Limbal rings are dark annuli encircling the iris that fluctuate in visibility based on health and age. Research also indicates their presence augments facial attractiveness. Given individuals’ prioritization of health cues in short-term mates, those with limbal rings may be implicated as ideal short-term mates. Three studies tested whether limbal rings serve as veridical health cues, specifically the extent to which this cue enhances a person’s value as a short-term mating partner. In Study 1, targets with limbal rings were rated as healthier, an effect that was stronger for female participants and male targets. In Study 2, temporally activated short-term mating motives led women to report a heightened preference for targets with limbal rings. In Study 3, women rated targets with limbal rings as more desirable short-term mates. Results provide evidence for limbal rings as veridical cues to health, particularly in relevant mating domains.
AngM.WongW.ParkJ.WuR.LavanyaR.ZhengY.. . . WongT. Y. (2011). Corneal arcus is a sign of cardiovascular disease, even in low-risk persons. American Journal of Ophthalmology, 152, 864-871.
2.
ArgyleM.CookM. (1976). Gaze and mutual gaze. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
3.
Barrett-ConnorE.BushT. L. (1991). Estrogen and coronary heart disease in women. Journal of the American Medical Association, 265, 1861-1867.
4.
BrownM.SaccoD. F. (2017). Unrestricted sociosexuality predicts preferences for extraverted male faces. Personality and Individual Differences, 108, 123-127.
5.
BuhrmesterM.KwangT.GoslingS. D. (2011). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk a new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data?Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 3-5.
6.
BussD. M.SchmittD. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100, 204-232.
7.
CavallottiC.CerulliL. (Eds.). (2008). Age-related changes of the human eye. New York, NY: Springer Science & Business Media.
8.
CellerinoA.BorghettiD.SartucciF. (2004). Sex differences in face gender recognition in humans. Brain Research Bulletin, 63, 443-449.
9.
ConferJ. C.PerillouxC.BussD. M. (2010). More than just a pretty face: Men’s priority shifts toward bodily attractiveness in short-term versus long-term mating contexts. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31, 348-353.
10.
ConwayC.JonesB. C.DeBruineL. M.LittleA. C. (2010). Sexual dimorphism of male face shape: Partnership status and the temporal context of relationship sought modulate women’s preferences for direct gaze. British Journal of Psychology, 101, 109-121.
11.
CurrieT. E.LittleA. C. (2009). The relative importance of the face and body in judgments of human physical attractiveness. Evolution and Human Behavior, 30, 409-416.
12.
DaviesT. N.HoffmanD. D. (2002). Attention to faces: A change-blindness study. Perception, 31, 1123-1146.
13.
DobešM.MachalaL. (2002). The database of human iris images.
14.
EtcoffN. L.StockS.HaleyL. E.VickeryS. A.HouseD. M. (2011). Cosmetics as a feature of the extended human phenotype: Modulation of the perception of biologically important facial signals. PLoS ONE, 6, Article e25656.
15.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.LangA. G.BuchnerA. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175-191.
16.
FernandezA. B.KeyesM. J.PencinaM.D’AgostinoR.O’DonnellC. J.ThompsonP. D. (2009). Relation of corneal arcus to cardiovascular disease (from the Framingham Heart Study data set). The American Journal of Cardiology, 103, 64-66.
17.
FinkB.NeaveN.ManningJ. T.GrammerK. (2006). Facial symmetry and judgements of attractiveness, health and personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 41, 491-499.
GangestadS. W.Garver-ApgarC. E.SimpsonJ. A.CousinsA. J. (2007). Changes in women’s mate preferences across the ovulatory cycle. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 151-163.
20.
GildersleeveK.HaseltonM. G.FalesM. R. (2014). Do women’s mate preferences change across the ovulatory cycle? A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 140, 1205-1259.
21.
GriskeviciusV.TyburJ. M.SundieJ. M.CialdiniR. B.MillerG. F.KenrickD. T. (2007). Blatant benevolence and conspicuous consumption: When romantic motives elicit strategic costly signals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 85-102.
22.
GründlM.KnollS.Eisenmann-KleinM.PrantlL. (2012). The blue-eyes stereotype: So eye color, pupil diameter, and scleral color affect attractiveness?Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 36, 234-240.
23.
HampsonE.van AndersS. M.MullinL. I. (2006). A female advantage in the recognition of emotional facial expressions: Test of an evolutionary hypothesis. Evolution and Human Behavior, 27, 401-416.
24.
HaseltonM. G.BussD. M. (2000). Error management theory: A new perspective on biases in cross-sex mind reading. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 81-100.
25.
HaseltonM. G.GangestadS. W. (2006). Conditional expression of women’s desires and men’s mate guarding across the ovulatory cycle. Hormones and Behavior, 49, 509-518.
26.
HolmlundA.HolmG.LindL. (2006). Severity of periodontal disease and number of remaining teeth are related to the prevalence of myocardial infarction and hypertension in a study based on 4,254 subjects. Journal of Periodontology, 77, 1173-1178.
27.
IlicicJ.BaxterS. M.KulczynskiA. (2016). White eyes are the window to the pure soul: Metaphorical association and overgeneralization effects for spokespeople with limbal rings. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 33, 840-855.
28.
JonasonP. K.GarciaJ. R.WebsterG. D.LiN. P.FisherH. E. (2015). Relationship dealbreakers traits people avoid in potential mates. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41, 1697-1711.
29.
JonasonP. K.RaulstonT.RotoloA. (2012). More than just a pretty face and a hot body: Multiple cues in mate-choice. The Journal of Social Psychology, 152, 174-184.
30.
JonesA. L.PorcheronA.SwedaJ. R.MorizotF.RussellR. (2016). Coloration in different areas of facial skin is a cue to health: The role of cheek redness and periorbital luminance in health perception. Body Image, 17, 57-66.
31.
KenrickD. T.GrothG. E.TrostM. R.SadallaE. K. (1993). Integrating evolutionary and social exchange perspectives on relationships: Effects of gender, self-appraisal, and involvement level on mate selection criteria. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 951-969.
32.
KobayashiH.KohshimaS. (2001). Unique morphology of the human eye and its adaptive meaning: Comparative studies on external morphology of the primate eye. Journal of Human Evolution, 40, 419-435.
33.
KrugerD. J.PiglowskiJ. S. (2012). The effect of eyelid constriction on perceptions of mating strategy: Beware of the squinty-eyed guy!Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 576-580.
34.
LiN. P.BalleyJ. M.KenrickD. T.LinsenmeierJ. A. (2002). The necessities and luxuries of mate preferences: Testing the tradeoffs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 947-955.
35.
LiN. P.KenrickD. T. (2006). Sex similarities and differences in preferences for short-term mates: What, whether, and why. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 468-489.
36.
LiN. P.YongJ. C.TovW.SngO.FletcherG. J.ValentineK. A.. . . BallietD. (2013). Mate preferences do predict attraction and choices in the early stages of mate selection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105, 757-776.
37.
LittleA. C.JonesB. C.Penton-VoakI. S.BurtD. M.PerrettD. I. (2002). Partnership status and the temporal context of relationships influence human female preferences for sexual dimorphism in male face shape. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 269, 1095-1100.
38.
LuH. J.ChangL. (2012). Automatic attention towards face or body as a function of mating motivation. Evolutionary Psychology, 10, 120-135.
39.
ManerJ. K.GailliotM. T.RoubyD. A.MillerS. L. (2007). Can’t take my eyes off you: Attentional adhesion to mates and rivals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 389-401.
40.
McCrohonJ. A.NakhlaS.JessupW.StanleyK. K.CelermajerD. S. (1999). Estrogen and progesterone reduce lipid accumulation in human monocyte-derived macrophages. Circulation, 100, 2319-2325.
41.
MontoyaR. M. (2007). Gender similarities and differences in preferences for specific body parts. Current Research in Social Psychology, 13, 133-144.
42.
MontoyaR. M.InskoC. A. (2008). Toward a more complete understanding of the reciprocity of liking effect. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 477-498.
43.
MurphyP. J.LauJ. S. C.SimM. M. L.WoodsR. L. (2007). How red is a white eye? Clinical grading of normal conjunctival hyperaemia. Eye, 21, 633-638.
44.
Penton-VoakI. S.ChenJ. Y. (2004). High salivary testosterone is linked to masculine male facial appearance in humans. Evolution and Human Behavior, 25, 229-241.
45.
PerillouxC.KurzbanR. (2015). Do men overperceive women’s sexual interest?Psychological Science, 26, 70-77.
46.
PeshekD. J. (2013). Evaluations of facial attractiveness and expression (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of California Irvine. Retrieved from https://search.proquest.com/docview/1271758457
47.
PeshekD. J.SemmaknejadN.HoffmanD.FoleyP. (2011). Preliminary evidence that the limbal ring influences facial attractiveness. Evolutionary Psychology, 9, 137-146.
48.
PoundN.LawsonD. W.TomaA. M.RichmondS.ZhurovA. I.Penton-VoakI. S. (2014). Facial fluctuating asymmetry is not associated with childhood ill-health in a large British cohort study. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 281, Article 20141639.
49.
PrenticeD. A.MillerD. T. (1992). When small effects are impressive. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 160-164.
50.
ProvineR. R.CabreraM. O.BrocatoN. W.KrosnowskiK. A. (2011). When the whites of the eyes are red: A uniquely human cue. Ethology, 117, 395-399.
51.
ProvineR. R.CabreraM. O.Nave-BlodgettJ. (2013). Red, yellow, and super-white sclera. Human Nature, 24, 126-136.
52.
RhodesG. (2006). The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 199-226.
53.
RussellR.PorcheronA.SwedaJ. R.JonesA. L.MaugerE.MorizotF. (2016). Facial contrast is a cue for perceiving health from the face. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 42, 1354-1362.
54.
RussellR.SwedaJ. R.PorcheronA.MaugerE. (2014). Sclera color changes with age and is a cue for perceiving age, health, and beauty. Psychology and Aging, 29, 626-635.
55.
SaccoD. F.HugenbergK.SefcekJ. A. (2009). Sociosexuality and face perception: Unrestricted sexual orientation facilitates sensitivity to female facial cues. Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 777-782.
56.
SangwanV. S. (2001). Limbal stem cells in health and disease. Bioscience Reports, 21, 385-405.
57.
ScheibJ. E.GangestadS. W.ThornhillR. (1999). Facial attractiveness, symmetry and cues of good genes. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 266, 1913-1917.
58.
ShackelfordT. K.LarsenR. J. (1997). Facial asymmetry as an indicator of psychological, emotional, and physiological distress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 456-466.
59.
ShlipakM. G.SimonJ. A.VittinghoffE.LinF.Barrett-ConnorE.KnoppR. H.. . . HulleyS. B. (2000). Estrogen and progestin, lipoprotein (a), and the risk of recurrent coronary heart disease events after menopause. Journal of the American Medical Association, 283, 1845-1852.
60.
ShyuB. P.WyattH. J. (2009). Appearance of the human eye: Optical contributions to the “limbal ring.”Optometry and Vision Science, 86, E1069-E1077.
61.
SmithM. L.PerrettD. I.JonesB. C.CornwellR. E.MooreF. R.FeinbergD. R.. . . PitmanR. M. (2006). Facial appearance is a cue to oestrogen levels in women. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 273, 135-140.
62.
StassJ. W.WillisF. N. (1967). Eye contact, pupil dilation, and personal preference. Psychonomic Science, 7, 375-376.
63.
ThornhillR.GangestadS. W. (1999). Facial attractiveness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3, 452-460.
64.
ThornhillR.GangestadS. W. (2006). Facial sexual dimorphism, developmental stability, and susceptibility to disease in men and women. Evolution and Human Behavior, 27, 131-144.
65.
TriversR. L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In CampbellB. (Ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man (pp. 136-179). New York, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
66.
WillisJ.TodorovA. (2006). First impressions: Making up your mind after a 100-ms exposure to a face. Psychological Science, 17, 592-598.
67.
YangP. C.ClancyC. E. (2011). Gender-based differences in cardiac disease. Journal of Biomedical Research, 25, 81-89.
68.
YoungS. G.SaccoD. F.HugenbergK. (2011). Vulnerability to disease is associated with a domain-specific preference for symmetrical faces relative to symmetrical non-face stimuli. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 558-563.
69.
ZhengT.XuJ. (2008). Age-related changes of human limbus on in vivo confocal microscopy. Cornea, 27, 782-786.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
