A Darker Side of Hope: Harmony-Focused Hope Decreases Collective Action Intentions Among the Disadvantaged

Abstract

Hope is viewed as a positive emotion associated with the motivation to change existing conditions. As such, it is highly relevant for social change, particularly when considering disadvantaged groups. We propose that, in the context of unequal intergroup relations, hope may actually undermine motivation for change among disadvantaged group members. Specifically, we distinguish between hope targeted at harmony with the outgroup and hope targeted at social equality between groups. Drawing on insights regarding the consequences of positive intergroup interactions, we predict that hope for harmony with the outgroup can undermine the constructive tension that motivates the disadvantaged toward equality. Across four studies, involving different intergroup contexts, hope for harmony was negatively associated with disadvantaged group members’ motivation for collective action. We further found that high identifiers from the disadvantaged group were immune to this effect. We discuss theoretical and practical implications for the role of hope in social change.

Keywords

hope harmony equality identification collective action

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aminzade

McAdam

(2001). Emotions and contentious politics. In Aminzade

Goldstone

J. A.

McAdam

Perry

E. J.

Sewell

W. H.

Tarrow

Tilly

(Eds.), Silence and voice in the study of contentious politics (pp. 14-50). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Cohen-Chen

Van-Zomeren

Halperin

(2015). Hope(lessness) and collective (in)action in intractable intergroup conflict. In Halperin

Sharvit

(Eds.), The social psychology of intractable conflicts: Celebrating the legacy of Daniel Bar-Tal (Vol. 1., pp. 89-101). New York, NY: Springer.

Dixon

Durrheim

Tredoux

(2005). Beyond the optimal contact strategy: A reality check for the contact hypothesis. American Psychologist, 60, 697-711.

Dixon

J. A.

Durrheim

Tredoux

(2007). Intergroup contact and attitudes toward the principle and practice of racial equality. Psychological Science, 18, 867-872. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01993.x

Dixon

Levine

Reicher

Durrheim

(2012). Beyond prejudice: Are negative evaluations the problem and is getting us to like one another more the solution? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 35, 411-425. doi:10.1017/S0140525X11002214

Doosje

Ellemers

Spears

(1995). Perceived variability as a function of group status and identification. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 410-436. doi:10.1006/jesp.1995.1018

Goh

J. X.

Hall

J. A.

Rosenthal

(2016). Mini meta-analysis of your own studies: Some arguments on why and a primer on how. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 10, 535-549. doi:10.1111/spc3.12267

Greenaway

K. H.

Cichocka

Van Veelen

Likki

Branscombe

N. R.

(2016). Feeling hopeful inspires support for social change. Political Psychology, 37, 89-107. doi:10.1111/pops.12225

Guimond

Dube-Simard

(1983). Relative deprivation theory and the Quebec nationalist movement: The cognition-emotion distinction and the personal-group deprivation issue. Journal of Personality Social Psychology, 44, 526-535. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.44.3.526

10.

Halperin

(2016). Emotions in conflict: Inhibitors and facilitators of peace making. New York, NY: Routledge.

11.

Halperin

Russel

A. G.

Dweck

C. S.

Gross

J. J.

(2011). Anger, hatred, and the quest for peace: Anger can be constructive in the absence of hatred. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 55, 274-291.

12.

Halperin

Sharvit

Gross

J. J.

(2011). Emotion and emotion regulation in conflicts. In Bar-Tal

(Ed.), Intergroup conflicts and their resolution: Social psychological perspective (pp. 83-103). New York, NY: Psychology Press.

13.

Hayes

A. F.

(2013). Methodology in the social sciences. Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

14.

Hayes

A. F.

Preacher

K. J.

(2014). Statistical mediation analysis with a multicategorical independent variable. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 67, 451-470.

15.

Hornsey

M. J.

Fielding

K. S.

(2016). A cautionary note about messages of hope: Focusing on progress in reducing carbon emissions weakens mitigation motivation. Global Environmental Change, 39, 26-34. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.04.003

16.

Jackman

M. R.

(1994). The velvet glove: Paternalism and conflict in gender, class, and race relations. Berkeley: University of California Press.

17.

Klandermans

(1984). Mobilization and participation: Social psychological expansions of resource mobilization theory. American Sociological Review, 49, 583-600.

18.

Klandermans

(2002). How group identification helps to overcome the Dilemma of collective action. American Behavioral Scientist, 45, 887-900.

19.

Lala

McGarty

Thomas

E. F.

Ebert

Broderick

Mhando

Kamuronsi

(2014). Messages of hope: Using positive stories of survival to assist recovery in Rwanda. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 2, 450-468. doi:10.5964/jspp.v2i1.290

20.

Lazarus

R. S.

(1999). Stress and emotion: A new synthesis. New York, NY: Springer.

21.

Lerner

J. S.

Keltner

(2001). Fear, anger, and risk. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 146-159.

22.

Nietzsche

F.W.

(2006). Human, all too human: Parts one and two. Mineola, NY: Dover. (Original work published 1878)

23.

Pearlman

(2013). Emotions and the micro foundations of the Arab uprisings. Perspectives on Politics, 11, 387-409. doi:10.1017/S1537592713001072

24.

Roccas

Sagiv

Schwartz

S. H.

Halevy

Eidelson

(2008). Towards a unifying model of identification with groups: Integrating theoretical perspectives. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12, 280-306. doi:10.1177/1088868308319225

25.

Saguy

(2018). Downside of intergroup harmony? When reconciliation Might Backfire and what to do. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 5, 75-81. doi:10.1177/2372732217747085

26.

Saguy

Schori-Eyal

Hasan-Aslih

Sobol

Dovidio

J. F.

(2016). The irony of harmony: Past and new development. In Vezzali

Stathi

(Eds.), Intergroup contact theory: Recent developments and future directions (pp. 53-71). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.

27.

Saguy

Tausch

Dovidio

J. F.

Pratto

(2009). The irony of harmony: Intergroup contact can produce false expectations for equality. Psychological Science, 20, 114-121. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02261.x

28.

Saguy

Tausch

Dovidio

J. F.

Pratto

Singh

(2010). Tension and harmony in intergroup relations. In Mikulincer

Shaver

P. R.

(Eds.), Human aggression and violence: Causes, manifestations, and consequences (pp. 333-348). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

29.

Sengupta

N. K.

Sibley

C. G.

(2013). Perpetuating one’s own disadvantage: Intergroup contact enables the ideological legitimation of inequality. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 1391-1403. doi:10.1177/0146167213497593

30.

Smith

C. A.

Lazarus

R. S.

(1990). Emotion and adaptation. In Pervin

L. A.

(Ed.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 609-637). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

31.

Spanovic

Lickel

Denson

T. F.

Petrovic

(2010). Fear and anger as predictors of motivation for intergroup aggression: Evidence from Serbia and Republika Srpska. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 13, 725-733.

32.

Stroebe

Wang

Wright

S. C.

(2015). Broadening perspectives on achieving social change. Journal of Social Issues, 71, 633-645. doi:10.1111/josi.12132

33.

Stürmer

Simon

(2004b). The role of collective identification in social movement participation: A panel study in the context of the German gay movement. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 263-277. doi:10.1177/0146167203256690

34.

Tausch

Becker

J. C.

Spears

Christ

Saab

Singh

Siddiqui

R. N.

(2011). Explaining radical group behavior: Developing emotion and efficacy routes to normative and nonnormative collective action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 129-148. doi:10.1037/a0022728

35.

Van Zomeren

. (2013). Four core social-psychological motivations to undertake collective action. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7, 378-388. doi:10.1111/spc3.12031

36.

Van Zomeren

Postmes

Spears

. (2008). Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: A quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 504-535. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.504

37.

Van Zomeren

Saguy

Schellhaas

F. M. H

. (2013). Believing in “making a difference” to collective efforts: Participative efficacy beliefs as a unique predictor of collective action. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 16, 618-634. doi:10.1177/1368430212467476

38.

Van Zomeren

Spears

Fischer

A. H.

Leach

C. W

. (2004). Put your money where your mouth is! Explaining collective action tendencies though group-focused anger and group efficacy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 649-664. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.87.5.649

39.

Van Zomeren

Spears

Leach

C. W

. (2008). Exploring psychological mechanisms of collective action: Does relevance of group identity influence how people cope with collective disadvantage? British Journal of Social Psychology, 47, 353-372. doi:10.1348/014466607X231091

40.

Wlodarczyk

Basabe

Páez

Zumeta

(2017). Hope and anger as mediators between collective action frames and participation in collective mobilization: The case of 15-M. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 5, 200-223. doi:10.5964/jspp.v5i1.471

41.

Wright

Lubensky

(2009). The struggle for social equality: Collective action vs. prejudice reduction. In Demoulin

Leyens

J. P.

Dovidio

J. F.

(Eds.), Intergroup misunderstandings: Impact of divergent social realities (pp. 291-310). New York, NY: Psychology Press.

42.

Wright

S. C.

Taylor

D. M.

Moghaddam

F. M.

(1990). The relationship of perceptions and emotions to behavior in the face of collective inequality. Social Justice Research, 4, 229-248. doi:10.1007/BF01048399

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.05 MB