We examined associations between two orientations based on historical group trauma, a form of enduring group victimhood (Perpetual Ingroup Victimhood Orientation [PIVO]) and the belief that one’s group might itself become a victimizer (Fear of Victimizing [FOV]), and attitudes, cognitions, and emotions related to intergroup conflicts. PIVO was positively and FOV was negatively related to aggressive attitudes and emotions toward the outgroup (Studies 1a-1c, Israeli–Palestinian conflict), and to the attribution of responsibility for a series of hostilities to the outgroup (Study 3, Israeli–Palestinian conflict). PIVO was negatively and FOV positively related to support for forgiveness and reconciliation (Study 2, Northern Ireland conflict). In Experimental Study 4, FOV predicted greater accuracy in remembering harm, regardless of victims’ group identity, whereas PIVO was associated with reduced accuracy only when victims were Palestinians (outgroup members). Taken together, these findings indicate that both orientations have a significant impact on intergroup conflicts and their resolution.
AkaikeH. (1974). A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19, 716-723.
2.
AllportG. W. (1979). The nature of human prejudice. New York, NY: Basic books. (Original work published 1954)
3.
AltemeyerB. (1981). Right-wing authoritarianism. Winnipeg, Canada: University of Manitoba Press.
4.
AltemeyerB. (1998). The other “authoritarian personality.”Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 47-92.
5.
BandalosD. L. (2002). The effects of item parceling on goodness-of-fit and parameter estimate bias in structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 78-102.
6.
BarkanE. (2000). The guilt of nations: Restitution and negotiating historical injustices. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.
7.
Bar-TalD. (1998). Societal beliefs in times of intractable conflict: The Israeli case. International Journal of Conflict Management, 9, 22-50.
8.
Bar-TalD. (2007). Living with the conflict: Socio-psychological analysis of the Jewish Society in Israel. Jerusalem, Israel: Carmel Press.
9.
Bar-TalD.AntebiD. (1992). Siege mentality in Israel. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 16, 251-275.
10.
BilaliR.TroppL. R.DasguptaN. (2012). Attributions of responsibility and perceived harm in the aftermath of mass violence. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 18, 21-39.
11.
BishopJ.LaneR. C. (2000). Father absence and the attitude of entitlement. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 30, 105-117.
12.
CanettiD.HobfollS.PedhazurA.ZaidiseE. (2010). Much ado about religion: Religiosity, resource loss, and support for political violence. Journal of Peace Research, 47, 575-587.
13.
CastanoE.Giner-SorollaR. (2006). Not quite human: Infrahumanization in response to collective responsibility for intergroup killing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 804-818.
14.
CeciS. J.BruckM. (1995). Jeopardy in the courtroom: A scientific analysis of children’s testimony. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
15.
CooperJ.StoneJ. (2004). Cognitive dissonance and the social group. In TerryD. J.HoggM. A. (Eds.), Attitudes, behavior, and social context: The role of norms and group membership (pp. 227-244). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
16.
CrockerJ.LuhtanenR. (1990). Collective self-esteem and ingroup bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 60-67.
17.
DavidovE.SchmidtP.SchwartzS. H. (2008). Bringing values back in the adequacy of the European Social Survey to measure values in 20 countries. Public Opinion Quarterly, 72, 420-445.
18.
DiLilloD. (2001). Interpersonal functioning among women reporting a history of childhood sexual abuse: Empirical findings and methodological issues. Clinical Psychology Review, 21, 553-576.
19.
DoosjeB.BranscombeN. R. (2003). Attributions for the negative historical actions of a group. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 235-248.
20.
DoosjeB.BranscombeN. R.SpearsR.MansteadA. S. R. (1998). Guilty by association: When one’s group has a negative history. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 872-886.
21.
DuckittJ.SibleyC. J. (2007). Right wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation and the dimensions of generalized prejudice. European Journal of Personality, 21, 113-130.
22.
DugasM.Schori-EyalN.KruglanskiA. W.Touchstone-LeonardK.McNeillA.GelfandM. J.. . . RoccasS. (in press). The hurt justifies the means: Perceived ingroup victimhood and group glorification as motivated by cognitive need for closure. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations.
23.
EidelsonR. J.EidelsonJ. I. (2003). Dangerous ideas: Five beliefs that propel groups toward conflict. American Psychologist, 58, 182-192.
24.
EitamB.HigginsE. T. (2010). Motivation in mental accessibility: Relevance of a Representation (ROAR) as a new framework. Social & Personality Psychology Compass, 4, 951-967.
25.
FigueiredoA.ValentimJ.DoosjeB. (2011). A shared past and a common future: The Portuguese colonial war and the dynamics of group-based guilt. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 14, 163-171.
26.
FitzgeraldM. F.ShipmanK. L.JacksonJ. L.McMahonR. J.HanleyH. M. (2005). Perceptions of parenting versus parent-child interactions among incest survivors. Child Abuse & Neglect, 29, 661-681.
27.
FlewA. (Ed.). (1979). A dictionary of philosophy. London, England: Pan Books in Association With the McMillan Press.
28.
FroeseP.MenckenF. C. (2009). A U.S. holy war? The effects of religion on Iraq War policy attitudes. Social Science Quarterly, 90, 103-116.
29.
GilliganC. (2003). Constant crisis/permanent process: Diminished agency and weak structures in the Northern Ireland Peace Process. The Global Review of Ethnopolitics, 3, 22-37.
HallD. L.MatzD. C.WoodW. (2010). Why don’t we practice what we preach? A meta-analytic review of religious racism. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 126-139.
32.
HalperinE.CehajicS.SchoriN. (2011). Perpetual ingroup victimhood orientation in Israel and in Serbia. (Unpublished data).
33.
HayesA. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
34.
HewstoneM. (1990). The “ultimate attribution error?” A review of the literature on intergroup causal attribution. European Journal of Social Psychology, 20, 311-335.
35.
HuL. T.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1-55.
36.
International Committee for the Red Cross. (2010). Summary report: Afghanistan, Colombia, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Georgia, Haiti, Lebanon, Liberia and the Philippines, Online Survey and in-depth research, 2009. Geneva, Switzerland: Author.
37.
Janoff-BulmanR. (1992). Shattered assumptions: Towards a new psychology of trauma. New York, NY: Free Press.
38.
JinJ.RoundsJ. (2012). Stability and change in work values: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80, 326-339.
39.
KimhiS. (2014). Moral dilemma in the war against terror: Political attitudes and regular versus reserve military service. Ethics & Behavior, 24, 1-15.
40.
KlarY. (2016). Four moral obligations in the aftermath of historical ingroup victimization. Current Opinion in Psychology, 11, 54-58.
41.
KlarY.Schori-EyalN.KlarY. (2013). The “never again” state of Israel: The emergence of the Holocaust as a core feature of Israeli identity and its four incongruent voices. Journal of Social Issues, 69, 125-143.
42.
LicataL.KleinO. (2010). Holocaust or Benevolent paternalism? Intergenerational comparisons on collective memories and emotions about Belgium’s Colonial Past. International Journal of Conflict and Violence, 4, 45-57.
43.
LickelB.MillerN.StenstromD. M.DensonT. F.SchmaderT. (2006). Vicarious retribution: The role of collective blame in intergroup aggression. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 372-390.
44.
LittleT. D.CunninghamW. A.ShaharG.WidamanK. F. (2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 151-173.
McMullinD.WirthR. J.WhiteJ. W. (2007). The impact of sexual victimization on personality: A longitudinal study of gendered attributes. Sex Roles, 56, 403-414.
47.
MinowM. (1998). Between vengeance and forgiveness: Facing history after genocide and mass violence. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
48.
MontvilleJ. V. (Ed.). (1990). Conflict and peacemaking in multiethnic societies. New York, NY: Free Press.
49.
NadlerA. (2002). Social-psychological analysis of reconciliation: Instrumental and socio-emotional routes to reconciliation. Peace education worldwide: The concepts, underlying principles, and research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
50.
NadlerA.SaguyT. (2003). Reconciliation between nations: Overcoming emotional deterrents to ending conflicts between groups. In LangholtzH.StoutC. E. (Eds.), The psychology of diplomacy (pp. 29-46). Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers.
51.
NoorM.BrownR. J.PrenticeG. (2008). Precursors and mediators of intergroup reconciliation in Northern Ireland: A new model. British Journal of Social Psychology, 47, 481-495.
52.
NoorM.ShnabelN.HalabiS.NadlerA. (2012). When suffering begets suffering the psychology of competitive victimhood between adversarial groups in violent conflicts. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16, 351-374.
53.
PaulhusD. L. (1991). Measurement and control of response bias. In RobinsonL. P.ShaverP. R.WrightsmanL. S. (Eds.), Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes (pp. 17-59). New York, NY: Academic Press.
54.
PrattoF.SidaniusJ.StallworthL.MalleB. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741-763.
55.
PyszczynskiT.AbdollahiA.SolomonS.GreenbergJ.CohenF.WeiseD. (2006). Mortality salience, martyrdom, and military might: The great Satan versus the axis of evil. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 525-537.
56.
RoccasS.ElsterA. (2012). Group identities. In TroppL. A. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of intergroup conflict (pp. 106-122). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
57.
RoccasS.KlarY.LiviatanI. (2004). Exonerating cognitions, group identification, and personal values as predictors of collective guilt among Jewish-Israelis. In BranscombeN. R.DoosjeB. (Eds.), Collective guilt: International perspectives (pp. 130-147). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
58.
RoccasS.KlarY.LiviatanI. (2006). The paradox of group-based guilt: Modes of national identification, conflict vehemence, and reactions to the in-group’s moral violations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 698-711.
59.
RohanM. J. (2000). A rose by any name? The values construct. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 255-277.
60.
RosetteA. S.TostL. P. (2013). Perceiving social inequity when subordinate-group positioning on one dimension of social hierarchy enhances privilege recognition on another. Psychological Science, 24, 1420-1427.
61.
RotellaK. N.RichesonJ. A. (2013). Motivated to “forget”: The effects of in-group wrongdoing on memory and collective guilt. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4, 730-737.
62.
RozinP.HaidtJ.McCauleyC. R. (2008). Disgust. In LewisM.Haviland-JonesJ. M.FeldmanL. (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (3rd ed., pp. 757-776). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
63.
SagivL.RoccasS.HazanO. (2012). Identification with groups: The role of personality and context. Journal of Personality, 80, 345-374.
64.
SagivL.SverdlikN.SchwarzN. (2011). To compete or to cooperate? Values’ impact on perception and action in social dilemma games. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 64-77.
65.
Schori-EyalN.HalperinE.Bar-TalD. (2014). Three layers of collective victimhood: Effects of multileveled victimhood on intergroup conflicts in the Israeli–Arab context. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 44, 778-794.
66.
Schori-EyalN.KlarY.Ben-AmiY. (in press). Perpetual ingroup victimhood as a distorted lens: Effects on attribution and categorization. European Journal of Social Psychology.
67.
SchwartzS. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 1-65.
68.
SekerdejM.RoccasS. (2016). Love versus loving criticism: Disentangling conventional and constructive patriotism. British Journal of Social Psychology, 55, 499-521.
69.
SidaniusJ.PrattoF. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
70.
SkarżyńskaK. (2012). Grupowa martyrologia: Psychologiczne funkcje przekonań o narodowej krzywdzie [Group martyrdom: Psychological functional beliefs on national harm]. Psychologia Społeczna, 4, 335-352.
71.
StaubE. (2006). Reconciliation after genocide, mass killing or intractable conflict: Understanding the roots of violence, psychological recovery and steps toward a general theory. Political Psychology, 27, 867-895.
72.
StaubE.PearlmanL. A. (2001). Healing, reconciliation and forgiving after genocide and other collective violence. In HelmickS. J.PetersenR. L. (Eds.), Forgiveness and reconciliation: Religion, public policy and conflict transformation (pp. 205-229). Radnor, PA: Templeton Foundation Press.
73.
SullivanD.LandauM. J.BranscombeN. R.RothschildZ. K. (2012). Competitive victimhood as a response to accusations of ingroup harm doing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 778-795.
74.
SverdlikN.RoccasS.SagivL. (2012). Morality across cultures: A values perspective. In MikulincerM.ShaverP. R. (Eds.), The social psychology of morality: Exploring the causes of good and evil (pp. 219-235). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
75.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In WorchelS.AustinW. (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7-24). Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.
76.
TamT.HewstoneM.KenworthyJ. B.CairnsE.MarinettiC.GeddesL.ParkinsonB. (2008). Postconflict reconciliation: Intergroup forgiveness and implicit biases in Northern Ireland. Journal of Social Issues, 64, 303-320.
77.
ThompsonJ.MortonJ.FraserL. (1997). Memories for the Marchioness. Memory, 5, 615-638.
78.
UhlmannE. L.PizarroD. A.TannenbaumD.DittoP. H. (2009). The motivated use of moral principles. Judgment and Decision Making, 4, 479-491.
79.
VerplankenB.HollandR. W. (2002). Motivated decision making: Effects of activation and self-centrality of values on choices and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 434-447.
80.
VolkanV. (1997). Blood lines: From ethnic pride to ethnic terrorism. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
81.
VollhardtJ. R. (2009). The role of victim beliefs in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict: Risk or potential for peace? Peace and conflict. Journal of Peace Psychology, 15, 135-159.
82.
VollhardtJ. R.BilaliR. (2015). The role of inclusive and exclusive victim consciousness in predicting intergroup attitudes: Findings from Rwanda, Burundi, and DRC. Political Psychology, 36, 489-506.
83.
WarnerR. H.BranscombeN. R. (2012). Observer perceptions of moral obligations in groups with a history of victimization. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 882-894.
84.
WegnerD. M. (1989). White bears and other unwanted thoughts: Suppression, obsession, and the psychology of mental control. London, England: Guilford.
85.
WegnerD. M.SchneiderD. J. (1989). Mental control: The war of the ghosts in the machine. In UlemanJ.BarghJ. (Eds.), Unintended thought (pp. 287-305). New York, NY: Guilford Press. (Reprinted from Introductory readings for cognitive psychology, 3rd ed., by HoneckR. P. Ed., 1995, Guilford, CT: Dushkin)
86.
WohlM. J. A.BranscombeN. R. (2005). Forgiveness and collective guilt assignment to historical perpetrator groups depend on level of social category inclusiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 288-303.
87.
WohlM. J. A.BranscombeN. R. (2008). Remembering historical victimization: Collective guilt for current ingroup transgressions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 988-1006.
88.
WohlM. J.BranscombeN. R. (2009). Group threat, collective angst, and ingroup forgiveness for the war in Iraq. Political Psychology, 30, 193-217.
89.
YzerbytV.DumontM.WigboldusD.GordijnE. (2003). I feel for us: The impact of categorization and identification on emotions and action tendencies. British Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 533-549.
90.
ZitekE. M.JordanA. H.MoninB.LeachF. R. (2010). Victim entitlement to behave selfishly. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 245-255.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
