We examined how merely sharing attitudes with a good listener shapes speakers’ attitudes. We predicted that high-quality (i.e., empathic, attentive, and nonjudgmental) listening reduces speakers’ social anxiety and leads them to delve deeper into their attitude-relevant knowledge (greater self-awareness). This, subsequently, differentially affects two components of speaker’s attitude certainty by increasing attitude clarity, but not attitude correctness. In addition, we predicted that this increased clarity is followed by increased attitude-expression intentions, but not attitude-persuasion intentions. We obtained consistent support for our hypotheses across five experiments (including one preregistered study), manipulating listening behavior in a variety of ways. This is the first evidence that an interpersonal variable, unrelated to the attitude itself, can affect attitude clarity and its consequences.
AkhtarO.PauneskuD.TormalaZ. L. (2013). Weak > strong: The ironic effect of argument strength on supportive advocacy. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 1214-1226.
2.
BakerS. M.PettyR. E. (1994). Majority and minority influence: Source-position imbalance as a determinant of message scrutiny. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 5-19.
3.
BavelasJ. B.CoatesL.JohnsonT. (2000). Listeners as co-narrators. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 941-952.
4.
BergeronJ.LarocheM. (2009). The effects of perceived salesperson listening effectiveness in the financial industry. Journal of Financial Services Marketing, 14, 6-25. doi:10.1057/fsm.2009.1
5.
BodieG.JonesS. M.VickeryA. J.HatcherL.CannavaK. (2014). Examining the construct validity of enacted support: A multitrait–multimethod analysis of three perspectives for judging immediacy and listening behaviors. Communication Monographs, 81, 495-523.
6.
CampbellJ. D.TrapnellP. D.HeineS. J.KatzI. M.LavalleeL. F.LehmanD. R. (1996). Self-concept clarity: Measurement, personality correlates, and cultural boundaries. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 141-156.
7.
CaprarielloP. A.ReisH. T. (2011). Perceived partner responsiveness minimizes defensive reactions to failure. Social Psychological & Personality Science, 2, 365-372.
8.
CastroD. R.KlugerA. N.ItzchakovG. (2016). Does avoidance-attachment style attenuate the benefits of being listened to?European Journal of Social Psychology, 46, 762-775.
9.
CheathamL.TormalaZ. L. (2015). Attitude certainty and attitudinal advocacy: The unique roles of clarity and correctness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41, 1537-1550.
10.
ClarkJ. K.WegenerD. T.FabrigarL. R. (2008). Attitudinal ambivalence and message-based persuasion: Motivated processing of proattitudinal information and avoidance of counterattitudinal information. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 565-577.
11.
CohenY. (2014) Can listening in mentoring relationships increase role clarity?Jerusalem, Israel: The Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
12.
DeciE. L.RyanR. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
13.
DeMarreeK. G.BobrowskiM. E. (in press). Structure and validity of self-concept clarity measures. In Lodi-SmithJ.DeMarreeK. G. (Eds.), Self-concept clarity: Perspectives on Assessment, Research, and Application. New York, NY: Springer.
14.
DourH. J.WileyJ. F.Roy ByrneP.SteinM. B.SullivanG.SherbourneC. D.. . . CraskeM. G. (2014). Perceived social support mediates anxiety and depressive symptom changes following primary care intervention. Depression and Anxiety, 31, 436-442.
15.
EysenckM. W.DerakshanN.SantosR.CalvoM. G. (2007). Anxiety and cognitive performance: Attentional control theory. Emotion, 7, 336-353.
16.
GohJ. X.HallJ. A.RosenthalR. (2016). Mini meta-analysis of your own studies: Some arguments on why and a primer on how. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 10, 535-549.
17.
GrossS. R.HoltzR.MillerN. (1995). Attitude certainty. In PettyR. E.KrosnickJ. A. (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 215-245). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
18.
HaleW. W.JansenJ. H.BouhuysA. L.van den HoofdakkerR. H. (1997). Depression relapse and ethological measures. Psychiatry Research, 70, 57-64.
19.
HayesA. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
20.
HolbrookA. L.BerentM. K.KrosnickJ. A.VisserP. S.BoningerD. S. (2005). Attitude importance and the accumulation of attitude-relevant knowledge in memory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 749-769.
21.
ItzchakovG.CastroD. R.KlugerA. N. (2016). If you want people to listen to you, tell a story. International Journal of Listening, 30, 120-133.
22.
ItzchakovG.KlugerA. N.CastroD. R. (2017). I am aware of my inconsistencies but can tolerate them: The effect of high quality listening on speakers’ attitude ambivalence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43, 105-120.
23.
JonesS. M. (2011). Supportive listening. The International Journal of Listening, 25, 85-103.
24.
KaplanK. J. (1972). On the ambivalence-indifference problem in attitude theory and measurement: A suggested modification of the semantic differential technique. Psychological Bulletin, 77, 361-372.
25.
KashdanT. B.StegerM. F. (2006). Expanding the topography of social anxiety: An experience-sampling assessment of positive emotions, positive events, and emotion suppression. Psychological Science, 17, 120-128.
26.
KennyD. A.KashyD. A.CookW. L. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
27.
KernisM. H.GoldmanB. M. (2006). A multicomponent conceptualization of authenticity: Theory and research. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 283-357.
28.
KlugerA. N.Bouskila-YamO. (in press). Facilitating Listening Scale: (Bouskila-Yam & Kluger, 2011, December). In WorthingtonD. L.BodieG. (Eds.), The sourcebook of listening research: Methodology and measures. West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
29.
LloydK. J.BoerD.KlugerA. N.VoelpelS. C. (2015). Building trust and feeling well: Examining intraindividual and interpersonal outcomes and underlying mechanisms of listening. International Journal of Listening, 29, 12-29. doi:10.1080/10904018.2014.928211
30.
LumsdaineA. A.JanisI. L. (1953). Resistance to “counterpropaganda” produced by one-sided and two-sided “propaganda” presentations. Public Opinion Quarterly, 17, 311-318.
31.
McGuireW. J.McGuireC. V. (1988). Content and process in the experience of self. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 21, 97-144.
32.
PasupathiM. (2001). The social construction of the personal past and its implications for adult development. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 651-672. doi:10.1037//0033-2909.127.5.651
33.
PasupathiM.HoytT. (2010). Silence and the shaping of memory: How distracted listeners affect speakers’ subsequent recall of a computer game experience. Memory, 18, 159-169.
34.
PetrocelliJ. V.TormalaZ. L.RuckerD. D. (2007). Unpacking attitude certainty: Attitude clarity and attitude correctness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 30-41.
35.
PreacherK. J.HayesA. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879-891.
36.
PriesterJ. R.PettyR. E. (1996). The gradual threshold model of ambivalence: Relating the positive and negative bases of attitudes to subjective ambivalence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 431-449.
37.
PrislinR.ShafferE.CrowderM. (2012). Populism vs. elitism: Social consensus and social status as bases of attitude certainty. The Journal of Social Psychology, 152, 327-339.
38.
ReisH. T. (2017). Perceived partner responsiveness and intellectual humility. Manuscript under review.
39.
RiosK.DeMarreeK. G.StatzerJ. (2014). Attitude certainty and conflict style: Divergent effects of correctness and clarity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40, 819-830.
40.
RogersC. (1951). Client-centered therapy: Its current practice, implications, and theory. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
41.
RogersC. (1980). A way of being. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
42.
RuckerD. D.PettyR. E.BriñolP. (2008). What’s in a frame anyway? A meta-cognitive analysis of the impact of one versus two sided message framing on attitude certainty. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 18, 137-149.
43.
SchlenkerB. R.LearyM. R. (1982). Social anxiety and self-presentation: A conceptualization model. Psychological Bulletin, 92, 641-669.
44.
SchwartzS. J.KlimstraT. A.LuyckxK.HaleW. W.IIIMeeusW. H. (2012). Characterizing the self-system over time in adolescence: Internal structure and associations with internalizing symptoms. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 41, 1208-1225.
45.
ThompsonM. M.ZannaM. P.GriffinD. W. (1995). Let’s not be indifferent about (attitudinal) ambivalence. In PettyR. E.KrosnickJ. A. (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 361-386). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
TrapnellP. D.CampbellJ. D. (1999). Private self-consciousness and the five-factor model of personality: Distinguishing rumination from reflection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 284-304.
VisserP. S.MirabileR. R. (2004). Attitudes in the social context: The impact of social network composition on individual-level attitude strength. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 779-795.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
