Moral foundations theory (MFT) posits that binding moral foundations (purity, authority, and ingroup loyalty) are rooted in the need for groups to promote order and cohesion, and that they therefore underlie political conservatism. We present evidence that binding foundations (and the related construct of disgust sensitivity) are associated with lower levels of ideological polarization on political issues outside the domain of moral traditionalism. Consistent support for this hypothesis was obtained from three large American Internet-based samples and one large national sample of New Zealanders (combined N = 7,874). We suggest that when political issues do not have inherent relevance to moral traditionalism, binding foundations promote a small centrist shift away from ideologically prescribed positions, and that they do so out of desire for national uniformity and cohesion.
AltemeyerB. (1988). Enemies of freedom: Understanding right-wing authoritarianism. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
2.
AltemeyerB. (1996). The authoritarian specter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
3.
BenoitK.LaverM. (2006). Party policy in modern democracies. London, England: Routledge.
4.
CrawfordJ. T.InbarY.MaloneyV. (2014). Disgust sensitivity selectively predicts attitudes toward groups that threaten (or uphold) traditional sexual morality. Personality and Individual Differences, 70, 218-223.
5.
CrowsonH. M. (2009). Are all conservatives alike? A study of the psychological correlates of cultural and economic conservatism. The Journal of Psychology, 143, 449-463.
6.
DayM. V.FiskeS. T.DowningE. L.TrailT. E. (2014). Shifting liberal and conservative attitudes using moral foundations theory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40, 1559-1573.
7.
DevineC. J. (2015). Ideological social identity: Psychological attachment to ideological in-groups as a political phenomenon and a behavioral influence. Political Behavior, 37, 509-535.
8.
DuckittJ.SibleyC. G. (2009). A dual-process motivational model of ideology, politics, and prejudice. Psychological Inquiry, 20, 98-109.
9.
EllisC.StimsonJ. A. (2012). Ideology in America. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
10.
FaulknerJ.SchallerM.ParkJ. H.DuncanL. A. (2004). Evolved disease-avoidance mechanisms and contemporary xenophobic attitudes. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 7, 333-353.
11.
FedericoC. M.DeasonG.FisherE. L. (2012). Ideological asymmetry in the relationship between epistemic motivation and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 381-398.
12.
FedericoC. M.SchneiderM. C. (2007). Political expertise and the use of ideology: Moderating effects of evaluative motivation. Public Opinion Quarterly, 71, 221-252.
13.
FedericoC. M.WeberC. R.ErgunD.HuntC. (2013). Mapping the connections between politics and morality: The multiple sociopolitical orientations involved in moral intuition. Political Psychology, 34, 589-610.
14.
FeinbergM.AntonenkoO.WillerR.HorbergE. J.JohnO. P. (2014). Gut check: Reappraisal of disgust helps explain liberal–conservative differences on issues of purity. Emotion, 14, 513-521.
15.
FeinbergM.WillerR. (2013). The moral roots of environmental attitudes. Psychological Science, 24, 56-62.
16.
FeinbergM.WillerR. (2015). From gulf to bridge: When do moral arguments facilitate political influence?Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41, 1665-1681.
17.
FeldmanS. (1988). Structure and consistency in public opinion: The role of core beliefs and values. American Journal of Political Science, 32, 416-440.
18.
FeldmanS. (2003). Enforcing social conformity: A theory of authoritarianism. Political Psychology, 24, 41-74.
19.
FeldmanS.JohnstonC. (2014). Understanding the determinants of political ideology: Implications of structural complexity. Political Psychology, 35, 337-358.
20.
FincherC. L.ThornhillR.MurrayD. R.SchallerM. (2008). Pathogen prevalence predicts human cross-cultural variability in individualism/collectivism. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 275, 1279-1285.
21.
FrimerJ. A.BiesanzJ. C.WalkerL. J.MacKinlayC. W. (2013). Liberals and conservatives rely on common moral foundations when making moral judgments about influential people. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104, 1040-1059.
22.
GoslingS. D.VazireS.SrivastavaS.JohnO. P. (2004). Should we trust web-based studies? A comparative analysis of six preconceptions about internet questionnaires. American Psychologist, 59, 93-104.
23.
GrahamJ.HaidtJ.KolevaS.MotylM.IyerR.WojcikS.DittoP. H. (2013). Moral foundations theory: The pragmatic validity of moral pluralism. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 55-130.
24.
GrahamJ.HaidtJ.NosekB. A. (2009). Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 1029-1046.
25.
GrahamJ.NosekB. A.HaidtJ.IyerR.KolevaS.DittoP. H. (2011). Mapping the moral domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 366-385.
26.
GrayK.KeeneyJ. (2015). Impure, or just weird? Scenario sampling bias raises questions about the foundation of morality. Social Psychological & Personality Science, 6, 859-868.
27.
GrayK.YoungL.WaytzA. (2012). Mind perception is the essence of morality. Psychological Inquiry, 23, 101-124.
28.
GreenD.PalmquistB.SchicklerE. (2002). Partisan hearts and minds. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
29.
HaidtJ. (2012). The righteous mind: Why good people are divided by religion and politics. New York, NY: Pantheon.
30.
HaidtJ.GrahamJ. (2007). When morality opposes justice: Conservatives have moral intuitions that liberals may not recognize. Social Justice Research, 20, 98-116.
31.
HatemiP.McDermottR. (2012). Policing the perimeter: Disgust and purity in democratic debate. Political Science & Politics, 45, 675-687.
32.
HorbergE. J.OveisC.KeltnerD.CohenA. B. (2009). Disgust and the moralization of purity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 963-976.
33.
HuddyL. (2001). From social to political identity: A critical examination of social identity theory. Political Psychology, 22, 127-156.
34.
HuddyL.KhatibN. (2007). American patriotism, national identity, and political involvement. American Journal of Political Science, 51, 63-77.
35.
HuddyL.MasonL.AaroeL. (2015). Expressive partisanship: Campaign involvement, political emotion, and partisan identity. American Political Science Review, 109, 1-17.
36.
InbarY.PizarroD. A.BloomP. (2009). Conservatives are more easily disgusted than liberals. Cognition and Emotion, 23, 714-725.
37.
InbarY.PizarroD. A.BloomP. (2012). Disgusting smells cause decreased liking of gay men. Emotion, 12, 23-27.
IyerR.KolevaS.GrahamJ.DittoP.HaidtJ. (2012). Understanding libertarian morality: The psychological dispositions of self-identified libertarians. PLoS ONE, 7(8), e42366.
40.
Janoff-BulmanR.CarnesN. C. (2013). Surveying the moral landscape moral motives and group-based moralities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 17, 219-236.
41.
JenningsM. K. (1992). Ideological thinking among mass publics and political elites. Public Opinion Quarterly, 56, 419-441.
42.
JohnsonS. D.TamneyJ. B. (2001). Social traditionalism and economic conservatism: Two conservative political ideologies in the United States. The Journal of Social Psychology, 141, 233-243.
43.
KolevaS. P.GrahamJ.IyerR.DittoP. H.HaidtJ. (2012). Tracing the threads: How five moral concerns (especially purity) help explain culture war attitudes. Journal of Research in Personality, 46, 184-194.
44.
KrosnickJ. A. (1990). Government policy and citizen passion: A study of issue publics in contemporary America. Political Behavior, 12, 59-92.
45.
KuglerM.JostJ. T.NoorbaloochiS. (2014). Another look at moral foundations theory: Do authoritarianism and social dominance orientation explain liberal-conservative differences in “moral” intuitions?Social Justice Research, 27, 413-431.
46.
LandyJ. F.GoodwinG. P. (2015). Does incidental disgust amplify moral judgment? A meta-analytic review of experimental evidence. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10, 518-536.
47.
MalkaA.LelkesY. (2010). More than ideology: Conservative–liberal identity and receptivity to political cues. Social Justice Research, 23, 156-188.
48.
MalkaA.SotoC. J.InzlichtM.LelkesY. (2014). Do needs for security and certainty predict cultural and economic conservatism? A cross-national analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106, 1031-1051.
49.
MurrayD. R.TrudeauR.SchallerM. (2011). On the origins of cultural differences in conformity: Four tests of the pathogen prevalence hypothesis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 318-329.
50.
NavarreteC. D.FesslerD. M. T. (2006). Disease avoidance and ethnocentrism: The effects of disease vulnerability and disgust sensitivity on intergroup attitudes. Evolution & Human Behavior, 27, 270-282.
51.
PetrescuD. C.ParkinsonB. (2014). Incidental disgust increases adherence to left-wing economic attitudes. Social Justice Research, 27, 464-486.
52.
SchallerM. (2006). Parasites, behavioral defenses, and the social psychological mechanisms through which cultures are evoked. Psychological Inquiry, 17, 96-137.
53.
SchatzR. T.StaubE.LavineH. (1999). On the varieties of national attachment: Blind versus constructive patriotism. Political Psychology, 20, 151-174.
54.
ScheinC.GrayK. (2015). The unifying moral dyad: Liberals and conservatives share the same harm-based moral template. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41, 1147-1163.
55.
SearsD. O. (2001). The role of affect in symbolic politics. In KuklinskiJ. H. (Ed.), Citizens and politics: Perspectives from political psychology (pp. 14-40). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
56.
SibleyC. G.OsborneD. (2016). Ideology and post-colonial society. Advances in Political Psychology, 37, 1-47. doi:10.1111/pops.12323
57.
SidaniusJ.PrattoF. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
58.
SinclairS.HardinC. D.LoweryB. S. (2006). Self-stereotyping in the context of multiple social identities. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 529-542.
59.
SkitkaL. J.BaumanC. W.SargisE. G. (2005). Moral conviction: Another contributor to attitude strength or something more?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 895-917.
60.
SmithI. H.AquinoK.KolevaS.GrahamJ. (2014). The moral ties that bind … even to out-groups: The interactive effect of moral identity and the binding moral foundations. Psychological Science, 25, 1554-1562.
61.
SmithK. B.OxleyD.HibbingM. V.AlfordJ. R.HibbingJ. R. (2011). Disgust sensitivity and the neurophysiology of left-right political orientations. PLoS ONE, 6(10), e25552.
62.
StennerK. (2005). The authoritarian dynamic. London, England: Cambridge University Press.
63.
StimsonJ. A. (2004). Tides of consent: How public opinion shapes American politics. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
64.
TerrizziJ. A.Jr.ShookN. J.McDanielM. A. (2013). The behavioral immune system and social conservatism: A meta-analysis. Evolution & Human Behavior, 34, 99-108.
65.
ThorisdottirH.JostJ. T.LiviatanI.ShroutP. E. (2007). Psychological needs and values underlying left-right political orientation: Cross-national evidence from Eastern and Western Europe. Public Opinion Quarterly, 71, 175-203.
66.
TreierS.HillygusD. S. (2009). The nature of political ideology in the contemporary electorate. Public Opinion Quarterly, 73, 679-703.
67.
TullerH. M.BryanC. J.HeymanG. D.ChristenfeldN. J. (2015). Seeing the other side: Perspective taking and the moderation of extremity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 59, 18-23.
68.
TurnerJ. C. (1991). Social influence. Belmont, CA: Thomson Brooks/Cole Publishing.
69.
TyburJ. M.LiebermanD.GriskeviciusV. (2009). Microbes, mating, and morality: Individual differences in three functional domains of disgust. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 103-122.
70.
WeberC. R.FedericoC. M. (2013). Moral foundations and heterogeneity in ideological preferences. Political Psychology, 34, 107-126.
71.
ZallerJ. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
72.
ZallerJ.FeldmanS. (1992). A simple theory of the survey response: Answering questions versus revealing preferences. American Journal of Political Science, 36, 579-616.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
