In general, people prefer to view themselves positively. But some individuals are more prone to self-flattery than others, that is, holding an unjustifiably high opinion of oneself. Applying regulatory mode theory, we identify motivational factors that predict which individuals are and are not prone to self-flattery. In four studies, using both chronic (Studies 1-3) and experimental (Study 4) conditions, we found that those with high locomotion concerns about effecting change (control) are more inclined to flatter themselves, whereas those with high assessment concerns about making the right choices (truth) are less inclined to flatter themselves. The relation between stronger locomotion and greater self-flattery, and stronger assessment and lesser self-flattery, was mediated by locomotors’ low self-criticism and assessors’ high self-criticism. These results shed light on how locomotion and assessment differ in the motivation to flatter oneself.
AlickeM. D.GovorunO. (2005). The better-than-average effect. The Self in Social Judgment, 1, 85-106.
2.
AvnetT.HigginsE. T. (2003). Locomotion, assessment, and regulatory fit: Value transfer from “how” to “what.”Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 525-530.
3.
BalcazarF.HopkinsB. L.SuarezY. (1985). A critical, objective review of performance feedback. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 7(3-4), 65-89.
4.
BlakeB. F.ValdiserriJ.NeuendorfK. A.NemethJ. (2006). Validity of the SDS-17 measure of social desirability in the American context. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 1625-1636. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2005.12.007
5.
BuhrmesterM.KwangT.GoslingS. D. (2011). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data?Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 3-5.
6.
CattellR. B. (1966). The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1, 245-276. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr0102_10
7.
Rossignac-MilonM.HigginsE. T. (2018). Feeling distressed from making decisions: Assessors’ need to be right. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Advance online publication. doi:10.1037/pspp0000181
8.
ChernikovaM.DestroC. L.MauroR.PierroA.KruglanskiA. W.HigginsE. T. (2016). Different strokes for different folks: Effects of regulatory mode complementarity and task complexity on performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 89, 134-142.
9.
CrumpM. J.McDonnellJ. V.GureckisT. M. (2013). Evaluating Amazon’s Mechanical Turk as a tool for experimental behavioral research. PLoS ONE, 8(3), e57410.
10.
de CarloN. A.FalcoA.PierroA.DugasM.KruglanskiA. W.HigginsE. T. (2014). Regulatory mode orientations and well-being in an organizational setting: The differential mediating roles of workaholism and work engagement. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 44, 725-738.
11.
de StobbeleirK. E.AshfordS. J.BuyensD. (2011). Self-regulation of creativity at work: The role of feedback-seeking behavior in creative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 54, 811-831.
12.
DufnerM.GebauerJ. E.SedikidesC.DenissenJ. J. A. (2018). Self-enhancement and psychological adjustment: A meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Review. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/1088868318756467
13.
HayesA. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
14.
HigginsE. T. (2008). Culture and personality: Variability across universal motives as the missing link. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 608-634.
15.
HigginsE. T. (2012). Beyond pleasure and pain: How motivation works. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
16.
HigginsE. T.FriedmanR. S.HarlowR. E.IdsonL. C.AydukO. N.TaylorA. (2001). Achievement orientations from subjective histories of success: Promotion pride versus prevention pride. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 3-23.
17.
HigginsE. T.KruglanskiA. W.PierroA. (2003). Regulatory mode: Locomotion and assessment as distinct orientations. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 35, pp. 293-344). New York, NY: Academic Press.
18.
KruglanskiA. W.PierroA.MannettiL.HigginsE. T. (2013). The distinct psychologies of “looking” and “leaping”: Assessment and locomotion as the springs of action. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7, 79-92.
19.
KruglanskiA. W.ThompsonE. P.HigginsE. T.AtashM.PierroA.ShahJ. Y.SpiegelS. (2000). To” do the right thing” or to” just do it”: Locomotion and assessment as distinct self-regulatory imperatives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 793-815.
20.
KurmanJ. (2003). Why is self-enhancement low in certain collectivist cultures? An investigation of two competing explanations. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 34, 496-510.
21.
LalwaniA. K.ShrumL. J.ChiuC. Y. (2009). Motivated response styles: The role of cultural values, regulatory focus, and self-consciousness in socially desirable responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 870-882.
22.
LentR. W.BrownS. D.LarkinK. C. (1984). Relation of self-efficacy expectations to academic achievement and persistence. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 31, 356-362.
23.
Lo DestroC.ChernikovaM.PierroA.KruglanskiA. W.HigginsE. T. (2016). Practice benefits locomotors: Regulatory mode complementarity and task performance. Social Psychological & Personality Science, 7, 358-365.
24.
LuthansF.AvolioB. J.WalumbwaF. O.LiW. (2005). The psychological capital of Chinese workers: Exploring the relationship with performance. Management and Organization Review, 1, 249-271.
25.
MultonK. D.BrownS. D.LentR. W. (1991). Relation of self-efficacy beliefs to academic outcomes: A meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 38, 30-38.
26.
O’ConnorB. P. (2000). SPSS and SAS programs for determining the number of components using parallel analysis and Velicer’s MAP test. Behavior Research Methods, 32, 396-402. doi:10.3758/BF03200807
27.
PaulhusD. L. (1994). Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding: Reference manual for BIDR version6 (Unpublished manuscript). University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
28.
PeerE.VosgerauJ.AcquistiA. (2013). Reputation as a sufficient condition for data quality on Amazon Mechanical Turk. Behavior Research Methods, 46, 1023-1031. doi:10.3758/s13428-013-0434-y
29.
PierroA.LederS.MannettiL.HigginsE. T.KruglanskiA. W.AielloA. (2008). Regulatory mode effects on counterfactual thinking and regret. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 321-329.
30.
PierroA.PicaG.KleinK.KruglanskiA. W.HigginsE. T. (2013). Looking back or moving on: How regulatory modes affect nostalgia. Motivation and Emotion, 37, 653-660.
31.
PierroA.PicaG.GianniniA. M.HigginsE. T.KruglanskiA. W. (2018). “ Letting myself go forward past wrongs”: How regulatory modes affect self-forgiveness. PloS one, 13(3), e0193357.
32.
PierroA.PicaG.MauroR.KruglanskiA. W.HigginsE. T. (2012). How regulatory modes work together: Locomotion-assessment complementarity in work performance. TPM: Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, 19, 247-262.
33.
PierroA.PresaghiF.HigginsE. T.KleinK. M.KruglanskiA. W. (2012). Frogs and ponds: A multilevel analysis of the regulatory mode complementarity hypothesis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 269-279.
34.
PierroA.PresaghiF.HigginsT. E.KruglanskiA. W. (2009). Regulatory mode preferences for autonomy supporting versus controlling instructional styles. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 599-615.
35.
ProostK.SchreursB.De WitteK.DerousE. (2010). Ingratiation and self-promotion in the selection interview: The effects of using single tactics or a combination of tactics on interviewer judgments. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 40, 2155-2169.
36.
RosenbergM. (1979). Conceiving the self. New York, NY: Basic Books.
37.
SedikidesC.GreggA. P. (2003). Portraits of the self. In HoggM. A.CooperJ. (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 110-138). London, England: SAGE.
38.
SlomanS. A.RabbN. (2016). Your understanding is my understanding: Evidence for a community of knowledge. Psychological Science, 27(11), 1451-1460.
39.
StöberJ. (2001). The Social Desirability Scale-17 (SDS-17): Convergent validity, discriminant validity, and relationship with age. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 17, 222-232. doi:10.1027//1015-5759.17.3.222
40.
TaylorS. E.BrownJ. D. (1988). Illusion and well-being: A social psychological perspective on mental health. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 193-210.
41.
ThompsonR.ZuroffD. C. (2004). The Levels of Self-Criticism Scale: Comparative self-criticism and internalized self-criticism. Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 419-430. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(03)00106-5
42.
Vazeou-NieuwenhuisA.OrehekE.ScheierM. F. (2017). The meaning of action: Do self-regulatory processes contribute to a purposeful life?Personality and Individual Differences, 116, 115-122.
43.
WebbC. E.ColemanP. T.TomasuloL. R.HigginsE. T. (2017). Moving on or digging deeper: Regulatory mode effects on conflict resolution. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 112, 621-641. doi:10.1037/pspp0000131
44.
YoussefC. M.LuthansF. (2007). Positive organizational behavior in the workplace: The impact of hope, optimism, and resilience. Journal of Management, 33, 774-800.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
