People are more likely to become politically engaged (e.g., vote, engage in activism) when issues are associated with strong moral convictions. The goal of this research was to understand the underlying motivations that lead to this well-replicated effect. Specifically, to what extent is moralized political engagement motivated by proscriptive concerns (e.g., perceived harms, anticipated regret), prescriptive concerns (e.g., perceived benefits, anticipated pride), or some combination of these processes? And are the motivational pathways between moral conviction and political engagement the same or different for liberals and conservatives? Two studies (combined N = 2,069) found that regardless of political orientation, the association between moral conviction and political engagement was mediated by the perceived benefits of preferred but not the perceived harms of non-preferred policy outcomes, and by both anticipated pride and regret, findings that replicated in two contexts: legalizing same-sex marriage and allowing concealed weapons on college campuses.
AbrahamC.SheeranP. (2003). Acting on intentions: The role of anticipated regret. British Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 495-511.
2.
AikenL. S.WestS. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
3.
AjzenI.FishbeinM. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Engelwood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
4.
BaumeisterR. F.BratslavskyE.FinkenauerC.VohsK. D. (2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5, 323-370.
5.
BoydR. L. (2014). RIOT Scan: Recursive Inspection of Text Scanner (Version 2.0.1) [Software]. Available from http://riot.ryanb.cc
6.
BrandtM. J.IjzermanH.DijksterhuisA.FarachF. J.GellerJ.Giner-SorollaR.. . . Van’t VeerA. (2001). The replication recipe: What makes for a convincing replication?Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 50, 217-224.
7.
BrandtM. J.WisneskiD. C.SkitkaL. J. (2015). Moralization and the 2012 presidential election campaign. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 3, 211-237.
8.
ConnollyT.RebJ. (2003). Omission bias in vaccination decision: Where’s the omission? Where’s the bias?Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 91, 186-202.
9.
DuckittJ.FisherK. (2003). The impact of social threat on worldview and ideological attitudes. Political Psychology, 24, 199-222.
10.
EaglyA. H.ChaikenS. (1998). Attitude structure and function. In GilbertD. T.FiskeS. T.GardnerL. (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (pp. 269-322). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
11.
EaglyA. H.MladinicA.OttoS. (1994). Cognitive and affective bases of attitudes toward social groups and social policies. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 113-137.
12.
ElliotA. J. (2006). Approach and avoidance motivation. Motivation and Emotion, 30, 111-116.
13.
FootP. (1967). Theories of ethics. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
14.
GilovichT.MedvecV. H. (1995). The experience of regret: What, when, and why. Psychological Review, 102, 379-395.
15.
GrayK.YoungL.WaytzA. (2012). Mind perception is the essence of morality. Psychological Inquiry, 23, 101-124.
16.
GreenwaldA. G. (1975). Consequences of prejudice against the null hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 82, 1-20.
17.
HaidtJ. (2008). Morality. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 65-72.
18.
HibbingJ. R.SmithK. B.AlfordJ. R. (2014). Differences in negativity bias underlie variations in political ideology. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 37, 297-350.
19.
HillygusD. S.ShieldsT. G. (2005). Moral issues and voter decision making in the 2004 presidential election. Political Science and Politics, 38, 201-209.
20.
Janoff-BulmanR.CarnesN. C. (2013). Surveying the moral landscape moral motives and group-based moralities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 17, 219-236.
21.
Janoff-BulmanR.SheikhS.HeppS. (2009). Proscriptive versus prescriptive morality: Two faces of moral regulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 521-537.
22.
JostJ. T.GlaserJ.KruglanskiA. W.SullowayF. J. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 339-375.
23.
KahnemanD.TverskyA. (1984). Choices, values, and frames. American Psychologist, 39, 341-350.
24.
KaiserF. G. (2006). A moral extension of the theory of planned behavior: Norms and anticipated feelings of regret in conservationism. Personality and Individual Differences, 41, 71-81.
25.
KatzirM.EyalT.MeiranN.KesslerY. (2010). Imagined positive emotions and inhibitory control: The differentiated effect of pride versus happiness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 1314-1320.
26.
LavineH.BurgessD.SnyderM.TransueJ.SullivanJ. L.HaneyB.WagnerS. H. (1999). Threat, authoritarianism, and voting: An investigation of personality and persuasion. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 337-347.
27.
LiebermanD.HatfieldE. (2006). Passionate love: Cross-cultural and evolutionary perspectives. In SternbergR. J.WeisK. (Eds.), The new psychology of love (pp. 274-297). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
28.
MansteadA. S. R.ParkerD. (1995). Evaluating and extending the theory of planned behaviour. In StroebeW.HewstoneM. (Eds.), European review of social psychology (pp. 69-95). Chichester, UK: John Wiley.
29.
OnwezenM. C.AntonidesG.BartelsJ. (2013). The norm activation model: An exploration of the functions of anticipated pride and guilt in pro-environmental behaviour. Journal of Economic Psychology, 39, 141-153.
30.
ParkerD.StradlingS. G.MansteadA. S. R. (1996). Modifying beliefs and attitudes to exceeding the speed limit: An intervention study based on the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 26, 1-19.
31.
PreacherK. J.HayesA. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879-891.
32.
ShookN. J.FazioR. H. (2009). Political ideology, exploration of novel stimuli, and attitude formation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 995-998.
33.
SkitkaL. J. (2014). The psychological foundations of moral conviction. In WrightJ.SarkissianH. (Eds.), Advances in moral psychology (pp. 148-166). New York, NY: Bloomsbury Academic Press.
34.
SkitkaL. J.BaumanC. W. (2008). Moral conviction and political engagement. Political Psychology, 29, 29-54.
35.
SkitkaL. J.BaumanC. W.SargisE. G. (2005). Moral conviction: Another contributor to attitude strength or something more?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 895-917.
36.
SkitkaL. J.WisneskiD. C. (2011). Moral conviction and emotion. Emotion Review, 3, 328-330.
37.
StoneP. J.DunphyD. C.SmithM. S.OgilvieD. M. (1966). The general inquirer: A computer approach to content analysis. Oxford, UK: MIT Press.
38.
TangneyJ. P.StuewigJ.MashekD. J. (2007). Moral emotions and moral behavior. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 345-372.
39.
van ZomerenM.PostmesT.SpearsR. (2012). On conviction’s collective consequences: Integrating moral conviction with the social identity model of collective action. British Journal of Social Psychology, 51(1), 52-71.
40.
WetherellG. A.BrandtM. J.ReynaC. (2013). Discrimination across the ideological divide: The role of value violations and abstract values in discrimination by liberals and conservatives. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4, 658-667.
41.
WilliamsL. A.DeStenoD. (2008). Pride and perseverance: The motivational role of pride. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 1007-1017.
42.
ZaalM. P.LaarC. V.StåhlT.EllemersN.DerksB. (2011). By any means necessary: The effects of regulatory focus and moral conviction on hostile and benevolent forms of collective action. British Journal of Social Psychology, 50, 670-689.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
