis of 10 cohort studies. Depression and Anxiety, 33, 461–470.
22.
JeronimusB. F.KotovR.RieseH.OrmelJ. (2016). Neuroticism’s prospective association with mental disorders halves after adjustment for baseline symptoms and psychiatric history, but the adjusted association hardly decays with time: A meta-analysis on 59 longitudinal/prospective studies with 443 313 participants. Psychological Medicine, 46, 2883–2906.
23.
KesslerR. C.AndrewsG.ColpeL. J.HiripiE.MroczekD. K.NormandS. L. T.. . . ZaslavskyA. M. (2002). Short screening scales to monitor population prevalences and trends in non-specific psychological distress. Psychological Medicine, 32, 959–976.
24.
KesslerR. C.GreenJ. G.GruberM. J.SampsonN. A.BrometE.CuitanM.ZaslavskyA. M. (2010). Screening for serious mental illness in the general population with the K6 screening scale: Results from the WHO World Mental Health (WMH) survey initiative. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 19, 4–22.
25.
KleinD. N.KotovR.BufferdS. J. (2011). Personality and depression: Explanatory models and review of the evidence. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 7, 269–295.
26.
KotovR.GamezW.SchmidtF.WatsonD. (2010). Linking “big” personality traits to anxiety, depressive, and substance use disorders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 768–821.
27.
KruyenA. M.OsborneD.DuckI. M.HoukamauC. A.SibleyC. G. (2013). Measuring psychological distress in New Zealand: Item response properties and demographic differences in the Kessler-6 screening measure. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 42, 69–83.
28.
LöckenhoffC. E.TerracianoA.PatriciuN. S.EatonW. W.CostaP. T. (2009). Self-reported extremely adverse life events and longitudinal changes in five-factor model personality traits in an urban sample. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 22, 53–59.
29.
MaherB. A.MaherW. B. (1994). Personality and psychopathology: A historical perspective. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 103, 72–77.
30.
McCraeR. R.CostaP. T. (1987). Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 81–90.
31.
McCraeR. R.CostaP. T.Jr. (2008). The Five-Factor Theory of personality. In JohnO. P.RobinsR. W.PervinL. A. (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 159–181). Guilford Press.
32.
McCraeR. R.LöckenhoffC. E.CostaP. T. (2005). A step toward DSM-V: Cataloguing personality-related problems in living. European Journal of Personality, 19, 269–286.
33.
MilojevP.OsborneD.GreavesL. M.BarlowF. K.SibleyC. G. (2013). The mini-IPIP6: Tiny yet highly stable markers of Big Six personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 47, 936–944.
34.
MilojevP.OsborneD.SibleyC. G. (2014). Personality resilience following a natural disaster. Social Psychology and Personality Science, 5, 760–768.
35.
MilojevP.SibleyC. G. (2014). The stability of adult personality varies across age: Evidence from a two-year longitudinal sample of adult New Zealanders. Journal of Research in Personality, 51, 29–37.
36.
MilojevP.SibleyC. G. (2017). Normative personality trait development in adulthood: A 6-year cohort-sequential growth model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 112, 510–526.
37.
MuthénB. O.CurranP. J. (1997). General longitudinal modeling of individual differences in experimental designs: A latent variable framework for analysis and power estimation. Psychological Methods, 2, 371–402.
38.
OgleC. M.RubinD. C.SieglerI. C. (2013). Changes in Neuroticism following trauma exposure. Journal of Personality, 82, 93–102.
39.
OrmelJ.JeronimusB. F.KotovR.RieseH.BosE. H.HankinB.OldehinkelA. J. (2013). Neuroticism and common mental disorders: Meaning and utility of a complex relationship. Clinical Psychology Review, 33, 686–697.
40.
OrmelJ.OldehinkelA. J.BrilmanE. I. (2001). The interplay and etiological continuity of Neuroticism, difficulties, and life events in the etiology of major and subsyndromal, first and recurrent depressive episodes in later life. American Journal of Psychiatry, 158, 885–891.
41.
OrmelJ.RosmalenJ.FarmerA. (2004). Neuroticism: A non-informative marker of vulnerability to psychopathology. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 39, 906–912.
42.
OsborneD.SibleyC. G. (2013). After the disaster: Using the Big-Five to predict changes in mental health among survivors of the 2011 Christchurch earthquake. Disaster and Prevention Management, 22, 456–466.
43.
RobertsB. W. (1997). Plaster or plasticity: Are adult work experiences associated with personality change in women?Journal of Personality, 65, 205–232.
44.
RobertsB. W.DelVecchioW. F. (2000). The rank-order consistency of personality traits from childhood to old age: A quantitative review of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 3–25.
45.
RobertsB. W.WaltonK. E.ViechtbauerW. (2006). Patterns of mean-level change in personality traits across the life course: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 1–25.
46.
RobertsB. W.WoodD. (2006). Personality development in the context of the neo-socioanalytic model of personality. In MroczekD. K.LittleT. D. (Eds.), Handbook of personality development (pp. 11–39). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Publishers.
47.
SarisW. E.SatorraA. (1993). Power evaluations in structural equation models. In BollenK. A.LongJ. S. (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 181–204). SAGE.
48.
SatherleyN.MilojevP.GreavesL. M.HuangY.OsborneD.BulbuliaJ.SibleyC. G. (2015). Demographic and psychological predictors of panel attrition: Evidence from the New Zealand attitudes and values study. PLOS ONE, 10, e0121950.
49.
SegalD. L.HookJ. N.CoolidgeF. L. (2001). Personality dysfunction, coping styles, and clinical symptoms in younger and older adults. Journal of Clinical Geropsychology, 7, 201–212.
50.
SibleyC. G. (2012). The mini-IPIP6: Item response theory analysis of a short measure of the Big-Six factors of personality in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 41, 21–31.
SibleyC. G.LuytenN.PurnomoM.MoberlyA.WoottonL. W.HammondM. D.RobertsonA. (2011). The mini-IPIP6: Validation and extension of a short measure of the Big-Six factors of personality in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 40, 142–159.
53.
SibleyC. G.PirieD. J. (2013). Personality in New Zealand: Scale norms and demographic differences in the mini-IPIP6. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 42, 13–30.
54.
VachonD.BagbyR. (2009). Mood and anxiety disorders. In CorrP.MatthewsG. (Eds.), Cambridge handbooks in psychology: The Cambridge handbook of personality psychology (pp. 611–630). Cambridge University Press.
55.
WorthingtonE. L.Jr.DavisD. E.HookJ. N.ProvencherC. (2018). Humility. In MadduxJ. E. (Ed.), Social psychological foundations of well-being and life satisfaction (pp. 168–183). Routledge.
56.
WorthingtonE. L.DavisD. E.HookJ. N. (Eds.). (2017). Handbook of humility: Theory, research, and application. Routledge.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
