Positive interpersonal interactions such as affection are central to well-being. Sex is associated with greater individual well-being, but little is known about why this occurs. We predicted that experienced affection would account for the association between sex and well-being. Cross-sectional results indicated that affection mediated the association between sex and both life satisfaction (Study 1) and positive emotions (however, among men only in Study 2). In Study 3, an experience sampling study with 106 dual-earner couples with children, affection mediated the association between sex and increased positive affect in daily life. Cross-lagged analyses in Study 3 to 4 supported the predicted direction of the associations. Moreover, the strength of the daily association between sex and positive affect predicted both partners’ relationship satisfaction 6 months later. Our findings underscore the importance of affection and positive affect for understanding how sex promotes well-being and has long-term relational benefits.
AronA.NormanC. C.AronE. N.McKennaC.HeymanR. E. (2000). Couples’ shared participation in novel and arousing activities and experienced relationship quality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 273-284.
2.
BaumeisterR. F.LearyM. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497-529.
3.
BirnbaumG. E.ReisH. T.MikulincerM.GillathO.OrpazA. (2006). When sex is more than just sex: Attachment orientations, sexual experience, and relationship quality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 929-943.
4.
BlanchflowerD. G.OswaldA. J. (2004). Money, sex and happiness: An empirical study. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 106, 393-415. doi:10.1111/j.0347-0520.2004.00369.x
5.
BolgerN.LaurenceauJ.-P. (2013). Intensive longitudinal methods: An introduction to diary and experience sampling research. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
6.
BurlesonM. H.TrevathanW. R.ToddM. (2007). In the mood for love or vice versa? Exploring the relations among sexual activity, physical affection, affect, and stress in the daily lives of mid-aged women. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36, 357-368. doi:10.1007/s10508-006-9071-1
7.
CarverC. S. (2006). Approach, avoidance, and the self-regulation of affect and action. Motivation and Emotion, 30, 105-110. doi:10.1007/s11031-006-9044-7
8.
CohenS.Janicki-DevertsD.TurnerR. B.DoyleW. J. (2014). Does hugging provide stress-buffering social support? A study of susceptibility to upper respiratory infection and illness. Psychological Science, 26, 135-147. doi:10.1177/0956797614559284
9.
CohnM. A.FredricksonB. L.BrownS. L.MikelsJ. A.ConwayA. M. (2009). Happiness unpacked: Positive emotions increase life satisfaction by building resilience. Emotion, 9, 361-368.
10.
ConnerT. S.LehmanB. J. (2012). Getting started: Launching a study in daily life. In MehlM. R.ConnerT. S. (Eds.), Handbook of research methods for studying daily life (pp. 89-107). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
11.
CrandallC. S.ShermanJ. W. (2016). On the scientific superiority of conceptual replications for scientific progress. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 66, 93-99. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2015.10.002
12.
DebrotA.SchoebiD.PerrezM.HornA. B. (2013). Touch as an interpersonal emotion regulation process in couples’ daily lives: The mediating role of psychological intimacy. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 1373-1385. doi:10.1177/0146167213497592
13.
DiamondL. M. (2000). Passionate friendships among adolescent sexual-minority women. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 10, 191-209. doi:10.1207/SJRA1002_4
14.
DiamondL. M. (2013). Where’s the sex in relationship research? In StewartR. S. (Ed.), Let’s talk about sex: A Multidisciplinary discussions (pp. 46-66). Sydney, Australia: Cape Breton University Press.
15.
DienerE.EmmonsR. A.LarsenR. J.GriffinS. (1985). The Satisfaction With Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71-75. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13
16.
DonaldM.LuckeJ.DunneM.RaphaelB. (1995). Gender differences associated with young people’s emotional reactions to sexual intercourse. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 24, 453-464. doi:10.1007/BF01537191
17.
FloydK. (2008). Communicating affection: Interpersonal behavior and social context. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
18.
FloydK.BorenJ. P.HannawaA. F.HesseC.McEwanB.VekslerA. E. (2009). Kissing in marital and cohabiting relationships: Effects on blood lipids, stress, and relationship satisfaction. Western Journal of Communication, 73, 113-133.
19.
FloydK.HessJ. A.MiczoL. A.HaloneK. K.MikkelsonA. C.TusingK. J. (2005). Human affection exchange: VIII. Further evidence of the benefits of expressed affection. Communication Quarterly, 53, 285-303. doi:10.1080/01463370500101071
20.
FloydK.RiforgiateS. (2008). Affectionate communication received from spouses predicts stress hormone levels in healthy adults. Communication Monographs, 75, 351-368. doi:10.1080/03637750802512371
21.
FortenberryJ. D.TemkitM.TuW.GrahamC. A.KatzB. P.OrrD. P. (2005). Daily mood, partner support, sexual interest, and sexual activity among adolescent women. Health Psychology, 24, 252-257. doi:10.1037/0278-6133.24.3.252
22.
GallaceA.SpenceC. (2010). The science of interpersonal touch: An overview. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 34, 246-259. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.10.004
23.
GeorgiadisJ. R.KortekaasR. (2009). The sweetest taboo: Functional neurobiology of human sexuality in relation to pleasure. In KringelbachM. L.BerridgeK. C. (Eds.), Series in Affective Science: Pleasures of the brain (pp. 178-201). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
24.
GillathO.CollinsT. (2016). Unconscious desire: The affective and motivational aspects of subliminal sexual priming. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 45, 5-20. doi:10.1007/s10508-015-0609-y
25.
HeimanJ. R. (1980). Female sexual response patterns. Archives of General Psychiatry, 37, 1311-1316. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1980.01780240109013
26.
HeimanJ. R.LongJ. S.SmithS. N.FisherW. A.SandM. S.RosenR. C. (2011). Sexual satisfaction and relationship happiness in midlife and older couples in five countries. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 741-753. doi:10.1007/s10508-010-9703-3
27.
Holt-LunstadJ.SmithT. B.LaytonJ. B.BrayneC. (2010). Social relationships and mortality risk: A meta-analytic review. PLoS Medicine, 7(7), Article e1000316. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000316
28.
ImpettE. A.GordonA. M.KoganA.OveisC.GableS. L.KeltnerD. (2010). Moving toward more perfect unions: Daily and long-term consequences of approach and avoidance goals in romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 948-963. doi:10.1037/a0020271
29.
ImpettE. A.MuiseA.BreinesJ. G. (2013). From risk to pleasure: Toward a positive psychology of sexuality. In HojjatM.CramerD. (Eds.), Series in Positive Psychology: Positive psychology of love (pp. 57-76). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
30.
ImpettE. A.MuiseA.PeragineD. (2014). Sexuality in the context of relationships. In TolmanD. L.DiamondL. M.BauermeisterJ. A.GeorgeW. H.PfausJ. G.WardL. M. (Eds.), APA Handbook of Sexuality and Psychology: Vol. 2. Contextual approaches (pp. 269-315). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
31.
JakubiakB. K.FeeneyB. C. (2016). Affectionate touch to promote relational, psychological, and physical well-being in adulthood: A theoretical model and review of the research. Personality and Social Psychology Review. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/1088868316650307
32.
JanssenE. (2002). Psychophysiological measurement of sexual arousal. In WhitleyB. E.WiedermanM. W. (Eds.), Handbook for conducting research on human sexuality (pp. 139-171). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
33.
JormA. F.DearK. B. G.RodgersB.ChristensenH. (2003). Interaction between mother’s and father’s affection as a risk factor for anxiety and depression symptoms: Evidence for increased risk in adults who rate their father as having been more affectionate than their mother. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 38, 173-179. doi:10.1007/s00127-003-0620-9
34.
KafetsiosK.SideridisG. D. (2006). Attachment, social support and well-being in young and older adults. Journal of Health Psychology, 11, 863-876.
35.
KahnemanD.KruegerA. B.SchkadeD. A.SchwarzN.StoneA. A. (2004). A survey method for characterizing daily life experience: The day reconstruction method. Science, 306, 1776-1780. doi:10.1126/science.1103572
36.
KarneyB. R.BradburyT. N. (1995). The longitudinal course of marital quality and stability: A review of theory, method, and research. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 3-34.
37.
KennyD. A.KashyD. A. (2011). Dyadic data analysis using multilevel modeling. In HoxJ.RobertsJ. K. (Eds.), Handbook of advanced multilevel analysis (pp. 335-370). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
38.
KennyD. A.KashyD. A.CookW. L. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
39.
KimJ.LaRoseR.PengW. (2009). Loneliness as the cause and the effect of problematic Internet use: The relationship between Internet use and psychological well-being. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 12, 451-455. doi:10.1089/cpb.2008.0327
40.
LaumannE. O.PaikA.GlasserD. B.KangJ.-H.WangT.LevinsonB.. . . GingellC. (2006). A cross-national study of subjective sexual well-being among older women and men: Findings from the global study of sexual attitudes and behaviors. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 35, 145-161. doi:10.1007/s10508-005-9005-3
41.
LaurenceauJ.-P.BolgerN. (2012). Analyzing diary and intensive longitudinal data from dyads. In MehlM. R.ConnerT. S. (Eds.), Handbook of research methods for studying daily life (pp. 407-422). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
42.
LaurenceauJ.-P.TroyA. B.CarverC. S. (2005). Two distinct emotional experiences in romantic relationships: Effects of perceptions regarding approach of intimacy and avoidance of conflict. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1123-1133. doi:10.1177/0146167205274447
43.
LedermannT.BodenmannG. (2006). Moderator and mediator effects in dyadic research: Two extensions of the Actor-Partner Interdependence Model. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 37, 27-40. doi:10.1024/0044-3514.37.1.27
44.
LightK. C.GrewenK. M.AmicoJ. A. (2005). More frequent partner hugs and higher oxytocin levels are linked to lower blood pressure and heart rate in premenopausal women. Biological Psychology, 69, 5-21. doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2004.11.002
45.
LittleK. C.McNultyJ. K.RussellV. M. (2010). Sex buffers intimates against the negative implications of attachment insecurity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 484-498. doi:10.1177/0146167209352494
46.
MaasC. J. M.HoxJ. J. (2005). Sufficient sample sizes for multilevel modeling. Methodology, 1, 86-92. doi:10.1027/1614-2241.1.3.86
47.
McNultyJ. K.WennerC. A.FisherT. D. (2016). Longitudinal associations among relationship satisfaction, sexual satisfaction, and frequency of sex in early marriage. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 45, 85-97. doi:10.1007/s10508-014-0444-6
48.
MeislerA. W.CareyM. P. (1991). Depressed affect and male sexual arousal. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 20, 541-554. doi:10.1007/BF01550953
49.
MuiseA.ImpettE. A. (2015). Good, giving, and game: The relationship benefits of communal sexual motivation. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6, 164-172. doi:10.1177/1948550614553641
50.
MuiseA.ImpettE. A. (2016). Applying theories of communal motivation to sexuality. Social & Personality Psychology Compass, 10, 455-467.
51.
MuiseA.ImpettE. A.DesmaraisS. (2013). Getting it on versus getting it over with: Sexual motivation, desire, and satisfaction in intimate bonds. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 1320-1332. doi:10.1177/0146167213490963
52.
MuiseA.SchimmackU.ImpettE. A. (2016). Sexual frequency predicts greater well-being, but more is not always better. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7, 295-302. doi:10.1177/1948550615616462
53.
MuiseA.StantonS. C. E.KimJ. J.ImpettE. A. (2016). Not in the mood? Men under- (not over-) perceive their partner’s sexual desire in established intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110, 725-742. doi:10.1037/pspi0000046
54.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (1998-2012). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Author.
55.
NortonR. (1983). Measuring marital quality: A critical look at the dependent variable. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 45, 141-151. doi:10.2307/351302
56.
PreacherK. J.HayesA. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 717-731. doi:10.3758/BF03206553
57.
PreacherK. J.HayesA. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879-891. doi:10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
58.
PreacherK. J.SeligJ. P. (2012). Advantages of Monte Carlo confidence intervals for indirect effects. Communication Methods and Measures, 6, 77-98. doi:10.1080/19312458.2012.679848
59.
RabashJ.SteeleF.BrownW. J.GoldsteinH. (2009). A user’s guide to MLwiN, v. 2.10 (3rd ed.). Bristol, UK: Center for Multilevel Modelling, University of Bristol.
RosenthalR.RosnowR. L.RubinD. B. (2000). Contrasts and effect sizes in behavioral research: A correlational approach. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
62.
SchoebiD.PerrezM.BradburyT. N. (2012). Expectancy effects on marital interaction: Rejection sensitivity as a critical moderator. Journal of Family Psychology, 26, 709-718. doi:10.1037/a0029444
63.
SchoebiD.RandallA. K. (2015). Emotional dynamics in intimate relationships. Emotion Review, 7, 342-348. doi:10.1177/1754073915590620
64.
SchoebiD.WayB. M.KarneyB. R.BradburyT. N. (2012). Genetic moderation of sensitivity to positive and negative affect in marriage. Emotion, 12, 208-212. doi:10.1037/a0026067
65.
SchwarzN. (2012). Why researches should think “real-time”: A cognitive rationale. In MehlM. R.ConnerT. S. (Eds.), Handbook of research methods for studying daily life (pp. 22-42). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
66.
SchwarzN.KahnemanD.XuJ. (2009). Global and episodic reports of hedonic experience. In BelliR.StaffordF.AlwinD. (Eds.), Calendar and time diary: Methods in life course research (pp. 157-174). Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
67.
ShaverP. R.HazanC.BradshawD. (1988). The integration three behavioral systems. In SternbergR. J.BarnesM. L. (Eds.), The psychology of love (pp. 68-99). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
68.
ShiotaM. N.KeltnerD.JohnO. P. (2006). Positive emotion dispositions differentially associated with Big Five personality and attachment style. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 1, 61-71. doi:10.1080/17439760500510833
69.
van AndersS. M.EdelsteinR. S.WadeR. M.Samples-SteeleC. R. (2013). Descriptive experiences and sexual vs. nurturant aspects of cuddling between adult romantic partners. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 42, 553-560. doi:10.1007/s10508-012-0014-8
70.
VohsK. D.CataneseK. R.BaumeisterR. F. (2004). Sex in “his” versus “her” relationships. In HarveyJ. H.WenzelA.SprecherS. (Eds.), The handbook of sexuality in close relationships (pp. 455-479). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
71.
WatsonD.ClarkL. A. (1994). The PANAS-X: Manual for the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule-Expanded Form. Iowa City: Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences Publications, University of Iowa.
72.
WiedermanM. W. (2004). Methodological issues in studying sexuality in close relationships. In HarveyJ. H.WenzelA.SprecherS. (Eds.), The handbook of sexuality in close relationships (pp. 31-56). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
