People’s feelings about political issues are often experienced as moral convictions, that is, as rooted in beliefs about right and wrong, morality and immorality. The authors tested and found that morally convicted policy preferences are associated with positive as well as negative emotions among policy supporters and opponents, respectively, and that positive and negative emotions partially mediate the effects of moral convictions on relevant behavioral intentions (i.e., willingness to engage in activism).
Greene, J.D. ( 2009). Dual process morality and the personal/impersonal distinction: A reply to McGuire, Langdon, and Mackenzie. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 581-584.
2.
Lerner, J.S., & Tiedens, L.Z. ( 2006). Portrait of the angry decision maker: How appraisal tendencies shape anger’s influence on cognition. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 19, 115-137.
3.
Mullen, E., & Skitka, L.J. ( 2006). Exploring the psychological underpinnings of the moral mandate effect: Motivated reasoning, identification, or anger?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 629-643.
4.
Preacher, K.J., & Hayes, A.F. ( 2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavioral Research Methods, 40, 879-891.
5.
Skitka, L.J. ( 2010). The psychology of moral conviction. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4, 267-281.
6.
van den Bos, K. ( 2007). Hot cognition and social justice judgments: The combined influence of cognitive and affective factors on the justice judgment process . In D. de Cremer (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of justice and affect (pp. 59-82). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
