Americans are the world’s best armed citizens and public polling suggests protection/self-defense is their main reason for gun ownership. However, there is virtually no psychological research on gun ownership. The present article develops the first psychological process model of defensive gun ownership—specifically, a two-component model that considers both the antecedents and consequences of owning a gun for protection/self-defense. We demonstrate that different levels of threat construal—the specific perceived threat of assault and a diffuse threat of a dangerous world—independently predict handgun ownership; we also show how utility judgments can explain the motivated reasoning that drives beliefs about gun rights. We tested our model in two independent samples of gun owners (total N = 899), from just before and after the Orlando mass shooting. This study illustrates how social-cognitive theories can help explain what motivates Americans to own handguns and advocate for broad rights to carry and use them.
BélangerJ. J.KruglanskiA. W.ChenX.OrehekE. (2014). Bending perception to desire: Effects of task demands, motivation, and cognitive resources. Motivation and Emotion, 38, 802-814. doi:10.1007/s11031-014-9436-z
6.
BélangerJ. J.Schori-EyalN.PicaG.KruglanskiA. W.LafrieniereM.-A. (2015). The “more is less” effect in equifinal structures: Alternative means reduce the intensity and quality of motivation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 60, 93-102. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2015.05.005
7.
BlairJ. P.NicholsT.BurnsD.CurnuttJ. R. (2013). Active shooter events and response. Boca Raton, FL: CBC Press.
8.
CaoL.CullenF. T.LinkB. G. (1997). The social determinants of gun ownership: Self-protection in an urban environment. Criminology, 35, 625-650.
CohenD.NisbettR.E. (1994). Self-protection and the culture of honor: The role of institutions in perpetuating norms of violence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 1188-1199. doi: 10.1177/0146167294205012
11.
CohenJ. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York, NY: Academic Press.
12.
CookP. J.LudwigJ. (1996). Guns in America. Washington, DC: Police Foundation.
FilindraA.KaplanN. J. (2016). Racial resentment and white’s gun policy preferences in contemporary America. Political Behavior, 38, 255-275. doi: 10.1007/s11109-015-9326-4
HemenwayD.SolnickS. J. (2015). The epidemiology of self-defense gun use: Evidence from the National Crime Victimization Surveys 2007–2011. Preventive Medicine, 29, 22-27.
27.
HoyleR. H. (Ed.). (1995). Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
KleckG.KovandzikT.SaberM.HauserW. (2011). The effect of perceived risk of victimization on plans to purchase a gun for self-protection. Journal of Criminal Justice, 39, 312-319.
30.
KlineR. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York, NY: Guilford.
31.
KoffkaK. (1935). Principles of gestalt psychology. London, England: Routledge.
32.
KoffkaK (1936). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
33.
KruglanskiA. W.ShahJ. Y.FishbachA.FriedmanR. S.ChunW. Y.Sleeth-KepplerD.ZannaM. P. (2002). A theory of goal systems. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 34, pp. 331-378). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
34.
KruglanskiA. W.StroebeW. (2005). Attitudes, goals and beliefs: issues of structure, function and dynamics. In AberracinD.JohnsonB.ZannaM. P. (Eds.), Handbook of attitude research (pp. 323-368). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
35.
KundaZ. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 480-498.
36.
LewinK. (1917). Die Kriegslandschaft [The war landscape]. Zeitschrift für Angewandte Psychologie, 12, 440-447.
37.
MaslowA. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50, 370-396. doi:10.1037/h0054346
38.
McDowallD.WiersemaB. (1994). The incidence of defensive firearm use by US crime victims, 1987 through 1990. American Journal of Public Health, 84, 1982-1984. doi:10.2105/AJPH.84.12.1982
RomerD.Hall JamiesonK.AdayS. (2003). Television news and the cultivation of fear of crime. Journal of Communication, 53, 88-104.
47.
SaleemM.AndersonC. A. (2012). The good, the bad, and the ugly of electronic media. In DvoskinJ.SkeemJ. L.NovacoR. W.DouglasK. S. (Eds.), Using social science to reduce violent offending (pp. 83-101). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
48.
SiegelM.NegussieY.VentureS.PleskunasJ.RossC. S.KingC. (2014). The relationship between gun ownership and stranger and nonstranger firearm homicide rates in the United States, 1981–2010. American Journal of Public Health, 104, 1912-1919.
49.
StroebeW. (2013). Firearm possession and violent death: A critical review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 18, 209-721.
50.
StroebeW. (2016). Firearm availability and violent death: The need for a culture change in attitudes toward guns. Analyses of Social Issues and Policy, 16, 7-35. doi: 10.1111/asap.12100
51.
TropeY.LibermanN. (2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117, 440-463.
52.
US Department of Justice (2011). Homicide rate falls to lowest rate in four decades. Retrieved from https://www.bjs.gov
WegnerD. M.VallacherR. R. (1986). Action identification. In SorrentinoR. M.HigginsE. T. (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior (pp. 550-582). New York, NY: Guilford.
WilliamsJ. S.McGrathJ. H.III (1976). Why people own guns. Journal of Communication, 26, 22-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1976.tb01931.x
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
