Previous work has reliably demonstrated that when people experience more subjective ambivalence about an attitude object, their attitudes have less impact on strength-related outcomes such as attitude-related thinking, judging, or behaving. However, previous research has not considered whether the amount of perceived knowledge a person has about the topic might moderate these effects. Across eight studies on different topics using a variety of outcome measures, the current research demonstrates that perceived knowledge can moderate the relation between ambivalence and the impact of attitudes on related thinking, judging, and behaving. Although the typical Attitude × Ambivalence effect emerged when participants had relatively high perceived knowledge, this interaction did not emerge when participants were lower in perceived knowledge. This work provides a more nuanced view of the effects of subjective ambivalence on attitude impact and highlights the importance of understanding the combined impact of attitude strength antecedents.
AjzenI.FishbeinM. (1977). Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 888-918.
2.
AloeA. M.ThompsonC. G. (2013). The synthesis of partial effect sizes. Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research, 4, 390-405.
3.
ArmitageC. J.ConnerM. (2000). Attitudinal ambivalence: A test of three key hypotheses. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1421-1432.
4.
BardenJ.PettyR. E. (2008). The mere perception of elaboration creates attitude certainty: Exploring the thoughtfulness heuristic. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 489-509.
5.
BassiliJ. N. (1996). Meta-judgmental versus operative indexes of psychological attributes: The case of measures of attitude strength. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 637-653.
6.
BergerI. E.RatchfordB. T.HainesG. H. (1994). Subjective product knowledge as a moderator of the relationship between attitudes and purchase intentions for a durable product. Journal of Economic Psychology, 15, 301-314.
7.
ByrneD. (1997). An overview (and underview) of research and theory within the attraction paradigm. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 14, 417-431.
8.
ClarksonJ. J.TormalaZ. L.RuckerD. D. (2008). A new look at the consequences of attitude certainty: The amplification hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 810-825.
9.
CohenJ. (1992). A power primer. Quantitative Methods in Psychology, 112, 155-159.
10.
ConnerM.FleschD. (1998). Attitudes, intentions and ambivalence about having casual sex. Unpublished raw data. School of Psychology, University of Leeds, UK.
11.
ConnerM.SparksP. (2002). Ambivalence and attitudes. European Review of Social Psychology, 12, 37-70.
12.
DavidsonA. R.YantisS.NorwoodM.MontanoD. E. (1985). Amount of information about the attitude object and attitude-behavior consistency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 1184-1198.
13.
FabrigarL. R.MacDonaldT. K.WegenerD. T. (2005). The structure of attitudes. In AlbarracínD.JohnsonB. T.ZannaM. P. (Eds.), The handbook of attitudes (pp. 79-125). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
14.
FabrigarL. R.MacDonaldT. K.WegenerD. T. (2019). Attitude structure. In AlbarracinD.JohnsonB. T. (Eds.), The handbook of attitudes (2nd ed., pp. 79-125). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
15.
FabrigarL. R.PettyR. E.SmithS. M.CritesS. L. (2006). Understanding knowledge effects on attitude-behavior consistency: The role of relevance, complexity, and amount of knowledge. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 556-577.
16.
FabrigarL. R.WegenerD. T. (2016). Conceptualizing and evaluating the replication of research results. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 66, 68-80.
17.
GibbonsF. X.GerrardM.OuelletteJ. A.BurzetteR. (2007). Cognitive antecedents to adolescent health risk: Discriminating between behavioral intention and behavioral willingness. Psychology and Health, 13, 319-339.
18.
GohJ. X.HallJ. A.RosenthalR. (2016). Mini meta-analysis of your own studies: Some arguments on why and a primer on how. Social & Personality Psychology Compass, 10, 535-549.
19.
GreenwaldA. G.BanajiM. R.NosekB. A. (2015). Statistically small effects of the Implicit Association Test can have societally large effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108, 553-561.
20.
Harmon-JonesE.Harmon-JonesC.LevyN. (2015). An action-based model of cognitive-dissonance processes. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24, 184-189.
21.
HohmanZ. P.CranoW. D.NiedbalaE. M. (2016). Attitude ambivalence, social norms, and behavioral intentions: Developing effective antitobacco persuasive communications. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 30, 209-219.
22.
HolbrookA. L.KrosnickJ. A. (2005). Meta-psychological vs. operative measures of perceived intra-psychic conflict and real intra-psychic conflict. In CraigS. C.MartinezM. D. (Eds.), Ambivalence and the structure of public opinion (pp. 73-191). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
23.
JonesL. V.TukeyJ. W. (2000). A sensible formulation of the significance test. Psychological Methods, 5(4), 411-414.
24.
KallgrenC. A.WoodW. (1986). Access to attitude-relevant information in memory as a determinant of attitude-behavior consistency. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 328-338.
25.
KennyD. A.JuddC. M. (2019). The unappreciated heterogeneity of effect sizes: Implications for power, precision, planning of research, and replication. Psychological Methods. Advance online publication. doi:10.1037/met0000209
26.
LuttrellA.PettyR. E.BriñolP. (2016). Ambivalence and certainty can interact to predict attitude stability over time. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 63, 56-68.
27.
LuttrellA.PettyR. E.XuM. (2017). Replicating and fixing failed replications: The case of need for cognition and argument quality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 69, 178-183.
28.
LuttrellA.StillmanP. E.HasinskiA. E.CunninghamW. A. (2016). Neural dissociations in attitude strength: Distinct regions of cingulate cortex track ambivalence and certainty. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 63, 56-68.
29.
McClellandG. H.JuddC. M. (1993). Statistical difficulties of detecting interactions and moderator effects. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 376-390.
30.
McshaneB. B.BöckenholtU. (2017). Single paper meta-analysis: Benefits for study summary, theory-testing, and replicability. Journal of Consumer Research, 43, 1048-1063.
31.
PettyR. E.KrosnickJ. A. (1995). Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.
32.
PriesterJ. R.PettyR. E. (1996). The gradual threshold model of ambivalence: Relating the positive and negative bases of attitudes to subjective ambivalence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 7, 431-449.
33.
PriesterJ. R.PettyR. E.ParkK. (2007). Whence univalent ambivalence? From the anticipation of conflicting reactions. Journal of Consumer Research, 34, 11-21.
34.
PrislinR. (1996). Attitude stability and attitude strength: One is enough to make it stable. European Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 447-477.
35.
SawickiV.WegenerD. T. (2018). Metacognitive reflection as a moderator of attitude strength versus attitude bolstering: Implications for attitude similarity and attraction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 44, 638-652.
36.
SawickiV.WegenerD. T.ClarkJ. K.FabrigarL. R.SmithS. M.BengalS. T. (2011). Seeking confirmation in times of doubt. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2, 540-546.
37.
SawickiV.WegenerD. T.ClarkJ. K.FabrigarL. R.SmithS. M.DursoG. R. O. (2013). Feeling conflicted and seeking information. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 735-747.
38.
SeeY. H. M.PettyR. E.FabrigarL. R. (2013). Affective-cognitive meta-bases versus structural bases of attitudes predict processing interest versus efficiency. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 1111-1123.
39.
SenguptaJ.JoharG. V. (2002). Effects of inconsistent attribute information on the predictive value of product attitudes: Toward a resolution of opposing perspectives. Journal of Consumer Research, 29, 39-56.
40.
SmithS. M.FabrigarL. R.MacDougallB. L.WiesenthalN. L. (2008). The role of amount, cognitive elaboration, and structural consistency of attitude-relevant knowledge in the formation of attitude certainty. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 280-295.
41.
StanleyD. J.SpenceJ. R. (2014). Expectations for replications: Are yours realistic?Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9, 305-318.
42.
TeenyJ. D.PettyR. E. (2018). The role of perceived attitudinal bases on spontaneous and requested advocacy. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 76, 175-185.
43.
ThompsonM. M.ZannaM. P.GriffinD. W. (1995). Let’s not be indifferent about (attitudinal) ambivalence. In PettyR. E.KrosnickJ. A. (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 361-386). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
44.
TukeyJ. W. (1991). The philosophy of multiple comparisons. Statistical Science, 6, 100-116.
45.
van HarreveldF.NohlenH. U.SchneiderI. K. (2015). The ABC of ambivalence. In ZannaM. P.OlsonJ. (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 52, pp. 285-324). New York, NY: Academic Press.
46.
van HarreveldF.RutjensB. T.RotteveelM.NordgrenL. F.van der PligtJ. (2009). Ambivalence and decisional conflict as a cause of psychological discomfort: Feeling tense before jumping off the fence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 167-173.
47.
van HarreveldF.van der PligtJ.de LiverY. N. (2009). The agony of ambivalence and ways to resolve it: Introducing the MAID model. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13, 45-61.
48.
VisserP. S.KrosnickJ. A.SimmonsJ. P. (2003). Distinguishing the cognitive and behavioral consequences of attitude importance and certainty: A new approach to testing the common-factor hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 118-141.
49.
WegenerD. T.DowningJ.KrosnickJ. A.PettyR. E. (1995). Measures and manipulations of strength-related properties of attitudes: Current practice and future directions. In PettyR. E.KrosnickJ. A. (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 455-488). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
50.
WoodW. (1982). Retrieval of attitude-relevant information from memory: Effects on susceptibility to persuasion and on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 798-810.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
