Responsiveness to others (i.e., our understanding, validation, and support of important aspects of others) significantly contributes to positive social relationships. In the present research, we found evidence that responsiveness has motivational origins. In two experiments, participants who were approaching positive social outcomes had a higher level of responsiveness compared with participants who were avoiding negative social outcomes. A third experiment disentangled the roles of motivation and situation valence. Positive (compared with negative) social situations were associated with higher approach motivation, lower avoidance motivation, and a higher level of responsiveness. However, within a given situation, both approach and avoidance motivation were associated with a higher level of responsiveness. This association was even stronger in negative situations, suggesting that both approach and avoidance motivation might be ways of behaving responsively in potentially difficult social situations. The effects were independent of relationship closeness and partly weaker in older compared with younger adults.
AkiyamaH.AntonucciT.TakahashiK.LangfahlE. S. (2003). Negative interactions in close relationships across the life span. The Journals of Gerontology Series B, 58, P70-P79. doi:10.1093/geronb/58.2.P70
2.
BradleyM. M.LangP. J. (1994). Measuring emotion: The self-assessment manikin and the semantic differential. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 25, 49-59. doi:10.1016/0005-7916(94)90063-9
3.
BroseA.ScheibeS.SchmiedekF. (2013). Life contexts make a difference: Emotional stability in younger and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 28, 148-159. doi:10.1037/a0030047
4.
BrownP.LevinsonS. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
5.
CanevelloA.CrockerJ. (2010). Creating good relationships: Responsiveness, relationship quality, and interpersonal goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 78-106. doi:10.1037/a0018186
6.
CarstensenL. L. (2006). The influence of a sense of time on human development. Science, 312, 1913-1915. doi:10.1126/science.1127488
7.
CegalaD. J. (1989). A study of selected linguistic components of involvement in interaction. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 53, 311-326. doi:10.1080/10570318909374309
8.
CharlesS. T.PiazzaJ. R. (2007). Memories of social interactions: Age differences in emotional intensity. Psychology and Aging, 22, 300-309. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.22.2.300
9.
CharlesS. T.PiazzaJ. R.LuongG.AlmeidaD. M. (2009). Now you see it, now you don’t: Age differences in affective reactivity to social tensions. Psychology and Aging, 24, 645-653. doi:10.1037/a0016673
10.
CialdiniR. B.BrownS. L.LewisB. P.LuceC.NeubergS. L. (1997). Reinterpreting the empathy–altruism relationship: When one into one equals oneness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 481-494. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.73.3.481
11.
CrockerJ.CanevelloA.LewisK. A. (2017). Romantic relationships in the ecosystem: Compassionate goals, nonzero-sum beliefs, and change in relationship quality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 112, 58-75. doi:10.1037/pspi0000076
12.
DebrotA.CookW. L.PerrezM.HornA. B. (2012). Deeds matter: Daily enacted responsiveness and intimacy in couples’ daily lives. Journal of Family Psychology, 26, 617-627. doi:10.1037/a0028666
13.
DerryberryD.TuckerD. M. (1994). Motivating the focus of attention. In NiedenthalP. M.KitayamaS. (Eds.), The heart’s eye: Emotional influences in perception and attention (pp. 167-196). New York, NY: Academic press.
14.
FiedlerK.SchottM.MeiserT. (2011). What mediation analysis can (not) do. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 1231-1236. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2011.05.007
15.
FörsterJ.HigginsE. T. (2005). How global versus local perception fits regulatory focus. Psychological Science, 16, 631-636. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01586.x
16.
FreundA. M.Blanchard-FieldsF. (2014). Age-related differences in altruism across adulthood: Making personal financial gain versus contributing to the public good. Developmental Psychology, 50, 1125-1136. doi:10.1037/a0034491
17.
FrijdaN. H.MesquitaB. (1994). The social roles and functions of emotions. In KityaymaS.MarcusH. (Eds.), Emotion and culture: Empirical studies of mutual influence (pp. 51-87). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
18.
FungH. H.CarstensenL. L.LangF. R. (2001). Age-related patterns in social networks among European Americans and African Americans: Implications for socioemotional selectivity across the life span. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 52, 185-206. doi:10.2190/1ABL-9BE5-M0X2-LR9V
19.
GableS. L. (2006). Approach and avoidance social motives and goals. Journal of Personality, 74, 175-222. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2005.00373.x
20.
GableS. L.BerkmanE. T. (2008). Making connections and avoiding loneliness: Approach and avoidance social motives and goals. In ElliotA. J. (Ed.), Handbook of approach and avoidance motivation (pp. 204-216). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
21.
GableS. L.ReisH. T.ElliotA. J. (2003). Evidence for bivariate systems: An empirical test of appetition and aversion across domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 349-372. doi:10.1016/S0092-6566(02)00580-9
22.
GrossJ. J.CarstensenL. L.PasupathiM.TsaiJ.SkorpenC. G.HsuA. Y. C. (1997). Emotion and aging: Experience, expression, and control. Psychology and Aging, 12, 590-599. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.12.4.590
23.
HayesA. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
24.
ImpettE. A.GordonA. M.KoganA.OveisC.GableS. L.KeltnerD. (2010). Moving toward more perfect unions: Daily and long-term consquences of approach and avoidance goals in romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 948-963. doi:10.1037/a0020271
25.
KenrickD. T.ShiotaM. N. (2008). Approach and avoidance motivation(s): An evolutionary perspective. In ElliotA. J. (Ed.), Handbook of approach and avoidance motivation (pp. 273-288). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
26.
LemayE. P.ClarkM. S.FeeneyB. C. (2007). Projection of responsiveness to needs and the construction of satisfying communal relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 834-853. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.92.5.834
27.
LevineL. J.SaferM. A. (2002). Sources of bias in memory for emotions. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 169-173. doi:10.1111/1467-8721.00193
28.
MacraeC. N.LewisH. L. (2002). Do I know you? Processing orientation and face recognition. Psychological Science, 13, 194-196. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00436
29.
MehrabianA.KsionzkyS. (1974). A theory of affiliation. Lexington, KY: Heath.
30.
MorewedgeC. K. (2013). It was a most unusual time: How memory bias engenders nostalgic preferences. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 26, 319-326. doi:10.1002/bdm.1767
31.
MyersD. G. (1999). Close relationships and the quality of life. In KahnemanD.DienerE.SchwartzN. (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 374-380). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
32.
NeysariM.BodenmannG.MehlM. R.BerneckerK.NussbeckF. W.BackesS.. . . HornA. B. (2016). Monitoring Pronouns in Conflicts. GeroPsych, 29, 201-213. doi:10.1024/1662-9647/a000158
33.
NikitinJ.FreundA. M. (2008). The role of social approach and avoidance motives for subjective well-being and the successful transition to adulthood. Applied Psychology, 57, 90-111. doi:10.1111/j.1464-0597.2008.00356.x
34.
NikitinJ.FreundA. M. (2015). What you want to avoid is what you see: Social avoidance motivation affects the interpretation of emotional faces. Motivation and Emotion, 39, 384-391. doi:10.1007/s11031-014-9459-5
35.
NikitinJ.FreundA. M. (2018). Feeling loved and integrated or lonely and rejected in everyday life: The role of age and social motivation. Developmental Psychology, 54, 1186-1198.
36.
NikitinJ.SchochS. (2014). Social approach and avoidance motivations. In CoplanR. J.BowkerJ. C. (Eds.), A handbook of solitude: Psychological perspectives on social isolation, social withdrawal, and being alone (pp. 202-223). West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. doi:10.1002/9781118427378
37.
NikitinJ.SchochS.FreundA. M. (2014). The role of age and motivation for the experience of social acceptance and rejection. Developmental Psychology, 50, 1943-1950. doi:10.1037/a0036979
38.
PennebakerJ. W.BoothR. J.FrancisM. E. (2007). Linguistic inquiry and word count program: LIWC 2007. Austin, TX: Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count.
39.
PennebakerJ. W.LayT. C. (2002). Language use and personality during crises: Analyses of mayor Rudolph Giuliani’s Press conferences. Journal of Research in Personality, 36, 271-282. doi:10.1006/jrpe.2002.2349
40.
PennebakerJ. W.MehlM. R.NiederhofferK. G. (2003). Psychological aspects of natural language use: Our words, our selves. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 547-577. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145041
41.
RaudenbushW. W.BrykA. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models. Applications and data analysis methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
42.
ReedA. E.ChanL.MikelsJ. A. (2014). Meta-analysis of the age-related positivity effect: Age differences in preferences for positive over negative information. Psychology and Aging, 29, 1-15. doi:10.1037/a0035194
43.
ReisH. T.ClarkM. S.GrayD. J. P.TsaiF.-F.BrownJ. B.StewartM.UnderwoodL. G. (2008). Measuring responsiveness in the therapeutic relationship: A patient perspective. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 30, 339-348. doi:10.1080/01973530802502275
44.
ReisH. T.ClarkM. S.HolmesJ. G. (2004). Perceived partner responsiveness as an organizing construct in the study of intimacy and closeness. In MashekD. J.AronA. P. (Eds.), Handbook of closeness and intimacy (pp. 201-225). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
45.
ReisH. T.GableS. L. (2015). Responsiveness. Current Opinion in Psychology, 1, 67-71. doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.01.001
46.
ReisH. T.ShaverP. (1988). Intimacy as an interpersonal process. In DuckS.HayD. F.HobfollS. E.IckesW.MontgomeryB. M. (Eds.), Handbook of personal relationships: Theory, research and interventions (pp. 367-389). Oxford, UK: John Wiley.
47.
ReisH. T.SmithS. M.CarmichaelC. L.CaprarielloP. A.TsaiF.-F.RodriguesA.ManiaciM. R. (2010). Are you happy for me? How sharing positive events with others provides personal and interpersonal benefits. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 311-329. doi:10.1037/a0018344
48.
SeiderB. H.HirschbergerG.NelsonK. L.LevensonR. W. (2009). We can work it out: Age differences in relational pronouns, physiology, and behavior in marital conflict. Psychology and Aging, 24, 604-613. doi:10.1037/a0016950
49.
SillarsA.ShellenW.McIntoshA.PomegranateM. (1997). Relational characteristics of language: Elaboration and differentiation in marital conversations. Western Journal of Communication, 61, 403-422. doi:10.1080/10570319709374587
50.
StaudingerU. M.BluckS. (2001). A view on midlife development from life-span theory. In LachmanM. E. (Ed.), Wiley series on adulthood and aging. Handbook of midlife development (pp. 3-39). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley. Retrieved from http://psycnet.apa.org/psycinfo/2001-06209-001
StoneL. D.PennebakerJ. W. (2002). Trauma in real time: Talking and avoiding online conversations about the death of princess Diana. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 24, 173-183. doi:10.1207/S15324834BASP2403_1
53.
StrachmanA.GableS. L. (2006). What you want (and do not want) affects what you see (and do not see): Avoidance social goals and social events. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1446-1458. doi:10.1177/0146167206291007
54.
TabachnickB. G.FidellL. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon/Pearson Education.
55.
UchinoB. N.CacioppoJ. T.Kiecolt-GlaserJ. K. (1996). The relationship between social support and physiological processes: A review with emphasis on underlying mechanisms and implications for health. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 488-531. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.119.3.488
56.
VorauerJ. D.CameronJ. J.HolmesJ. G.PearceD. G. (2003). Invisible overtures: Fears of rejection and the signal amplification bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 793-812. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.84.4.793
57.
WinczewskiL. A.BowenJ. D.CollinsN. L. (2016). Is empathic accuracy enough to facilitate responsive behavior in dyadic interaction? Distinguishing ability from motivation. Psychological Science, 27, 394-404. doi:10.1177/0956797615624491
58.
WolfM.HornA. B.MehlM. R.HaugS.PennebakerJ. W.KordyH. (2008). Computer-aided quantitative textanalysis: Equivalence and reliability of the German adaptation of the Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count. Diagnostica, 54, 85-98. doi:10.1026/0012-1924.54.2.85
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
