The investment theory of adult intelligence posits that individual differences in knowledge attainment result from people’s differences in cognitive ability and their propensity to apply and invest that ability, which is referred to as investment personality traits. Here, we differentiated intellectual (i.e., intellectual curiosity) and nonintellectual investment (i.e., openness to experience), and we tested their respective predictive validity for knowledge attainment in four independent lab-based studies (overall N = 649). Openness to experience was positively associated with knowledge attainment across all four studies, and this effect was by and large independent of cognitive ability. By contrast, intellectual curiosity was not related to knowledge attainment. The findings suggest that openness to experience, rather than intellectual curiosity, is the investment personality trait that broadly benefits learning and adult intelligence.
AckermanP. L. (1996). A theory of adult intellectual development: Process, personality, interests, and knowledge. Intelligence, 22, 227-257.
2.
AckermanP. L. (2013). Personality and cognition. In KreitlerS. (Ed.), Cognition and motivation: Forging an interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 62-75). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
3.
AckermanP. L.BeierM. E. (2006). Determinants of domain knowledge and independent study learning in an adult sample. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 366-381.
4.
AckermanP. L.RolfhusE. L. (1999). The locus of adult intelligence: Knowledge, abilities, and non-ability traits. Psychology and Aging, 14, 314-330.
5.
BerlyneD. E. (1954). A theory of human curiosity. British Journal of Psychology, 45, 180-191.
6.
BerlyneD. E. (1960). Conflict, arousal, and curiosity. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
7.
CacioppoJ. T.PettyR. E. (1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 116-131.
8.
CacioppoJ. T.PettyR. E.FeinsteinJ.JarvisW. B. G. (1996). Dispositional differences in cognitive motivation: The life and times of individuals varying in need for cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 197-253.
9.
CattellR. B. (1943). The measurement of adult intelligence. Psychological Bulletin, 40, 153-193.
10.
CooperW. H.WitheyM. J. (2009). The strong situation hypothesis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13, 62-72.
11.
CostaP. T.McCraeR. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI): Professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
12.
DeYoungC. G.GraziopleneR. G.PetersonJ. B. (2012). From madness to genius: The openness/intellect trait domain as a paradoxical simplex. Journal of Research in Personality, 46, 63-78.
13.
DeYoungC. G.ShamoshN. A.GreenA. E.BraverT. S.GrayJ. R. (2009). Intellect as distinct from openness: Differences revealed by fMRI of working memory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 883-892.
14.
EkstromR. B.FrenchJ. W.HarmanH. H. (1976). Manual for kit of factor-referenced cognitive tests. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
15.
FleischhauerM.EngeS.BrockeB.StrobelA.StrobelA. (2010). Same or different? Clarifying the relationship of need for cognition to personality and intelligence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 82-96.
16.
GoffM.AckermanP. L. (1992). Personality-intelligence relations: Assessment of typical intellectual engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 537-552.
17.
GrossnickleE. M. (2016). Disentangling curiosity: Dimensionality, definitions, and distinctions from interest in educational contexts. Educational Psychology Review, 28, 23-60.
18.
HillB. D.FosterJ.ElliottE. M.SheltonJ. T.McCainJ.GouvierW. D. (2013). Need for cognition is related to higher general intelligence, fluid intelligence, and crystallized intelligence, but not working memory. Journal of Research in Personality, 47, 22-25.
19.
KangM. J.HsuM.KrajbichI. M.LoewensteinG.McClureS. M.WangJ. T.CamererC. F. (2009). The wick in the candle of learning: epistemic curiosity activates reward circuitry and enhances memory. Psychological Science, 20, 963-73.
20.
KaufmanS. B.QuiltyL. C.GraziopleneR. G.HirshJ. B.GrayJ. R.PetersonJ. B.DeYoungC. G. (2016). Openness to experience and intellect differentially predict creative achievement in the arts and sciences. Journal of Personality, 84, 248-258.
21.
LitmanJ. A.SpielbergerC. D. (2003). The measurement of epistemic curiosity and its diversive and specific components. Journal of Personality Assessment, 80, 75-86.
22.
LoewensteinG. (1994). The psychology of curiosity: A review and reinterpretation. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 75-98.
23.
McAbeeS. T.OswaldF. (2013). The criterion-related validity of personality measures for predicting GPA: A meta-analytic validity competition. Psychological Assessment, 25, 532-544.
24.
McCraeR. R. (1994). Openness to experience: Expanding the boundaries of Factor V. European Journal of Personality, 8, 251-272.
25.
MusselP. (2010). Epistemic curiosity and related constructs: Lacking evidence of discriminant validity. Personality and Individual Differences, 49, 506-510.
26.
MusselP. (2013). Intellect: A theoretical framework for personality traits related to intellectual achievements. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104, 885-906.
27.
PoropatA. E. (2009). A meta-analysis of the Five Factor model of personality and academic performance. Psychology Bulletin, 135, 322-338.
28.
RavenJ. C. (1968). Progressive matrices: A perceptual test of intelligence. London, England: H. K. Lewis.
29.
SoubeletA.SalthouseT. A. (2010). The role of activity engagement in the relations between openness/intellect and cognition. Personality and Individual Differences, 49, 896-901.
30.
Stine-MorrowE. A. L. (2007). The Dumbledore hypothesis of cognitive aging. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 300-304.
31.
VedelA. (2014). Big five personality group differences across academic majors: A systematic review. Personality and Individual Differences, 192, 1-10.
32.
von StummS. (2012). Investment trait, activity engagement, and age: Independent effects on cognitive ability. Journal of Aging Research, 2012, Article 949837. doi:10.1155/2012/949837
33.
von StummS. (2016). Is day-to-day variability in cognitive function coupled with day-to-day variability in affect?Intelligence, 55, 1-6.
34.
von StummS.AckermanP. L. (2013). Investment and intellect: A review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 139, 841-869.
35.
von StummS.Chamorro-PremuzicT.AckermanP. L. (2011). Re-visiting intelligence-personality associations: Vindicating intellectual investment. In Chamorro-PremuzicT.von StummS.FurnhamA. (Eds.), Handbook of individual differences. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
36.
von StummS.HellB.Chamorro-PremuzicT. (2011). The hungry mind: Intellectual curiosity as third pillar of academic performance. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 51, 12-31.
37.
WainwrightM. A.WrightM. J.LucianoM.GeffenG. M.MartinN. G. (2008). Genetic covariation among facets of openness to experience and general cognitive ability. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 11, 275-286.
38.
ZieglerM.DanayE.HeeneM.AsendorpfJ.BühnerM. (2012). Openness, fluid intelligence, and crystallized intelligence: Toward an integrative model. Journal of Research in Personality, 46, 173-183.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
