Self-determination theory (SDT) is used to predict individual differences in goal-directed behavior. A fundamental tenet of SDT is that autonomously regulated behavior is more likely to be engaged in and sustained than externally controlled behavior. Unidimensional treatment of regulation is suboptimal. The current study utilizes a multidimensional approach—polynomial regression—to evaluate the interdependent effects of autonomous and controlled regulation on physical activity. Results from three samples of healthy, younger adults demonstrate a mostly positive influence of autonomous regulation but a curvilinear effect of controlled regulation on behavior such that greater activity was associated with moderate levels of controlled regulation—an effect that cannot be identified with “unidimensional” methods. Results from Sample 3 showed that autonomous regulation was associated with greater exercise levels only when controlled regulation was moderate or high. Results suggest that controlled regulation is not wholly detrimental to behavioral promotion.
AinsworthB. E.MaceraC. A.JonesD. A.ReisJ. P.AddyC. L.BowlesH. R.KohlH. W.3rd. (2006). Comparison of the 2001 BRFSS and the IPAQ Physical Activity Questionnaires. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 38, 1584-1592. doi:10.1249/01.mss.0000229457.73333.9a
2.
BartholomewK. J.NtoumanisN.RyanR. M.BoschJ. A.Thøgersen-NtoumaniC. (2011). Self-determination theory and diminished functioning: The role of interpersonal control and psychological need thwarting. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 1459-1473. doi:10.1177/0146167211413125
3.
BoichéJ.SarrazinP.GrouzetF.PelletierP.ChanalJ. (2008). Students’ motivational profiles and achievement outcomes in physical education: A self-determination perspective. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 688-701.
4.
BoothM. (2000). Assessment of physical activity: An international perspective. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 71, S114-S120. doi:10.1080/02701367.2000.11082794
5.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2004). Improving the health of adolescents & young adults: A guide for states and communities. Atlanta, GA: Health Resources and Services Administration; National Adolescent Health Information Center, University of California, San Francisco.
6.
ChemolliE.GagnéM. (2014). Evidence against the continuum structure underlying motivation measures derived from self-determination theory. Psychological Assessment, 26, 575-585. doi:10.1037/a0036212
7.
CidL.MoutãoJ.LeitãoJ.AlvesJ. (2012). Behavioral regulation assessment in exercise: Exploring an autonomous and controlled motivation index. Spanish Journal of Psychology, 15, 1520-1528. doi:10.5209/rev_SJOP.2012.v15.n3.39436
8.
DeciE. L.RyanR. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227-268.
9.
DeciE. L.RyanR. M. (2008). Facilitating optimal motivation and psychological well-being across life’s domains. Canadian Psychology, 49(1), 14-23.
10.
EdmundsJ.NtoumanisN.DudaJ. L. (2008). Testing a self-determination theory-based teaching style intervention in the exercise domain. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 375-388. doi:10.1002/ejsp.463
11.
EdwardsJ. R. (2001). Ten difference score myths. Organizational Research Methods, 4, 265-287.
12.
EdwardsJ. R. (2002). Alternatives to difference scores: Polynomial regression analysis and response surface methodology. In DrasgowF.SchmittN. W. (Eds.), Advances in measurement and data analysis (pp. 350-400). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
13.
EdwardsJ. R. (2008). Seven deadly myths of testing moderation in organizational research. In LanceC. E.VandenbergR. J. (Eds.), Statistical and methodological myths and urban legends: Received doctrine, verity, and fable in the organizational and social sciences (pp. 145-166). New York, NY: Routledge.
14.
EdwardsJ. R.HarrisonR. (1993). Job demands and worker health: Three-dimensional reexamination of the relationship between person-environment fit and strain. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 628-648.
15.
FortierM. S.DudaJ. L.GuerinE.TeixeiraP. J. (2012). Promoting physical activity: Development and testing of self-determination theory-based interventions. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 9, 20.
16.
FortunatoV. J.GoldblattA. M. (2006). An examination of goal orientation profiles using cluster analysis and their relationships with dispositional characteristics and motivational response patterns. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36, 2150-2183.
17.
FriederichsS. A. H.BolmanC.OenemaA.LechnerL. (2015). Profiling physical activity motivation based on self-determination theory: A cluster analysis approach. BMC Psychology, 3, Article 1. doi:10.1186/s40359-015-0059-2
18.
GagnéM.ForestJ.GilbertM.AubéC.MorinE.MalorniA. (2010). The motivation at work scale: Validation evidence in two languages. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70, 628-646. doi:10.1177/0013164409355698
19.
GilletN.VallerandR.PatyP. (2013). Situational motivational profiles and performance with elite performers. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43, 1200-1210.
20.
GravesL. M.CullenK. L.LesterH. F.RudermanM. N.GentryW. A. (2015). Managerial motivational profiles: Composition, antecedents, and consequences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 87, 32-42. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2014.12.002
21.
GrolnickW. S.RyanR. M. (1987). Autonomy in children’s learning: An experimental and individual difference investigation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 890-898.
22.
GrouzetF. M. E.KasserT.AhuviaA.Fernandez-DolsJ. M.KimY.LauS.. . . SheldonK. (2005). The structure of goal contents across 15 cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 800-816.
23.
GrubbsL.CarterJ. (2002). The relationship of perceived benefits and barriers to reported exercise behaviors in college undergraduates. Family and Community Health, 25(2), 76-84.
24.
HalvariA.HalvariH.BjørnebekkG.DeciE. (2010). Motivation and anxiety for dental treatment: Testing a self-determination theory model of oral self-care behavior and dental clinic attendance. Motivation and Emotion, 34(1), 15-33. doi:10.1007/s11031-010-9254-0
25.
HowardJ.GagnéM.MorinA. J. S.WangZ.ForestJ. (in press). Using bifactor-exploratory structural equation modeling to test for a continuum structure of motivation. Journal of Management. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0149206316645653
26.
HunterJ. E.SchmidtF. L. (1990). Dichotomization of continuous variables: The implications for meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 334-349. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.75.3.334
27.
JohnsonC. A.CorriganS. A.DubbertP. M.GramlingS. E. (1990). Perceived barriers to exercise and weight control practices in community women. Women & Health, 16, 177-191. doi:10.1300/J013v16n03_10
28.
KelleyK.MaxwellS. E. (2003). Sample size for multiple regression: Obtaining regression coefficients that are accurate, not simply significant. Psychological Methods, 8, 305-321. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.8.3.305
29.
LeeW.ReeveJ. (2013). Self-determined, but not non-self-determined, motivation predicts activations in the anterior insular cortex: An fMRI study of personal agency. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 8, 538-545. doi:10.1093/scan/nss029
30.
LeeW.ReeveJ.XueY.XiongJ. (2012). Neural differences between intrinsic reasons for doing versus extrinsic reasons for doing: An fMRI study. Neuroscience Research, 73(1), 68-72. doi:10.1016/j.neures.2012.02.010
31.
LiuW.WangJ.TanO.KohC.EeJ. (2009). A self-determination approach to understanding students’ motivation in project work. Learning and Individual Differences, 19, 139-145.
32.
MarklandD.TobinV. (2004). A modification to the behavioural regulation in exercise questionnaire to include an assessment of amotivation. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 26, 191-196.
33.
MarshH. W.LüdtkeO.TrautweinU.MorinA. J. S. (2009). Classical latent profile analysis of academic self-concept dimensions: Synergy of person- and variable-centered approaches to theoretical models of self-concept. Structural Equation Modeling, 16, 191-225. doi:10.1080/10705510902751010
34.
MataJ.SilvaM. N.VieiraP. N.CarracaE. V.AndradeA. M.CoutinhoS. R.. . . TeixeiraP. J. (2009). Motivational “spill-over” during weight control: Increased self-determination and exercise intrinsic motivation predict eating self-regulation. Health Psychology, 28, 709-716. doi:10.1037/a0016764
35.
MiserandinoM. (1996). Children who do well in school: Individual differences in perceived competence and autonomy in above-average children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 203-214.
36.
MoranM.DiefendorffJ.KimT.LiuZ. (2012). A profile approach to self-determination theory motivations at work. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 81, 354-363.
37.
NgJ. Y. Y.NtoumanisN.Thøgersen-NtoumaniC.DeciE. L.RyanR. M.DudaJ. L.. . . WilliamsG. C. (2012). Self-determination theory applied to health contexts: A meta-analysis. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 325-340. doi:10.1177/1745691612447309
38.
O’ConnorB. P. (2000). SPSS and SAS programs for determining the number of components using parallel analysis and Velicer’s MAP test. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 32, 396-402. doi:10.3758/BF03200807
39.
OsbaldistonR.SheldonK. M. (2003). Promoting internalized motivation for environmentally responsible behavior: A prospective study of environmental goals. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23, 349-357.
40.
PastorD. A.BarronK. E.MillerB. J.DavisS. L. (2007). A latent profile analysis of college students’ achievement goal orientation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32(1), 8-47. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2006.10.003
41.
PatrickB. C.SkinnerE. A.ConnellJ. P. (1993). What motivates children’s behavior and emotion? Joint effects of perceived control and autonomy in the academic domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 781-791.
42.
PhillipsL. A. (2013). Congruence research in behavioral medicine: Methodological review and demonstration of alternative methodology. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 36(1), 61-74. doi:10.1007/s10865-012-9401-9
43.
PhillipsL. A.DiefenbachM. A.KronishI. M.NegronR. M.HorowitzC. R. (2014). The necessity-concerns framework: A multidimensional theory benefits from multidimensional analysis. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 48(1), 7-16. doi:10.1007/s12160-013-9579-2
44.
RatelleC. F.GuayF.VallerandR. J. (2007). Autonomous, controlled, and amotivated types of academic motivation: A person-oriented analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 734-746. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.00.4.734
45.
Renaud-DubéA.TaylorG.LekesN.KoestnerR.GuayF. (2010). Adolescents’ motivation toward the environment: Age-related trends and correlates. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 42, 194-199. doi:10.1037/a0018596
46.
RigbyC. S.DeciE. L.PatrickB. C.RyanR. M. (1992). Beyond the intrinsic€xtrinsic dichotomy: Self-determination in motivation and learning. Motivation and Emotion, 16, 165-185.
47.
RodgersW. M.HallC. R.DuncanL. R.PearsonE.MilneM. I. (2010). Becoming a regular exerciser: Examining change in behavioral regulations among exercise initiates. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 11, 378-386.
48.
RudyD.SheldonK. M.AwongT.TanH. H. (2007). Autonomy, culture, and well-being: The benefits of inclusive autonomy. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 983-1007.
49.
RyanR. M.ConnellJ. P. (1989). Perceived locus of causality and internalization: Examining reasons for acting in two domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 479-761.
50.
RyanR. M.DeciE. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 54-67. doi:10.1006/ceps.1999/1020
51.
RyanR. M.KuhlJ.DeciE. L. (1997). Nature and autonomy: An organizational view of social and neurobiological aspects of self-regulation in behavior and development. Development and Psychopathology, 9, 701-728.
52.
RyanR. M.PatrickH.DeciE. L.WilliamsG. C. (2008). Facilitating health behaviour change and its maintenance: Interventions based on Self-Determination Theory. The European Health Psychologist, 10, 2-5.
53.
ShanockL. R.BaranB. E.GentryW. A.PattinsonS. C.HeggestadE. D. (2010). Polynomial regression with response surface analysis: A powerful approach for examining moderation and overcoming limitations of difference scores. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25, 543-554.
54.
SheldonK. M.RyanR. M.DeciE. L.KasserT. (2004). The independent effects of goal contents and motives on well-being: It’s both what you pursue and why you pursue it. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 475-486. doi:10.1177/0146167203261883
55.
StandageM.DudaJ. L.NtoumanisN. (2003). A model of contextual motivation in physical education: Using constructs from self-determination and achievement goal theories to predict physical activity intentions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(1), 97-110. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.95.1.97
56.
TabachnickB. G.FidellL. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
57.
TeixeiraP. J.CarraçaE. V.MarklandD.SilvaM. N.RyanR. M. (2012). Exercise, physical activity, and self-determination theory: A systematic review. The International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 9, 78.
58.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2010). The Surgeon General’s vision for a healthy and fit nation. Rockville, MD: Office of the Surgeon General, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
59.
VallerandR. J.FortierM. S.GuayF. (1997). Self-determination and persistence in a real-life setting: Toward a motivational model of high school dropout. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1161-1176.
60.
VansteenkisteM.LensW.DeciE. L. (2006). Intrinsic versus extrinsic goal contents in self-determination theory: Another look at the quality of academic motivation. Educational Psychologist, 41(1), 19-31.
61.
VansteenkisteM.LensW.De WitteS.De WitteH.DeciE. L. (2004). The “why” and “why not” of job search behaviour: Their relation to searching, unemployment experience, and well-being. European Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 345-363. doi:10.1002/ejsp.202
62.
VansteenkisteM.MingmingZ.LensW.SoenensB. (2005). Experiences of autonomy and control among Chinese learners: Vitalizing or immobilizing?Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 468-483. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.97.3.468
63.
VansteenkisteM.SierensE.SoenensB.LuyckxK.LensW. (2009). Motivational profiles from a self-determination perspective: The quality of motivational matters. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 671-688. doi:10.1037/a0015083
64.
WangC. K. J.BiddleS. J. H. (2001). Young people’s motivational profiles in physical activity: A cluster analysis. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 23, 1-22.
65.
WilliamsG. C.McGregorH. A.ZeldmanA.FreedmanZ. R.DeciE. L. (2004). Testing a self-determination theory process model for promoting glycemic control through diabetes self-management. Healthy Psychology, 23(1), 58-66. doi:10.1037/0278-6133.23.1.58
66.
WilliamsG. C.RodinG. C.RyanR. M.GrolnickW. S.DeciE. L. (1998). Autonomous regulation and long-term medication adherence in adult outpatients. Health Psychology, 17, 269-276.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
