Little is known about how couples’ social support facilitates the pursuit of important goals in daily life. Using an interpersonal perspective, we examined the effects of support provision and receipt on same-day physical activity, and studied the role of partners’ joint engagement in activities. One hundred nineteen heterosexual couples reported on target persons’ received and partners’ provided support across 28 diary days, yielding 2,854 valid days. A dyadic report on couples’ joint engagement was obtained from a subset of 88 couples. Target persons’ daily activity was objectively assessed via accelerometers. On days with high versus low levels of provided support, target persons’ activity was 25 min higher. Support receipt mediated 20% of this effect. Joint engagement accounted for around half of the effects of provided and received support. Support provision is uniquely linked to goal implementation in everyday life. Joint engagement in activities may be one explanation for how support is facilitated.
AinsworthB. E.HaskellW. L.HerrmannS. D.MeckesN.BassettD. R.Jr.Tudor-LockeC.. . . LeonA. S. (2011). 2011Compendium of physical activities: A second update of codes and MET values. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 43, 1575-1581. doi:10.1249/MSS.0b013e31821ece12
2.
AntonucciT. C. (2001). Social relations: An examination of social networks, social support, and sense of control. In BirrenJ. E.SchaieK. W. (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of aging (pp. 427-453). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
3.
BarrD. J.LevyR.ScheepersC.TilyH. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68, 255-278. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001
4.
BerkmanL. F.GlassT.BrissetteI.SeemanT. E. (2000). From social integration to health: Durkheim in the new millennium. Social Science & Medicine, 51, 843-857. doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(00)00065-4
5.
BerliC.StadlerG.InauenJ.ScholzU. (2016). Action control in dyads: A randomized controlled trial to promote physical activity in everyday life. Social Science & Medicine, 163, 89-97. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.07.003
6.
BerliC.StadlerG.ShroutP. E.BolgerN.ScholzU. (2017). Mediators of Physical Activity Adherence: Results from an Action Control Intervention in Couples. Annals of Behavioral Medicine. doi: 10.1007/s12160-017-9923-z
7.
BodenmannG. (2005). Dyadic coping and its significance for marital functioning. In RevensonT. A.KayserK.BodenmannG. (Eds.), Couples coping with stress: Emerging perspectives on dyadic coping (pp. 33-50). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
8.
BolgerN.AmarelD. (2007). Effects of social support visibility on adjustment to stress: Experimental evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 458-475. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.92.3.458
9.
BolgerN.DavisA.RafaeliE. (2003). Diary methods: Capturing life as it is lived. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 579-616. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145030
10.
BolgerN.LaurenceauJ. P. (2013). Intensive longitudinal methods: An introduction to diary and experience sampling research. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
11.
BolgerN.StadlerG.LaurenceauJ. P. (2012). Power analysis for intensive longitudinal studies. In MehlM. R.ConnerT. S. (Eds.), Handbook of research methods for studying daily life (pp. 285-301). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
12.
BolgerN.ZuckermanA.KesslerR. C. (2000). Invisible support and adjustment to stress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 953-961. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.79.6.953
13.
ChoiL.LiuZ.MatthewsC. E.BuchowskiM. S. (2011). Validation of accelerometer wear and nonwear time classification algorithm. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 43, 357-364. doi:10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181ed61a3
14.
CohenJ. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155-159.
15.
CohenJ. L.LakeyB.TiellK.NeeleyL. C. (2005). Recipient-provider agreement on enacted support, perceived support, and provider personality. Psychological Assessment, 17, 375-378. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.17.3.375
16.
CraddockE.vanDellenM. R.NovakS. A.RanbyK. W. (2015). Influence in relationships: A meta-analysis on health-related social control. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 37, 118-130. doi:10.1080/01973533.2015.1011271
17.
CutronaC. E.RussellD. (1990). Type of social support and specific stress: Toward a theory of optimal matching. In SarasonI. G.SarasonB. R.PierceG. R. (Eds.), Social support: An interactional view (pp. 319-366). New York, NY: John Wiley.
18.
FeeneyB. C.CollinsN. L. (2003). Motivations for caregiving in adult intimate relationships: Influences on caregiving behavior and relationship functioning. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 950-968. doi:10.1177/0146167203252807
19.
FeeneyB. C.CollinsN. L. (2015). A new look at social support: A theoretical perspective on thriving through relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 19, 113-147. doi:10.1177/1088868314544222
GableS. L.GonzagaG. C.StrachmanA. (2006). Will you be there for me when things go right? Supportive responses to positive event disclosure. Journal of Personaliy and Social Psychology, 91(5), 904-917. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.91.5.904
22.
GirmeY. U.OverallN. C.SimpsonJ. A. (2013). When visibility matters: Short-term versus long-term costs and benefits of visible and invisible support. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 1441-1454. doi:10.1177/0146167213497802
23.
GleasonM. E.IidaM.BolgerN.ShroutP. E. (2003). Daily supportive equity in close relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 1036-1045. doi:10.1177/0146167203253473
24.
HeaneyC. A.IsraelB. A. (2008). Social networks and social support. In GlanzK.RimerB. K.ViswanathK. (Eds.), Health behavior and health education: Theory, research, and practice (4th ed., pp. 189-207). San Francisco, CA: John Wiley.
25.
HohlD. H.KnollN.WiedemannA.KellerJ.ScholzU.SchraderM.BurkertS. (2016). Enabling or cultivating? The role of prostate cancer patients’ received partner support and self-efficacy in the maintenance of pelvic floor exercise following tumor surgery. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 50, 247-258. doi:10.1007/s12160-015-9748-6
26.
Holt-LunstadJ.SmithT. B.LaytonJ. B. (2010). Social relationships and mortality risk: A meta-analytic review. PLoS Medicine, 7(7), e1000316. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000316
27.
HongT. B.FranksM. M.GonzalezR.KeteyianS. J.FranklinB. A.ArtinianN. T. (2005). A dyadic investigation of exercise support between cardiac patients and their spouses. Health Psychology, 24, 430-434. doi:10.1037/0278-6133.24.4.430
28.
HowlandM.SimpsonJ. A. (2010). Getting in under the radar: A dyadic view of invisible support. Psychological Science, 21, 1878-1885. doi:10.1177/0956797610388817
29.
KawachiI.BerkmanL. F. (2001). Social ties and mental health. Journal of Urban Health: Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 78, 458-467.
KhanC. M.StephensM. A.FranksM. M.RookK. S.SalemJ. K. (2013). Influences of spousal support and control on diabetes management through physical activity. Health Psychology, 32, 739-747. doi:10.1037/a0028609
32.
KouvonenA.De VogliR.StaffordM.ShipleyM. J.MarmotM. G.CoxT.. . . KivimakiM. (2012). Social support and the likelihood of maintaining and improving levels of physical activity: The Whitehall II Study. European Journal of Public Health, 22, 514-518. doi:10.1093/eurpub/ckr091
LeeI. M.ShiromaE. J. (2014). Using accelerometers to measure physical activity in large-scale epidemiological studies: Issues and challenges. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 48, 197-201. doi:10.1136/bjsports-2013-093154
35.
LewisM. A.McBrideC. M.PollakK. I.PuleoE.ButterfieldR. M.EmmonsK. M. (2006). Understanding health behavior change among couples: An interdependence and communal coping approach. Social Science & Medicine, 62, 1369-1380. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.08.006
36.
LewisM. A.RookK. S. (1999). Social control in personal relationships: Impact on health behaviors and psychological distress. Health Psychology, 18(1), 63-71.
37.
MarquezD. X.McAuleyE. (2006). Social cognitive correlates of leisure time physical activity among Latinos. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 29, 281-289. doi:10.1007/s10865-006-9055-6
38.
MolloyG. J.DixonD.HamerM.SniehottaF. F. (2010). Social support and regular physical activity: Does planning mediate this link?British Journal of Health Psychology, 15, 859-870. doi:10.1348/135910710X490406
39.
MozaffarianD.BenjaminE. J.GoA. S.ArnettD. K.BlahaM. J.CushmanM.. . . Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. (2016). Heart disease and stroke statistics-2016 update: A report from the American heart association. Circulation, 133, e38-e60. doi:10.1161/CIR.0000000000000350
40.
RackowP.ScholzU.HornungR. (2014). Effects of a new sports companion on received social support and physical exercise: An intervention study. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-being, 6, 300-317. doi:10.1111/aphw.12029
41.
RackowP.ScholzU.HornungR. (2015). Received social support and exercising: An intervention study to test the enabling hypothesis. British Journal of Health Psychology, 20, 763-776. doi:10.1111/bjhp.12139
42.
RafaeliE.GleasonM. E. (2009). Skilled support within intimate relationships. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 1, 20-37.
43.
RookK. S. (2015). Social networks in later life: Weighing positive and negative effects on health and well-being. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24, 45-51. doi:10.1177/0963721414551364
44.
RusbultC. E.FinkelE. J.KumashiroM. (2009). The Michelangelo phenomenon. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18, 305-309.
45.
SallisJ. F.TaylorW. C.DowdaM.FreesonP. S.PateR. R. (2002). Correlates of vigorous physical activity for children in grades 1 through 12: Comparing parent-reported and objectively measured physical activity. Pediatric Exercise Science, 14, 30-44.
46.
SasakiJ. E.JohnD.FreedsonP. S. (2011). Validation and comparison of ActiGraph activity monitors. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 14, 411-416. doi:10.1016/j.jsams.2011.04.003
47.
ScholzU.BerliC. (2014). A dyadic action control trial in overweight and obese couples (DYACTIC). BMC Public Health, 14, 1321-1329.
48.
ScholzU.StadlerG.OchsnerS.RackowP.HornungR.KnollN. (2016). Examining the relationship between daily changes in support and smoking around a self-set quit date. Health Psychology, 35, 514-517. doi:10.1037/hea0000286
49.
SchwarzerR.KnollN. (2007). Functional roles of social support within the stress and coping process: A theoretical and empirical overview. International Journal of Psychology, 42, 243-252. doi:10.1080/00207590701396641
50.
ShroutP. E.BolgerN.IidaM.BurkeC.GleasonM. E. J.LaneS. P. (2010). The effects of daily support transactions during acute stress: Results from a diary study of bar exam preparation. In SullivanK. T.DavilaJ. (Eds.), Support processes in intimate relationships (pp. 175-199). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
51.
ThoitsP. A. (1995). Stress, coping, and social support processes: Where are we? what next?Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 35, 53-79.
52.
UchinoB. N. (2009). Understanding the links between social support and physical health: A life-span perspective with emphasis on the separability of perceived and received support. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4, 236-255. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01122.x
53.
VilchinskyN.DekelR.LeibowitzM.RegesO.KhaskiaA.MosseriM. (2011). Dynamics of support perceptions among couples coping with cardiac illness: The effect on recovery outcomes. Health Psychology, 30, 411-419. doi:10.1037/a0023453
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
