The current article focuses on attachment style—an individual difference widely studied in the field of close relationships—and its application to the study of social networks. Specifically, we investigated whether attachment style predicts perception and management of social networks. In Study 1, we examined the associations of attachment style with perceptions of network tie strength and multiplexity. In Studies 2a and 2b, we investigated the association between attachment style and network management skills (initiating, maintaining, and dissolving ties) and whether network management skills mediated the associations of attachment style with network tie strength and multiplexity. In Study 3, experimentally enhancing attachment security made people more likely to initiate and less likely to dissolve social ties (for the latter, especially among those high on avoidance or anxiety). As for maintenance, security priming also increased maintenance; however, mainly among people high on attachment anxiety or low on attachment avoidance.
AntonucciT. C.AkiyamaH.TakahashiK. (2004). Attachment and close relationships across the life span. Attachment & Human Development, 6, 353-370.
2.
BerkmanL. F.GlassT.BrissetteI.SeemanT. E. (2000). From social integration to health: Durkheim in the new millennium. Social Science & Medicine, 51, 843-857.
3.
BowlbyJ. (1982). Attachment and Loss: Vol. 1. Attachment (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Basic Books. (Original work published 1969)
4.
BrennanK. A.ClarkC. L.ShaverP. R. (1998). Self-report measurement of adult attachment: An integrative overview. In SimpsonJ. A.RholesW. S. (Eds.), Attachment theory and close relationships (pp. 46-76). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
5.
BuoteV. M.PancerS. M.PrattM. W.AdamsG.Birnie-LefcovitchS.PolivyJ.WintreM. G. (2007). The importance of friends: Friendship and adjustment among 1st-year university students. Journal of Adolescent Research, 22, 665-689.
6.
BurtR. S. (1984). Network items and the General Social Survey. Social Networks, 6, 293-339.
7.
CampbellK. E.LeeB. A. (1991). Name generators in surveys of personal networks. Social Networks, 13, 203-221.
8.
CampbellK. E.MarsdenP. V.HurlbertJ. S. (1986). Social resources and socioeconomic status. Social Networks, 8, 97-117.
9.
CarstensenL. L. (1993). Motivation for social contact across the life span: A theory of socioemotional selectivity. In JacobsJ. E. (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation: 1992, developmental perspectives on motivation (Vol. 40, pp. 209-254). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
10.
CassidyJ.ShaverP. R. (Eds.). (2008). Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
11.
CollinsN. L.FeeneyB. C. (2004). Working models of attachment shape perceptions of social support: Evidence from experimental and observational studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 363-383.
12.
CollinsT. J.GillathO. (2012). Attachment, breakup strategies, and associated outcomes: The effects of security enhancement on the selection of breakup strategies. Journal of Research in Personality, 46, 210-222.
13.
DegenneA.ForséM. (1999). Introducing social networks. London, England: SAGE.
14.
DohertyN. A.FeeneyJ. A. (2004). The composition of attachment networks throughout the adult years. Personal Relationships, 11, 469-488.
15.
DunbarR. I. M.ArnaboldiV.ContiM.PassarellaA. (2015). The structure of online social networks mirrors those in the offline world. Social Networks, 43, 39-47.
16.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.BuchnerA.LangA. G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G* Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior research methods, 41, 1149-1160.
17.
FeeneyJ. A. (2008). Adult romantic attachment: Developments in the study of couple relationships. In CassidyJ.ShaverP. R. (Eds.), Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications (2nd ed., pp. 456-481). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
18.
FraleyR. C.DavisK. E. (1997). Attachment formation and transfer in young adults’ close friendships and romantic relationships. Personal Relationships, 4, 131-144.
19.
GerichJ.LehnerR. (2006). Collection of ego-centered network data with computer-assisted interviews. Methodology: European Journal of Research Methods for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, 2, 7-15.
20.
GillathO.HartJ.NoftleE. E.StockdaleG. D. (2009). Development and validation of a state adult attachment measure (SAAM). Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 362-373.
21.
GillathO.JohnsonD. K.SelcukE.TeelC. (2011). Comparing old and young adults as they cope with life transitions: The links between social network management skills and attachment style to depression. Clinical Gerontologist: Perspectives on Diversity, Behavioral Health, and Aging, 34, 251-265.
22.
GillathO.MikulincerM.FitzsimonsG. M.ShaverP. R.SchachnerD. A.BarghJ. A. (2006). Automatic activation of attachment-related goals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1375-1388.
23.
GillathO.SelcukE.ShaverP. (2008). Moving toward a secure attachment style: Can repeated security priming help?Social & Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 1651-1666.
24.
GillathO.ShaverP. R. (2007). Effects of attachment style and relationship context on selection among relational strategies. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 968-976.
25.
GillathO.ShaverP. R.MikulincerM.NitzbergR. E.ErezA.van IJzendoornM. H. (2005). Attachment, caregiving, and volunteering: Placing volunteerism in an attachment-theoretical framework. Personal Relationships, 12, 425-446.
26.
GillathO.KarantzasC. G.FraleyR. C. (2016). Adult Atachment: A Concise Introduction to Theory and Research. Washington D.C.: Academic Press.
27.
GranovetterM. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 73, 1361-1380.
28.
GreenJ. D.CampbellW. K. (2000). Attachment and exploration in adults: Chronic and contextual accessibility. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(4), 452-461.
29.
HayesA. F.PreacherK. J. (2014). Statistical mediation analysis with a multicategorical independent variable. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 67, 451-470.
30.
HendersonS. (1977). The social network, support and neurosis: The function of attachment in adult life. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 131, 185-191.
31.
HustedB. W. (1994). Transaction costs, norms, and social networks: A preliminary study of cooperation in industrial buyer-seller relationships in the United States and Mexico. Business & Society, 33, 30-57.
32.
IbarraH. (1995). Race, opportunity, and diversity in social circles in managerial networks. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 673-701.
33.
IyerA.JettenJ.TsivrikosD.PostmesT.HaslamS. A. (2009). The more (and the more compatible) the merrier: Multiple group memberships and identity compatibility as predictors of adjustment after life transitions. British Journal of Social Psychology, 48, 707-733.
34.
KadushinC. (2011). Understanding social networks theories, concepts, and findings. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
35.
KalishY.RobinsG. (2006). Psychological predispositions and network structure: The relationship between individual predispositions, structural holes and network closure. Social Networks, 28, 56-84.
36.
KarantzasG. C.ColeS. F. (2011). Arthritis and support seeking tendencies: The role of attachment. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 30, 404-440.
37.
KrackhardtD. (1987). Cognitive social structures. Social Networks, 9, 104-134.
38.
KruglanskiA. W.ShahJ. Y.FishbachA.FriedmanR. S.ChunW. Y.Sleeth-KepplerD. (2002). A theory of goal systems: Implications for social cognition, affect, and action. In ZannaM. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 34, pp. 331-376). New York, NY: Academic Press.
39.
LewinK. (1935). A dynamic theory of personality. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
40.
LoC.WalshA.MikulincerM.GaglieseL.ZimmermannC.RodinG. (2009). Measuring attachment security in patients with advanced cancer: Psychometric properties of a modified and brief Experiences in Close Relationships Scale. Psycho-Oncology, 18, 490-499.
41.
MarinA.HamptonK. N. (2007). Simplifying the personal network name generator alternatives to traditional multiple and single name generators. Field Methods, 19, 163-193.
42.
MikulincerM.SelingerM. (2001). The interplay between attachment and affiliation systems in adolescents’ same-sex friendships: The role of attachment style. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 18, 81-106.
43.
MikulincerM.ShaverP. R. (2001). Attachment theory and intergroup bias: Evidence that priming the secure base schema attenuates negative reactions to out-groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 97-115.
44.
MikulincerM.ShaverP. R. (2007). Boosting attachment security to promote mental health, prosocial values, and inter-group tolerance. Psychological Inquiry, 18, 139-156.
45.
MikulincerM.ShaverP. R.Bar-OnN.Ein-DorT. (2010). The pushes and pulls of close relationships: Attachment insecurities and relational ambivalence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 450-468.
46.
MilardoR. (1988). Families and social networks. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
47.
MuscanellN. L.GuadagnoR. E. (2012). Make new friends or keep the old: Gender and personality differences in social networking use. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 107-112.
48.
OrchardL. J.FullwoodC.GalbraithN.MorrisN. (2014). Individual differences as predictors of social networking. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19, 388-402.
49.
ParksM. R. (2006). Personal relationships and personal networks. New York: Routledge.
50.
PottsM. K. (1997). Social support and depression among older adults living alone: The importance of friends within and outside of a retirement community. Social Work, 42, 348-362.
51.
PowellW. (1991). Neither market nor hierarchy. The Sociology of Organizations: Classic, Contemporary, and Critical Readings, 315, 104-117.
52.
PrellC. (2012). Social network analysis: History, theory and methodology. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
53.
RempelJ. K.HolmesJ. G.ZannaM. P. (1985). Trust in close relationships. Journal of personality and social psychology, 49, 95-112.
54.
RoweA. C.CarnelleyK. B. (2005). Preliminary support for the use of a hierarchical mapping technique to examine attachment networks. Personal Relationships, 12, 499-519.
55.
SchenkM. (1995). Soziale Netzwerke und Massenmedien [Social networks and mass media]. Tübingen, Germany: Mohr.
56.
SchugJ.YukiM.HorikawaH.TakemuraK. (2009). Similarity attraction and actually selecting similar others: How cross-societal differences in relational mobility affect interpersonal similarity in Japan and the USA. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 12, 95-103.
57.
SimpsonJ. A.RholesW. (2012). Adult attachment orientations, stress and romantic relationships. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 279-328.
58.
ValkenburgP. M.PeterJ.SchoutenA. P. (2006). Friend networking sites and their relationship to adolescents’ well-being and social self-esteem. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 9, 584-590.
59.
van DuijnM. A. J.VermuntJ. K. (2006). What is special about social network analysis?Methodology: European Journal of Research Methods for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, 2, 2-6.
60.
WallaceJ. L.VauxA. (1993). Social support network orientation: The role of adult attachment style. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 12, 354-365.
61.
WassermanS.FaustK. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications (Vol. 8). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
62.
WeiM.RussellD. W.MallinckrodtB.VogelD. L. (2007). The Experiences in Close Relationship Scale (ECR)-short form: Reliability, validity, and factor structure. Journal of Personality Assessment, 88, 187-204.
63.
XuC.RyanS.PrybutokV.WenC. (2012). It is not for fun: An examination of social network site usage. Information & Management, 49, 210-217.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
