We examined how listeners characterized by empathy and a non-judgmental approach affect speakers’ attitude structure. We hypothesized that high quality listening decreases speakers’ social anxiety, which in turn reduces defensive processing. This reduction in defensive processing was hypothesized to result in an awareness of contradictions (increased objective-attitude ambivalence), and decreased attitude extremity. Moreover, we hypothesized that experiencing high quality listening would enable speakers to tolerate contradictory responses, such that listening would attenuate the association between objective- and subjective-attitude ambivalence. We obtained consistent support for our hypotheses across four laboratory experiments that manipulated listening experience in different ways on a range of attitude topics. The effects of listening on objective-attitude ambivalence were stronger for higher dispositional social anxiety and initial objective-attitude ambivalence (Study 4). Overall, the results suggest that speakers’ attitude structure can be changed by a heretofore unexplored interpersonal variable: merely providing high quality listening.
AronsonE.(1999). The power of self-persuasion. American Psychologist, 54(11), 875.
2.
AguinisH.PierceC. A.CulpepperS. A. (2009). Scale coarseness as a methodological artifact: Correcting correlation coefficients attenuated from using coarse scales. Organizational Research Methods, 12, 623-652. doi:10.1177/1094428108318065
3.
BakerS. M.PettyR. E. (1994). Majority and minority influence: Source-position imbalance as a determinant of message scrutiny. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 5-19.
4.
BodieG. D. (2012). Listening as positive communication. In SochaT.PittsM. (Eds.), The positive side of interpersonal communication (pp. 109-125). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
5.
BodieG. D.JonesS. M.VickeryA. J.HatcherL.CannavaK. (2014). Examining the construct validity of enacted support: A multitrait-multimethod analysis of three perspectives for judging immediacy and listening behaviors. Communication Monographs, 81, 495-523.
6.
BorensteinM.HedgesL.HigginsJ.RothsteinH. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis. Chichester, UK: John Wiley.
7.
BrehmJ. W. (1972). Responses to loss of freedom: A theory of psychological reactance. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
8.
BriñolP.PettyR. E.GallardoI.DeMarreeK. G. (2007). The effect of self-affirmation in nonthreatening persuasion domains: Timing affects the process. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 1533-1546.
9.
BriñolP.PettyR. E.WheelerS. C. (2006). Discrepancies between explicit and implicit self-concepts: Consequences for information processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 154-170.
10.
BriñolP.RuckerD.TormalaZ. L.PettyR. E. (2004). Individual differences in resistance to persuasion: The role of beliefs and meta-beliefs. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
11.
BruneauE. G.SaxeR. (2012). The power of being heard: The benefits of “perspective-giving” in the context of intergroup conflict. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 855-866.
12.
CacioppoJ. T.PettyR. E. (1981). Social psychological procedures for cognitive response assessment: The thought-listing technique. In MerluzziT.GlassC.GenestM. (Eds.), Cognitive assessment (pp. 309-342). New York: Guilford.
13.
CaprarielloP. A.ReisH. T. (2011). Perceived partner responsiveness minimizes defensive reactions to failure. Social Psychological & Personality Science, 2, 365-372.
14.
CastroD. R.KlugerA. N.ItzchakovG. (2016). Does avoidance-attachment style attenuate the benefits of being listened to?European Journal of Social Psychology. Advance online publication. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2185
15.
ClarkJ. K.WegenerD. T.FabrigarL. R. (2008). Attitudinal ambivalence and message-based persuasion: Motivated processing of proattitudinal information and avoidance of counterattitudinal information. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 565-577.
16.
ConnorK. M.DavidsonJ. R.ChurchillL. E.SherwoodA.WeislerR. H.FoaE. (2000). Psychometric properties of the Social Phobia Inventory (SPIN) New Self-Rating Scale. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 176, 379-386.
17.
CorrellJ.SpencerS. J.ZannaM. P. (2004). An affirmed self and an open mind: Self-affirmation and sensitivity to argument strength. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 350-356.
18.
CrockerJ.ParkL. E. (2004). The costly pursuit of self-esteem. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 392-414.
19.
DeMarreeK. G.WheelerS. C.BriñolP.PettyR. E. (2014). Wanting other attitudes: Actual–desired attitude discrepancies predict feelings of ambivalence and ambivalence consequences. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 53, 5-18.
20.
FabrigarL. R.MacDonaldT. K.WegenerD. T. (2005). The structure of attitudes. In AlbarracínD.JohnsonB. T.ZannaM. P. (Eds.), The handbook of attitudes (pp. 79-124).
21.
FisbeinM.AjzenI. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wiley.
22.
FreyD. (1986). Recent research on selective exposure to information. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 41-80.
23.
FriendR. M.GilbertJ. (1973). Threat and fear of negative evaluation as determinants of locus of social comparison. Journal of Personality, 41, 328-340.
24.
HarrisP. R.NapperL. (2005). Self-affirmation and the biased processing of threatening health-risk information. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1250-1263.
25.
HellerJ. F.PallakM. S.PicekJ. M. (1973). The interactive effects of intent and threat on boomerang attitude change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 26, 273-279.
26.
HermansH. J. M. (1996). Voicing the self: From information processing to dialogical interchange. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 31-50.
27.
ItzchakovG.CastroD. R.KlugerA. N. (2016). If you want people to listen to you, tell a story. International Journal of Listening, 30, 120-133.
28.
ItzchakovG.KlugerA. N. (2015, April). If you listen to me, I will change my attitude. Paper presented at the 30th Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Philadelphia, PA.
29.
JemmottJ. B.DittoP. H.CroyleR. T. (1986). Judging health status: Effects of perceived prevalence and personal relevance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 899-905.
30.
JohnsonD. W. (1971). Effects of warmth of interaction, accuracy of understanding, and the proposal of compromises on listener’s behavior. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 18, 207-216.
31.
KaplanK. J. (1972). On the ambivalence-indifference problem in attitude theory and measurement: A suggested modification of the semantic differential technique. Psychological Bulletin, 77, 361-372.
32.
KashdanT. B.StegerM. F. (2006). Expanding the topography of social anxiety: An experience-sampling assessment of positive emotions, positive events, and emotion suppression. Psychological Science, 17, 120-128.
33.
KennyD. A.KashyD. A.CookW. L. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. New York: Guilford Press.
34.
KlineR. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
35.
KnowlesE. S.LinnJ. A. (2004). Resistance and persuasion. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
36.
KrosnickJ. A.PettyR. E. (1995). Attitude strength: An overview. In PettyR. E.KrosnickJ. A. (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 1-24). Mahawah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
37.
KumashiroM.SedikidesC. (2005). Taking on board liability-focused information: Close positive relationships as a self-bolstering resource. Psychological Science, 16, 732-739.
38.
KundaZ. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 480-498.
39.
LearyM. R. (1983). Social anxiousness: The construct and its measurement. Journal of Personality Assessment, 47, 66-75.
40.
LibermanA.ChaikenS. (1992). Defensive processing of personally relevant health messages. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 669-679.
41.
LydonJ.ZannaM. P.RossM. (1988). Bolstering attitudes by autobiographical recall: Attitude persistence and selective memory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 14, 78-86.
42.
MaioG. R.HaddockG. (2010). The psychology of attitudes and attitude change. London, England: SAGE.
43.
Newby-ClarkI. R.McGregorI.ZannaM. P. (2002). Thinking and caring about cognitive inconsistency: When and for whom does attitudinal ambivalence feel uncomfortable?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 157-166.
44.
PasupathiM.HoytT. (2010). Silence and the shaping of memory: How distracted listeners affect speakers’ subsequent recall of a computer game experience. Memory, 18, 159-169.
45.
PasupathiM.RichB. (2005). Inattentive listening undermines self-verification in personal storytelling. Journal of Personality, 73, 1051-1086.
46.
PettyR. E.OstromT.BrockT. (1981). Historical foundation of the cognitive response approach to attitudes and persuasion. In PettyR. E.OstromT.BrockT. (Eds.), Cognitive response in persuasion (pp. 5-29). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
47.
PreacherK. J.HayesA. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879-891.
48.
PriesterJ. R.PettyR. E. (1996). The gradual threshold model of ambivalence: Relating the positive and negative bases of attitudes to subjective ambivalence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 431-449.
49.
RogersC. (1951). Client-centered therapy: Its current practice, implications and theory. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
50.
RogersC. (1980). A way of being. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
51.
RogersC.RoethlisbergerF. J. (1991). HBR classic—Barriers and gateways to communication (Reprinted from Harvard Business Review, July-August, 1952). Harvard Business Review, 69, 105-111.
52.
SchimelJ.ArndtJ.PyszczynskiT.GreenbergJ. (2001). Being accepted for who we are: Evidence that social validation of the intrinsic self reduces general defensiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 35-52.
53.
SchlenkerB. R.LearyM. R. (1982). Social anxiety and self-presentation: A conceptualization model. Psychological Bulletin, 92, 641-669.
54.
SchneiderI. K.EerlandA.van HarreveldF.RotteveelM.van der PligtJ.van der StoepN.ZwaanR. A. (2013). One way and the other: The bidirectional relationship between ambivalence and body movement. Psychological Science, 24, 319-325.
55.
ShermanD. K.CohenG. L. (2002). Accepting threatening information: Self-affirmation and the reduction of defensive biases. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 119-123.
56.
SnellingE. (2005). Hungry researchers: The tensions and dilemmas of developing an emancipatory research project with members of a hearing voices group. Journal of Social Work Practice, 19, 131-147.
57.
SuedfeldP.TetlockP. E.StreufertS. (1992). Conceptual/integrative complexity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
58.
ThompsonM. M.GriffinD. W. (1995). Let’s not be indifferent about (attitudinal) ambivalence. In PettyR. E.KrosnickJ. A. (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 361-386). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
59.
TormalaZ. L.DeSensiV. L.PettyR. E. (2007). Resisting persuasion by illegitimate means: A metacognitive perspective on minority influence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 354-367.
60.
TormalaZ. L.PettyR. E. (2004). Source credibility and attitude certainty: A metacognitive analysis of resistance to persuasion. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14, 427-442.
61.
van HarreveldF.NohlenH. U.SchneiderI. K. (2015). Chapter five—The ABC of ambivalence: Affective, behavioral, and cognitive consequences of attitudinal conflict. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 52, 285-324.
62.
van HarreveldF.RutjensB. T.RotteveelM.NordgrenL. F.van der PligtJ. (2009). Ambivalence and decisional conflict as a cause of psychological discomfort: Feeling tense before jumping off the fence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 167-173.
63.
van HarreveldF.RutjensB. T.SchneiderI. K.NohlenH. U.KeskinisK. (2014). In doubt and disorderly: Ambivalence promotes compensatory perceptions of order. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143, 1666-1676.
64.
WenzelA.KashdanT. B. (2008). Emotional disturbances and the initial stages of relationship development: Processes and consequences of social anxiety and depression. In SprecherS.WenzelA.HarveyJ. (Eds.), Handbook of relationship initiation (pp. 425-450). New York: Psychology Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
