Extant political–psychological research has identified stable, context-independent differences between conservatives and liberals in a wide range of preferences and psychological processes. One consistent finding is that conservatives show higher disgust sensitivity than liberals. This finding, however, is predominantly based on assessments of disgust to specific elicitors, which confound individuals’ sensitivity and propensity to the experience of disgust with the extent to which they find specific elicitors disgusting. Across five studies, we vary specific elicitors of disgust, showing that the relations between political orientation and disgust sensitivity depend on the specific set of elicitors used. We also show that disgust sensitivity is not associated with political orientation when measured with an elicitor-unspecific scale. Taken together, our findings suggest that the differences between conservatives and liberals in disgust sensitivity are context dependent rather than a stable personality difference. Broader theoretical implications are discussed.
AhnW. Y.KishidaK. T.GuX.LohrenzT.HarveyA.AlfordJ. R.. . . MontagueP. R. (2014). Nonpolitical images evoke neural predictors of political ideology. Current Biology, 24, 2693-2699.
2.
AverillJ. R. (1983). Studies on anger and aggression: Implications for theories of emotion. American Psychologist, 38, 1145-1160.
3.
BloomP. (2004). Descartes’ baby: How child development explains what makes us human. London, England: William Heinemann.
4.
ChapmanH. A.KimD. A.SusskindJ. M.AndersonA. K. (2009). In bad taste: Evidence for the oral origins of moral disgust. Science, 323, 1222-1226.
5.
CrawfordJ. T.InbarY.MaloneyV. (2014). Disgust sensitivity selectively predicts attitudes toward groups that threaten (or uphold) traditional sexual morality. Personality and Individual Differences, 70, 218-223.
6.
CronbachL. J.MeehlP. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 281-302.
7.
DarwinC. R. (1872). The expression of the emotions in man and animals. London, England: John Murray.
8.
DuckittJ. (2001). A dual-process cognitive-motivational theory of ideology and prejudice. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 33, pp. 41-113). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
9.
Elad-StrengerJ.ShaharG. (2017). Revisiting the effects of societal threat perceptions on conflict-related political positions: A three-wave study. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 62, 1753-1783.
10.
EverettJ. A. (2013). The 12 item Social and Economic Conservatism Scale (SECS). PLoS ONE, 8(12), e82131.
11.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.BuchnerA.LangA. G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G* Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 1149-1160.
12.
GrahamJ.HaidtJ.NosekB. A. (2009). Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 1029-1046.
13.
HaidtJ.GrahamJ. (2007). When morality opposes justice: Conservatives have moral intuitions that liberals may not recognize. Social Justice Research, 20, 98-116.
14.
HaidtJ.McCauleyC. R.RozinP. (1994). Individual differences in sensitivity to disgust: A scale sampling seven domains of disgust elicitors. Personality and Individual Differences, 16, 701-713.
15.
HaidtJ.RozinP.MccauleyC.ImadaS. (1997). Body, psyche, and culture: The relationship between disgust and morality. Psychology and Developing Societies, 9, 107-131.
16.
HibbingJ. R.SmithK. B.AlfordJ. R. (2014). Differences in negativity bias underlie variations in political ideology. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 37, 297-307.
17.
HutchersonC. A.GrossJ. J. (2011). The moral emotions: A social-functionalist account of anger, disgust, and contempt. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 719-737.
18.
IhmeJ. M.MitteK. (2009). Measuring state disgust: Evaluation of a German state disgust scale. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 25, 150-156.
19.
InbarY.PizarroD. A.BloomP. (2009). Conservatives are more easily disgusted than liberals. Cognition and Emotion, 23, 714-725.
20.
InbarY.PizarroD. A.IyerR.HaidtJ. (2012). Disgust sensitivity, political conservatism, and voting. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3, 537-544.
21.
JostJ. T.GlaserJ.KruglanskiA. W.SullowayF. J. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 339-375.
22.
MarzillierS. L.DaveyG. C. L. (2004). The emotional profiling of disgust-eliciting stimuli: Evidence for primary and complex disgusts. Cognition and Emotion, 18, 313-336.
23.
MillerS. B. (2004). Disgust: The gatekeeper emotion. Mahwah, NJ: Analytic Press.
24.
MollJ.de Oliveira-SouzaR.MollF. T.IgnacioF. A.BramatiI. E.Caparelli DaquerE. M.EslingerP. J. (2005). The moral affiliations of disgust: A functional MRI study. Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology, 18, 68-78.
25.
NavarreteC. D.FesslerD. M. (2006). Disease avoidance and ethnocentrism: The effects of disease vulnerability and disgust sensitivity on intergroup attitudes. Evolution and Human Behavior, 27, 270-282.
26.
OlatunjiB. O.CislerJ. M.DeaconB. J.ConnollyK.LohrJ. M. (2007a). The Disgust Propensity and Sensitivity Scale-Revised: Psychometric properties and specificity in relation to anxiety disorder symptoms. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 21, 918-930.
27.
OlatunjiB. O.WilliamsN. L.TolinD. F.AbramowitzJ. S.SawchukC. N.LohrJ. M.ElwoodL. S. (2007b). The Disgust Scale: Item analysis, factor structure, and suggestions for refinement. Psychological Assessment, 19, 281-297.
28.
OosterhoffB.ShookN. J.FordC. (2018). Is that disgust I see? Political ideology and biased visual attention. Behavioral Brain Research, 336, 227-235.
29.
ProchJ.Elad-StrengerJ.KesslerT. (2019). Liberalism and conservatism, for a change! Rethinking the association between political orientation and relation to societal change. Political Psychology, 40, 877-903.
30.
ReissS.McNallyR. J. (1985). Expectancy model of fear. In ReissS.BootzinR. (Eds.), Theoretical issues in behavior therapy (pp. 107-121). New York, NY: Academic Press.
31.
RozinP.FallonA. E. (1987). A perspective on disgust. Psychological Review, 94, 23-41.
32.
RozinP.HaidtJ.McCauleyC. R. (2008). Disgust. In LewisM.Haviland-JonesJ. M.BarrettL. (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (3rd ed., pp. 757-776). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
33.
RussellP. S.Giner-SorollaR. (2013). Bodily moral disgust: What it is, how it is different from anger, and why it is an unreasoned emotion. Psychological Bulletin, 139, 328-351.
34.
Schaich BorgJ.LiebermanD.KiehlK. A. (2008). Infection, incest, and iniquity: Investigating the neural correlates of disgust and morality. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20, 1529-1546.
35.
SchallerM. (2006). Parasites, behavioral defenses, and the social psychological mechanisms through which cultures are evoked. Psychological Inquiry, 17, 96-101.
36.
SchallerM.DuncanL. A. (2007). The behavioral immune system: Its evolution and social psychological implications. In ForgasJ. P.HaseltonM. G.von HippelW. (Eds.), Evolution and the social mind: Evolutionary psychology and social cognition (pp. 293-307). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
37.
SchiebelB.RiemannR.MummendeyH. D. (1984). Eine aktualisierte deutschsprachige Form der Konservatismusskala von Wilson & Patterson [Actualized German version of the Wilson-Patterson Conservatism Scale]. Zeitschrift Für Differentielle Und Diagnostische Psychologie, 5, 311-321.
38.
SchienleA.DietmaierG.LeutgebV.IlleR. (2010). Eine Skala zur Erfassung der Ekelsensitivität (SEE) [A scale for detecting disgust sensitivity (ESS)]. Zeitschrift für Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie, 39, 80-86.
39.
ShookN. J.FordC. G.BoggsS. T. (2017). Dangerous worldview: A mediator of the relation between disgust sensitivity and social conservatism. Personality and Individual Differences, 119, 252-261.
40.
ShookN. J.OosterhoffB.TerrizziJ. A.Jr.BradyK. M. (2017). “Dirty politics”: The role of disgust sensitivity in voting. Translational Issues in Psychological Science, 3, 284-297.
41.
ShookN. J.TerrizziJ. A.ClayR.OosterhoffB. (2015). In defense of pathogen disgust and disease avoidance: A response to Tybur et al. (2015). Evolution & Human Behavior, 36, 498-504.
42.
SimpsonJ.CarterS.AnthonyS. H.OvertonP. G. (2006). Is disgust a homogeneous emotion?Motivation and Emotion, 30, 31-41.
43.
SmithK. B.OxleyD.HibbingM. V.AlfordJ. R.HibbingJ. R. (2011). Disgust sensitivity and the neurophysiology of left-right political orientations. PLoS ONE, 6(10), e25552.
44.
TerrizziJ. R.Jr.ShookN. J.McDanielM. A. (2013). The behavioral immune system and social conservatism: A meta-analysis. Evolution and Human Behavior, 34, 99-108.
45.
TerrizziJ. A.Jr.ShookN. J.VentisW. L. (2010). Disgust: A predictor of social conservatism and prejudicial attitudes toward homosexuals. Personality and Individual Differences, 49, 587-592.
46.
ThornhillR.FincherC. L. (2014). The parasite-stress theory of sociality, the behavioral immune system, and human social and cognitive uniqueness. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences, 8, 257-264.
47.
TyburJ. M.InbarY.AarøeL.BarclayP.BarlowF. K.de BarraM.. . . ŽeželjI. (2016). Parasite stress and pathogen avoidance relate to distinct dimensions of political ideology across 30 nations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113, 12408-12413.
48.
TyburJ. M.InbarY.GülerE.MolhoC. (2015). Is the relationship between pathogen avoidance and ideological conservatism explained by sexual strategies?Evolution and Human Behavior, 36, 489-497.
49.
TyburJ. M.LiebermanD.GriskeviciusV. (2009). Microbes, mating, and morality: Individual differences in three functional domains of disgust. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 103-122.
50.
TyburJ. M.LiebermanD.KurzbanR.DeScioliP. (2013). Disgust: Evolved function and structure. Psychological Review, 120, 65-84.
51.
TyburJ. M.MerrimanL. A.HooperA. E. C.McDonaldM. M.NavarreteC. D. (2010). Extending the behavioral immune system to political psychology: Are political conservatism and disgust sensitivity really related?Evolutionary Psychology, 8, 599-616.
52.
Van OverveldW. J. M.de JongP. D.PetersM. L.CavanaghK.DaveyG. C. L. (2006). Disgust propensity and disgust sensitivity: Separate constructs that are differentially related to specific fears. Personality and Individual Differences, 41, 1241-1252.
53.
WellsG. L.WindschitlP. D. (1999). Stimulus sampling and social psychological experimentation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 1115-1125.
54.
WheatleyT.HaidtJ. (2005). Hypnotically induced disgust makes moral judgments more severe. Psychological Science, 16, 780-784.
55.
WilsonG. D. (1973). The psychology of conservatism. Oxford, UK: Academic Press.
56.
WilsonG. D.PattersonJ. R. (1968). A new measure of conservatism. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 7, 264-269.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
