Relational closeness has been positively associated with relationship quality and mental health; however, desire for closeness and intimacy in a relationship may also motivate sexual risk-taking, that is, forgoing condom use. This study examined the impact of desiring more closeness with a primary partner (i.e., motivation for reducing closeness discrepancies) on HIV prevention behavior. Using pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) as a case study, we examined the extent to which closeness discrepancies motivate behavioral intentions (Study 1) and actual behavior (Study 2). In both studies, desiring more closeness and believing that condoms interfere with intimacy were independently positively associated with PrEP adoption. Understanding the relational needs for closeness and intimacy in motivating prevention behavior is critical for social psychology, relationship science, and public health efforts to improve sexual health.
AdamB. D.SearsA.SchellenbergE. G. (2000). Accounting for unsafe sex: Interviews with men who have sex with men. The Journal of Sex Research, 37, 24-36.
2.
AgnewC. R.LovingT. J.LeB.GoodfriendW. (2004). Thinking close: Measuring relational closeness as perceived self-other inclusion. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
3.
AgnewC. R.Van LangeP. A. M.RusbultC. E.LangstonC. A. (1998). Cognitive interdependence: Commitment and the mental representation of close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 939-954.
4.
AjzenI. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179-211.
5.
AjzenI.FishbeinM. (1977). Attitude–behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 888-891.
6.
ArnoldT.Brinkley-RubinsteinL.ChanP. A.Perez-BrumerA.BolognaE. S.BeauchampsL.. . . NunnA. (2017). Social, structural, behavioral, and clinical factors influencing retention in Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) care in Mississippi. PLoS ONE, 12(2), e0162354.
7.
AronA.AronE. N.NormanC. (2001). The self-expansion model of motivation and cognition in close relationships and beyond. In ClarkM.FletcherG. (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 478-501). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
8.
AronA.AronE. N.SmollanD. (1992). Inclusion of Other in the Self Scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 596-612.
9.
AronA.MashekD. J.AronE. N. (2004). Closeness as including other in the self. In MashekD. J.AronA. (Eds.), Handbook of closeness and intimacy (pp. 27-41). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
10.
AronA.McLaughlin-VolpeT.MashekD.LewandowskiG.WrightS. C.AronE. N. (2004). Including others in the self. European Review of Social Psychology, 15, 101-132.
11.
Birnie-PorterC.LydonJ. E. (2013). A prototype approach to understanding sexual intimacy through its relationship to intimacy. Personal Relationships, 20, 236-258.
12.
BuunkB. P.BakkerA. B. (1997). Commitment to the relationship, extradyadic sex, and AIDS preventive behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27, 1241-1257.
13.
CareyM. P.CareyK. B.MaistoS. A.GordonC. M.WeinhardtL. S. (2001). Assessing sexual risk behaviour with the Timeline Followback (TLFB) approach: Continued development and psychometric evaluation with psychiatric outpatients. International Journal of STD & AIDS, 12, 365-375.
14.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2014). Pre-exposure prophylaxis for the prevention of HIV infection in the United States: A clinical practice guideline. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/pdf/PrEPguidelines2014.pdf
15.
CusickL.RhodesT. (2000). Sustaining sexual safety in relationships: HIV-positive people and their sexual partners. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 2, 473-487.
16.
DavisD.ShaverP. R.VernonM. L. (2004). Attachment style and subjective motivations for sex. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1076-1090.
17.
de VroomeE. M. M.StroebeW.SandfortT. G. M.de witJ. B. F.Van GriensvenG. J. P. (2000). Safer sex in social context: Individualistic and relational determinants of AIDS-preventive behavior among gay men. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30, 2322-2340.
18.
FerreiraL. C.NarcisoI.NovoR. F.PereiraC. R. (2014). Predicting couple satisfaction: The role of differentiation of self, sexual desire and intimacy in heterosexual individuals. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 29, 390-404.
FrostD. M.ForresterC. (2013). Closeness discrepancies in romantic relationships implications for relational well-being, stability, and mental health. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 456-469.
21.
FrostD. M.McClellandS. I.DettmannM. (2017). Sexual closeness discrepancies: What they are and why they matter for sexual well-being in romantic relationships. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 46, 2353-2364.
22.
FrostD. M.StirrattM. J.OuelletteS. C. (2008). Understanding why gay men seek HIV-seroconcordant partners: Intimacy and risk reduction motivations. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 10, 513-527.
23.
GamarelK. E.GolubS. A. (2015). Intimacy motivations and pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) adoption intentions among HIV-negative men who have sex with men (MSM) in romantic relationships. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 49, 177-186.
24.
GamarelK. E.NeilandsT. B.GolubS. A.JohnsonM. O. (2014). An omitted level: An examination of relational orientations and viral suppression among HIV serodiscordant male couples. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 66, 193-196.
25.
GamarelK. E.StarksT. J.DilworthS. E.NeilandsT. B.TaylorJ. M.JohnsonM. O. (2014). Personal or relational? Examining sexual health in the context of HIV serodiscordant same-sex male couples. AIDS and Behavior, 18, 171-179.
26.
GolubS. A.GamarelK. E. (2016). Psychometric evaluation of the Condom Barriers and Motivations Scale (CBMS). Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 40, 494-505.
27.
GolubS. A.GamarelK. E.RendinaH. J.SuraceA.Lelutiu-WeinbergerC. (2013). From efficacy to effectiveness: Facilitators and barriers to PrEP acceptability and motivations for adherence among MSM and transgender women in New York City. AIDS Patient Care & STDs, 27, 248-254.
28.
GolubS. A.GamarelK. E.SuraceA. (2017). Demographic differences in PrEP-related stereotypes: Implications for implementation. AIDS and Behavior, 21(5), 1229-1235.
29.
GoodreauS. M.CarnegieN. B.VittinghoffE.LamaJ. R.SanchezJ.GrinsztejnB.. . . BuchbinderS. P. (2012). What drives the US and Peruvian HIV epidemic in men who have sex with men (MSM)?PLoS ONE, 7, e50522.
30.
GrovC.WhitfieldT. H. F.RendinaH. J.VentuneacA.ParsonsJ. T. (2015). Willingness to take PrEP and potential for risk compensation among highly sexually active gay and bisexual men. AIDS and Behavior, 19, 2234-2244.
31.
HarmanJ. J.AmicoK. R. (2009). The relationship-oriented information-motivation-behavioral skills model: A multilevel structural equation model among dyads. AIDS and Behavior, 13, 173-184.
32.
HassebrauckM.FehrB. (2002). Dimensions of relationship quality. Personal Relationships, 9, 253-270.
33.
HigginsE. T. (1987). Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect. Psychological Review, 94, 319-340.
34.
HoffC. C.BeougherS. C.ChakravartyD.DarbesL. A.NeilandsT. B. (2010). Relationship characteristics and motivations behind agreements among gay male couples: Differences by agreement type and couple serostatus. AIDS Care, 22, 827-835.
35.
HoffC. C.ChakravartyD.BeougherS. C.DarbesL. A.DadasovichR.NeilandsT. B. (2009). Serostatus differences and agreements about sex with outside partners among gay male couples. AIDS Education and Prevention, 21, 25-38.
36.
JadackR. A.FresiaA.RompaloA. M.ZenilmanJ. (1997). Reasons for not using condoms of clients at urban sexually transmitted diseases clinics. Sexually Transmitted Diseases, 24, 402-408.
37.
LeB.DoveN. L.AgnewC. R.KornM. S.MutsoA. A. (2010). Predicting nonmarital romantic relationship dissolution: A meta-analytic synthesis. Personal Relationships, 17, 377-390.
38.
MacapagalK.GreeneG. J.AndrewsR.MustanskiB. (2016). Evaluating the Relationship-Oriented Information, Motivation, and Behavioral Skills model of HIV preventive behaviors in young men who have sex with men. AIDS Education and Prevention, 28, 165-179.
39.
MalebrancheD. J.FieldsE. L.BryantL. O.HarperS. R. (2009). Masculine socialization and sexual risk behaviors among Black men who have sex with men: A qualitative exploration. Men and Masculinities, 12, 90-112.
40.
MashekD. J.ShermanM. D. (2004). Desiring less closeness with intimate others. In MashekD. J.AronA. (Eds.), Handbook of closeness and intimacy (pp. 343-356). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
41.
McNealJ. L. (1997). The association of idealization and intimacy factors with condom use in gay male couples. Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings, 4, 437-451.
42.
MisovichS. J.FisherJ. D.FisherW. A. (1997). Close relationships and elevated HIV risk behavior: Evidence and possible underlying psychological processes. Review of General Psychology, 1, 72-107.
43.
NewcombM. E.RyanD. T.GarofaloR.MustanskiB. (2014). The effects of sexual partnership and relationship characteristics on three sexual risk variables in young men who have sex with men. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 43, 61-72.
44.
ParsonsJ. T.StarksT. J.GamarelK. E.GrovC. (2012). Non-monogamy and sexual relationship quality among same-sex male couples. Journal of Family Psychology, 26, 669-677.
45.
PurcellD. W.MizunoY.SmithD. K.GrabbeK.Courtenay-QuirkC.TomlinsonH.MerminJ. (2014). Incorporating couples-based approaches into HIV prevention for gay and bisexual men: Opportunities and challenges. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 43, 35-46.
46.
RobinsG.BolderoJ. (2003). Relational discrepancy theory: The implications of self-discrepancy theory for dyadic relationships and for the emergence of social structure. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7, 56-74.
47.
RusbultC. E. (1980). Commitment and satisfaction in romantic associations: A test of the investment model. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 16, 172-186.
48.
SheeranP. (2002). Intention-behavior relations: A conceptual and empirical review. European Journal of Social Psychology, 12, 1-36.
49.
SnellW. E.FisherT. D.WaltersA. S. (1993). The multidimensional sexuality questionnaire: An objective self-report measure of psychological tendencies associated with human sexuality. Annals of Sex Research, 6, 27-55.
50.
SobellM. B.SobellL. C. (1993). Problem drinkers: Guided self-change treatment. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
51.
SprecherS. (2002). Sexual satisfaction in premarital relationships: Associations with satisfaction, love, commitment, and stability. Journal of Sex Research, 39, 190-196.
52.
SprecherS.CateR. (2004). Sexual satisfaction and sexual expression as predictors of relationship satisfaction and stability. In HarveyJ. H.WenzelA.SprecherS. (Eds.), The handbook of sexuality in close relationships (pp. 235-256). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
53.
SprecherS.ReganP. C. (1998). Passionate and companionate love in courting and young married couples. Sociological Inquiry, 68, 163-185.
54.
StarksT. J.PaytonG.GolubS. A.WeinbergerC. L.ParsonsJ. T. (2014). Contextualizing condom use: Intimacy interference, stigma, and unprotected sex. Journal of Health Psychology, 19, 711-720.
55.
SullivanP.SalazarL.BuckbinderS.SanchezT. H. (2009). Estimating the proportion of HIV transmissions from main sex partners among men who have sex with men in five US cities. AIDS, 23, 1153-1162.
56.
TsapelasI.AronA.OrbuchT. (2009). Marital boredom now predicts less satisfaction 9 years later. Psychological Science, 20, 543-545.
57.
VolkJ. E.MarcusJ. L.PhengrasamyT.BlechingerD.NguyenD. P.FollansbeeS.HareC. B. (2015). No new HIV infections with increasing use of HIV preexposure prophylaxis in a clinical practice setting. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 61, 1601-1603.
YelaC. (2000). Predictors of and factors related to loving and sexual satisfaction for men and women. European Review of Applied Psychology, 50, 235-243.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
