Within social psychology, it is well accepted that trait inference is the dominant tool for understanding others’ behavior. Outside of social psychology, a different consensus has emerged, namely, that people predominantly explain behavior in terms of mental states. Both positions are based on limited evidence. The trait literature focuses on trait ascriptions to persons, not explanations of behavior. The mental state literature focuses on explanations of ordinary behaviors (for which social scripts provide mental states), not of expectancy-violating behaviors. We examined the critical test case for the two opposing positions: explanations of expectancy-violating behaviors. Participants provided open-ended explanations of puzzling actions, which were content-analyzed for use of mental states, traits, and other causal background factors. Across four studies, three stimulus sets, and two subpopulations, people overwhelmingly offered mental states when explaining puzzling actions (compared with ordinary actions), while they struggled to generate traits and other background factors.
BartschK.WellmanH. M. (1995). Children talk about the mind. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
2.
BussA. R. (1978). Causes and reasons in attribution theory: A conceptual critique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 1311-1321. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.36.11.1311
3.
ClementR. W.KruegerJ. (2000). The primacy of self-referent information in perceptions of social consensus. British Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 279-299. doi:10.1348/014466600164471
4.
CushmanF. (2008). Crime and punishment: Distinguishing the roles of causal and intentional analyses in moral judgment. Cognition, 108, 353-380. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2008.03.006
5.
DevineP. G.SedikidesC.FuhrmanR. W. (1989). Goals in social information processing: The case of anticipated interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 680-690.
6.
EpleyN.KeysarB.Van BovenL.GilovichT. (2004). Perspective taking as egocentric anchoring and adjustment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 327-339. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.87.3.327
7.
FiskeS. T.TaylorS. E. (1991). Social cognition (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
8.
GergelyG.NádasdyZ.CsibraG.BíróS. (1995). Taking the intentional stance at 12 months of age. Cognition, 56, 165-193. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(95)00661-H
9.
GilbertD. T.MaloneP. S. (1995). The correspondence bias. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 21-38. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.117.1.21
10.
HamiltonD. L. (1998). Dispositional and attributional inferences in person perception. In DarleyJ. M.CooperJ. (Eds.), Attribution and social interaction (pp. 99-114). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
11.
HassinR. R.AartsH.FergusonM. J. (2005). Automatic goal inferences. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 129-140. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2004.06.008
12.
HastorfA. H.SchneiderD. J.PolefkaJ. (1970). Person perception. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
13.
HeiderF. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York, NY: Wiley.
14.
HempelC. G. (1966). Philosophy of natural science. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
15.
HiltonD. J. (1990). Conversational processes and causal explanation. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 65-81.
16.
HiltonD. J.SmithR. H.KimS. H. (1995). Processes of causal explanation and dispositional attribution. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 377-387. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.68.3.377
17.
JohnsonJ. T.JemmottJ. B.PettigrewT. F. (1984). Causal attribution and dispositional inference: Evidence of inconsistent judgments. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 20, 567-585. doi:10.1016/0022-1031(84)90044-1
18.
JonesE. E.DavisK. E. (1965). From acts to dispositions: The attribution process in person perception. In BerkowitzL. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 219-266). New York, NY: Academic Press.
19.
JonesE. E.HarrisV. A. (1967). The attribution of attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 3, 1-24. doi:10.1016/0022-1031(67)90034-0
20.
KalishC. W.ShiverickS. M. (2004). Children’s reasoning about norms and traits as motives for behavior. Cognitive Development, 19, 401-416.
21.
KelleyH. H. (1967). Attribution theory in social psychology. In LevineD. (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (Vol. 15, pp. 192-240). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
22.
KitcherP. (1989). Explanatory unification and the causal structure of the world. In KitcherP.SalmonW. (Eds.), Scientific explanation (Vol. 8, pp. 410-505). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
23.
KormanJ.MalleB. F. (2016). The folk concept of rationality. Unpublished data, Brown University.
24.
LewisP. T. (1995). A naturalistic test of two fundamental propositions: Correspondence bias and the actor-observer hypothesis. Journal of Personality, 63, 87-111.
25.
LinS.KeysarB.EpleyN. (2010). Reflexively mindblind: Using theory of mind to interpret behavior requires effortful attention. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 551-556. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2009.12.019
26.
LombrozoT. (2009). Explanation and categorization: How “why?” informs “what?”Cognition, 110, 248-253. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2008.10.007
MalleB. F. (1999). How people explain behavior: A new theoretical framework. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3, 23-48. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0301_2
30.
MalleB. F. (2004). How the mind explains behavior: Folk explanations, meaning, and social interaction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
31.
MalleB. F. (2006). The actor-observer asymmetry in attribution: A (surprising) meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 895-919. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.132.6.895
32.
MalleB. F. (2011). Time to give up the dogmas of attribution: A new theory of behavior explanation. In ZannaM. P.OlsonJ. M. (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 44, pp. 297-352). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
33.
MalleB. F.HolbrookJ. (2012). Is there a hierarchy of social inferences? The likelihood and speed of inferring intentionality, mind, and personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 661-684. doi:10.1037/a0026790
34.
MalleB. F.KnobeJ. (1997). Which behaviors do people explain? A basic actor-observer asymmetry. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 288-304. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.72.2.288
35.
MalleB. F.KnobeJ.NelsonS. E. (2007). Actor-observer asymmetries in explanations of behavior: New answers to an old question. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 491-514. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.93.4.491
36.
MalleB. F.KnobeJ.O’LaughlinM. J.PearceG. E.NelsonS. E. (2000). Conceptual structure and social functions of behavior explanations: Beyond person-situation attributions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 309-326. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.79.3.309
37.
McClureJ. (2002). Goal-based explanations of actions and outcomes. In StroebeW.HewstoneM. (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 12, pp. 201-235). New York, NY: Wiley.
38.
McClureJ.HiltonD. J. (1998). Are goals or preconditions better explanations? It depends on the question. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 897-911.
NicholsS.StichS. P. (2003). Mindreading: An integrated account of pretence, self-awareness, and understanding other minds. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
41.
O’LaughlinM. J.MalleB. F. (2002). How people explain actions performed by groups and individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 33-48. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.82.1.33
42.
RatcliffeM. (2007). Rethinking commonsense psychology: A critique of folk psychology, theory of mind and simulation. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
43.
ReadS. J.JonesD. K.MillerL. C. (1990). Traits as goal-based categories: The importance of goals in the coherence of dispositional categories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 1048-1061. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.58.6.1048
44.
ReederG. D. (2009). Mindreading: Judgments about intentionality and motives in dispositional inference. Psychological Inquiry, 20, 1-18. doi:10.1080/10478400802615744
45.
ReederG. D.BrewerM. B. (1979). A schematic model of dispositional attribution in interpersonal perception. Psychological Review, 86, 61-79. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.86.1.61
46.
RossL.NisbettR. E. (1991). The person and the situation. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
47.
RumelhartD. E.OrtonyA. (1977). The representation of knowledge in memory. In AndersonR. C.SpiroR. J.MontagueW. E. (Eds.), Schooling and the acquisition of knowledge (pp. 99-135). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
48.
SanbonmatsuD. M.MazurD.BehrendsA. A.MooreS. M. (2015). The role of the baserate frequency of correspondent behavior and trait stereotypes in attribution: Building on Rothbart and Park (1986). Social Cognition, 33, 255-283. doi:10.1521/soco.2015.33.4.255
49.
SandisC. (Ed.). (2009). New essays on the explanation of action. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
50.
SaxeR.CareyS.KanwisherN. (2004). Understanding other minds: Linking developmental psychology and functional neuroimaging. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 87-124. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142044
51.
SchankR. C.AbelsonR. P. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals, and understanding: An inquiry into human knowledge structures. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
52.
ShaverK. G. (1975). An introduction to attribution processes. Cambridge, MA: Winthrop.
53.
SkowronskiJ. J.CarlstonD. E. (1989). Negativity and extremity biases in impression formation: A review of explanations. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 131-142. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.105.1.131
54.
SlugoskiB. R.LalljeeM.LambR.GinsburgG. P. (1993). Attribution in conversational context: Effect of mutual knowledge on explanation-giving. European Journal of Social Psychology, 23, 219-238. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420230302
55.
SnodgrassS. R. (1976). The development of trait inference. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 128, 163-172.
TrafimowD.BromgardI. K.FinlayK. A.KetelaarT. (2005). The role of affect in determining the attributional weight of immoral behaviors. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 935-948.
58.
UlemanJ. S.SaribayS. A.GonzalezC. M. (2008). Spontaneous inferences, implicit impressions, and implicit theories. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 329-360. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093707
59.
Van OverwalleF.Van DuynslaegerM.CoomansD.TimmermansB. (2012). Spontaneous goal inferences are often inferred faster than spontaneous trait inferences. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 13-18. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2011.06.016
60.
WalkerC. M.LombrozoT.LegareC. H.GopnikA. (2014). Explaining prompts children to privilege inductively rich properties. Cognition, 133, 343-357. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2014.07.008
WilliamsJ. J.LombrozoT. (2010). The role of explanation in discovery and generalization: Evidence from category learning. Cognitive Science, 34, 776-806. doi:10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01113.x
63.
WinterL.UlemanJ. S. (1984). When are social judgments made? Evidence for the spontaneousness of trait inferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 237-252. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.47.2.237
64.
WongP. T. P.WeinerB. (1981). When people ask “why” questions, and the heuristics of attributional search. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 650-663.
65.
YoungL.SaxeR. (2009). An fMRI investigation of spontaneous mental state inference for moral judgment. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21, 1396-1405.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
