Breaking from the typical focus on the antecedents of creativity, we investigate the psychological and interpersonal consequences of being creative. Across five experiments, we find that generating creative ideas is revealing of the self and thus prompts the perception of self-disclosure. Individuals respond to the expectation to be creative with greater self-focus—adopting their own idiosyncratic perspective on the task and thinking about their own personal preferences and experiences in connection to the problem. Because creative ideas derived from self-focused attention are uniquely personal, the act of sharing a creative idea is, in turn, perceived to be revealing of the self. Finally, an interactive dyad study shows that sharing creative ideas makes partners more confident in the accuracy of judgments they made about each other’s personality. We discuss the implications of our findings for future research investigating the consequences of creativity.
AltmanI.TaylorD. A. (1973). Social penetration: The development of interpersonal relationships. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
2.
AmabileT. M. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to the social psychology of creativity. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
3.
AmabileT. M.PrattM. G. (2016). The dynamic componential model of creativity and innovation in organizations: Making progress, making meaning. Research in Organizational Behavior, 36, 157-183.
BaumeisterR. F.LearyM. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497-529.
6.
BaxterL. A.MontgomeryB. M. (1996). Relating: Dialogues and dialectics. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
7.
BeersmaB.De DreuC. K. (2005). Conflict’s consequences: Effects of social motives on postnegotiation creative and convergent group functioning and performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 358-374.
8.
BirnbaumG. E.MizrahiM.KaplanA.KadoshD.KarivD.TabibD.. . . BurbanD. (2017). Sex unleashes your tongue: Sexual priming motivates self-disclosure to a new acquaintance and interest in future interactions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43, 706-715.
9.
BransonR. (2015, June11). A life of ideas. Trinidad and Tobago Guardian. Available from http://www.guardian.co.tt
10.
CamachoL. M.PaulusP. B. (1995). The role of social anxiousness in group brainstorming. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 1071-1080.
11.
CampbellD. T. (1960). Blind variation and selective retentions in creative thought as in other knowledge processes. Psychological Review, 67, 380-400.
12.
CarmeliA.Reiter-PalmonR.ZivE. (2010). Inclusive leadership and employee involvement in creative tasks in the workplace: The mediating role of psychological safety. Creativity Research Journal, 22, 250-260.
13.
CheluneG. J. (1979). Measuring openness in interpersonal communication. In CheluneG. J. (Ed.), Self-disclosure: Origins, patterns, and implications of openness in interpersonal relationships (pp. 1-27). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
14.
ChengC. Y.Sanchez-BurksJ.LeeF. (2008). Connecting the dots within: Creative performance and identity integration. Psychological Science, 19, 1178-1184.
15.
ColemanA. (2014, November). How Prezi helped turn Budapest into Europe’s newest startup hub. Forbes. Available from https://www.forbes.com/
16.
CollinsN. L.MillerL. C. (1994). Self-disclosure and liking: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 457-475.
17.
ConnollyT.JessupL. M.ValacichJ. S. (1990). Effects of anonymity and evaluative tone on idea generation in computer-mediated groups. Management Science, 36, 689-703.
18.
CozbyP. C. (1973). Self-disclosure: A literature review. Psychological Bulletin, 79, 73-91.
19.
DerlegaV. J.GrzelakJ. (1979). Appropriateness of self-disclosure. In CheluneG. (Ed.), Self-disclosure: Origins, patterns, and implications of openness in interpersonal relationships. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. 151-176.
20.
DeWallC. N.BushmanB. J. (2011). Social acceptance and rejection: The sweet and the bitter. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 256-260.
21.
DiehlM.StroebeW. (1987). Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: Toward the solution of a riddle. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 497-509.
22.
DollingerS. J. (2003). Need for uniqueness, need for cognition, and creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 37, 99-116.
23.
Fast Company Staff. (2015, June). Most creative people in business. Fast Company. Available from www.fastcompany.com
24.
ForerB. R. (1949). The fallacy of personal validation: A classroom demonstration of gullibility. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 44, 118-123.
25.
GinoF.ArielyD. (2012). The dark side of creativity: Original thinkers can be more dishonest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 445-459.
26.
GoncaloJ. A.StawB. M. (2006). Individualism–collectivism and group creativity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 100, 96-109.
27.
GoncaloJ. A.VincentL. C.KrauseV. (2015). The liberating consequences of creative work: How a creative outlet lifts the physical burden of secrecy. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 59, 32-39.
28.
GoughH. G. (1979). A creative personality scale for the Adjective Check List. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1398-1405.
29.
HenryW. P.StruppH. H. (1994). The therapeutic alliance as interpersonal process. In HorvathA. O.GreenbergL. S. (Eds.), The working alliance: Theory, research, and practice (Vol. 173, pp. 51-84). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
30.
HowellA.ConwayM. (1990). Perceived intimacy of expressed emotion. The Journal of Social Psychology, 130, 467-476.
31.
JanssenO. (2003). Innovative behaviour and job involvement at the price of conflict and less satisfactory relations with co-workers. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 76, 347-364.
32.
JoinsonA. N. (2001). Self-disclosure in computer-mediated communication: The role of self-awareness and visual anonymity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 177-192.
33.
JonesE. E.ArcherR. L. (1976). Are there special effects of personalistic self-disclosure?Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 12, 180-193.
34.
KellyA. E.McKillopK. J. (1996). Consequences of revealing personal secrets. Psychological Bulletin, 120, 450-465.
35.
KesselM.KratzerJ.SchultzC. (2012). Psychological safety, knowledge sharing, and creative performance in healthcare teams. Creativity and Innovation Management, 21, 147-157.
36.
KhessinaO. M.GoncaloJ. A.KrauseV. (2018). It’s time to sober up: The direct costs, side effects and long-term consequences of creativity and innovation. Research in Organizational Behavior, 38, 107-135.
37.
KimS. H.VincentL. C.GoncaloJ. A. (2013). Outside advantage: Can social rejection fuel creative thought?Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142, 605-611.
38.
LaurenceauJ. P.BarrettL. F.PietromonacoP. R. (1998). Intimacy as an interpersonal process: The importance of self-disclosure, partner disclosure, and perceived partner responsiveness in interpersonal exchanges. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1238-1251.
39.
LepistoD. A.PrattM. G. (2017). Meaningful work as realization and justification: Toward a dual conceptualization. Organizational Psychology Review, 7, 99-121.
40.
LeungA. K. Y.MadduxW. W.GalinskyA. D.ChiuC. Y. (2008). Multicultural experience enhances creativity: The when and how. American Psychologist, 63, 169-181.
41.
McKennaK. Y.BarghJ. A. (2000). Plan 9 from cyberspace: The implications of the Internet for personality and social psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 57-75.
42.
MilgramS. (1974). Obedience to authority: An experimental view. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
43.
MillarK. U.MillarM. G. (1988). Sex differences in perceived self- and other-disclosure: A case where inequity increases satisfaction. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 16, 59-64.
44.
MooreC.GinoF. (2013). Ethically adrift: How others pull our moral compass from true North, and how we can fix it. Research in Organizational Behavior, 33, 53-77.
45.
MortonT. L. (1978). Intimacy and reciprocity of exchange: A comparison of spouses and strangers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 72-81.
46.
MuellerJ. S.GoncaloJ. A.KamdarD. (2011). Recognizing creative leadership: Can creative idea expression negatively relate to perceptions of leadership potential?Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 494-498.
47.
MuellerJ. S.MelwaniS.GoncaloJ. A. (2012). The bias against creativity: Why people desire but reject creative ideas. Psychological Science, 23, 13-17.
48.
NijstadB. A.De DreuC. K.RietzschelE. F.BaasM. (2010). The dual pathway to creativity model: Creative ideation as a function of flexibility and persistence. European Review of Social Psychology, 21, 34-77.
49.
NijstadB. A.StroebeW.LodewijkxH. F. (2002). Cognitive stimulation and interference in groups: Exposure effects in an idea generation task. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 535-544.
50.
OmarzuJ. (2000). A disclosure decision model: Determining how and when individuals will self-disclose. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 174-185.
51.
PaulusP. B.DzindoletM.KohnN. W. (2012). Collaborative creativity—Group creativity and team innovation. In MumfordM. D.HesterK. S.RobledoI. C. (Eds.), Handbook of organizational creativity (pp. 327-357). Cambridge, MA: Academic Press.
52.
PaulusP. B.NijstadB. A. (Eds.). (2003). Group creativity: Innovation through collaboration. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
53.
PaulusP. B.YangH. C. (2000). Idea generation in groups: A basis for creativity in organizations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82, 76-87.
54.
PhillipsK. W.RothbardN. P.DumasT. L. (2009). To disclose or not to disclose? Status distance and self-disclosure in diverse environments. Academy of Management Review, 34, 710-732.
55.
PolmanE.EmichK. J. (2011). Decisions for others are more creative than decisions for the self. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 492-501.
56.
PolzerJ. T.MiltonL. P.SwannW. B.Jr. (2002). Capitalizing on diversity: Interpersonal congruence in small work groups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47, 296-324.
57.
ReisH. T.ShaverP. (1988). Intimacy as an interpersonal process. In DuckS.HayD. F.HobfollS. E.IckesW.MontgomeryB. M. (Eds.), Handbook of personal relationships: Theory, research and interventions (pp. 367-389). Oxford, UK: John Wiley.
58.
Reiter-PalmonR.WigertB.de VreedeT. (2012). Team creativity and innovation: The effect of group composition, social processes, and cognition. In MumfordM. D.HesterK. S.RobledoI. C. (Eds.), Handbook of organizational creativity (pp. 295-326). Cambridge, MA: Academic Press.
59.
RietzschelE. F.NijstadB. A.StroebeW. (2006). Productivity is not enough: A comparison of interactive and nominal brainstorming groups on idea generation and selection. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 244-251.
60.
RookK. S. (1984). The negative side of social interaction: Impact on psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 1097-1108.
61.
RusbultC. E.Van LangeP. A. (2003). Interdependence, interaction, and relationships. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 351-375.
62.
SassenbergK.MoskowitzG. B. (2005). Don’t stereotype, think different! Overcoming automatic stereotype activation by mindset priming. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 506-514.
63.
SawyerR. K.DeZutterS. (2009). Distributed creativity: How collective creations emerge from collaboration. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 3, 81-92.
64.
SimontonD. K. (1999). Creativity as blind variation and selective retention: Is the creative process Darwinian?Psychological Inquiry, 10, 309-328.
65.
SimontonD. K. (2003). Scientific creativity as constrained stochastic behavior: The integration of product, person, and process perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 475-494.
66.
StawB. M. (1990). An evolutionary approach to creativity and innovation. In WestM. A.FarrJ. L. (Eds.), Innovation and creativity at work: Psychological and organizational strategies (pp. 287-308). Oxford, UK: John Wiley.
67.
StawB. M. (1995). Why no one really wants creativity. In FordC. M.GioiaD. A. (Eds.), Creative action in organizations: Ivory tower visions and real world voices (pp. 161-166). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
68.
SwannW. B.Jr.GillM. J. (1997). Confidence and accuracy in person perception: Do we know what we think we know about our relationship partners?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 747-757.
UzziB.SpiroJ. (2005). Collaboration and creativity: The small world problem. American Journal of Sociology, 111, 447-504.
71.
VartanianO. (2009). Variable attention facilitates creative problem solving. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 3, 57-59.
72.
VincentL. C.KouchakiM. (2016). Creative, rare, entitled, and dishonest: How commonality of creativity in one’s group decreases an individual’s entitlement and dishonesty. Academy of Management Journal, 59, 1451-1473.
73.
VossJ. F.PostT. A. (1988). On the solving of ill-structured problems. In ChiM. T. H.GlaserR.FarrM. J. (Eds.), The nature of expertise (pp. 261-285). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
74.
WaltherJ. B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23, 3-43.
75.
WeiM.RussellD. W.ZakalikR. A. (2005). Adult attachment, social self-efficacy, self-disclosure, loneliness, and subsequent depression for freshman college students: A longitudinal study. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52, 602-614.
76.
WestbyE. L.DawsonV. L. (1995). Creativity: Asset or burden in the classroom?Creativity Research Journal, 8, 1-10.
77.
WheelessL. R.GrotzJ. (1976). Conceptualization and measurement of reported self-disclosure. Human Communication Research, 2, 338-346.
WronskaM. K.KolańczykA.NijstadB. A. (2018). Engaging in creativity broadens attentional scope. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, Article 1772.
80.
ZitekE. M.VincentL. C. (2015). Deserve and diverge: Feeling entitled makes people more creative. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 56, 242-248.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
