Previous research suggests both relationship status and relationship quality correlate with well-being. The present study extended these findings in three ways. First, we benchmarked individuals with various-quality relationships against uncoupled people to determine whether even low-quality relationships are associated with greater well-being than being unpartnered. Second, research suggests global well-being (e.g., life satisfaction) and experiential well-being (e.g., momentary affect) oftentimes have different predictors. Thus, we tested whether individuals report greater experiential well-being while with their partners. Finally, we examined whether daily time invested into one’s relationship predicted well-being. Results indicated that being in a romantic relationship, interacting with one’s partner, and investing greater time into the relationship all predicted greater well-being. However, these effects were moderated by relationship quality, such that being in even relatively neutral relationships and interacting therein were associated with lower well-being than being unpartnered.
AckermanR. A.DonnellanM. B.KashyD. A. (2011). Working with dyadic data in studies of emerging adulthood: Specific recommendations, general advice, and practical tips. In FinchamF. D.CuiM. (Eds.), Romantic relationships in emerging adulthood: Advances in personal relationships (pp. 67-97). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
2.
AhadiS.DienerE. (1989). Multiple determinants and effect size. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 398-406.
3.
AnusicI.LucasR. E.DonnellanM. B. (2017). The validity of the day reconstruction method in the German socio-economic panel study. Social Indicators Research, 130, 213-232.
4.
ArgyleM. (2001). The psychology of happiness. New York, NY: Routledge.
5.
BakerL. R.McNultyJ. K.OverallN. C.LambertN. M.FinchamF. D. (2013). How do relationship maintenance behaviors affect individual well-being? A contextual perspective. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4, 282-289.
6.
BaumeisterR. F.LearyM. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497-529.
7.
BlantonH.JaccardJ. (2006). Arbitrary metrics in psychology. American Psychologist, 61, 27-41.
8.
BolgerN.LaurenceauJ. P. (2013). Intensive longitudinal methods: An introduction to diary and experience sampling research. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
9.
BowlbyJ. (1969). Attachment. New York, NY: Basic Books.
10.
ButtonK. S.IoannidisJ. P. A.MokryszC.NosekB. A.FlintJ.RobinsonE. S. J.MunafòM. R. (2013). Power failure: Why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 14, 365-376.
11.
BylsmaL. M.Taylor-CliftA.RottenbergJ. (2011). Emotional reactivity to daily events in major and minor depression. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 120, 155-167.
12.
CichyK. E.StawskiR. S.AlmeidaD. M. (2014). A double-edged sword: Race, daily family support exchanges, and daily well-being. Journal of Family Issues, 35, 1824-1845.
13.
DebrotA.SchoebiD.PerrezM.HornA. B. (2013). Touch as an interpersonal emotion regulation process in couples’ daily lives the mediating role of psychological intimacy. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 1373-1385.
14.
DeciE. L.RyanR. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227-268.
15.
DePauloB. M. (2005). Singles in society and in science. Psychological Inquiry, 16, 57-83.
16.
DienerE.EmmonsR. A.LarsenR. J.GriffinS. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71-75.
17.
EriksonE. H. (1974). Dimensions of a new identity. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.
18.
FloodS. M.GenadekK. R. (2016). Time for each other: Work and family constraints among couples: Time for each other. Journal of Marriage and Family, 78, 142-164.
19.
GereJ.SchimmackU. (2013). When romantic partners’ goals conflict: Effects on relationship quality and subjective well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 14, 37-49.
20.
GreenhausJ. H.CollinsK. M.ShawJ. D. (2003). The relation between work–family balance and quality of life. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 63, 510-531.
21.
GustavsonK.RøysambE.BorrenI.TorvikF. A.KarevoldE. (2016). Life satisfaction in close relationships: Findings from a longitudinal study. Journal of Happiness Studies, 17, 1293-1311.
22.
HazanC.ZeifmanD. (1994). Sex and the psychological tether. In BartholomewK.PerlmanD. (Eds.), Attachment processes in adulthood: Advances in personal relationships (Vol. 5, pp. 151-178). Philadelphia, PA: Jessica Kingsley.
23.
HellerD.WatsonD.IliesR. (2004). The role of person versus situation in life satisfaction: A critical examination. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 574-600.
24.
HelliwellJ. F. (2003). How’s life? Combining individual and national variables to explain subjective well-being. Economic Modelling, 20, 331-360.
25.
Holt-LunstadJ.BirminghamW.JonesB. Q. (2008). Is there something unique about marriage? The relative impact of marital status, relationship quality, and network social support on ambulatory blood pressure and mental health. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 35, 239-244.
26.
HopeS.RodgersB.PowerC. (1999). Marital status transitions and psychological distress: Longitudinal evidence from a national population sample. Psychological Medicine, 29, 381-389.
27.
HudsonN. W.LucasR. E.DonnellanM. B. (2017). Day-to-day affect is surprisingly stable: A 2-year longitudinal study of well-being. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8, 45-54.
28.
HudsonN. W.LucasR. E.DonnellanM. B.KushlevK. (2016). Income reliably predicts sadness, but not happiness: A replication and extension of Kushlev, Dunn, & Lucas (2015). Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7, 828-836.
29.
HudsonN. W.RobertsB. W. (2014). Goals to change personality traits: Concurrent links between personality traits, daily behavior, and goals to change oneself. Journal of Research in Personality, 53, 68-83.
30.
KahnemanD.DeatonA. (2010). High income improves evaluations of life but not emotional well-being. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107, 16489-16493.
31.
KahnemanD.KruegerA. B.SchkadeD. A.SchwarzN.StoneA. A. (2004). A survey method for characterizing daily life experience: The day reconstruction method. Science, 306, 1776-1780.
32.
Kim-PrietoC.DienerE.TamirM.ScollonC.DienerM. (2005). Integrating the diverse definitions of happiness: A time-sequential framework of subjective well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 6, 261-300.
33.
LehmannV.TuinmanM. A.BraekenJ.VingerhoetsA. J. J. M.SandermanR.HagedoornM. (2015). Satisfaction with relationship status: Development of a new scale and the role in predicting well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 16, 169-184.
34.
LucasR. E.DienerE.SuhE. (1996). Discriminant validity of well-being measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 616-628.
35.
LucasR. E.DyrenforthP. S. (2006). Does the existence of social relationships matter for subjective well-being? In VohsK. D.FinkleE. J. (Eds.), Self and relationships: Connecting intrapersonal and interpersonal processes (pp. 245-273). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
36.
MackinnonS. P.SherryS. B.AntonyM. M.StewartS. H.SherryD. L.HartlingN. (2012). Caught in a bad romance: Perfectionism, conflict, and depression in romantic relationships. Journal of Family Psychology, 26, 215-225.
37.
McCabeM. P.CumminsR. A.RomeoY. (1996). Relationship status, relationship quality, and health. Journal of Family Studies, 2, 109-120.
38.
Michigan State University, Institute for Public Policy and Social Research. (2015). State of the State Survey69 [Data file and code book]. Retrieved from http://ippsr.msu.edu/soss/
39.
MyersD. G. (1992). The pursuit of happiness: Discovering the pathway to fulfillment, well-being, and enduring personal joy. New York, NY: Harper Collins.
40.
MyersD. G. (2000). The funds, friends, and faith of happy people. American Psychologist, 55, 56-67.
41.
Odle-dusseauH. N.BrittT. W.BobkoP. (2012). Work-family balance, well-being, and organizational outcomes: Investigating actual versus desired work/family time discrepancies. Journal of Business and Psychology, 27, 331-343.
42.
PierceG. L. (2016). Methodological report: Michigan State University State of the State Survey 1-70 longitudinal data. East Lansing: Institute for Public Policy and Social Research, Michigan State University.
43.
PinquartM.SorensenS. (2000). Influences of socioeconomic status, social network, and competence on subjective well-being in later life: A meta-analysis. Psychology and Aging, 15, 187-224.
44.
ProulxC. M.HelmsH. M.BuehlerC. (2007). Marital quality and personal well-being: A meta-analysis. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69, 576-593.
45.
ReisH. T.ManiaciM. R.RoggeR. D. (2014). The expression of compassionate love in everyday compassionate acts. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 31, 651-676.
46.
RichardF. D.BondC. F.Stokes-ZootaJ. J. (2003). One hundred years of social psychology quantitatively described. Review of General Psychology, 7, 331-363.
47.
RobinsonM. D.CloreG. L. (2002). Belief and feeling: Evidence for an accessibility model of emotional self-report. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 934-960.
48.
RyanR. M.DeciE. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 141-166.
49.
SonJ.WilsonJ. (2012). Volunteer work and hedonic, eudemonic, and social well-being. In CeruloK. A. (Ed.), Sociological forum (Vol. 27, pp. 658-681). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
50.
TwetenC.AnusicI.LucasR. E.DonnellanM. B. (2016, January). A direct comparison of the experience sampling method (ESM) and the day reconstruction method (DRM). Poster presented at the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, San Diego, CA.
51.
WatsonD.ClarkL. A.TellegenA. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063-1070.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
