Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2020-4
A Longitudinal Field Investigation of Narcissism and Popularity Over Time: How Agentic and Antagonistic Aspects of Narcissism Shape the Development of Peer Relationships
Grandiose narcissism has been linked to initial popularity but to later unpopularity in peer groups and laboratory contexts. Do these effects on peer relationships also emerge in larger real-life contexts and what are the underlying behavioral processes (i.e., behavioral expressions, interpersonal perceptions)? Using data from the longitudinal CONNECT field study (N = 126), we investigated effects of agentic and antagonistic aspects of grandiose narcissism on emerging popularity in a complete peer network. A cohort of psychology first-year students was assessed with a quasiexperimental, experience-sampling methodology involving online surveys, diaries, and behavioral observations. In contrast to previous laboratory research, narcissism was unrelated to popularity at the level of zero-order correlations. However, results indicated that (a) an agentic behavioral pathway fostered popularity across time, and an antagonistic behavioral pathway drove the long-term decline in popularity, and (b) the two pathways were differentially related to agentic (admiration) and antagonistic (rivalry) aspects of narcissism.
AdamsJ. M.HartW.Alex BurtonK. (2015). I only like the idea of you: Narcissists tolerate others’ narcissistic traits but not their corresponding behaviors. Personality and Individual Differences, 82, 232-236.
2.
AndersonC.CowanJ. (2014). Personality and status attainment: A micropolitics perspective. In ChengJ. T.TracyJ. L.AndersonC. (Eds.), The psychology of social status (pp. 99-117). New York, NY: Springer.
3.
ArnettJ. J. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55, 469-480.
4.
AsendorpfJ. B.WilpersS. (1998). Personality effects on social relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1531-1544.
5.
BackM. D. (2018). The Narcissistic admiration and rivalry concept. In HermannA. D.BrunellA.FosterJ. (Eds.), The handbook of trait narcissism: Key advances, research methods, and controversies (pp. 57-67). New York, NY: Springer.
6.
BackM. D.BaumertA.DenissenJ. J. A.HartungF.-M.PenkeL.SchmukleS. C.WrzusC. (2011). PERSOC: A unified framework for understanding the dynamic interplay of personality and social relationships. European Journal of Personality, 25, 90-107.
7.
BackM. D.KennyD. A. (2010). The social relations model: How to understand dyadic processes. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4, 855-870.
8.
BackM. D.KüfnerA. C. P.DufnerM.GerlachT. M.RauthmannJ. F.DenissenJ. J. A. (2013). Narcissistic admiration and rivalry: Disentangling the bright and dark sides of narcissism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105, 1013-1037.
9.
BackM. D.KüfnerA. C. P.LeckeltM. (2018). Early impressions of grandiose narcissists: A dual-pathway perspective. In HermannA. D.BrunellA.FosterJ. (Eds.), The Handbook of trait narcissism: Key advances, research methods, and controversies (pp. 309-316). New York, NY: Springer.
10.
BackM. D.MorfC. C. (in press). Narcissism. In Zeigler-HillV.ShackelfordT. K. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of personality and individual differences. New York, NY: Springer.
11.
BackM. D.SchmukleS. C.EgloffB. (2010). Why are narcissists so charming at first sight? Decoding the narcissism–popularity link at zero acquaintance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 132-145.
12.
BackM. D.SchmukleS. C.EgloffB. (2011). A closer look at first sight: Social relations lens model analyses of personality and interpersonal attraction at zero acquaintance. European Journal of Personality, 25, 225-238.
13.
BackM. D.VazireS. (2015). The social consequences of personality: Six suggestions for future research. European Journal of Personality, 29, 296-307.
14.
BohrnstedtG. W.FelsonR. B. (1983). Explaining the relations among children’s actual and perceived performances and self-esteem: A comparison of several causal models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 451(1), 43-56.
15.
BrownR. P.BudzekK.TamborskiM. (2009). On the meaning and measure of narcissism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 951-964.
16.
BrunellA. B.GentryW. A.CampbellW. K.HoffmanB. J.KuhnertK. W.DeMarreeK. G. (2008). Leader emergence: The case of the Narcissistic leader. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1663-1676. doi:10.1177/0146167208324101
17.
BrunswikE. (1956). Perception and the representative design of psychological experiments. Berkeley: University of California Press.
18.
CampbellW. K.CampbellS. M. (2009). On the self-regulatory dynamics created by the peculiar benefits and costs of narcissism: A contextual reinforcement model and examination of leadership. Self and Identity, 8, 214-232.
19.
CarlsonE. N.Lawless DesJardinsN. M. L. (2015). Do mean guys always finish first or just say that they do? Narcissists’ awareness of their social status and popularity over time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41, 901-917.
20.
CarlsonE. N.NaumannL. P.VazireS. (2011). Getting to know a narcissist inside and out. In CampbellW. K.MillerJ. D. (Eds.), The handbook of narcissism and narcissistic personality disorder (pp. 283-299). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
21.
CarlsonE. N.VazireS.OltmannsT. F. (2011). You probably think this paper’s about you: Narcissists’ perceptions of their personality and reputation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 185-201.
22.
CarpenterR. W.WycoffA. M.TrullT. J. (2016). Ambulatory assessment: New adventures in characterizing dynamic processes. Assessment, 23, 414-424.
23.
CarrollL. (1987). A study of narcissism, affiliation, intimacy, and power motives among students in business administration. Psychological Reports, 61, 355-358.
24.
CzarnaA. Z.DufnerM.CliftonA. D. (2014). The effects of vulnerable and grandiose narcissism on liking-based and disliking-based centrality in social networks. Journal of Research in Personality, 50, 42-45.
25.
CzarnaA. Z.LeifeldP.ŚmiejaM.DufnerM.SaloveyP. (2016). Do narcissism and emotional intelligence win us friends? Modeling dynamics of peer popularity using inferential network analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42, 1588-1599.
26.
DufnerM.RauthmannJ. F.CzarnaA. Z.DenissenJ. J. A. (2013). Are narcissists sexy? Zeroing in on the effect of narcissism on short-term mate appeal. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 397, 870-882. doi:10.1177/0146167213483580
27.
EisingaR.GrotenhuisM.PelzerB. (2013). The reliability of a two-item scale: Pearson, Cronbach, or Spearman-Brown?International Journal of Public Health, 58, 637-642.
28.
EndersC. K. (2001). A primer on maximum likelihood algorithms available for use with missing data. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 8, 128-141.
29.
EverettM. G.BorgattiS. P. (2005). Extending centrality. In CarringtonP. J.ScottJ.WassermanS. (Eds.), Models and methods in social network analysis (pp. 57-76). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
30.
FosterJ. D.CampbellW. K.TwengeJ. M. (2003). Individual differences in narcissism: Inflated self-views across the lifespan and around the world. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 469-486.
31.
FosterJ. D.TrimmR. F. (2008). On being eager and uninhibited: Narcissism and approach–avoidance motivation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1004-1017.
32.
FunderD. C. (1999). Personality judgment: A realistic approach to person perception. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
33.
GeukesK.BreilS. M.KüfnerA.HuttemanR.NestlerS.BackM. (2019). Explaining the longitudinal interplay of personality and social relationships in the laboratory and in the field: The PILS and the CONNECT study. PLoS ONE, 14, e0210424.
34.
GoncaloJ. A.FlynnF. J.KimS. H. (2010). Are two narcissists better than one? The link between narcissism, perceived creativity, and creative performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 1484-1495.
35.
GrijalvaE.HarmsP. D.NewmanD. A.GaddisB. H.FraleyR. C. (2015). Narcissism and leadership: A meta-analytic review of linear and nonlinear relationships. Personnel Psychology, 68, 1-47.
36.
GrijalvaE.NewmanD. A. (2015). Narcissism and counterproductive work behavior (CWB): Meta-analysis and consideration of collectivist culture, big five personality, and narcissism’s facet structure. Applied Psychology, 64, 93-126.
37.
GrijalvaE.NewmanD. A.TayL.DonnellanM. B.HarmsP. D.RobinsR. W.YanT. (2015). Gender differences in narcissism: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 141, 261-310.
38.
HarariG. M.LaneN. D.WangR.CrosierB. S.CampbellA. T.GoslingS. D. (2016). Using smartphones to collect behavioral data in psychological science: Opportunities, practical considerations, and challenges. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11, 838-854.
39.
HayesA. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
40.
HeathertonT. F.VohsK. D. (2000). Interpersonal evaluations following threats to self: Role of self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 725-736.
41.
HumanL. J.SandstromG. M.BiesanzJ. C.DunnE. W. (2013). Accurate first impressions leave a lasting impression: The long-term effects of distinctive self-other agreement on relationship development. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4, 395-402.
42.
HuttemanR.HenneckeM.OrthU.ReitzA. K.SpechtJ. (2014). Developmental tasks as a framework to study personality development in adulthood and old age. European Journal of Personality, 28, 267-278.
43.
JacksonD. L. (2003). Revisiting sample size and number of parameter estimates: Some support for the N:q hypothesis. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 10, 128-141.
44.
JaukE.NeubauerA. C.MairuntereggerT.PempS.SieberK. P.RauthmannJ. F. (2016). How alluring are dark personalities? The Dark Triad and attractiveness in speed dating. European Journal of Personality, 302, 125-138. doi:10.1002/per.2040
45.
KennyD. A. (1994). Interpersonal perception: A social relations analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
46.
KlonskyE. D.OltmannsT. F.TurkheimerE. (2002). Informant-reports of personality disorder: Relation to self-reports and future research directions. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 9, 300-311.
47.
KrizanZ.HerlacheA. D. (2018). The Narcissism Spectrum Model: A synthetic view of narcissistic personality. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 22, 3-31.
48.
KüfnerA. C. P.NestlerS.BackM. D. (2013). The two pathways to being an (un-)popular narcissist. Journal of Personality, 81, 184-195.
49.
LangeJ.CrusiusJ.HagemeyerB. (2016). The evil queen’s dilemma: Linking narcissistic admiration and rivalry to benign and malicious envy. European Journal of Personality, 30, 168-188.
50.
LeckeltM.KüfnerA. C. P.NestlerS.BackM. D. (2015). Behavioral processes underlying the decline of narcissists’ popularity over time. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109, 856-871.
51.
LeckeltM.WetzelE.GerlachT. M.AckermanR. A.MillerJ. D.ChopikW. J.BackM. D. (2018). Validation of the Narcissistic Admiration and Rivalry Questionnaire Short Scale (NARQ-S) in convenience and representative samples. Psychological Assessment, 30, 86-96.
52.
LuanZ.HuttemanR.DenissenJ. J. A.AsendorpfJ. B.van AkenM. A. G. (2017). Do you see my growth? Two longitudinal studies on personality development from childhood to young adulthood from multiple perspectives. Journal of Research in Personality, 67, 44-60.
53.
McGrawK. O.WongS. P. (1996). Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. Psychological Methods, 1, 30-46.
54.
MillerJ. D.LynamD. R.HyattC. S.CampbellW. K. (2017). Controversies in narcissism. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 13, 291-315.
55.
MillerJ. D.LynamD. R.McCainJ. L.FewL. R.CregoC.WidigerT. A.CampbellW. K. (2015). Thinking structurally about narcissism: An examination of the five-factor narcissism inventory and its components. Journal of Personality Disorders, 30, 1-18.
56.
MorfC. C.RhodewaltF. (2001). Unraveling the paradoxes of narcissism: A dynamic self-regulatory processing model. Psychological Inquiry, 12, 177-196.
57.
NestlerS.BackM. D. (2013). Applications and extensions of the lens model to understand interpersonal judgments at zero acquaintance. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22, 374-379.
58.
NezlekJ. B.SchützA.Schröder-AbéM.SmithC. V. (2011). A cross-cultural study of relationships between daily social interaction and the five-factor model of personality. Journal of Personality, 79, 811-840.
59.
OltmannsJ. R.CregoC.WidigerT. A. (2018). Informant assessment: The Informant Five-Factor Narcissism Inventory. Psychological Assessment, 30, 31-42.
60.
PaulhusD. L. (1998). Interpersonal and intrapsychic adaptiveness of trait self-enhancement: A mixed blessing?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1197-1208.
61.
PaulhusD. L. (2001). Normal narcissism: Two minimalist accounts. Psychological Inquiry, 12, 228-230.
62.
PaulhusD. L.TrapnellP. D. (1998). Typological measures of shyness: Additive, interactive, and categorical. Journal of Research in Personality, 32, 183-201.
63.
RaskinR. N.HallC. S. (1979). A Narcissistic Personality Inventory. Psychological Reports, 45, 590-590.
64.
RauthmannJ. F. (2012). The Dark Triad and interpersonal perception: Similarities and differences in the social consequences of narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3, 487-496.
65.
R Core Team. (2016). R: A language and environment for statistical computing (Version 3.3.2.). Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available from http://www.R-project.org
66.
RevelleW. (2017) psych: Procedures for Personality and Psychological Research, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, USA. Retrieved from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=psych Version = 1.6.8.
67.
RosseelY. (2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(i02), 1-36.
68.
SchönbrodtF. D.BackM. D.SchmukleS. C. (2012). TripleR: An R package for social relations analyses based on round-robin designs. Behavior Research Methods, 44, 455-470.
69.
SekaraV.StopczynskiA.LehmannS. (2016). Fundamental structures of dynamic social networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113, 9977-9982.
70.
SelfhoutM.BurkW.BranjeS.DenissenJ.van AkenM.MeeusW. (2010). Emerging late adolescent friendship networks and big five personality traits: A social network approach. Journal of Personality, 78, 509-538.
71.
StopferJ. M.EgloffB.NestlerS.BackM. D. (2013). Being popular in online social networks: How agentic, communal, and creativity traits relate to judgments of status and liking. Journal of Research in Personality, 47, 592-598.
72.
SunnafrankM.RamirezA. (2004). At first sight: Persistent relational effects of get-acquainted conversations. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 21, 361-379.
73.
VazireS. (2010). Who knows what about a person? The self–other knowledge asymmetry (SOKA) model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 281-300.
74.
VazireS.CarlsonE. N. (2011). Others sometimes know us better than we know ourselves. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 104-108.
75.
VazireS.NaumannL. P.RentfrowP. J.GoslingS. D. (2008). Portrait of a narcissist: Manifestations of narcissism in physical appearance. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 1439-1447.
76.
WatsonD.HumrichouseJ. (2006). Personality development in emerging adulthood: Integrating evidence from self-ratings and spouse ratings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 959-974.
77.
WrzusC.MehlM. R. (2015). Lab and/or field? Measuring personality processes and their social consequences. European Journal of Personality, 29, 250-271.
78.
WurstS. N.GerlachT. M.DufnerM.RauthmannJ. F.GroszM. P.KüfnerA. C. P.BackM. D. (2017). Narcissism and romantic relationships: The differential impact of narcissistic admiration and rivalry. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 112, 280-306.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
