People drastically overestimate how often others attend to them or notice their unusual features, a phenomenon termed the spotlight effect. Despite the prevalence of this egocentric bias, little is known about how to reduce the tendency to see oneself as the object of others’ attention. Here, we tested the hypothesis that a basic property of mental imagery—the visual perspective from which an event is viewed—may alleviate a future-oriented variant of the spotlight effect. The results of three experiments supported this prediction. Experiment 1 revealed a reduction in egocentric spotlighting when participants imagined an event in the far compared with near future. Experiments 2 and 3 demonstrated reduced spotlighting and feelings of embarrassment when participants viewed an impending event from a third-person (vs. first-person) vantage point. Simple changes in one’s visual perspective may be sufficient to diminish the illusion of personal salience.
AydukÖ.KrossE. (2008). Enhancing the pace of recovery: Self-distanced analysis of negative experiences reduces blood pressure reactivity. Psychological Science, 19, 229-231.
2.
AydukÖ.KrossE. (2010). From a distance: Implications of spontaneous self-distancing for adaptive self-reflection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 809-829.
3.
BaronR. M.KennyD. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
4.
BrownM. A.StopaL. (2007). The spotlight effect and illusion of transparency in social anxiety. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 21, 804-819.
5.
BuehlerR.GriffinD.LamK. C. H.DeslauriersJ. (2012). Perspectives on prediction: Does third-person imagery improve task completion estimates?Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 117, 138-149.
6.
ChristianB. M.MilesL. K.KenyeriS.MattscheyJ.MacraeC. N. (2016). Taming temptation: Visual perspective impacts consumption and willingness to pay for unhealthy foods. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 22, 85-94.
7.
ChristianB. M.ParkinsonC.MacraeC. N.MilesL. K.WheatleyT. P. (2015). When imagining yourself in pain, visual perspective matters: The neural and behavioral correlates of simulated sensory experiences. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 27, 866-875.
8.
CooleyC. H. (1902). Human nature and the social order. New York, NY: Scribner’s.
9.
DunningD. (2007). Prediction: The inside view. In KruglanskiA. W.HigginsE. T. (Eds.), Social psychology, Handbook of basic principles (2nd ed., pp. 69-90). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
10.
DuvalS.WicklundR. A. (1972). A theory of objective self-awareness. New York, NY: Academic press.
11.
EmanuelA. S.UpdegraffJ. A.KalmbachD. A.CieslaJ. A. (2010). The role of mindfulness facets in affective forecasting. Personality and Individual Differences, 49, 815-818.
12.
EpleyN.GilovichT. (2004). Are adjustments insufficient?Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 447-460.
13.
EpleyN.MorewedgeC.KeysarB. (2004). Perspective taking in children and adults: Equivalent egocentrism but different correction. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 760-768.
14.
EpleyN.SavitskyK.GilovichT. (2002). Empathy neglect: Reconciling the spotlight effect and the correspondence bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 300-312.
15.
GalinkskyA. D.MoskowitzG. B. (2000). Perspective-taking: Decreasing stereotype expression, stereotype accessibility, and in-group favoritism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 708-724.
16.
GilbertD. T.KillingsworthM. A.EyreR. N.WilsonT. D. (2009). The surprising power of neighborly advice. Science, 323, 1617-1619.
17.
GilbertD. T.WilsonT. D. (2009). Why the brain talks to itself: Sources of error in emotional prediction. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 364, 1335-1341.
18.
GilovichT.KrugerJ.MedvecV. H. (2002). The spotlight effect revisited: Overestimating the manifest variability of our actions and appearance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 93-99.
19.
GilovichT.MedvecV. H.SavitskyK. (2000). The spotlight effect in social judgment: An egocentric bias in the estimates of one’s own actions and appearance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 211-222.
20.
GilovichT.SavitskyK. (1999). The spotlight effect and the illusion of transparency: Egocentric assessments of how we are seen by others. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 8, 165-168.
21.
GilovichT.SavitskyK.MedvecV. H. (1998). The illusion of transparency: Biased assessments of others’ ability to read one’s emotional states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 332-346.
22.
HershfieldH. E. (2011). Future self-continuity: How conceptions of the future self transform intertemporal choice. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1235, 30-43.
23.
HershfieldH. E.GartonM. T.BallardK.Samanez-LarkinG. R.KnutsonB. (2009). Don’t stop thinking about tomorrow: Individual differences in future self-continuity account for saving. Judgment and Decision Making, 4, 280-286.
24.
HolmesE. A.MathewsA. (2010). Mental imagery in emotion and emotional disorders. Clinical Psychology Review, 30, 349-362.
25.
IacobucciD. (2012). Mediation analysis and categorical variables: The final frontier. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22, 582-594.
26.
KrossE. (2009). When the self becomes other. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1167, 35-40.
27.
KrossE.AydukÖ. (2008). Facilitating adaptive emotional analysis: Distinguishing distanced-analysis of depressive experiences from immersed analysis and distraction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 924-938.
28.
KrossE.AydukÖ.MischelW. (2005). When asking “why” does not hurt distinguishing rumination from reflective processing of negative emotions. Psychological Science, 16, 709-715.
29.
KrossE.GardD.DeldinP.CliftonJ. (2012). “Asking why” from a distance: Its cognitive and emotional consequences for people with major depressive disorder. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 121, 559-569.
30.
LibbyL. K.EibachR. P. (2011). Visual perspective in mental imagery: A representational tool that functions in judgment, emotion, and self-insight. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 185-245.
31.
LibbyL. K.EibachR. P.GilovichT. (2005). Here’s looking at me: The effect of memory perspective on assessments of personal change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 50-62.
32.
LibbyL. K.ShaefferE. M.EibachR. P.SlemmerJ. A. (2007). Picture yourself at the polls: Visual perspective in mental imagery affects self-perception and behavior. Psychological Science, 18, 199-203.
33.
LibbyL. K.ValentiG.HinesK. A.EibachR. P. (2014). Using imagery perspective to assess two distinct forms of self-knowledge: Associative evaluations versus propositional self-beliefs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143, 492-497.
34.
LibbyL. K.ValentiG.PfentA.EibachR. P. (2011). Seeing failure in your life: Imagery perspective determines whether self-esteem shapes reactions to recalled and imagined failure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 1157-1173.
35.
MacraeC. N.ChristianB. M.GolubickisM.KaranasiouM.TroksiarovaL.McNamaraD. L.MilesL. K. (2014). When do I wear me out? Mental simulation and the diminution of self-control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143, 1755-1764.
36.
MacraeC. N.MitchellJ. P.TaitK. A.McNamaraD. L.GolubickisM.TopalidisP.ChristianB. M. (2015). Turning I into me: Imagining your future self. Consciousness and Cognition, 37, 207-213.
37.
MacraeC. N.Sunder RajR.BestS. B.ChristianB. M.MilesL. K. (2013). Imagined sensory experiences can shape person perception: It’s a matter of visual perspective. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 595-598.
38.
McIsaacH. K.EichE. (2002). Vantage point in episodic memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 146-150.
39.
MilesL. K.ChristianB. M.MasilamaniN.VolpiL.MacraeC. N. (2014). Not so close encounters of the third kind: Visual perspective and imagined social interaction. Social Psychological & Personality Science, 5, 558-565.
40.
MitchellJ. P.SchirmerJ.AmesD. L.GilbertD. T. (2011). Medial prefrontal cortex predicts intertemporal choice. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23, 857-866.
41.
PiagetJ. (1926). The child’s conception of the world. London, England: Routledge and Keegan Paul.
42.
ProninE.OlivolaC. Y.KennedyK. A. (2008). Doing unto future selves as you would do unto others: Psychological distance and decision-making. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 224-236.
43.
ProninE.RossL. (2006). Temporal differences in trait self-ascription: When the self is seen as an other. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 197-209.
44.
SavitskyK.EpleyN.GilovichT. (2001). Do others judge us as harshly as we think? Overestimating the impact of our failures, shortcomings, and mishaps. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 44-56.
45.
SavitskyK.GilovichT. (2003). The illusion of transparency and the alleviation of speech anxiety. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 618-625.
46.
SmallwoodJ.SchoolerJ. W. (2006). The restless mind. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 946-958.
47.
SuddendorfT.CorballisM. C. (2007). The evolution of foresight: What is mental time travel and is it unique to humans?Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 30, 299-351.
48.
SzpunarK. K. (2010). Episodic future thought: An emerging concept. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 142-162.
TropeY.LibermanN. (2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117, 440-463.
51.
WilsonT. D.GilbertD. T. (2003). Affective forecasting. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 345-411.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
