This research integrates self-determination theory and the social identity approach to investigate the notion of collective (group level) self-determination, and to test how the agent of intergroup help (helping initiated by a group representative versus group members) shapes group members’ motives and support for intergroup helping. Study 1 (N = 432) demonstrates that collective self-determination predicts support for intergroup helping, group pride, and well-being, over and above individual-level self-determined motivation. Study 2 (N = 216) confirmed that helping by group members was seen as more collectively self-determined than helping by a group representative, producing effects on pride, well-being, and support. Study 3 (N = 124) explores a qualifier of these effects: People who identify more strongly with the leader who is providing the help also experience representative helping as more collectively self-determined, thereby promoting well-being, group pride, and support. Findings highlight the value of integrating self-determination theory with intergroup theories to consider collective aspects of self-determination.
AikenL. S.WestS. G.RenoR. R. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
2.
AmiotC. E.SansfaçonS.LouisW. R. (2013). Investigating the motivations underlying harmful social behaviors and the motivational nature of social norms. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43, 2146-2157.
3.
AmiotC. E.SansfaconS.LouisW. R.YelleM. (2012). Can intergroup behaviours be emitted out of self-determined reasons? Testing the role of group norms and behavioural congruence in the internalization of discrimination and parity behaviours. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 63-76.
4.
ChemolliE.GagnéM. (2014). Evidence against the continuum structure underlying motivation measures derived from self-determination theory. Psychological Assessment, 26, 575-585.
5.
ChirkovV.RyanR. M.KimY.KaplanU. (2003). Differentiating autonomy from individualism and independence: A self-determination theory perspective on internalization of cultural orientations and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 97-110.
6.
CumminsR. A.EckersleyR.PallantJ.van VugtJ.MisajonR. (2003). Developing a national index of subjective wellbeing: The Australian Unity Wellbeing Index. Social Indicators Research, 64, 159-190.
7.
DarntonA.KirkM. (2011). Finding Frames: New ways to engage the UK public in global poverty. London, UK: Bond.
8.
DeciE. L.KoestnerR.RyanR. M. (1999). A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 627-668.
9.
DeciE. L.RyanR. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York, NY: Springer Science & Business Media.
10.
DeciE.RyanR. M. (1987). The support of autonomy and the control of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 1024-1037.
11.
FreyB. S.Oberholzer-GeeF. (1997). The cost of price incentives: An empirical analysis of motivation crowding-out. The American Economic Review, 87, 746-755.
12.
GagnéM. (2003). The role of autonomy support and autonomy orientation in prosocial behaviour engagement. Motivation and Emotion, 27, 199-223.
13.
HalevyN.BersonY.GalinskyA. D. (2011). The mainstream is not electable: When vision triumphs over representativeness in leader emergence and effectiveness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 893-904.
14.
HarthN. S.LeachC. W.KesslerT. (2013). Guilt, anger, and pride about in-group environmental behaviour: Different emotions predict distinct intentions. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 34, 18-26.
15.
HaslamS. A.PlatowM. J. (2001). The link between leadership and followership: How affirming social identity translates vision into action. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1469-1479.
16.
HaslamS. A.ReicherS. D.PlatowM. J. (2011). The new psychology of leadership: Identity, influence, and power. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
17.
HayesA. F. (2012). PROCESS: A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling. Retrieved from http://www.afhayes.com/public/process2012.pdf
18.
HoggM. A.SmithJ. R. (2007). Attitudes in social context: A social identity perspective. European Review of Social Psychology, 18, 89-131.
19.
HopkinsN.ReicherS.HarrisonK.CassidyC.BullR.LevineM. (2007). Helping to improve the group stereotype: On the strategic dimension of prosocial behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 776-788.
20.
KoestnerR.LosierG. F.VallerandR. J.CarducciD. (1996). Identified and introjected forms of political internalization: Extending self-determination theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 1025-1036.
21.
LeachC. W.van ZomerenM.ZebelS.VliekM. L.PennekampS. F.DoosjeB.… & SpearsR. (2008). Group-level self-definition and self-investment: a hierarchical (multicomponent) model of in-group identification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 144-165.
22.
LegaultL.AmiotC. (2014). The role of autonomy in intergroup processes: Integrating self-determination theory and intergroup approaches. In WeinsteinN. (Ed.), Integrating human motivation and interpersonal relationships: Theory, research and applications (pp. 159-190). New York, NY: Springer.
23.
LouisW. R.La MacchiaS. T.AmiotC. E.ThomasE. F.BlackwoodL. M.MavorK. I.SaeriA. (2016). Causality in the study of collective action and political behaviour. In MoghaddamF. M.HarréR. (Eds.), Causes and consequences: A multidisciplinary exploration (pp. 277-302). Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger.
24.
LouisW. R.TaylorD. M. (1999). From passive acceptance to social disruption: Towards an understanding of behavioural responses to discrimination. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 31, 19-28.
MackieD. M.DevosT.SmithE. R. (2000). Intergroup emotions: Explaining offensive action tendencies in an intergroup context. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 602-616.
27.
MullerD.JuddC. M.YzerbytV. Y. (2005). When moderation is mediated and mediation is moderated. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 852-863.
28.
NadlerA. (2002). Inter-group helping relations as power relations: Maintaining or challenging social dominance between groups through helping. Journal of Social Issues, 58, 487-502.
29.
Niesta KayserD.FarwellL.GreitemeyerT. (2008). A comparison of help giving to individuals versus humanitarian organisations. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 38, 2990-3008.
30.
ReicherS.CassidyC.WolpertI.HopkinsN.LevineM. (2006). Saving Bulgaria’s Jews: An analysis of social identity and the mobilisation of social solidarity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 49-72.
31.
RyanR. M.DeciE. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68-78.
32.
RyanR. M.FrederickC. (1997). On energy, personality, and health: Subjective vitality as a dynamic reflection of well-being. Journal of Personality, 65, 529-565.
33.
SassenbergK.WoltinK. A. (2008). Group-based self-regulation: The effects of regulatory focus. European Review of Social Psychology, 19, 126-164.
34.
SimonB.PantaleoG.MummendeyA. (1995). Unique individual or interchangeable group member? The accentuation of intragroup differences versus similarities as an indicator of the individual self versus the collective self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 106-119.
35.
SteffensN. K.HaslamS. A.ReicherS. D. (2014). Up close and personal: Evidence that shared social identity is a basis for the “special” relationship that binds followers to their leaders. The Leadership Quarterly, 25, 296-313.
36.
SteffensN. K.HaslamS. A.ReicherS. D.PlatowM. J.FransenK.YangJ.. . . BoenF. (2014). Leadership as social identity management: Introducing the Identity Leadership Inventory (ILI) to assess and validate a four-dimensional model. The Leadership Quarterly, 25, 1001-1024.
37.
StukasA.SnyderM.ClaryE. (1999). The effects of “mandatory volunteerism” on intentions to volunteer. Psychological Science, 10, 59-64.
38.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In WorchelS.AustinW. G. (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
39.
ThomasE. F.McGartyC.MavorK. (2010). Social psychology of making poverty history: Motivating anti-poverty action in Australia. Australian Psychologist, 45, 4-15.
40.
TurnerJ. C.HoggM.OakesP. J.ReicherS.WetherellM. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
VallerandR. J. (1997). Toward a hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 29, pp. 271-360). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
43.
VallerandR. J.FortierM. S.GuayF. (1997). Self-determination and persistence in a real-life setting: Toward a motivational model of high school dropout. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1161.
44.
van LeeuwenE. (2007). Restoring identity through outgroup helping: Beliefs about international aid in response to the December 2004 tsunami. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 661-671.
45.
van LeeuwenE.van DijkW.KaynakÜ. (2013). Of saints and sinners: How appeals to collective pride and guilt affect outgroup helping. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 16, 781-796.
46.
WeinsteinN.RyanR. (2010). When helping helps: Autonomous motivation for prosocial behaviour and its influence on well-being for the helper and recipient. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 222-244.
47.
ZagefkaH.NoorM.BrownR.De MooraG. R.HopthrowT. (2011). Donating to disaster victims: Responses to natural and humanly caused events. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 353-363.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
